I am working with JSON data in Tibco Designer whose variable list is unknown over time, such as the below:
{
"d":
{
"FileSystemObjectType": 0,
"Id": 28,
"ServerRedirectedEmbedUri": null,
"ServerRedirectedEmbedUrl": "",
"ContentTypeId": "0x0100B1C6D289C2D47E44A2BA609B1F830824",
"Title": "Title 5",
"ComplianceAssetId": null,
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Fir": "Name",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Mid": "Name",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Las": "Name",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Dat": "2000-01-01",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Gen": "Male",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Ema": "name#email.com",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Nat": "National",
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_Pre": null,
"Personal_x0020_Details_x007c_KRA": null,
"ID": 28,
"Modified": "2018-09-14T12:39:41Z",
"Created": "2018-09-14T12:39:41Z",
"AuthorId": 1073741822,
"EditorId": 1073741822,
"OData__UIVersionString": "1.0",
"Attachments": false,
"GUID": "f4f0bef9-3a5d-4a61-813d-8b5973b24316"
}
}
So, is there a way I can loop over the fields after Parsing the data into XML dynamically, given the fields are non-repeating, such that I get a "key:value" pair which I can use for other purposes?
If you do not want to use a particular java code (json xml) you can try to tokenize the input JSON string based on "}", ":", and "," into hierarchical string arrays (no strict typing in JSON). You can use regexp (I use a java function jar to extend the xpath mapper) to make the basic "{ ... }" recursive splitting and then tokenize by ":" and finally strip off leading and trailing '"'. If you invoke the splitting recursively you also get the hierarchical string array you want to have to represent the hierarchical JSON. I'd prefer using a java code for this.
Related
I have some json data that I would like to filter in a Power Automate Flow.
A simplified version of the json is as follows:
[
{
"ItemId": "1",
"Blah": "test1",
"CustomFieldArray": [
{
"Name": "Code",
"Value": "A"
},
{
"Name": "Category",
"Value": "Test"
}
]
},
{
"ItemId": "2",
"Blah": "test2",
"CustomFieldArray": [
{
"Name": "Code",
"Value": "B"
},
{
"Name": "Category",
"Value": "Test"
}
]
}
]
For example, I wish to filter items based on Name = "Code" and Value = "A". I should be left with the item with ItemId 1 in that case.
I can't figure out how to do this in Power Automate. It would be nice to change the data structure, but this is the way the data is, and I'm trying to work out if this is possible in Power Automate without changing the data itself.
Firstly, I had to fix your JSON, it wasn't complete.
Secondly, filtering on sub array information isn't what I'd call easy. However, to get around the limitations, you can perform a bit of trickery.
Prior to the step above, I create a variable of type Array and called it Array.
In the step above, the left hand side expression is ...
string(item()?['CustomFieldArray'])
... and the contains comparison on the right hand side is simply as you can see, a string with the appropriate filter value ...
{"Name":"Code","Value":"A"}
... it's not an expression or a proper object, just a string.
If you need to enhance it to cater for case sensitive values, just set everything to lower case using the toLower expression on the left.
Although it's hard to see, that will produce your desired result ...
... you can see by the vertical scrollbars that it's reduced the size of the array.
I have a data structure like this
{
"id": 926267,
"updated_sequence": 2304899,
"published_at": {
"unix": 1589574240,
"text": "2020-05-15 21:24:00 +0100",
"iso_8601": "2020-05-15T20:24:00Z"
},
"updated_at": {
"unix": 1589574438,
"text": "2020-05-15 21:27:18 +0100",
"iso_8601": "2020-05-15T20:27:18Z"
},
}
I want to replace the updated_at field with its unix field value using Streamsets Data Collector. As far as I know, it can be done using field replacer. But I'm still didn't get it how to make a mapping expression. How can I achieve that?
In Field Replacer, set Fields to /rec/updated_at and New value to ${record:value('/rec/updated_at/unix')} and it will replace the value. See below.
Cheers,
Dash
I my Nifi controller I want to configure the FreeFormTextRecordSetWriter, but I have no Idea what I should put in the "Text" field. I'm getting the text from my source (in my case GetSolr), and just want to write this, period.
Documentation and mailinglist do not seem to tell me how this is done, any help appreciated.
EDIT: Here the sample input + output I want to achieve (as you can see: not ransformation needed, plain text, no JSON input)
EDIT: I now realize, that I can't tell GetSolr to return just CSV data - but I have to use Json
So referencing with attribute seems to be fine. What the documentation omits is, that the ${flowFile} attribute should containt the complete flowfile that is returned.
Sample input:
{
"responseHeader": {
"zkConnected": true,
"status": 0,
"QTime": 0,
"params": {
"q": "*:*",
"_": "1553686715465"
}
},
"response": {
"numFound": 3194,
"start": 0,
"docs": [
{
"id": "{402EBE69-0000-CD1D-8FFF-D07756271B4E}",
"MimeType": "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document",
"FileName": "Test.docx",
"DateLastModified": "2019-03-27T08:05:00.103Z",
"_version_": 1629145864291221504,
"LAST_UPDATE": "2019-03-27T08:16:08.451Z"
}
]
}
}
Wanted output
{402EBE69-0000-CD1D-8FFF-D07756271B4E}
BTW: The documentation says this:
The text to use when writing the results. This property will evaluate the Expression Language using any of the fields available in a Record.
Supports Expression Language: true (will be evaluated using flow file attributes and variable registry)
I want to use my source's text, so I'm confused
You need to use expression language as if the record's fields are the FlowFile's attributes.
Example:
Input:
{
"t1": "test",
"t2": "ttt",
"hello": true,
"testN": 1
}
Text property in FreeFormTextRecordSetWriter:
${t1} k!${t2} ${hello}:boolean
${testN}Num
Output(using ConvertRecord):
test k!ttt true:boolean
1Num
EDIT:
Seems like what you needed was reading from Solr and write a single column csv. You need to use CSVRecordSetWriter. As for the same,
I should tell you to consider to upgrade to 1.9.1. Starting from 1.9.0, the schema can be inferred for you.
otherwise, you can set Schema Access Strategy as Use 'Schema Text' Property
then, use the following schema in Schema Text
{
"name": "MyClass",
"type": "record",
"namespace": "com.acme.avro",
"fields": [
{
"name": "id",
"type": "int"
}
]
}
this should work
I'll edit it into my answer. If it works for you, please choose my answer :)
I'm trying to read individual value from be json array object to display in the page. I have tried with below code but couldn't make it. Please advise what am i doing wrong here.
Apperciate your help.
You can get the length of a JavaScript array via its property length. To access the array Reference in your object, you can use dot notation.
In combination, the following should do what you expect:
var obj = {
"Reference": [
{
"name": "xxxxxxxx",
"typeReference": {
"articulation": 0,
"locked": false,
"createdBy": {
"userName": "System",
},
"lastModifiedBy": {
"userName": "System",
},
"lastModified": 1391084398660,
"createdOn": 1391084398647,
"isSystem": true
},
...
},
...
]
};
console.log(obj.Reference.length);
In case you are actually dealing with a JSON string, not a JavaScript object, you will need to parse it first via JSON.parse().
You get the length of an array by simply access the length attribute.
For example [0,1,2,3].length === 4.
If you just want to loop through the array, use forEach or map instead of a for loop. It's safer, cleaner, less hassle and you don't meed to know the length.
E.g.
[0,1,2,3].forEach(num => console.log(num))
I'm trying to decide upon the best format of response for my API. I need to return a reports response which provides information on the report itself and the fields contained on it. Fields can be of differing types, so there can be: SelectList; TextArea; Location etc..
They each use different properties, so "SelectList" might use "Value" to store its string value and "Location" might use "ChildItems" to hold "Longitude" "Latitude" etc.
Here's what I mean:
"ReportList": [
{
"Fields": [
{
"Id": {},
"Label": "",
"Value": "",
"FieldType": "",
"FieldBankFieldId": {},
"ChildItems": [
{
"Item": "",
"Value": ""
}
]
}
]
}
The problem with this is I'm expecting the users to know when a value is supposed to be null. So I'm expecting a person looking to extract the value from "Location" to extract it from "ChildItems" and not "Value". The benefit to this however, is it's much easier to query for things than the alternative which is the following:
"ReportList": [
{
"Fields": [
{
"SelectList": [
{
"Id": {},
"Label": "",
"Value": "",
}
]
"Location": [
{
"Id": {},
"Label": "",
"Latitude": "",
"Longitude": "",
"etc": "",
}
]
}
]
}
So this one is a reports list that contains a list of fields which on it contains a list of fieldtype for every fieldtype I have (15 or something like that). This is opposed to just having a list of reports which has a list of fields with a "fieldtype" enum which I think is fairly easy to manipulate.
So the Question: Which format is best for a response? Any alternatives and comments appreciated.
EDIT:
To query all fields by fieldtype in a report and get values with the first way it would go something like this:
foreach(field in fields)
{
switch(field.fieldType){
case FieldType.Location :
var locationValue = field.childitems;
break;
case FieldType.SelectList:
var valueselectlist = field.Value;
break;
}
The second one would be like:
foreach(field in fields)
{
foreach(location in field.Locations)
{
var latitude = location.Latitude;
}
foreach(selectList in field.SelectLists)
{
var value= selectList.Value;
}
}
I think the right answer is the first one. With the switch statement. It makes it easier to query on for things like: Get me the value of the field with the id of this guid. It just means putting it through a big switch statement.
I went with the first one because It's easier to query for the most common use case. I'll expect the client code to put it into their own schema if they want to change it.