We are on a mission to run our acceptance tests from a selenium container running different browsers in their own containers and we have set things up so minimal config changes are necessary when testing on a local machine or a remote one triggered by continuous integration.
The stumbling block I have hit is that the site under test is authorised through windows authentication and the chrome container is effectively running as a different machine, which means that when WebDriver serves up the site it is prompted with a log in box.
So far I have run into dead ends with every technique I have used to get round this.
I can't send the credentials in the uri as many older posts suggest - just doesn't work. I can't use AutoIt to populate the auth window as the window is in a container and that runs in linux. Finally had no joy trying to proxy from one server to test server, for what ever reasons the credentials are not recognised that I set up in the proxy (using for example cntlm proxy tool).
Is this mission impossible or is there any way round this?
Related
How to disable the web security in Firefox or how to solve CORS issue in Firefox during development?
Things tried but did not work:
The option of filtering in "about:config" and setting the "security.fileuri.strict_origin_policy=false" doesn't work
Tried few add-ons like "CORS-Everywhere" (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cors-everywhere/). Doesn't work.
How to disable the web security in firefox
Don't. It gives unrealistic results for testing.
how to solve CORS issue in Firefox during development
Ideally: Create a development environment that is just like the live environment.
The server side code will, at some point, need development work performed on it. Your team will need the ability to create a development server with test data in it for that. Use the same development server for working on the client side code.
That way you can do you development work:
without making test calls to the live server (so you never need fake test users doing fake actions on the live server with the risk that test data will escape somewhere end users will see it).
without cross origin issues (because your development server for your client side code will be the same as the development server for the URL you are requesting)
able to use relative URLs
with a browser that acts like the browsers used by end users
As a quick and dirty hack which doesn't have most of the benefits of using a proper test environment: Use a proxy server that maps requests to the same origin as your development environment to the live environment.
I used Charles proxy for that before I moved to having proper development environments.
I have a server running on debian. It runs a scraper using ruby and watir which loads up in a headless fashion. I notice that a site can read the HTTP header my browser passes. How can I hide the HTTP info, or give false info, so a site cannot see my computer operating system?
I figured out a solution. I used x11 forwarding to access chrome from my local computer which has a user interface. It is possible to change the User Agent via dev tools -> network conditions, but this does NOT persist on new sessions. So I installed the first result on google for "plugin change chrome user-agent" and this does the trick.
I have the following problem to solve:
I few months ago I startet a website where you can watch youtube videos which aren't available in your country. Everythings works fine but now I want to offer a new method where I route all the requests directly over my server. Therefore I will later use a custom DNS-Server. Right now I use the hosts file for testing but I have really no idea how i can identify the user. I can promp the user user to login on a website but I will that it works systemwide so if he use a youtube downloader for example it have to work there either and not only in the browser where I could use a session system with cookies. I want a solution where the user can identify himself once in a time like a website or something like this but how can my server detect if this is a user which is logged in or if he is not?
There are several ways that this could be accomplished with varying levels of difficulty.
standard proxy server over https. Your service could simply be a proxy server and then every "client" would update their browser to point to your proxy server. You could also simplify this by using a proxy PAC file (proxy auto config).
An anonomyzing interface. The end user would not be able to use their standard search tools etc, instead they would have to use a web page much like what google translate does.
A browser plugin. There are already firefox plugins which do something similar to this. They change the way that the browser resolves DNS. This may be the best bet for you but would require development work.
An actual install utility that you have your users install on their machines which update the dns servers.
I'm wishing to use Visual Studio Load Tests to perform some load testing.
I was hoping to be able to use the counter monitoring that the Load Test provide in order to collect performance statistics from the web server I'm loading.
However there only seems to be support for connecting to machines you wish to monitor via your domain credentials. From http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms182594.aspx, section "To specify computers to monitor with counter sets during load test run"
On each server that you monitor, you must have sufficient user permissions to run performance monitors. Otherwise, errors are generated.
There seems to be no way to provide specific credentials to use to connect to machines you wish to monitor. As the web server I wish to monitor does not belong to a domain, I don't see any way to monitor it using VS Load Tests.
Is there some way to monitor it using VS Load Tests that I've missed?
There seems to be no way to provide specific credentials to use to connect to machines you wish to monitor
There is a way to do this. On Windows 7 it is called Credential Manager and you can access it either by searching for Manage Network Passwords on your Start Menu or via Control Panel > User Accounts. On older versions it was called Stored User Names and Passwords, also accessible via Control Panel > User Accounts.
In a nutshell, it allows you to specify alternative credentials for remote systems. Once you have set up credentials, it works completely invisibly and automatically for remote connection attempts from any application applications that support it, including Visual Studio collecting remote Perfmon data.
NOTE that you have to set up the credentials on the account that actually runs your load tests. If you are only running local load tests with no Controller then that's your own account. However if you run a Controller/Agent rig, the Controller may be configured to run under a service account (i.e. check the account running "Visual Studio Test Controller" service or QTController.exe). You have to login as that account and add the credentials.
I've found the following which is working for me. I'm just running the net use commands by hand because I don't want the user name and password in source control.
To get this working you will need to manually open an IPC channel to
the SQL and IIS machines with an account that has permissions in that
domain. This allows the account running the load tests to "piggyback"
across that IPC channel.
i have found this site to be a great help getting this going myself.
http://blogs.catapultsystems.com/tlingenfelder/archive/2009/06/18/performance-counters-timeouts-and-load-testing-with-visual-studio-2008.aspx
what you can do is create a small bat file and set it up to run in the
.testrunconfig file as a setup script.
net use \\SQLSERVER\IPC$ password1 /user:DOMAIN1\USER /persistent:yes
net use \\IISSERVER\IPC$ password2 /user:DOMAIN2\USER /persistent:yes
I'm using the AJAX Test Server in Rational Application Developer. I'm posting a form to another host for authentication. That host takes a URL to redirect to after authentication. However, it insists on using HTTPS whenever it sends the 302 response. The low hanging fruit would be to just use HTTPS locally.
Looking at the launch configuration, the AJAX Test Server appears to be a custom Apache HttpCore server. I haven't spotted anything in the configuration guide.
Is there a way to access this test server via HTTPS?
This is for demo and local development purposes; not production.
Speaking from working with WAS (WebSphere Application Server) in RAD, I'm pretty sure the answer would be yes. The server (at least with WAS) has both secure and "unsecure" ports.
What I have noticed is that when the server is built with the install (at least with the newer versions of the products 7.5+), the ports used are different per install. This is to help with not conflicting with other applications that may use those ports.
So https is probably fine. You just may have to use it over port 302 or some other port.
If there is no admin console for viewing your ports, you could always try the Window | Preferences option under your menu items. Sometimes IBM hides server config stuff in there.