Makefile: process colon-separated environment variables - makefile

Say I have some environment variable like
echo $CPATH
/share/software/user/open/metis/5.1.0/include:/share/software/user/restricted/imkl/2018/mkl/include
How I can use that within a Makefile where I'm compiling code with gcc (or whatever)?
This doesn't seem to work
gcc -I$(CPATH)
as gcc can't seem to process those.
What is the preferred solution? Should I just c/p the path inside my Makefile or is something else more elegant?

If you use GNU make I think the following is a simple (and maybe elegant) solution:
gcc -I $(subst :, -I ,${CPATH})
The case of BSD make:
gcc -I ${CPATH:C,:, -I ,g}
And maybe you can use C_INCLUDE_PATH environment variable too:
C_INCLUDE_PATH=${CPATH} ; gcc ...

Related

GNU Make expand pattern within shell command

I have a situation where I need a small program to determine the prerequisites of a file by examining it. Concretely:
%.bar: $(shell python get_preqs.py %.foo) # % in shell is not substituted
python gen_bar.py $^ $#
This doesn't work however, as the % in the shell command doesn't get substituted in by make. Is there any way to achieve this?
You can use the .SECONDEXPANSION feature of GNU make:
.SECONDEXPANSION:
%.bar: $$(shell python get_prereqs.py $$*.foo)
python gen_bar.py $^ $#
Another option is to use a build tool more suited to dynamic targets. For example, I've written a Gnu Make-like tool incorporating some of the concepts from DJB's ReDo, called GoodMake. Your equivalent makefile would just be:
#? *.bar
preqs=$(python get_preqs.py ${1%.bar}.foo)
$0 $preqs
python gen_bar.py $preqs $1

What's the meaning of $#?

I came across the makefile when I read something about flex
fb3-1: fb3-1.l fb3-1.y fb3-1.h
bison -d fb3-1.y
flex -ofb3-1.lex.c fb3-1.l
cc -o $# fb3-1.tab.c fb3-1.lex.c fb3-1funcs.c
but what's the meaning of $#? Is it in the shell or some argument of gcc?
$# is just short-hand for the file name of the current target (fb3-1 in this case).
See the Automatic Variables section of the gnu make manual for full details on this and other useful automatic variables such as $<.

Recursive make: correct way to insert `$(MAKEFLAGS)`

How can I use $(MAKEFLAGS) (or another way of passing variables defined on the command line to sub-make) in a way that supports invocation from shell with both make VAR=val and make -args?
I need my subprojects configurable, but I hate autotools, so I'm using make variables for this, e.g. invoking from shell:
$ make USE_SSE3=1
and USE_SSE3 needs to apply to all builds in all sub-makefiles.
The manual states that:
if you do ‘make -ks’ then MAKEFLAGS gets the value ‘ks’.
Therefore I'm using -$(MAKEFLAGS) (with a dash prefix) in my Makefile.
However, that expands into invalid arguments when variables with no flags are used. If I run:
$ make FOO=bar
then sub-make gets invalid -FOO=bar. OTOH without the dash prefix variable definitions work, then but make -s, etc. don't.
Is there a syntax/variable/hack that makes passing of arguments and lone variable definitions work with sub-makefiles?
The legacy $(MKFLAGS) doesn't have the weird dash prefix problem, but it doesn't include variable definitions either. I've tried fixing the variable with $(patsubst), but that only made things worse by trimming whitespace.
I need the solution to be compatible with the outdated GNU Make 3.81 shipped with Mac OS X Mavericks.
foo:
$(MAKE) -C subproject -$(MAKEFLAGS)
$ make foo -s # MAKEFLAGS = 's'
$ make foo BAR=baz # MAKEFLAGS = 'BAR=baz'
$ make foo -j8 # MAKEFLAGS = ' --job-server=…'
You shouldn't set MAKEFLAGS at all. Why do you want to? You didn't give any reason to do so.
MAKEFLAGS is intended, really, to be an internal implementation passing arguments from a parent make to a child make. It's not intended, generally, to be modified by a makefile. About the only thing you can usefully do to it is add new flags.
If you just run the recursive make using the $(MAKE) variable rather than hardcoding make, it will Just Work:
recurse:
#$(MAKE) all FOO=bar
or whatever.
Years too late I got your answer if I got it right.
You can construct $(MAKEARGS) manually yourself like:
MAKEARGS := $(strip \
$(foreach v,$(.VARIABLES),\
$(if $(filter command\ line,$(origin $(v))),\
$(v)=$(value $(v)) ,)))
MAKEARGS := assign static
strip cleans leading and trailing whitespaces.
foreach v iterate over all variable names.
origin $(v) check if variable origin is "command line".
$(v)=$(value $(v)) output env assignment string.
Alternatively you can unpick the $(MAKEFLAGS) like:
MAKEARGS := $(wordlist 2,$(words $(MAKEFLAGS)),$(MAKEFLAGS))
MAKEFLAGS := $(firstword $(MAKEFLAGS))
Which can leave you with cleaner code for further recursions IMHO. I say this because I sometimes need to keep apart arguments and flags in certain cases. Especially as you get caught in debugging a recursion djungle.
But for any specific case one should consult the manual about recursive options processing.
Changing the $(MAKEFLAGS) can lead to unwanted malfunction.
Another useful information for the willing user could be that the $(MAKEFLAGS) variable is basically the whole argument list passed to make, not only the flag characters. So $(info MAKEFLAGS = $(MAKEFLAGS)) can give you something like:
MAKEFLAGS = rRw -- VAR=val
Cheers
To check if -B is present in make flags i do :
BB_CLOBBER := $(shell echo $(MAKEFLAGS) | grep wB)
ifeq (,$(BB_CLOBBER))
# also force clobber make if these files are missing
BB_CLOBBER := $(shell (test -e $(bb_gen)/minimal/.config && test -e $(bb_gen)/full/.config) || echo "B")
endif
bb_prepare:
ifneq (,$(BB_CLOBBER))
#rm -rf $(bb_gen)/full
...

gnu make substring

i'm new to gnu make.
i searched around but i cannot find anything working...
I have a list of tool prefix suxh as:
DEFTOOL= /usr/bin/i686-mingw32- /usr/bin/x86_64-w64-mingw32- /usr/bin/
I want to change the extension of the binary file if string "mingw" is in the current tool, so
$(foreach c, $(DEFTOOL),$(call dist_make, $(c)))
...
define dist_make
result= ${shell echo $(1) | grep mingw }
echo x$(result)x
# $(if $(result),\
# $(1)gcc $(DIST_CFLAGS) -o cap2hccap$(WINEXT) ./cap2hccap.c; echo "windows";,
# $(1)gcc $(DIST_CFLAGS) -o cap2hccap$(LNXEXT) ./cap2hccap.c; echo "linux"; \
# )
endef
where LNXEXT is empty and WINEXT is ".exe".
i cannot get this working....
how can i known if the argument of the function contains "mingw" ?
PS:
i known that the 64bit and the 32bit mingw output is the same but i will fix it when i have understood how check if a string is inside another.
If you known a better way to automate cross dev building spit it out :)
Your question is a little unclear. If you want to change a variable, outside of any rule:
ifneq ($(findstring mingw,$(DEFTOOL)),)
FILENAME = foo.xxx
endif
If you want to rename a file conditionally within a rule:
someTarget:
ifneq ($(findstring mingw,$(DEFTOOL)),)
mv foo.aaa foo.xxx
endif
You could also put the conditional within the command, but I can't see why you'd want to.

Makefile and rm -f file.{ext1,ext2,ext3} issue

Could you explain me, why Makefile rule:
clean:
rm -f foo.{bar1,bar2,bar3}
does not result in removing files: foo.bar1 foo.bar2 and foo.bar3?
I believe I saw pattern like that many times in various Makefiles, but I'm currently writing my own Makefile and can't make that rule work correctly (no files are removed).
I'm using:
gnu make 3.81
gnu bash 4.1.5
Bash evals that pattern as I suspect:
$ echo test.{a,b,c}
test.a test.b test.c
Thanks!
UPDATE
Thank to David's hint I found solution for the problem described above.
The gnu make uses the /bin/sh by default and that is why a.{1,2,3} isn't evaluated to a.1 a.2 a.3.
To make 'make' use bash instead of sh add following line to your Makefile:
SHELL=/bin/bash
from now a.{1,2,3} will be considered as a.1 a.2 a.3
Is there a file named clean in the directory? If so, make will consider that target up to date and won't run the corresponding command. To fix that, add this line to your makefile:
.PHONY: clean
If when you run make clean you get the output
make: `clean' is up to date.
then that's probably your problem.
It's because the shell isn't being invoked here, but rather rm is directly. Since the shell does the {} substitution, what rm 'sees' is the raw foo.{bar1,bar2,bar3} string. As there's no such file, nothing happens.
You should use one of GNUmake's string macros to have it perform the expansion for you.

Resources