I have a Class that accepts the following constructor
public Student(int id, String name, Map<String, List<String>> mapInject) {
super();
this.id = id;
this.name = name;
this.mapInject = mapInject;
}
And from spring Java Config, I am injecting the constructor args like below..
#Configuration
public class JavaConfig {
#Bean
public Employee getEmployeeBean() {
Map<String,List<String>> mapInject = new HashMap<String,List<String>>();
//Add map element
return new Employee(3123,"John",mapInject);
}
}
Am i doing constructor injection here? Is this the right way to do so?
I wouldn't use Spring to handle this bean creation, unless you want ALL employees to have the same id and name which I doubt.
The power behind Spring is its Dependency Injection (DI) where you define beans for providers such as database managers, services, etc. and inject those into your components. Defining a #Bean like you have there serves no purpose as now you can only inject employees with an id of 3123 and name John.
It's important to understand that just because you are using Spring it doesn't mean EVERYTHING needs to be handled as a bean - you will always need standard POJOs for housing and passing around state (such as your Employee class) which doesn't need to have anything to do with Spring.
Down the line you might have an EmployeeService for example which houses business logic to fetch employees from a database or something, this could then be configured as a bean so it can be injected across the application.
EDIT
#Configuration
public class JavaConfig {
#Bean
#Autowired //assuming a sessionfactory been is configured elsewhere
public EmployeeService employeeService(final SessionFactory sessionfactory) {
return new EmployeeService(sessionFactory);
}
}
You could then inject this anywhere (maybe in a controller for example):
#RestController
public class EmployeeController {
private final EmployeeService employeeService;
#Autowired
public EmployeeController(final EmployeeService employeeService) {
this.employeeService = employeeService;
}
}
Where the EmployeeController doesn't need to know or care that the userService has a DB connection and doesn't need to worry about configuring it as Spring will handle all of that.
Related
I am trying to autowire a component into a custom JsonDeserializer but cannot get it right even with the following suggestions I found:
Autowiring in JsonDeserializer: SpringBeanAutowiringSupport vs HandlerInstantiator
Right way to write JSON deserializer in Spring or extend it
How to customise the Jackson JSON mapper implicitly used by Spring Boot?
Spring Boot Autowiring of JsonDeserializer in Integration test
My final goal is to accept URLs to resources in different microservices and store only the ID of the resource locally. But I don't want to just extract the ID from the URL but also verify that the rest of the URL is correct.
I have tried many things and lost track a bit of what I tried but I believe I tried everything mentioned in the links above. I created tons of beans for SpringHandlerInstantiator, Jackson2ObjectMapperBuilder, MappingJackson2HttpMessageConverter, RestTemplate and others and also tried with setting the SpringHandlerInstantiator in RepositoryRestConfigurer#configureJacksonObjectMapper.
I am using Spring Boot 2.1.6.RELEASE which makes me think something might have changed since some of the linked threads are quite old.
Here's my last attempt:
#Configuration
public class JacksonConfig {
#Bean
public HandlerInstantiator handlerInstantiator(ApplicationContext applicationContext) {
return new SpringHandlerInstantiator(applicationContext.getAutowireCapableBeanFactory());
}
}
#Configuration
public class RestConfiguration implements RepositoryRestConfigurer {
#Autowired
private Validator validator;
#Autowired
private HandlerInstantiator handlerInstantiator;
#Override
public void configureValidatingRepositoryEventListener(ValidatingRepositoryEventListener validatingListener) {
validatingListener.addValidator("beforeCreate", validator);
validatingListener.addValidator("beforeSave", validator);
}
#Override
public void configureJacksonObjectMapper(ObjectMapper objectMapper) {
objectMapper.setHandlerInstantiator(handlerInstantiator);
}
}
#Component
public class RestResourceURLSerializer extends JsonDeserializer<Long> {
#Autowired
private MyConfig config;
#Override
public Long deserialize(JsonParser p, DeserializationContext ctxt) throws IOException, JsonProcessingException {
ServiceConfig serviceConfig = config.getServices().get("identity");
URI serviceUri = serviceConfig.getExternalUrl();
String servicePath = serviceUri.getPath();
URL givenUrl = p.readValueAs(URL.class);
String givenPath = givenUrl.getPath();
if (servicePath.equals(givenPath)) {
return Long.parseLong(givenPath.substring(givenPath.lastIndexOf('/') + 1));
}
return null;
}
}
I keep getting a NullPointerException POSTing something to the API endpoint that is deserialized with the JsonDeserializer above.
I was able to solve a similar problem by marking my deserializer constructor accept a parameter (and therefore removing the empty constructor) and marking constructor as #Autowired.
public class MyDeserializer extends JsonDeserializer<MyEntity> {
private final MyBean bean;
// no default constructor
#Autowired
public MyDeserializer(MyBean bean){
this.bean = bean
}
...
}
#JsonDeserialize(using = MyDeserializer.class)
public class MyEntity{...}
My entity is marked with annotation #JsonDeserialize so I don't have to explicitly register it with ObjectMapper.
I want declare multiple object using same class but different properties in Spring boot annotation
application.properties
test1.name=Ken
test2.name=Anthony
the code example
#Component
public class People {
private String name;
public String getName() {
return this.name;
}
}
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
#AutoWired
public People man1;
#AutoWired
public People man2;
System.out.println(man1.getName());
System.out.println(man2.getName());
}
I try to add #ConfigurationProperties(prefix="test1") before declare man1
but it returned
The annotation #ConfigurationProperties is disallowed for this location
#ConfigurationProperties is only allow to be placed on the #Bean method in the #Configuration class or at the class level. For the former case , it will map the properties from the application.properties to the bean instance , which means you have to :
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
#Bean
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="test1")
public People man1() {
return new People();
}
#Bean
#ConfigurationProperties(prefix="test2")
public People man2() {
return new People();
}
}
And since both man1 and man2 are the same type , you have to further use #Qualifier to tell Spring which instance you actually want to inject by specifying its bean name. The bean name can be configured by #Bean("someBeanName"). If #Bean is used without configuring the bean name, the method name will be used as the bean name. (i.e. man1 and man2)
#Autowired
#Qualifier("man1")
public People man1;
#Autowired
#Qualifier("man2")
public People man2;
I would like to use spring transaction management capabilities within a prototype bean. I did the following:
I've used javax.inject.Provider to create my prototype bean.
I've annotated the method of the prototyped bean with the #Transactional annotation.
Is this the right way of doing it?
#Service
public class SomeService {
#Autowired
private Provider<SomePrototype> myPrototypeProvider;
public void execute() {
SomePrototype somePrototype = myPrototypeProvider.get();
somePrototype.someMethod();
}
}
#Component
#Scope(BeanDefinition.SCOPE_PROTOTYPE)
public class SomePrototype {
#Autowired
private SomeSpringBean someSpringBean;
#Autowired
private SomeRepository someRepository;
#Transactional(propagation = Propagation.REQUIRED)
public void someMethod() {
Result result = someSpringBean.doSomething();
someRepository.save(result);
}
}
The initialisation of transaction-scoped bean requires a proxy. Therefore, if we define a transactional bean as prototype, every that bean is requested, a new proxy is created, and that is not efficient.
What is reason behind this requirement (to have transactional prototype bean)
Can't wire layers in Spring Boot | MyBatis application. The problem is probably happening when Service layer uses Mapper.
Controller method sample:
#Controller
#RequestMapping("demo")
public class MessageController {
#Autowired
private MessageService messageService;
#RequestMapping(value = "messages", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String getMessages(ModelMap modelMap) {
modelMap.addAttribute(MESSAGE,
messageService.selectMessages());
return "messages";
}
Service class:
#Service
public class MessageService {
#Autowired // Not sure if I can use Autowired here.
private MessageMapper messageMapper;
public MessageService() {
}
public Collection<Message> selectMessages() { return
messageMapper.selectAll(); }
}
MyBatis Mapper:
#Mapper
public interface MessageMapper {
#Select("select * from message")
Collection<Message> selectAll();
}
UPDATE
It feels like I'm having some fundamental knowledge based mistake. Probably managing external libraries.
Here's maven pom.xml. Looks kind of overloaded, I faced a lot of errors managing different spring-boot packages. Starter for autoconfiguration included.
pom.xml
Here's the project structure:
UPDATE #2
I'm sure DB connection is working well, I'm able to track changes in MySQL Workbench while Spring Boot is executing schema.sql and data.sql. But somehow, MyBatis mapper methods throw NullPointerException and page proceeds with exit code 500. Seems like they can't connect.
MessageService isn't managed by spring.
You have to annotate the MessageService class with #Service annotation (also, after adding this annotation you can indeed use #Autowired inside the service class)
#Service
public class MessageService {
#Autowired
private MessageMapper messageMapper;
public Collection<Message> selectMessages() {
return messageMapper.selectAll();
}
}
and wire it to the controller with
#Autowired
private MessageService messageService
and use it in a method like this
#RequestMapping(value = "messages", method = RequestMethod.GET)
public String getMessages(ModelMap modelMap) {
modelMap.addAttribute(MESSAGE, messageService.selectMessages());
return "messages";
}
So this is basically what I am trying to achieve: Inject User with constructor into UserClass. But it is throwing "No default constructor found" error. As I suspect if I add #Autowired to class User constructor it expects injection there so I'm not really sure where the problem is.
The question might be too basic so you can redirect me to older such questions. There is very little information on annotation based DI.
#Component
public class UserClass {
public User user;
#Autowired
public UserClass(User user) {
this.user = user;
}
}
#Configuration
public class DIconfig {
#Bean
public User getUser() {
return new User('John');
}
}
#Component
public class User {
public String name;
//#Autowired
public User(String name) {
this.name = name;
}
}
Thank you for your time.
You define two beans of the class User, one with #Component, and one with #Bean. The bean configuration with #Bean is fine so far, however the bean definition with #Component is indeed lacking the default constructor. Every bean which is defined with #Component must either have a default constructor or a constructor where all dependencies are autowired. Neither is the case with your bean. So either add a default constructor or remove the #Component and only create beans of that class with an #Bean method.