I have a REST framework app for a multi-page form:
class InformationRequest(models.Model):
# user information
first_name = models.CharField(max_length=60)
last_name = models.CharField(max_length=60)
# contact details
phone = models.CharField(max_length=60)
email = models.CharField(max_length=60)
I'm trying to create endpoints for each of the two blocks of data within the model:
UserInformationSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
first_name = serializers.CharField(max_length=60)
last_name = serializers.CharField(max_length=60)
ContactDetailsSerializer(serializers.Serializer):
phone = serializers.CharField(max_length=60)
email = serializers.CharField(max_length=60)
I'd like the endpoints to look like:
requests/1/user-informtion
requests/1/contact-details
But I'm unsure of how to structure the view to achieve this. Currently I'm using a model viewset:
class InformationRequestViewSet(viewsets.ModelViewSet):
queryset = InformationRequest.objects.all()
serializer_class = ??
Is it possible to have two serializers for one model?
It's certainly possible to have 2 (or any number of) serializers for a model. And you are on the right path. What you want is different urls mapping to different views. So in your case, it can be something like the following:
Note that I turned each of your serializers into a ModelSerializer.
path-to/serializers.py
class UserInformationSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = InformationRequest
fields = ('first_name', 'last_name')
class ContactDetailsSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = InformationRequest
fields = ('phone', 'email')
Next, we have 2 different urls that point to 2 different views:
path-to/urls.py
urlpatterns = [
url(r'^requests/(?P<pk>\d+)/user-information/$', views.UserInformationDetail.as_view()),
url(r'^requests/(?P<pk>\d+)/contact-details/$', views.ContactInformationDetail.as_view()),
# ... other urls
]
And finally, the views themselves (I'm using generic RetrieveAPIView for convenience)
path-to/views.py
class UserInformationDetail(generics.RetrieveAPIView):
queryset = InformationRequest.objects.all()
serializer_class = UserInformationSerializer
class ContactInformationDetail(generics.RetrieveAPIView):
queryset = InformationRequest.objects.all()
serializer_class = ContactDetailsSerializer
Related
In my Django Rest Framework project, I have a ForeignKey relationship between two models:
class Book(models.Model):
...
category = models.ForeignKey(Category, on_delete=models.CASCADE, blank=True, null=True)
...
class Category(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=100, blank=False)
As you can see, a Book can belong to a Category but it does not have to. That means the 'category' field could be null.
So, in my views.py, any Book instance can be updated/patched if the user wants to assign a certain Book to a particular Category. That views.py update method looks like this:
class UpdateBooksCategory(generics.GenericAPIView):
'''
Class-based view to update the 'category' field of a Book instance.
'''
serializer_class = BookSerializer
permission_classes = [IsAuthenticated]
def patch(self, request,*args, **kwargs):
# get the Book instance first
book = Book.objects.get(pk=request.data.get('bookId'))
# if it is not assigned to a Category, then assign it
if book and not book.category:
book.category = Category.objects.get(name=request.data.get('categoryName'))
book.save()
serializer = self.get_serializer(book, context={"request": request})
return Response(serializer.data)
# otherwise, return a generic response
return Response({'response': "You have already put the selected Book in a Category."})
If you can see, first I get the Book instance that the user wants to update by using the Book's ID. If its Category field is not already filled, I get a Category instance using the given category name and assign it.
For the sake of completeness, here are my serializer classes:
class CategorySerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Category
fields = ['id', 'name']
class BookSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Book
fields = ['id', /*some other fields*/,..., 'category']
So, finally my question: I wanted to know if this is the preferred way of updating a ForeingKey field like this? I mean looking at the UpdateBooksCategory class-based view, is this the right way of doing it? The code works ( I tested it with PostMan) but since I am new to DRF I wanted to know if such an updating process is correct.
You can change your BookSerializer:
class BookSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
category_id = serializers.IntegerField(write_only=True)
category = CategorySerializer(read_only=True)
class Meta:
model = Book
fields = [
'id',
# some other fields,
'category',
'category_id',
]
category will be a nested data that is read only, then setting the category will be by including the category_id in your requests.
I am making a POST api using DRF. In that api, I need only few fields(name, size, customer_name, customer_address), but don't require this fields(status, ordered_time) because these fields I want to save these fields in run time as status='open' and ordered_time=DateTimeField.now()
views.py
class PizzaOrderCustomerView(APIView):
def post(self, request):
orders = request.data.get('orders')
# Create an article from the above data
serializer = ArticleSerializer(data=orders)
if serializer.is_valid(raise_exception=True):
article_saved = serializer.save()
return Response({"success": "Article '{}' created successfully".format(article_saved.name)})
models.py
class PizzaOrder(models.Model):
name = models.CharField(max_length=120)
size = models.CharField(max_length=10, choices=SIZE_CHOICE, default='MEDIUM')
customer_name = models.CharField(max_length=120)
customer_address = models.TextField()
ordered_time = models.DateTimeField(default=timezone.now, editable=False)
status = models.CharField(max_length=20, default='open', editable=False)
serializers.py
class OrderSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = PizzaOrder
# fields = '__all__'
read_only_fields = ('status',)
But when I try to create an order, it needed status and ordered_time also. But it should save at the time of creating order automatically.
Suggest a good way to do it.
from rest_framework import viewsets, mixins
class PizzaViewsets(viewsets.ViewSet, mixins.CreateModelMixin):
model = PizzaOrder
serializer_class = OrderSerializer
queryset = model.objects.all(
serializer, it is always good practise to mention all fields instead of
all
class OrderSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = PizzaOrder
fields = ('status','ordered_time','name', 'size', 'customer_name', 'customer_address',)
read_only_fields = ('status','ordered_time',)
I am trying to use Django with mongoengine to make an API.
So far I can get the objects and delete them. but when I want to post some data. Lets say student + course it is giving an error:
type object 'Course' has no attribute 'objects'
Models en ..
#Model.py
class Course(EmbeddedDocument):
course_name = StringField(max_length=200)
course_fee = StringField(max_length=200)
class Student(Document):
student_name = StringField(max_length=200)
student_contactperson = StringField(max_length=200)
student_adress = StringField(max_length=200)
courses = ListField(EmbeddedDocumentField(Course))
#Serializers.py
class CourseSerializer(EmbeddedDocumentSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Course
fields = ('course_name','course_fee')
class StudentSerializer(DocumentSerializer):
courses = CourseSerializer(many=True)
class Meta:
model = Student
fields = ('student_name','student_contactperson','student_adress','courses')
depth = 2
def create(self, validated_data):
course_data = validated_data.pop('courses')
student = Student.objects.create(**validated_data)
Course.objects.create(student=student, **course_data)
return student
#Views.py
class StudentViewSet(meviewsets.ModelViewSet):
lookup_field = 'name'
queryset = Student.objects.all().order_by('-date_joined')
serializer_class = StudentSerializer
A Document represents a MongoDB document (i.e a record in a collection), a Document class is bound to a particular collection. An EmbeddedDocument represents a structure that gets nested in a Document.
So by design an EmbeddedDocument isn't attached to any collection unless you embed it inside a Document.
This means that you can't query or save an EmbeddedDocument class, you need to query/save the parent Document.
Document.objects is an entry point for querying a collection, it only exists on Document classes. You are calling Course.objects.create but Course is an EmbeddedDocument.
I believe you need to change your code to the following
class StudentSerializer(DocumentSerializer):
...
def create(self, validated_data):
course_data = validated_data.pop('courses')
course = Course(**course_data) # assuming course_data is {course_name: ..., course_fee: ...}
return Student.objects.create(courses=[course], **validated_data)
i use django filter backend
I define multiple columns in a search field, as follows:
class tableViewSet(ModelViewSet):
"""
A simple ViewSet for viewing and editing accounts.
"""
queryset = table.objects.all()
serializer_class = WebSerializer
pagination_class = StandardResultsSetPagination
filter_backends = (DjangoFilterBackend,SearchFilter)
search_fields = ('name','family','tel',)
i want to make an api that handle some query like this:
select * from table1 where name like ('tom') and family like ('%anderson%') and tel like ('%0223654%')
Is there any way to specify the column name in the API?
For example:
http://127.0.0.1/api-user/table/search?name=tom&family=andeson&tel=0223455
You should rather use DjangoFilterBackend instead of SearchFilter if you want to filter per specific attribute.
As you are not looking for exact search, you will have to create a FilterSet and use filter_class in you view.
Something like:
class TableFilter(django_filters.FilterSet):
name = django_filters.CharFilter(name='name', lookup_expr='icontains')
family = django_filters.CharFilter(name='family', lookup_expr='icontains')
tel = django_filters.CharFilter(name='tel', lookup_expr='icontains')
class Meta:
model = table
fields = ['name', 'family', 'tel']
class tableViewSet(ModelViewSet):
"""
A simple ViewSet for viewing and editing accounts.
"""
queryset = table.objects.all()
serializer_class = WebSerializer
pagination_class = StandardResultsSetPagination
filter_backends = (DjangoFilterBackend,SearchFilter)
filter_class = TableFilter
Specifying the field in the query string is unnecessary. The following request should work:
http://127.0.0.1/api-user/table?search=something
relevant docs
I think this is simple and probably a duplicate, but I cannot figure it out by looking at the documentation.
I have Django models as follows:
class Image(models.Model):
manor = models.ForeignKey(Manor, related_name='image_for_manor')
filename = models.CharField(max_length=30, null=True, blank=True)
class Manor(models.Model):
id = models.IntegerField(primary_key=True)
I want the user to be able to query the Manor and see the related Image. I'd like this JSON to be returned:
{
id: 572,
image: 'my/filepath.png'
}
This is my view:
#api_view(['GET'])
def manor(request, id):
mymanor = Manor.objects.get(id=id)
serializer = ManorSerializer(mymanor)
return JSONResponse(serializer.data)
And these are my serializers:
class ImageFilePathSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Image
fields = ('filename',)
class ManorSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
image = ImageFilePathSerializer(source="image_for_manor")
class Meta:
model = Manor
fields = ('id', 'image')
But this doesn't work: I get an empty dictionary for image. (Even if it weren't empty, I realise it wouldn't be right, because I don't want the image property to be a dictionary: I want it to be a string.)
How can I change this to be correct? I cannot work it out.
As Kevin suggested , why dont you use ImageField which will give you url where your image is uploaded. although if you dont want to do that , here are some changes you have to do to get the result format you wanted.(Following solution assumes that only one image will be for one minor)
views.py ( why dont you ImageFilePathSerializer instead of another one as it also contains all the data you wanted)
#api_view(['GET'])
def manor(request, id):
mymanor = Image.objects.get(manor__id=id)
serializer = ImageFilePathSerializer(mymanor)
return Response(serializer.data)
serializers.py (add Id with filename in ImageFilePathSerializer)
class ImageFilePathSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
class Meta:
model = Image
fields = ('id', 'filename',)
class ManorSerializer(serializers.ModelSerializer):
filename = serializers.ImageField(source="image_for_manor")
class Meta:
model = Manor
fields = ('id', 'filename')