I have a simple batch script running constantly on a Windows 10 PC at work that performs relatively simple tasks over and over again throughout the day, basically testing certain server diagnostics while I'm working on it.
Every once in a while, the program will crash, so I have another program I downloaded that will auto-start up the program if it does crash and close.
However, there is one scenario where instead of the program just crashing and closing completely, a message box will pop up saying the program has stopped responding, with a 'Close Program' button. In this case, the auto-start program I have thinks the program is still running, so it won't attempt to re-run the batch script.
Is there a way to auto close the program when it crashes this way, or something that will automatically click the 'Close Program' button for me when it appears?
I suspect the messages comes out when the main thread hangs for too long. It may be cleaner to spawn another thread to take care of expensive / slow computation, Windows should not bother to kill the main thread (and your program) in first place like that.
Related
So we are running a Pandora on a specific pc to feed music to our phone lines. Every so often the program times out with "Are you still listening" or " Cant connect to the internet". In both instances all we need to do is to click the radio button and it resumes fine. The problem is as it only feeds the phone lines we never know when it has hung.
Currently I am closing and restarting Pandora thru a task at timed intervals. But as those conditions happen randomly as far as I can tell I still end up with no music for 1/2 to 45 min.
However in both instances when that occurs the Processor and memory usage is "0%". So what i think I can do is check to see if the Memory and processor usage both = 0 and if so I can then close and restart the applet.
I have tried several power-shell and bat scripts but I have not been successful.
Can anyone assist?
Thanks
-EDS
It is not circumventing business licensing. We are a paid subscriber.
I want to capture a stacktrace of an application which sometimes stops responding for few minutes.
When the application stops responding, the windows desktop also stops responding to mouse clicks, although some other already running applications are working fine at that time (for example windbg works fine, ProcessExplorer refreshes its screen, but does not respond to mouse events).
While the application is non responsive, it is actually taking about 80% of one CPU core. That is why I would like to get a stacktrace.
The misbehaving application usually takes about 2-3 minutes to do its strange job or if Ctrl+Esc is pressed it becomes responsive immediately (and the start menu opens of course...)
I have WinDbg attached to the misbehaving application and when I issue the Break command, the break-in does not happen until the application starts to respond again.
From what I understand the break-in actually creates a remote thread which pretty soon calls DbgBreakPoint.
What could be preventing debugger's thread from executing?
EDIT:
First of all thanks for your help!
I was also thinking that this might be caused by a bad device driver or something that installs a system wide hook somewhere.
I was thinking to enable kernel debugging and get a stack trace from the kernel for the offending thread or enable manual bluescreen trigger to produce a dump and look at that afterwards.
Process Explorer and Process Monitor does not reveal anything interesting. They also become unusable when the bug is triggered (updating their windows but not responsive to mouse or keyboard).
EDIT2:
Background info:
App uses QT, OpenGL and also DirectSound and runs on Windows 7 SP1 x64
I am currently suspecting something with the graphics part.
The strange thing is that if a system-wide lock is taken (like GDI Lock), this would prevent drawing of other Windows, but that does not happen. WinDbg on same machine works fine. ProcessExplorer updates but does not receive mouse clicks, Desktop updates but no mouse clicks.
I currently have a kernel debugger attached...
EDIT3
ETW was most useful for debugging. It turns out that Qt's main event processing loop goes crazy. PeekMessage and MsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx (with 0 timeout) gets called in a tight loop. That is where the high CPU usage comes from.
It looks like the App is generating/getting loads of messages at that time. But it is not easy to see what the messages are (or I don't know how to access function parameters in ETW). Using a debugger also does not help much but, with a breakpoint in the QT's event loop leads me to believe that WM_TIMER messages are the culprit.
Given that the desktop also misbehaves during this time, it sounds like your app isn't necessarily misbehaving but merely aggravating a bug elsewhere (e.g., in a device driver or some crummy anti-malware code that has injected itself into other processes). Stack traces from your app may or may not be very revealing.
If the problem is easily reproducible, I'd set a breakpoint somewhere in the "middle" of the app and see if the problem happens before or after that. Then move the breakpoint until you find the last instruction your app executes before things go bonkers. Figuring out what your app does that triggers this behavior may give a clue as what's going on.
Another option is to try using some system-wide debugging tools. First, I'd peak in the Event Viewer to see if there are suspicious error or warning events posting in proximity to the moment the machine goes haywire. Then I'd try a tool like Sysinternal's Process Monitor or Process Explorer to get a better view of what's happening. You might also try ETW to capture a system-wide trace of what's happening on the system that you can study after the fact. (ETW can be hard to use, so check out Bruce Dawson's UIforETW.)
Use ETW to find the cause. Install the Windows Performance Toolkit (part of the Win10 v1511 SDK: https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkID=698771 which is the last version that works in Win7), run WPRUI.exe, select CPU Usage and click on Start.
After you captured the hang, click on Save. Wait until WPRUI is finished, open the ETL in WPA, setup and load debug symbols in WPA.
Drag & Drop the CPU Usage (Precise) graph to analyse pane and look for WAIT (µs) max for your process to see that long hang and expand the stack to see where it happens.
I'm running Python 2.7 with ArcGIS Desktop 10.1 on Windows for Server (2 Xeon 2.13 Ghz processors).
Is it possible to suppress or automatically close the dialogue box from Windows that says "python.exe has stopped working" when python crashes? I have a continuously running, multiprocessing script that sometimes crashes for unknown reasons (working on that). When I click to close the crash report window, the script restarts and everything is okay. I want this to happen automatically until I can track down what is causing the crashes.
Thanks very much!
Doug
Procedure for disabling the Windows Debugger dialogue box found here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/bb204634(v=vs.85).aspx
This prevents the debug dialogue box that requires the user to click [Debug] or [Cancel] if python crashes.
However, there is now another Windows dialogue box that says "python.exe has stopped working. Please close the program" with a button [Close Program]. Sheesh!
The dialog you refer to is part of Windows Error Reporting.
The exact method varies between editions of Windows (Windows 7 instructions here, Google will happily provide for other versions...), but if you disable this feature of Windows, your crashes will happen a lot faster(!).
This is an simply an arcpy bug. You can try to avoid using the steps that are causing the crash, but it generally happens under different tools when used to process through a long list of data.
The only workaround I have found is to make my script save its progress along the way to disk so if you restart the process, it knows where to pickup from.
If you then disable windows debugger message by altering the registry (see below), you can then just repeatedly execute the script in cmd.exe until it completes the entire batch without having to close the process manually every time in between.
I know this is an awful workaround, but it is quite uncommon to have a python library kill off the python interpreter.
DWORD HKLM or HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\DontShowUI = "1"
DWORD HKLM or HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Windows\Windows Error Reporting\Disabled = "1"
On Microsoft website I saw this:
What does it mean when a program is not responding?
If a program is not responding, it means the program is interacting more slowly than usual with Windows, typically because a problem has occurred in the program. If the problem is temporary, and if you choose to wait, some programs will start responding again. Depending on the options available, you can also choose to close or restart the program.
On Windows 8, how do you DISABLE "the options" so that users of my application do not see the options to restart my app?
I'd suggest changing your application's design so that this situation doesn't arise. "Not responding" afaik means that the thread with the main message pump is not fetching messages. This is not a good thing to allow to happen.
It's better to do things that will take a long time in a separate thread, and keep responding to the user in the meantime (even if this just means asking them to wait and keeping a dialog responding to mouse events etc).
Visual Studio 2005 C++
Windows XP Pro
I have a sample application that I am testing, that links with boost libraries.
However, the program runs ok. However, when I try and stop the program by clicking the 'Stop Debugging' button. The program ends, but the console window remains open. So I have many of them, as during my testing I am starting and stopping the application.
Even when I try and close it by clicking the close button it has no affect. And it doesn't seem to appear under task manager when the program ends.
The only way I can close them if I reboot windows.
I am thinking it might be a thread that has not closed, and maybe that is keeping the console windows open.
Many thanks for any advice,
I have also seen this issue, I think it happens when a mutex or semaphore is still locked, or a thread hasn't cleanly exited. The only way I've found to prevent this is to make sure all mutexes/ semaphores/threads are cleaned up after before stopping the debugger.
Also it's interesting to note that this problem doesn't happen on Windows 7 or Linux. I have tried stopping the same program at the same places and the program always cleanly exits.
Good luck and happy coding!