I am trying to implement an OAuth 2 sign up for an Angular 6, using gitLab Api. Its website has some code for getting the access token based on Ruby. I will be so glad if anyone lets me know how to get this access token.
OAtuth 2 for gitLab says that I can get the secret code and YOUR_UNIQUE_STATE_HASH. I managed to follow their instruction.
To get the access token, gitLab posted some Rubi [sic] code, which I could not understand and don't know how to implement in angular.
Here is the instruction:
Once you have the authorization code you can request an access_token using the code, to do that you can use any HTTP client. In the following example, we are using Ruby's rest-client:
parameters = 'client_id=APP_ID&client_secret=APP_SECRET&code=RETURNED_CODE&grant_type=authorization_code&redirect_uri=REDIRECT_URI'
RestClient.post 'http://gitlab.example.com/oauth/token', parameters
# The response will be
{
"access_token": "de6780bc506a0446309bd9362820ba8aed28aa506c71eedbe1c5c4f9dd350e54",
"token_type": "bearer",
"expires_in": 7200,
"refresh_token": "8257e65c97202ed1726cf9571600918f3bffb2544b26e00a61df9897668c33a1"
}
I would be so kind if somebody explains this code snippet.
The snippet is basically doing as denoted already. You need to generate the access token (or bearer token) using your client id and client secret with the code which was returned after successful user auth - this access token is basically the token which you will then further use on behalf of user to gitlab.
OAuth makes sure that the client code cannot be used by unauthorized attacker by making sure that you as a developer request it with your client id and client_secret.
RestClient.post 'http://gitlab.example.com/oauth/token', parameters will send that POST request and then Gitlab will return the response with access token and about it's expiry.
Related
Within my Laravel 9 (Jetstream) installation, I've createad an account (admin) and also created an API token for it directly from the user interface available by default. So the API has an account and an API token for it.
I am able to login to my (Laravel) API, using that token as a Bearer token method 'Authorization: Bearer '.
Everything fine for now, I can access protected routes of the API that are only available for logged-in users.
I've implemented this approach within my frontend app (SPA), which is on a different domain.
At a certain point in my frontend app, I need to communicate with my API, so I am doing a request to it using the same approach like I did in Postman. Basically, within my (axios) request, I am configuring the route to the api, and also the required header (Authorization: Bearer xxxx) to authorize the request using the Bearer token.
axios.post(
'url',
{
"body": data
},
{
headers: {
'Authorization': 'Bearer <my token>'
}
}
)
Now, my main problem is that this request (including the token) can be seen in Chrome Developer tools for example (or other request trackings tools)
How can I secure this in a easy and strong way?
For those who know more about Laravel, this way of authorization that comes from Jetrstream is Sanctum, and comes out of the box. I know there's another method of creating tokens, by making an initial request to the API using basic auth, and in response, I'll get a token that I should use for each request. But does that mean that it's more secure? In the end, that "fresh" token will be also visible to next requests, right? Even if it will be deleted on logout. If someone sees that token, he can easily make a request to my API using it and pretend to be a logged in user.
Is JWT a solution?
There must be something that I'm missing here. Any solutions are welcome
I am trying to get new access token from my refresh token for google drive api. In my google playground it works but when I want to create the same request in postman or my code it doesn't work and I always get error "Invalid grand type". I don't know to find what is problem.
google developers playground
postman headers and body
You need to understand that there is three steps to the Oauth2 dance.
step one is requesting access of the user and getting the authorization code.
HTTP GET https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/auth?client_id={clientid}.apps.googleusercontent.com&redirect_uri=urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob&scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/analytics.readonly&response_type=code
Note &response_type=code tells the server you want an authorization code returned.
step two is to exchange that code for an access token and refresh token.
POST https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token
code=4/X9lG6uWd8-MMJPElWggHZRzyFKtp.QubAT_P-GEwePvB8fYmgkJzntDnaiAI&client_id={ClientId}.apps.googleusercontent.com&client_secret={ClientSecret}&redirect_uri=urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob&grant_type=authorization_code
Note the part where it says &grant_type=authorization_code. this tells the server you are giving them an authorization code.
3 the final step is refreshing your access token.
POST https://accounts.google.com/o/oauth2/token
client_id={ClientId}.apps.googleusercontent.com&client_secret={ClientSecret}&refresh_token=1/ffYmfI0sjR54Ft9oupubLzrJhD1hZS5tWQcyAvNECCA&grant_type=refresh_token
Note &grant_type=refresh_token you are telling the server you are sending them a refresh token.
You appear to be sending a refresh token with the wrong grant type.
I have a video on how to set up postman to use google oauth2
How to set up Oauth2 in PostMan.
Google 3 Legged OAuth2 Flow
Note: Due to a recent change with Making Google OAuth interactions safer by using more secure OAuth flows redirect uri of urn:ietf:wg:oauth:2.0:oob is going to stop working soon.
I get now the Access Token from Lumen-API-JWT (Backend) but the question is how can i work with that in the laravel-8-Client (frontend) project
Any Idea ?
In generally when we working with HTTP API or call need to authentication the user, Server will return the Access Token (JWT or whatever). Every API Request you need to bind that access token along with the header. Ex. Authorization: Bearer {{access_token}}.
When you fail to bind the access token server will return unauthenticated HTTP status code with the relevant message.
Please refer below links,
https://www.loginradius.com/blog/async/everything-you-want-to-know-about-authorization-headers
So I'm trying to use the Home Graph API by calling the API endpoint
https://homegraph.googleapis.com/v1/devices:requestSync
It is a HTTP POST request and it needs an ACCESS_TOKEN and service account key.
Getting the service account key is easily done as per Google's documentation. The issue is getting the ACCESS_TOKEN.
As per this documentation by Google, I need to get ACCESS_TOKEN created using the following scope of permissions
https://www.googleapis.com/auth/homegraph
I opened OAuth 2.0 Playground to request a developer temporary ACCESS_TOKEN for testing. I wrote all the necessary urls and in scope I wrote this-
scope is written to be authorized
Now after this, I am navigated to my Authorization URL (ie, Google's sign in page). I login with email id and password.
If credentials are correct and scope mentioned is valid then I should have been redirected to OAuth playground page with authorization code which I would have exchanged for access token and refresh token.
But, what actually happens is after I enter my credentials, I get following error and I am never redirected to Oauth Playground page-
Authorization Error
Error 400: invalid_scope
Some requested scopes cannot be shown: [https://www.googleapis.com/auth/homegraph]
Request Details
access_type=offline
o2v=2
response_type=code
redirect_uri=https://developers.google.com/oauthplayground
prompt=consent
client_id=xxxxxxxxx.apps.googleusercontent.com
scope=https://www.googleapis.com/auth/homegraph**
I searched a lot online too, but couldn't find the actual reason.
So due to this issue with scope, I am not able to get ACCESS_TOKEN.
I have followed Google's documentation and the scope was mentioned there.
This is the pic from oauth 2.0 playground settings- OAuth 2.0 configuration
The issue is that you, a user, should not be getting and sending an access token. The service account should be getting and sending an access token. This is to make sure your service is authorized to talk to the Home Graph API.
You indicated you logged into the OAuth playground with "userid and password". But service accounts don't have passwords.
If you are using one of Google's libraries, it will take care of getting the access token for you, and this is the easiest way to do so. If you are just testing and need an access token, you can use something like oauth2l to get the access token based on the service account credentials.
I had implemented the REST approach to call HomeGraph Report State as below.
We need to follow the below steps:
Create a service account for your project and safely store the json file
Using the service account JSON, get the access token from Google
Using Oauth 2.0 token as Bearer authorization, invoke Report State API
Step 1:
This is straightforward. Please follow the steps in the below link
https://developers.google.com/assistant/smarthome/develop/report-state#expandable-1
Step 2:
Refer below code to get the Access token using service account json
GoogleCredentials credentials = GoogleCredentials
.fromStream(Helper.class.getClassLoader().getResourceAsStream("smart-home-key.json"))
.createScoped("https://www.googleapis.com/auth/homegraph");
credentials.refreshIfExpired();
AccessToken token = credentials.getAccessToken();
return token.getTokenValue();
Step 3:
Invoke Report State API
curl -X POST -H "Authorization: Bearer [[Access token from Step 2]]"
-H "Content-Type: application/json"
-d #request-body.json
"https://homegraph.googleapis.com/v1/devices:reportStateAndNotification"
Reference Links :
https://developers.google.com/assistant/smarthome/develop/report-state#http-post
https://cloud.google.com/endpoints/docs/openapi/service-account-authentication
https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/oauth2/service-account#httprest_1
https://developers.google.com/assistant/smarthome/develop/report-state#expandable-1
I have read the page on implementing OAuth that Twitter have written. I've registered my app, it will only access my account, so I skip all the request token stuff. I have, from the "Your apps" page:
consumer token
consumer token secret
access token
access token secret
I write some ruby code and test its output against Beginner’s Guide to OAuth (suggested reading in the Twitter docs). I get the same output, i.e. the signature, the base string and the Authorization headers are identical.
However, when I connect to the Twitter Rest API and try the verify credentials command the response is invariably "Incorrect signature".
I try using different code (very similar to mine) from a gist by erikeldridge on github but it doesn't work either. Instead of connecting via cURL (using the curb library) I use Net/Http - same error response is returned.
I change over to using the OAuth gem. It uses Net/Http to connect. Same error response comes back.
Verify credentials isn't the only command I've tried to use in the API, but they all give the same error, whether it's GET or POST, requires extra params or not. I've been using the Search API successfully using the curb library without problems so I don't think it's the connection method.
What might I do to fix this?
Ruby 1.9.2; cURL 7.21.2; oauth 0.4.4; curb 0.7.8; json 1.4.6; OSX 10.6.5;
Even though your application is only accessing your data, you can't simply 'skip the request token stuff'. The request token is integral to the OAuthentication process.
Summarised, the 3 main parts of the OAuth process are as follows:
Get Request Token Key and Request Token Secret
Use Request Token to authorise application to access your data. This will provided the user(you) with a PIN
Use the PIN to exchange the Request Token and Secret for an Access Token and Secret.
A more detailed OAuthentication flow can be found here.
It's fixed - I regenerated the Consumer key and secret on the Twitter site and it started working. I've no idea why the previous set didn't work - the code was solid (works all the time now) and the details were correct. Perhaps they (Twitter) could provide more detailed error messages? But I'm happy :)