Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I need to dynamically generate deep links with few embedded parameters using branch.io in a golang project. That link will be sent to android phones as a SMS. So that invite referral link redirects to the play store app. Is there any go lang SDK or any way another way to generate referral link dynamically?
Currently, there is no library/wrapper support for GoLang specifically. However, you can make use of the Deep Linking API to achieve your use case.
Sample cURL -
curl -XPOST https://api2.branch.io/v1/url -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"branch_key": "key_live_xxxxxxxxx",
"channel": "facebook",
"feature": "onboarding",
"campaign": "new product",
"stage": "new user",
"tags": ["one", "two", "three"],
"data": {
"$canonical_identifier": "content/123",
"$og_title": "Title from Deep Link",
"$og_description": "Description from Deep Link",
"$og_image_url": "http://www.lorempixel.com/400/400/",
"$desktop_url": "http://www.example.com",
"custom_boolean": true,
"custom_integer": 1243,
"custom_string": "everything",
"custom_array": [1,2,3,4,5,6],
"custom_object": { "random": "dictionary" }
}
}'
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 2 years ago.
Improve this question
this is my Laravel respond array How i add Addons value in my Database.
i'm using Laravel 5.8
array (
'User' => 'asasadsd',
'User_Email' => 'asas#gmail.com',
'Addons' => '[
{
"id": 48,
"addon_id": "57",
"user_id": "501855393",
"booking_id": "477310302",
},
{
"id": 49,
"addon_id": "59",
"user_id": "501855393",
"booking_id": "477310302",
}
]',
)
Got it
$store_DB = json_decode($data->Addons, true);
foreach($db as $item) {
$uses = $item['id'];
}
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
Can we make all text except for comments appear bold in VS Code?
I've tried using "editor.fontWeight": "bold" but this makes everything, including comments, bold.
Example: in the screenshot below, all text except for the comments (grey) would be bold.
Setting different fonts or font size for comments is currently not a standard feature in VS Code.
You can however make everything except comments bold:
Open settings.json Ctrl+Shift+P → type 'Open Settings (JSON)' → Enter)
Paste in the entry below and save to make all text bold, except comments:
"editor.tokenColorCustomizations": {
"textMateRules": [{
"scope": [
"constant",
"constant.character",
"constant.character.escape",
"constant.numeric",
"constant.numeric.integer",
"constant.numeric.float",
"constant.numeric.hex",
"constant.numeric.octal",
"constant.other",
"constant.regexp",
"constant.rgb-value",
"emphasis",
"entity",
"entity.name",
"entity.name.class",
"entity.name.function",
"entity.name.method",
"entity.name.section",
"entity.name.selector",
"entity.name.tag",
"entity.name.type",
"entity.other",
"entity.other.attribute-name",
"entity.other.inherited-class",
"invalid",
"invalid.deprecated",
"invalid.illegal",
"keyword",
"keyword.control",
"keyword.operator",
"keyword.operator.new",
"keyword.operator.assignment",
"keyword.operator.arithmetic",
"keyword.operator.logical",
"keyword.other",
"markup",
"markup.bold",
"markup.changed",
"markup.deleted",
"markup.heading",
"markup.inline.raw",
"markup.inserted",
"markup.italic",
"markup.list",
"markup.list.numbered",
"markup.list.unnumbered",
"markup.other",
"markup.quote",
"markup.raw",
"markup.underline",
"markup.underline.link",
"meta",
"meta.block",
"meta.cast",
"meta.class",
"meta.function",
"meta.function-call",
"meta.preprocessor",
"meta.return-type",
"meta.selector",
"meta.tag",
"meta.type.annotation",
"meta.type",
"punctuation.definition.string.begin",
"punctuation.definition.string.end",
"punctuation.separator",
"punctuation.separator.continuation",
"punctuation.terminator",
"storage",
"storage.modifier",
"storage.type",
"string",
"string.interpolated",
"string.other",
"string.quoted",
"string.quoted.double",
"string.quoted.other",
"string.quoted.single",
"string.quoted.triple",
"string.regexp",
"string.unquoted",
"strong",
"support",
"support.class",
"support.constant",
"support.function",
"support.other",
"support.type",
"support.type.property-name",
"support.variable",
"variable",
"variable.language",
"variable.name",
"variable.other",
"variable.other.readwrite",
"variable.parameter"
],
"settings": {
"fontStyle": "bold"
}
},{
"scope": [
"comment",
"punctuation.definition.comment"
],
"settings": {
"fontStyle": ""
}
}]
}
If your settings.json doesn't contain any other entries just wrap the above in { }.
You can read more about customizing the editor text in VS Code here.
Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I have a JSON file that is like this:
{
"user" : { "movie": 0 }
}
I want to add another user to the above JSON file. For example, something like this:
{ "user" : {
"movie" : 0
},
"user2" : {
"movie": 0
}
}
Any help would be appreciated.
Load the file into a Ruby Hash using
hash = JSON.load(File.read("path/to/file"))
Then edit the Hash
hash["user2"] = { "movie" => 0 }
Then encode it back
File.write("path/to/file", JSON.dump(hash))
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I am unsure if I am creating a proper schema for a CouchBase mobile database. Here is an example of a schema for 1 user's mobile app:
{
"users": [
{
"firstname": "Jim",
"lastname": "terry",
"addresses": [
{
"address": "123 Way",
"zipcode": "65432"
},
...
],
"activities": [
{
"steps": 500
},
{
"sleep_hours": 2
},
...
],
"posts": [
{
"subject": "Hello",
"body": "World"
},
...
]
},
...
]
}
A mobile app could have 1 to many users on a device. The server database could hold many users that the app would only have access to. What I am having a hard time wrapping my head around is whether this is a good data model for a couchbase app. I have denormalized all of the data associated to a user under a user schema. My questions are as follows:
What happens if activity gets really large for a user and posts gets really large? When you make an update to activity does it have to save the whole document which could create a performance option when only one piece of data on the user gets updated? Does the database break up these arrays as separate documents from the user?
Is it best practice to store the data in activities in this fashion? In the example, both objects are an activity but they contain completely separate data.
Is this the most efficient model? One example of a change might be instead of having a generic "activities":[] creating "step_activities" and "sleep_activities"?