Greetings!!
One of my source table(oracle) date column having the value 5/3/2013 6:00:51.134000000 AM. I am trying to pull the same into to my target(oracle),
but my target converted the micro seconds as "zeros" and loading the value 5/3/2013 06.00.51.000000000 AM.
Both my source & target column has declared as timestamp. I have set the date format like MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS.US in session properties
Can anyone help to me to get the date with micro seconds? I am using informatica 10.2.0 Thx
The way to resolve this is to increase the precision of the source or target definition to precision 29 and scale 9 after the source/target is imported into Informatica. This will handle the digits in milliseconds without converting them to all zeros. Plz check below link
http://www.raghavatal.com/2014/06/05/how-to-handle-high-precision-dates-in-informatica-the-ones-with-milliseconds/
Related
I have to get the max payment date on an invoice and I am having trouble with the date format. I do not need the max in this formula as I am using the format in a reporting tool that is pulling the max from what it finds for me.
Using "to_char({datefield},'mm/dd/yyyy')" works for displaying that date the way we would like BUT when you use summary function MAX it does not pull the correct date because it is looking at a string and not a date (it will think 12/3/21 is larger than 3/2/22).
Another thing I have tried is trunc - "trunc({datefield})" which gives us the correct max date but it changes the formatting. For example if the date prior to the formula being applied is "8/12/21 12:00:00:000" the trunc formula will display it as 12-08-21 which is horribly wrong.
Long story short is I need a way to change a date/time to date with the format of 'mmmm/dd/yyyy' WITHOUT converting it to a string with something like to_char. Thank you!!!!
A DATE is a binary data type consisting of 7 bytes representing: century, year-of-century, month, day, hour, minute and second. It ALWAYS has all of those components and it is NEVER stored with any (human-readable) format.
What you are seeing when a date is displayed is the client application you are using to access the database making a decision to be helpful to you, the user, and display the binary DATE provided by the database in a human-readable format.
If you want to change how the DATE is displayed then you either need to:
Change the settings on the client application that controls how it formats dates when it displays them to you; or
Change the data-type so that it is no longer a DATE (which does not have a format) to a data type where the values of the date can be formatted (such as a string). You can do this using TO_CHAR.
If you want to find the maximum then do it BEFORE applying the formatting:
SELECT TO_CHAR(MAX({datefield}),'mm/dd/yyyy')
FROM your_table;
I ran an SQL Query for Oracle which consists of Invoice date and Check date. When these data are copied on to an Excel Spreadsheet as text, it's dispayed as ex: "13-10-31" (Oct 31, 2013). However, when converted to date format, it's displayed as "10/13/1931". I've tried different date types but it always recognizes as the first part of the text as the day, then month, then year. I need these values to be setup as a date format as I need to calculate Days Payable Outstanding and other related ratios.
Is there any way to convert these values so that Excel recognizes the day, month, and year correctly? Would there be a macro that could automate this process for existing data and data that will be added in the future?
Thank you in advance.
Firstly, I hope the data type of your date column is DATE.
Secondly, the date should always have year as YYYY and not just YY. The world has already learned from Y2K bug.
If above two points are met, then while displaying use to_char(date_column, 'mm/dd/yyyy'). Thus, with YYYY format, there won't be any confusion between year and other fields.
For few columns from the source i.e .csv file, we are having values like 1:52:00, 14:45:00.
I am supposed to load to the Oracle table.
Which data type should I choose in Target as well as source?
Should i be doing any thing in the expression transformation?
Use SQLLDR to load the data into database with the format described as in the link
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14200/sql_elements004.htm
ie.'HH24:MI:SS'
Oracle does not support time-only values, it supports dates (with a time component).
You have a few options:
Store the value as a string, perhaps providing a leading zero for
the hour.
Store the value as the number of seconds (or minutes) past midnight.
Store the value as the time component of some arbitrarily defined date, for
example 0001-JAN-01 01:52:00 and 0001-Jan-01 14:45:00. Tell your report writers to ignore the date portion of the value.
Your source datatype will be string(8). Use LPAD to add leading zeroes.
I work in a large scale IT support environment. Twice now we have seen an invalid date of 02/31/2157 being inserted in an Oracle DATE column. So far I have not been able to reproduce this problem, but it appears to be happening occasionally when a user attempts to save '00/00/0000' into the column. I believe the value is originating from a PowerBuilder DataWindow update.
The application uses myriad libraries for all sorts of technologies, so this question may be a bit vague, but...
Has anyone seen the date 02/31/2157 in some established library that Oracle could be defaulting to when some other invalid date is entered? Perhaps an end-of-time concept analogous to the beginning-of-time date of 1/1/1970?
From http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B19306_01/server.102/b14220/datatype.htm#i1847"
Oracle uses its own internal format to
store dates. Date data is stored in
fixed-length fields of seven bytes
each, corresponding to century, year,
month, day, hour, minute, and second.
2157-256 = 1901, which seems suspiciously close to a possible epoch of 1/1/1900 (or 12/13/1901 - which is the rollover date for the Year 2038 Problem)
I'd guess that it is storing either 0x00 or 0xFF in the date bytes, then getting confused when it decodes it. (How does it deal with month 255?)
Turns out this was a powerbuilder issue. The field was created in the datawindow as required, but was programmatically changed to be non-required before saving. So a null value was being saved to a non-null database column, and powerbuilder inserted some dummy date instead of just throwing an error.
I remember getting a weird value when saving an invalid date. IIRC it was in PB 9 and we had to get an EBF for it. It was a problem with Date Editmasks and entering an invalid date that wasn't rejected. Sorry I don't have more details.
I'm storing a simple java.util.date in an Oracle XE database via hibernate.
When testing with JUnit if I can retrieve the correct value, I get an error like this:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
expected:<Sun Dec 28 11:20:27 CET 2008>
but was:<2008-12-28 11:20:27.0>
The value is stored in an Oracle Date column (which should have a second-precision) which looks okay to me. Also, I'm surprised that 11:20:27 is not equal to 11:20:27.0. Or does this have to do with timezones?
Any help is welcome.
Thorsten
Okay, worked some more on it ...
Oracle Date columns only store values with an accuracy of a second.
Java Dates do contain milliseconds, but they are typically not printed. So
expected:
was actually created by a date like 11:20:27,345, which is of course not equal to 11:20:27.0
Solution:
either only use full second dates to store and retrieve
or
get hibernate to create the correct Oracle Datatype (TIMESTAMP) - this is very dependent on the dialect specified in the hibernate config (OracleDialect and Oracle10gDialect create different types).
If you compare a java.util.Date to a java.sql.Date that both represent the same instant in time, equals(Object) will return false (it considers two objects of different classes to never be equal).
Your tests need to account for that. The easiest way to do this is to convert the dates to UNIX time (e.g. java.util.Date.getTime()) and compare those values.