I'm trying to use multiple filters on a background-image
body {
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/200/300?image=0');
filter: grayscale(50%) blur(3px) brightness(10%);
}
it ignores the rule I've put in ...can't even do 1 at a time...can I not use filters on background images?
The filter is working fine but the background image is no more inside the body. Here you are facing a special background behavior that propagate the value of background from the body to the canvas AND it's removed from the body. In other words, your background is moved to an upper element and the filter is kept on the body.
To notice this, simply apply a background to the html element and you will disable the propagation effect thus the filter will work as expected:
body {
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/200/300?image=0');
filter: grayscale(50%) blur(3px) brightness(10%);
height:200px; /*you need a height to see the image !*/
}
html {
background:red;
}
By the way, it's not a good solution to apply filter to whole body as it will also affect the content. If you want to filter only the image better consider a pseudo element that will be your background layer and where you can apply the filer without affecting the content:
body {
position:relative;
z-index:0;
height:200px; /*you need a height to see the image !*/
}
body:before {
content:"";
position:absolute;
z-index:-1;
top:0;
left:0;
right:0;
bottom:0;
background-image: url('https://picsum.photos/200/300?image=0');
filter: grayscale(50%) blur(3px) brightness(10%);
}
You can use filter property on background-image
body {
height: 100vh;
padding: 0;
display: grid;
align-content: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.module {
width: 300px;
height: 300px;
display: grid;
place-items: center;
color: #ff43ea;
position: relative;
}
.module::before {
content: "";
top: 0;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
background-image: url(https://images.unsplash.com/photo-1494645009625-cc17363a5f20?ixlib=rb-0.3.5&q=80&fm=jpg&crop=entropy&cs=tinysrgb&w=400&fit=max&ixid=eyJhcHBfaWQiOjE0NTg5fQ&s=bd502af39c922553e5a13624d4f44f40);
background-size: cover;
filter: grayscale(100%);
}
.module-inside {
position: relative;
font: bold 42px sans-serif;
}
<div class="module">
<div class="module-inside">
Module
</div>
</div>
Related
So I was experimenting with css filter, the experiment worked quite well but not in Firefox.
I wanted to apply a filter onto a segment of the background image. The idea was to fix the background image of the wrapper and the inner elements to create the illusion that the filter is applying only to a certain area and can be moved, here with scrolling.
This is what I tried:
html,
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
body {
margin: 0px;
height: 200%;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-around;
align-items: center;
flex-direction: column
}
body,
div {
background-image: url("https://i.imgur.com/wu7EkAX.jpg");
background-attachment: fixed;
}
div {
filter: saturate(0%);
width: 50%;
height: 40%;
}
<div></div>
<div></div>
This works quite well with Chrome (and I think also in other browsers) but not with Firefox. It seems like it is a result of some optimization which misbehaves.
If you scroll with your mousewheele and then click, it refreshes, otherwise it stays in this state (at least if you run it standalone).
The "solution" is quite simple, you force Firefox to re render, there are whole posts about this topic but here are two of my approaches:
With a css animation
#keyframes renderFix {
from {
outline-color: red;
}
to {
outline-color: blue;
}
}
html {
outline: 1px solid red;
animation: 1s infinite alternate renderFix;
}
With some JavaScript
{
let html, s = false,
cycle = function () {
html.style.outlineColor = s ? "red" : "blue"
s = !s;
window.requestAnimationFrame(cycle)
}
window.requestAnimationFrame(function () {
html = document.body.parentElement
html.style.outlineStyle = "solid";
html.style.outlineWidth = "1px";
cycle()
})
}
The JavaScript fix applied:
{
let html, s = false,
cycle = function () {
html.style.outlineColor = s ? "red" : "blue"
s = !s;
window.requestAnimationFrame(cycle)
}
window.requestAnimationFrame(function () {
html = document.body.parentElement
html.style.outlineStyle = "solid";
html.style.outlineWidth = "1px";
cycle()
})
}
html,
body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
body {
margin: 0px;
height: 200%;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-around;
align-items: center;
flex-direction: column
}
body,
div {
background-image: url("https://i.imgur.com/wu7EkAX.jpg");
background-attachment: fixed;
}
div {
filter: saturate(0%);
width: 50%;
height: 40%;
}
<div></div>
<div></div>
I would like to achieve what i wrote in the title, simultaneously.
What i have is a div that is width:100% (container) and contains 4 images inside of a div, 25% each (grid), with a description layer inside (on) it - called desc, for the overall dimensions, and span, for the mere text.
Here is the CSS:
.grid-container {
width: 85%;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
}
.grid {
width: 25%;
float: left;
position: relative;
}
.grid img {
border-radius: 50%;
transition: .4s -webkit-filter linear;
-webkit-transition: background .5s ease 50ms;
transition: background .5s ease 50ms;
}
.grid img:hover {
filter: url(filters.svg#grayscale);
/* Firefox 3.5+ */
filter: gray;
/* IE6-9 */
-webkit-filter: grayscale(1);
/* Google Chrome & Safari 6+ */
background: rgba(168, 202, 217, .6)
}
.desc {
display: block;
position: absolute;
left: 26%;
width: 87%;
height: 100%;
top: 0%;
left: 0%;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.desc:hover {
background: rgba(168, 202, 217, .6)
}
.desc span {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
text-align: center;
margin-top: 37%;
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
font-size: 16px;
opacity: 0;
-webkit-transition: opacity .5s ease 50ms;
transition: opacity .5s ease 50ms;
color: #fff !important;
}
.desc span:hover {
opacity: 1;
}
So, what i want to achieve is to make the image go grayscale when hovered, while making the description visible. Description has a background color aswell (can i apply that to the image instead, along with the greyscale filter?)
The problem is that the description this way occupies the whole image, so the hover would be considered by the description only and not the image.
Any clues on how i can achieve what i want? Thanks for your attentio
Best regards
Simple, put both elements in the same container. For example,
.grid:hover img {
filter: url(filters.svg#grayscale);
}
.grid:hover .desc span {
opacity: 1;
}
If your description is an immediate following sibling of the image, you can use the immediate following-sibling selector:
.grid img:hover + .descr{display: block; background: whatever;}
(selects the element with the class="descr" once the mouse hovers over the image)
HTML structure for this to work:
<div>
<img>
<p class="descr">
</div>
I am starting mobile first and adding css as the viewport gets larger, but i've run into an issue with a certain image scaling issue and i can't seem to make sense of it.
I'm using Sass to begin with.
#media 320 i include all my styles for a certain block of content on the page of which I have an image within this block and here is the CSS for this media query:
section.catalog-grid {
position: relative;
height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
.cat-dvdr {
#include btm-brdr;
padding: 20px 0;
}
h4.catalog-title {
font-weight: normal;
font-size: 1.5em;
color: $blue;
top: 0;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
text-align: center;
}
h6 {
font-weight: normal;
font-size: 1em;
color: $pale-grey;
padding: 0 10%;
margin: 0;
text-align: center;
}
img.cat-img {
#include center;
}
img.rocket {
width: 40%;
margin-top: 30px;
}
img.wizard {
width: 50%;
margin-top: 10%;
margin-bottom: 10%;
}
img.order {
width: 60%;
margin-top: 10%;
margin-bottom: 10%;
}
#media min-width 568px I actually wanted the image to be a smaller percentage scale and here's my Sass that i added to this media query:
img.rocket {
width: 30%;
margin-top: 30px;
}
img.wizard {
width: 40%;
margin-top: 10%;
margin-bottom: 10%;
}
img.order {
width: 50%;
margin-top: 10%;
margin-bottom: 10%;
}
My thinking behind this is that since i'm only adding styles that are changing as the viewport gets larger i don't have to add all of the Sass for this block (as i did at the 320px media query) but rather just add the rules that I want changed.
However what is happening is that the 320px media query image percentage size is overriding my 568px media query percentage image size when the viewport is at 568px and i'm not sure why.
Attached is a screenshot of what is going on in DevTools and i suspect that the reason that the 320px style is overriding the 568px style is due to more specificity since it notes all the parent elements of this particular image.
However i've attempted to remove the specificity from the 320px file so that the only rules that i want to be affected on the 320px file would be. In other words not include the entire block and its children but only the classes i want adjusted at this specific viewport size and that didn't work either.
Does this make sense?
Here is the screenshot:
In the 568px query, the image is targeted as:
img.rocket { ... }
In the 320px query, it's:
section.catalog-grid img.rocket { ... }
Since you have the additional specificity on the 320px rule, it will always override the less-specific rule no matter where it is located in the style sheet. You'll either need to match that specificity in your 568px rule, or reduce the specificity of the 320px rule.
In your sass, it looks like you have image.rocket contained inside the section.catalog-grid block:
section.catalog-grid {
...
img.rocket { ... }
}
That creates the compiled rule you're seeing.
Example site
I have a site divided into your usual vertical sections. Header and footer both contain backgrounds with background-attachment: fixed. I have a slide-out nav, which you can see is activated on the first link. Everything works dandy except...
Issue:
Safari 6 (I'm not sure about 5.1, but it seems to be on Mac as my Windows Safari doesn't have the issue) has a nasty flicker upon animation. This can be resolved with the usual -webkit-backface hack HOWEVER upon using this, a new problem arises. The fixed background images start behaving very badly, and if you scroll/resize the browser enough, the images get distorted or content overlays improperly. Is there an alternative method I can use for this technique, or an actual fix?
HTML
<section>Hi CLICKME</section>
<section>hi</section>
<section>hi</section>
<section>hi</section>
<footer><p>I am some text</p></footer>
<aside class="menu">
I'm a menu.
</aside>
CSS
body {
background: #222;
transition: all 0.3s;
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
}
body.bump {
transform: translate(-258px, 0);
}
section {
background: #CBA;
color: white;
line-height: 450px;
font-size: 32px;
height: 500px;
position: relative;
text-align: center;
text-shadow: 1px 1px 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.3);
z-index: 1;
}
section:nth-child(2) {
background: #FAFAFA;
}
section:nth-child(3) {
background: #CCC;
}
section:nth-child(4) {
background: #ABC;
}
section:first-child {
background: url(http://placekitten.com/1600/500) center top;
background-attachment: fixed;
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
}
#media all and (min-width: 73.75em) {
section:first-child {
background-size: cover;
}
}
footer {
background: url(http://placekitten.com/1400/500) center top;
background-attachment: fixed;
color: white;
font-size: 32px;
height: 500px;
}
#media all and (min-width: 73.75em) {
footer {
background-size: cover;
}
}
footer p {
position: fixed;
bottom: 200px;
left: 0;
text-align: center;
width: 100%;
}
aside.menu {
background: #222;
color: #FFF;
height: 100%;
padding-top: 30px;
position: fixed;
top: 0;
right: 0;
text-align: left;
transform: translate(516px, 0);
transition: all 0.3s;
width: 258px;
-webkit-backface-visibility: hidden;
}
.bump aside.menu {
transform: translate(258px, 0);
}
JS (using Jquery)
$('section a').click( function(e) {
$('body').toggleClass('bump');
});
I did a workaround, by applying the fixed background to the body, wrapping everything in body in another div (animating that instead, so it wasn't affecting the body background) and the footer stayed the same, since having scrolled that far there is no way to pop the sidebar out anyway (so no animation flicker to worry about).
I'm trying to make a centered, 100% high layout that has NO FIXED width (argh). Everything seems to be ok with the solution below, apart from the img that I need to scale to height: 100%, that doesn't scale inside table-cell (outside of the div everything's ok).
EDIT: I am able to set fixed height like 100px or so, both in css and tag. Why doesn't this work with %?
<div id="center">
<div id="tcontainer">
<div id="tleft">a</div>
<div id="tright"><img id="bgright" src="images/bgright1.jpg" height="100px" /></div>
</div>
</div>
And styles:
html,body {
margin:0;
padding:0;
height:100%; /* needed for container min-height */
font-family:arial,sans-serif;
font-size:small;
color:#666;
}
#bgrepeat { /* unnecessary ATM */
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 0;
}
#bgright { /* HERE THE PROBLEM */
height: 100%;
}
img { border: 0; /*float: left;*/ }
#center {
text-align: center;
height: 100%;
}
#tcontainer {
text-align: left; /* POTRZEBNE ? */
background: red;
height: 100%;
display: table;
margin: 0 auto;
}
#tleft {
display: table-cell;
}
#tright {
background: pink;
display: table-cell;
}
OK, so the problem has been baldy formulated. I've had just forgotten to pass "height: 100%" in consecutive children. It didn't have anything to do with display: table nor images.