I am trying to write a few SONARQUBE custom rules for my project.
After reading up the below document -
https://docs.sonarqube.org/display/PLUG/Writing+Custom+Java+Rules+101
and
https://github.com/SonarSource/sonar-custom-rules-examples,
I created a custom rule like these classes below -
The Rule file:
#Rule(key = "MyAssertionRule")
public class FirstSonarCustomRule extends BaseTreeVisitor implements JavaFileScanner {
private static final String DEFAULT_VALUE = "Inject";
private JavaFileScannerContext context;
/**
* Name of the annotation to avoid. Value can be set by users in Quality
* profiles. The key
*/
#RuleProperty(defaultValue = DEFAULT_VALUE, description = "Name of the annotation to avoid, without the prefix #, for instance 'Override'")
protected String name;
#Override
public void scanFile(JavaFileScannerContext context) {
this.context = context;
System.out.println(PrinterVisitor.print(context.getTree()));
scan(context.getTree());
}
#Override
public void visitMethod(MethodTree tree) {
List<StatementTree> statements = tree.block().body();
for (StatementTree statement : statements) {
System.out.println("KIND IS " + statement.kind());
if (statement.is(Kind.EXPRESSION_STATEMENT)) {
if (statement.firstToken().text().equals("Assert")) {
System.out.println("ERROR");
}
}
}
}
}
The Test class:
public class FirstSonarCustomRuleTest {
#Test
public void verify() {
FirstSonarCustomRule f = new FirstSonarCustomRule();
f.name = "ASSERTION";
JavaCheckVerifier.verify("src/test/files/FirstSonarCustom.java", f);
}
}
And finally - the Test file:
class FirstSonarCustom {
int aField;
public void methodToUseTestNgAssertions() {
Assert.assertTrue(true);
}
}
The above Test file would later be my Project's source code.
As per the SONAR documentation - the // Noncompliant is a mandatory comment in my Test file. Thus my first question is should I add this comment everywhere in my Source code too?
If yes - is there any way I can avoid adding this comment, because I do not want to add that code refactoring exercise all over.
Can someone suggest me what I need to do here?
I am using SONARQUBE 6.3.
This comment is only used by the test framework (JavaCheckVerifier class) to test the implementation of your rule. It is not mandatory in any way and for sure you don't need it in your real code.
Related
I own a spring application and want to add camel routes dynamically during my application startup.End points are configured in property file and are loaded at run time.
Using Java DSL, i am using for loop to create all routes,
for(int i=0;i<allEndPoints;i++)
{
DynamcRouteBuilder route = new
DynamcRouteBuilder(context,fromUri,toUri)
camelContext.addRoutes(route)
}
private class DynamcRouteBuilder extends RouteBuilder {
private final String from;
private final String to;
private MyDynamcRouteBuilder(CamelContext context, String from, String to) {
super(context);
this.from = from;
this.to = to;
}
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(from).to(to);
}
}
but getting below exception while creating first route itself
Failed to create route file_routedirect: at: >>> OnException[[class org.apache.camel.component.file.GenericFileOperationFailedException] -> [Log[Exception trapped ${exception.class}], process[Processor#0x0]]] <<< in route: Route(file_routedirect:)[[From[direct:... because of ref must be specified on: process[Processor#0x0]\n\ta
Not sure about it- what is the issue ? Can someone has any suggestion or fix for this. Thanks
Well, to create routes in an iteration it is nice to have some object that holds the different values for one route. Let's call this RouteConfiguration, a simple POJO with String fields for from, to and routeId.
We are using YAML files to configure such things because you have a real List format instead of using "flat lists" in property files (route[0].from, route[0].to).
If you use Spring you can directly transform such a "list of object configurations" into a Collection of objects using #ConfigurationProperties
When you are able to create such a Collection of value objects, you can simply iterate over it. Here is a strongly simplified example.
#Override
public void configure() {
createConfiguredRoutes();
}
void createConfiguredRoutes() {
configuration.getRoutes().forEach(this::addRouteToContext);
}
// Implement route that is added in an iteration
private void addRouteToContext(final RouteConfiguration routeConfiguration) throws Exception {
this.camelContext.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
from(routeConfiguration.getFrom())
.routeId(routeConfiguration.getRouteId())
...
.to(routeConfiguration.getTo());
}
});
}
I have a simple scenario in which am trying to verify some behavior when a method is called (i.e. that a certain method was called with given parameter, a function pointer in this scenario). Below are my classes:
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ConfigurableApplicationContext context = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
AppBootStrapper bootStrapper = context.getBean(AppBootStrapper.class);
bootStrapper.start();
}
}
#Component
public class AppBootStrapper {
private NetworkScanner networkScanner;
private PacketConsumer packetConsumer;
public AppBootStrapper(NetworkScanner networkScanner, PacketConsumer packetConsumer) {
this.networkScanner = networkScanner;
this.packetConsumer = packetConsumer;
}
public void start() {
networkScanner.addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
networkScanner.startScan();
}
}
#Component
public class NetworkScanner {
private List<Consumer<String>> consumers = new ArrayList<>();
public void startScan(){
Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> {
while(true) {
// do some scanning and get/parse packets
consumers.forEach(consumer -> consumer.accept("Package Data"));
}
});
}
public void addConsumer(Consumer<String> consumer) {
this.consumers.add(consumer);
}
}
#Component
public class PacketConsumer {
public void consumePacket(String packet) {
System.out.println("Packet received: " + packet);
}
}
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class AppBootStrapperTest {
#Test
public void start() throws Exception {
NetworkScanner networkScanner = mock(NetworkScanner.class);
PacketConsumer packetConsumer = mock(PacketConsumer.class);
AppBootStrapper appBootStrapper = new AppBootStrapper(networkScanner, packetConsumer);
appBootStrapper.start();
verify(networkScanner).addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
verify(networkScanner, times(1)).startScan();
}
}
I want to verify that bootStrapper did in fact do proper setup by registering the packet consumer(there might be other consumers registered later on, but this one is mandatory) and then called startScan. I get the following error message when I execute the test case:
Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
networkScanner bean.addConsumer(
com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapperTest$$Lambda$8/438123546#282308c3
);
-> at com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapperTest.start(AppBootStrapperTest.java:24)
Actual invocation has different arguments:
networkScanner bean.addConsumer(
com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapper$$Lambda$7/920446957#5dda14d0
);
-> at com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapper.start(AppBootStrapper.java:12)
From the exception, clearly the function pointers aren't the same.
Am I approaching this the right way? Is there something basic I am missing? I played around and had a consumer injected into PacketConsumer just to see if it made a different and that was OK, but I know that's certainly not the right way to go.
Any help, perspectives on this would be greatly appreciated.
Java doesn't have any concept of "function pointers"; when you see:
networkScanner.addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
What Java actually compiles is (the equivalent of):
networkScanner.addConsumer(new Consumer<String>() {
#Override void accept(String packet) {
packetConsumer.consumePacket(packet);
}
});
This anonymous inner class happens to be called AppBootStrapper$$Lambda$7. Because it doesn't (and shouldn't) define an equals method, it will never be equal to the anonymous inner class that the compiler generates in your test, which happens to be called AppBootStrapperTest$$Lambda$8. This is regardless of the fact that the method bodies are the same, and are built in the same way from the same method reference.
If you generate the Consumer explicitly in your test and save it as a static final Consumer<String> field, then you can pass that reference in the test and compare it; at that point, reference equality should hold. This should work with a lambda expression or method reference just fine.
A more apt test would probably verify(packetConsumer, atLeastOnce()).consumePacket(...), as the contents of the lambda are an implementation detail and you're really more concerned about how your component collaborates with other components. The abstraction here should be at the consumePacket level, not at the addConsumer level.
See the comments and answer on this SO question.
I am using jmeter with Java Request samplers. These call java classes I have written which returns a SampleResult object which contains the timing metrics for the use case. SampleResult is a tree and can have child SampleResult objects (SampleResult.addSubResult method). I cant seem to find a good way in jmeter to track the sub results so I can only easily get the results for the parent SampleResult.
Is there a listener in jmeter that allows me to see statistics / graphs for sub results (for instance see the average time across all sub results with the same name).
I have just succeeded in doing this, and wanted to share it. If you follow the instructions I provide here, it will work for you as well. I did this for the summary table listener. And, I did it on Windows. And, I used Eclipse
Steps:
Go to JMeter's web site and download the source code. You can find that here, for version 3.0.
http://jmeter.apache.org/download_jmeter.cgi
One there, I clicked the option to download the Zip file for the Source.
Then, on that same page, download the binary for version 3.0, if you have not already done so. Then, extract that zip file onto your hard drive.
Once you've extracted the zip file to your hard drive, grab the file "SummaryReport.java". It can be found here: "\apache-jmeter-3.0\src\components\org\apache\jmeter\visualizers\SummaryReport.java"
Create a new class in Eclipse, then Copy/Paste all of that code into your new class. Then, rename your class from what it is, "SummaryReport" to a different name. And everywhere in the code, replace "SummaryReport" with the new name of your class.
I am using Java 8. So, there is one line of code that won't compile for me. It's the line below.
private final Map tableRows = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
You need to remove the <> on that line, as Java 1.8 doesn't support it. Then, it will compile
There was one more line that gave a compile error. It was the one below.
CSVSaveService.saveCSVStats(StatGraphVisualizer.getAllTableData(model, FORMATS),writer,`
saveHeaders.isSelected() ? StatGraphVisualizer.getLabels(COLUMNS) : null);
Firstly, it wasn't finding the source for class StatGraphVisualizer. So, I imported it, as below.
import org.apache.jmeter.visualizers.StatGraphVisualizer;
Secondly, it wasn't finding the method "getLabels" in "StatGraphVisualizer.getLabels." So, here is what this line of code looked like after I fixed it. It is seen below.
CSVSaveService.saveCSVStats(StatGraphVisualizer.getAllTableData(model, FORMATS),writer);
That compiles. That method doesn't need the second argument.
Now, everything should compile.
Find this method below. This is where you will begin adding your customizations.
#Override
public void add(final SampleResult res) {
You need to create an array of all of your sub results, as I did, as seen below. The line in Bold is the new code. (All new code is seen in Bold).
public void add(final SampleResult res) {
final String sampleLabel = res.getSampleLabel(); // useGroupName.isSelected());
**final SampleResult[] theSubResults = res.getSubResults();**
Then, create a String for each label for your sub results objects, as seen below.
**final String writesampleLabel = theSubResults[0].getSampleLabel(); // (useGroupName.isSelected());
final String readsampleLabel = theSubResults[1].getSampleLabel(); // (useGroupName.isSelected());**
Next, go to the method below.
JMeterUtils.runSafe(false, new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
The new code added is below, in Bold.
JMeterUtils.runSafe(false, new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
Calculator row = null;
**Calculator row1 = null;
Calculator row2 = null;**
synchronized (lock) {
row = tableRows.get(sampleLabel);
**row1 = tableRows.get(writesampleLabel);
row2 = tableRows.get(readsampleLabel);**
if (row == null) {
row = new Calculator(sampleLabel);
tableRows.put(row.getLabel(), row);
model.insertRow(row, model.getRowCount() - 1);
}
**if (row1 == null) {
row1 = new Calculator(writesampleLabel);
tableRows.put(row1.getLabel(), row1);
model.insertRow(row1, model.getRowCount() - 1);
}
if (row2 == null) {
row2 = new Calculator(readsampleLabel);
tableRows.put(row2.getLabel(), row2);
model.insertRow(row2, model.getRowCount() - 1);
}**
} // close lock
/*
* Synch is needed because multiple threads can update the counts.
*/
synchronized(row) {
row.addSample(res);
}
**synchronized(row1) {
row1.addSample(theSubResults[0]);
}**
**synchronized(row2) {
row2.addSample(theSubResults[1]);
}**
That is all that needs to be customized.
In Eclipse, export your new class into a Jar file. Then place it inside of the lib/ext folder of your binary of Jmeter that you extracted, from Step 1 above.
Start up Jmeter, as you normally would.
In your Java sampler, add a new Listener. You will now see two "Summary Table" listeners. One of these will be the new one that you have just created. Once you have brought that new one into your Java Sampler, rename it to something unique. Then run your test and look at your new "Summary Table" listener. You will see summary results/stats for all of your sample results.
My next step is to perform these same steps for all of the other Listeners that I would like to customize.
I hope that this post helps.
Here is some of my plugin code which you can use as a starting point in writing your own plugin. I cant really post everything as there are really dozens of classes. Few things to know are:
my plugin like all visualizer plugins extends the jmeter class
AbstractVisualizer
you need the following jars in eclipse to complile:
jfxrt.jar,ApacheJMeter_core.jar
you need java 1.8 for javafx (the jar file comes in the sdk)
if you compile a plugin you need to put that in jmeter/lib/ext.
You also need to put the jars from bullet 2 in jmeter/lib
there is a method called "add(SampleResult)" in my class. This
will get called by the jmeter framework every time a java sample
completes and will pass the SampleResult as a parameter. Assuming you
have your own Java Sample classes that extend
AbstractJavaSamplerClient your class will have a method called
runTest which returns a sampleresult. That same return object will be
passed into your plugins add method.
my plugin puts all the sample results into a buffer and only
updates the screen every 5 results.
Here is the code:
import java.awt.BorderLayout;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
import javafx.application.Platform;
import javafx.embed.swing.JFXPanel;
import javax.swing.border.Border;
import javax.swing.border.EmptyBorder;
import org.apache.jmeter.samplers.SampleResult;
import org.apache.jmeter.testelement.TestStateListener;
import org.apache.jmeter.visualizers.gui.AbstractVisualizer;
public class FxVisualizer extends AbstractVisualizer implements TestStateListener {
int currentId = 0;
/**
*
*/
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L;
private static final int BUFFER_SIZE = 5;
#Override
public String getName()
{
return super.getName();//"George's sub result viewer.";
}
#Override
public String getStaticLabel()
{
return "Georges FX Visualizer";
}
#Override
public String getComment()
{
return "George wrote this plugin. There are many plugins like it but this one is mine.";
}
static Long initCount = new Long(0);
public FxVisualizer()
{
init();
}
private void init()
{
//LoggingUtil.debug("in FxVisualizer init()");
try
{
FxTestListener.setListener(this);
this.setLayout(new BorderLayout());
Border margin = new EmptyBorder(10, 10, 5, 10);
this.setBorder(margin);
//this.add(makeTitlePanel(), BorderLayout.NORTH);
final JFXPanel fxPanel = new JFXPanel();
add(fxPanel);
//fxPanel.setScene(getScene());
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
initFX(fxPanel);
}
});
}
catch(Exception e)
{
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
static FxVisualizerScene fxScene;
private static void initFX(JFXPanel fxPanel) {
// This method is invoked on the JavaFX thread
fxScene = new FxVisualizerScene();
fxPanel.setScene(fxScene.getScene());
}
final List <Event> bufferedEvents = new ArrayList<Event>();
#Override
public void add(SampleResult result)
{
final List <Event> events = ...;//here you need to take the result.getSubResults() parameter and get all the children events.
final List<Event> eventsToAdd = new ArrayList<Event>();
synchronized(bufferedEvents)
{
for (Event evt : events)
{
bufferedEvents.add(evt);
}
if (bufferedEvents.size() >= BUFFER_SIZE)
{
eventsToAdd.addAll(bufferedEvents);
bufferedEvents.clear();
}
}
if (eventsToAdd.size() > 0)
{
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
updatePanel(eventsToAdd);
}
});
}
}
public void updatePanel(List <Event> events )
{
for (Event evt: events)
{
fxScene.addEvent(evt);
}
}
#Override
public void clearData()
{
synchronized(bufferedEvents)
{
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
bufferedEvents.clear();
fxScene.clearData();
}
});
}
}
#Override
public String getLabelResource() {
return "Georges Java Sub FX Sample Listener";
}
Boolean isRunning = false;
#Override
public void testEnded()
{
final List<Event> eventsToAdd = new ArrayList<Event>();
synchronized(bufferedEvents)
{
eventsToAdd.addAll(bufferedEvents);
bufferedEvents.clear();
}
if (eventsToAdd.size() > 0)
{
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
updatePanel(eventsToAdd);
fxScene.testStopped();
}
});
}
}
Long testCount = new Long(0);
#Override
public void testStarted() {
synchronized(bufferedEvents)
{
Platform.runLater(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
updatePanel(bufferedEvents);
bufferedEvents.clear();
fxScene.testStarted();
}
});
}
}
#Override
public void testEnded(String arg0)
{
//LoggingUtil.debug("testEnded 2:" + arg0);
testEnded();
}
int registeredCount = 0;
#Override
public void testStarted(String arg0) {
//LoggingUtil.debug("testStarted 2:" + arg0);
testStarted();
}
}
OK so I just decided to write my own jmeter plugin and it is dead simple. Ill share the code for posterity when it is complete. Just write a class that extends AbstractVisualizer, compile it into a jar, then throw it into the jmeter lib/ext directory. That plugin will show up in the listeners section of jmeter when you go to add visualizers.
I realise that best practise may advise on loading test data on every #Test method, however this can be painfully slow for DBUnit so I have come up with the following solution to load it only once per class:
Only load a data set once per test class
Support multiple data sources and those not named "dataSource" from the ApplicationContext
Roll back of the inserted DBUnit data set not strictly required
While the code below works, what is bugging me is that my Test class has the static method beforeClassWithApplicationContext() but it cannot belong to an Interface because its static. Therefore my use of Reflection is being used in a non Type safe manner. Is there a more elegant solution?
/**
* My Test class
*/
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#TestExecutionListeners({DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener.class, DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener.class, DbunitLoadOnceTestExecutionListener.class})
#ContextConfiguration(locations={"classpath:resources/spring/applicationContext.xml"})
public class TestClass {
public static final String TEST_DATA_FILENAME = "Scenario-1.xml";
public static void beforeClassWithApplicationContext(ApplicationContext ctx) throws Exception {
DataSource ds = (DataSource)ctx.getBean("dataSourceXyz");
IDatabaseConnection conn = new DatabaseConnection(ds.getConnection());
IDataSet dataSet = DbUnitHelper.getDataSetFromFile(conn, TEST_DATA_FILENAME);
InsertIdentityOperation.CLEAN_INSERT.execute(conn, dataSet);
}
#Test
public void somethingToTest() {
// do stuff...
}
}
/**
* My new custom TestExecutioner
*/
public class DbunitLoadOnceTestExecutionListener extends AbstractTestExecutionListener {
final String methodName = "beforeClassWithApplicationContext";
#Override
public void beforeTestClass(TestContext testContext) throws Exception {
super.beforeTestClass(testContext);
Class<?> clazz = testContext.getTestClass();
Method m = null;
try {
m = clazz.getDeclaredMethod(methodName, ApplicationContext.class);
}
catch(Exception e) {
throw new Exception("Test class must implement " + methodName + "()", e);
}
m.invoke(null, testContext.getApplicationContext());
}
}
One other thought I had was possibly creating a static singleton class for holding a reference to the ApplicationContext and populating it from DbunitLoadOnceTestExecutionListener.beforeTestClass(). I could then retrieve that singleton reference from a standard #BeforeClass method defined on TestClass. My code above calling back into each TestClass just seems a little messy.
After the helpful feedback from Matt and JB this is a much simpler solution to achieve the desired result
/**
* My Test class
*/
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#TestExecutionListeners({DependencyInjectionTestExecutionListener.class, DirtiesContextTestExecutionListener.class, DbunitLoadOnceTestExecutionListener.class})
#ContextConfiguration(locations={"classpath:resources/spring/applicationContext.xml"})
public class TestClass {
private static final String TEST_DATA_FILENAME = "Scenario-1.xml";
// must be static
private static volatile boolean isDataSetLoaded = false;
// use the Qualifier to select a specific dataSource
#Autowired
#Qualifier("dataSourceXyz")
private DataSource dataSource;
/**
* For performance reasons, we only want to load the DBUnit data set once per test class
* rather than before every test method.
*
* #throws Exception
*/
#Before
public void before() throws Exception {
if(!isDataSetLoaded) {
isDataSetLoaded = true;
IDatabaseConnection conn = new DatabaseConnection(dataSource.getConnection());
IDataSet dataSet = DbUnitHelper.getDataSetFromFile(conn, TEST_DATA_FILENAME);
InsertIdentityOperation.CLEAN_INSERT.execute(conn, dataSet);
}
}
#Test
public void somethingToTest() {
// do stuff...
}
}
The class DbunitLoadOnceTestExecutionListener is no longer requried and has been removed. It just goes to show that reading up on all the fancy techniques can sometimes cloud your own judgement :o)
Not a specialist, but couldn't you call an instance method of your test object in prepareTestInstance() after having verified it implements the appropriate interface, and call this method only if it's the first time prepareTestInstance is invoked with a test instance of this class. You would just have to keep a set of already seen classes:
#Override
public void prepareTestInstance(TestContext testContext) throws Exception {
MyDbUnitTest instance = (MyDbUnitTest) getTestInstance();
if (!this.alreadySeenClasses.contains(instance.getClass()) {
instance.beforeClassWithApplicationContext(testContext.getApplicationContext());
this.alreadySeenClasses.add(instance.getClass());
}
}
I'm just getting into the use of Selenium Webdriver and its EventFiring so that I can log any exceptions thrown by the driver to a file or email etc.
I have got Log4Net working and my Unit Tests are running fine with Selenium.
What I am having issues with is having Log4Net create 1 log file, but for multiple test fixtures.
Here are some important classes which I think I need to show you in order to explain my issue.
public class EventLogger : EventFiringWebDriver
{
// Not sure if this is the best place to declare Log4Net
public static readonly ILog Log = LogManager.GetLogger(typeof(EventLogger));
public EventLogger(IWebDriver parentDriver) : base(parentDriver)
{
// To get Log4Net to read the configuration file on what logger to use
// To console , file, email etc
XmlConfigurator.Configure();
if (Log.IsInfoEnabled)
{
Log.Info("Logger started.");
}
}
protected override void OnFindingElement(FindElementEventArgs e)
{
base.OnFindingElement(e);
//TODO:
if (Log.IsInfoEnabled)
{
Log.InfoFormat("OnFindingElement: {0}", e);
}
}
protected override void OnElementClicked(WebElementEventArgs e)
{
base.OnElementClicked(e);
//TODO:
if (Log.IsInfoEnabled)
{
Log.InfoFormat("OnElementClicked: {0}", e.Element.GetAttribute("id"));
}
}
}
Here is my SetupFixture - which I THINK is run every time a new TestFixture class is run.
[SetUpFixture]
public class BaseTest
{
protected static readonly ILog Log = LogManager.GetLogger(System.Reflection.MethodBase.GetCurrentMethod().DeclaringType);
private FirefoxProfile firefoxProfile;
private IWebDriver driver;
private EventLogger eventLogger;
public IWebDriver StartDriver()
{
Common.WebBrowser = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["WebBrowser"];
Log.Info("Browser: " + Common.WebBrowser);
switch (Common.WebBrowser)
{
case "firefox":
{
firefoxProfile = new FirefoxProfile { AcceptUntrustedCertificates = true };
driver = new FirefoxDriver(firefoxProfile);
break;
}
case "iexplorer":
{
driver = new InternetExplorerDriver();
break;
}
case "chrome":
{
driver = new ChromeDriver();
break;
}
}
driver.Manage().Timeouts().ImplicitlyWait(Common.DefaultTimeSpan);
// Here is where I start my EventLogger to handle the events from selenium
// web driver, onClick, OnFindingElement etc.
// Is this the best way? Seems a bit messy, lack of structure
return eventLogger = new EventLogger(driver);
}
public EventLogger EventLogger
{
get { return eventLogger; }
}
}
Here is one of the many TestFixtures I have, each one based on a Selenium2 PageObjects
[TestFixture]
public class LoginPageTest : BaseTest
{
private IWebDriver driver;
private LoginPage loginPage;
[SetUp]
public void SetUp()
{
// Where I use the Log from the BaseTest
// protected static readonly ILog Log <-- top of BaseTest
Log.Info("SetUp");
driver = StartDriver();
driver.Manage().Timeouts().ImplicitlyWait(TimeSpan.FromSeconds(30));
loginPage = new LoginPage();
PageFactory.InitElements(driver, loginPage);
}
[Test]
public void SubmitFormInvalidCredentials()
{
Console.WriteLine("SubmitFormInvalidCredentials");
loginPage.UserName.SendKeys("invalid");
loginPage.Password.SendKeys("invalid");
loginPage.SubmitButton.Click();
IWebElement invalidCredentials = driver.FindElement(By.Id("ctl00_ctl00_ctl00_insideForm_insideForm_ctl02_title"));
Assert.AreEqual("Invalid user name or password", invalidCredentials.Text);
}
}
My Log.txt file is obviously being re-written over and over after each TestFixture is run,
How can I set up my NUnit Testing so that I only run the Log4Net once, so that I can use it in both my EventLogger and TestFixtures?
I have Googled around a lot, maybe its something simple. Do I have some design issues with the structure of my project?
Try out setting explicitly AppendToFile="True" in the log4net configuration for the FileAppender you are using:
<log4net>
<appender name="..." type="log4net.Appender....">
<appendToFile value="true" />
FileAppender.AppendToFile property
Gets or sets a flag that indicates whether the file should be appended
to or overwritten
Regarding [SetupFixture], I believe you are using it in wrong way. It not supposed to mark base class of the each TesFixture by this attribute, this looks messy. You should declare class which considered to be SetupFixture and mark it by [SetupFixture] attribute so it will be called ONCE for all TestFixtures within a given (declaration) namespace.
From NUnit documentation, SetUpFixtureAttribute:
This is the attribute that marks a class that contains the one-time
setup or teardown methods for all the test fixtures under a given
namespace. The class may contain at most one method marked with the
SetUpAttribute and one method marked with the TearDownAttribute