I have a lot of FlexLayout element in my template and it is so slow on iOS devices.
i replaced that with StackLayout and now it became little fast than before.
I'd like to know which Layout Container is fastest layout in Nativescript.
There is never one right solution for all various needs, which is why we always have options and that applies to layouts in {N} too.
Learn more about layouts interactively at nslayouts.com and choose the one that suits your use case.
If you show use what exactly you are trying to achieve, we may able to give you some suggestion. There are some general guidelines you may have to follow for better performance,
Avoid nested layouts
Use GridLayout when you need known number of partitions in your UI, the less the number of partitions are, the better the performance would be. Use FlexboxLayout otherwise.
If you just want to stack items in vertical or horizontal order, StackLayout may be a good option. Use FlexboxLayout only when you want to use flex box specific features, like when items has to be wrapped to next line, change order of items etc.,
Try to not use StackLayouts just for the shake of borders around, since you can add border to the component itself.
If you have really complicated heavy UI components, you may load it once the page has completed navigation, that may be faster.
Prefer ListView over Repeater / for loop as much as possible.
By following the above at least I can confirm, I don't hit performance issues in my apps where I have 100s of elements and 10s of partitions on screen. If you still face issues, try creating a Playground example where we can see the issue.
I noticed this same thing with FlexboxLayouts on IOS where I was doing animations with the layouts. It worked great on Android, but was very slow on IOS. I switched it to a GridLayout, and things worked a lot better.
Related
I'm allowing users to select an icon from the full list of FontAwesome icons (using a List<ImageVector>). I'm going to open a dialog, and show the icons as IconButtons arranged in the list. There are ~1600 icons.
I implemented it using a LazyVerticalGrid, with a fixed number of columns. It works, but there's some lag loading the icons, and lag when scrolling the icons.
I'm converting this from a React Native project where I did the same thing (with a larger set of icons, actually) and scrolling that was pretty snappy, so I'm assuming it's possible to do performantly on native. Perhaps ImageVectors are heavier than the SVGs I was using in React Native?
I'm planning to provide a search box in the dialog where users can filter the list down by doing a fuzzy search on icon names, so the grid will change over time.
What sort of patterns should I be looking at here? Is LazyVerticalGrid the way to go, or should I be using a different approach entirely?
On Laziness
For an overview of use cases and appliable patterns you might be interested in the Android Dev Docs' page on Lists and Grids, încluding the topics Large data-sets (Paging) and the Tips on using Lazy layout.
This might wake your interest on the Android Jetpack Paging Library androidx.paging, which is designed for loading and displaying pages from large datasets, basically uniting the concepts of Laziness and Caching.
Currently you're only using Laziness. As Bartek Lipinski commented, that should usually be fine when the graphics to display are static. However, when they have to be loaded asynchronously, Paging will probably improve your performance.
Some Rules of Thumb
Scrolling
Pattern
No
Column or Row will be enough
Some
Column or Row with modifiers verticalScroll and horizontalScroll
More, static content
LazyColumn or LazyRow, resp. for gridding LazyVerticalGrid or LazyHorizontalGrid
More to mass, dynamic content
LazyColumn or one of its relatives with LazyPagingItems, so using the Paging Library androidx.paging
Also, as the docs say, consider adding contentType
. However, as Bartek Lipinski remarked, one usually benefits of contentType when there are scrollable elements of various types -- not only SVGs as maybe in your case. Still, giving hints to the system doesn't hurt, at least.
On Vector Graphics
As discussed in the comments, esp. by Subfly and Bartek Lipinski, though Laziness should be the main thing here, another bottleneck could be the loading of vector graphics during runtime.
If the graphics used are of static nature, then consider the usage of vector graphic assets. Those are supported for SVG and PSD since Android 5.0 (API level 21). Take also a look on the recommendations and some aspects of support and restrictions on SVG.
Summary
The basic formula is Laziness + Vector Assets with focus on the first. One might spice that with contentType and Paging.
I have a custom ListCell implementation, shown in the picture below.
The left side, which represents the date, consisting of 3 labels, put in a VBox and the "CounterContent" consisting of the counter, with a TextField for each digit, contained in a HBox, and two Hboxes containing labels for kWh, kWh/day and so on. And that seem to be just too much, to be running performantly.
I've tried to load the data in a background task, showing a progress indicator, while the task is running, but unlike on desktop, on android the performance is very poor. Whenever I switch to the listview, the garbage collection kicks in, and blocks the ui thread, so that the progress indicator never shows up.
I've tried it on a Huawei Y-300, Android 4.1.1, javafxports 8.60.6 (because javafxports 8.60.7 causes a bug, that makes TextField unusable), and on a Samsung S5 mini, Android 5+. On the Samsung phone the performance in general is way better, just like expected, because of the Ahead-of-Time compilation I guess, but there is still the garbage collection issue. Furthermore after the listview has been populated with cells, the scrolling is not very smooth.
Is the listcell to complex or what else could be the matter for the poor performance?
UPDATE:
After running a lot of tests it seems the unsmooth scrolling is not caused by performance problems. At least on the S5 (javafxports 8.60.7).
I removed all css styling, and replaced the textfields by a single label (the counter node is already a custom control(forgot about that), which lays out the textfields in 2 Regions(not HBoxes) and the nodes of the ListCell are instantiated in the constructor). Furthermore I switched the ListView for a CharmListView and set android.monocle.input.touchRadius=1.
None of these steps resulted in considerable improvement.
Just to clarify: In contrast to the Huawei phone, the scrolling on the S5 and android 5+ is usable, but it's not very smooth, which makes for a unsatisfactory user experience.
On the Huawei (javafxports 8.60.6), changing the counter textfields for a label, gave a significant improvement, but not to the point where the scrolling became usable. Until I set this magical experimental switch: gluon.experimental.performance=true, which makes the listview scrolling lightning fast(after a little warmup delay), but still not really smooth.
There are many reasons why the performance of a complex scene is reduced, so this is just a list of possible ideas that might help improving it, in any order.
ListCell
For starters, the number of nodes in the cell is really high. Notice that every single scroll you make means the full rendering of the virtual flow that holds the visible cells. And for every cell, that means recreating its content all over again.
Without viewing your code I can't tell, but you should avoid creating new instances of every node in the cell all the time, by having just one single instance, and in the updateItem method only change the content of the nodes.
Have a look at this sample. The NoteCell class is a custom cell, where a ListTile is used.
Number of nodes
Have you tried using just a Label to replace the 8 textfields and 3 boxes?
Cache
If you use images downloaded from Internet, use Gluon Charm Down Cache to avoid the same image being downloaded over and over again.
Have a look at this sample. Without the cache, even on desktop the performance is really affected.
Also use the JavaFX built-in cache for any node, trying different cache strategies.
CSS
Complex CSS requires long CPU time. Try to simplify it. Even you can remove the whole CSS for a quick test. Then decide what you may or may not use.
The same goes for animations: Avoid animations, transitions or even CSS effects, if possible.
Custom Control
The counter complex node could probably be replaced by a custom control that optimizes the rendering.
CharmListView
Have you tried using the Gluon Charm CharmListView control instead of the ListView?
There's a new experimental flag that you can use to test a possible optimization that might improve performance while scrolling the list. Set gluon.experimental.performance=true on the java.custom.properties file, and give it a try.
JavaFXPorts version
You mentioned you are using 8.60.6 because of the TextField bug. In this case, are your TextField nodes editable? If not, I'd suggest replacing them with other nodes and running with 8.60.7, since it contains a lot of performance improvements.
Performance tools
Use performance tools like Monitor and use its profiling options so you can trace down any possible bottle neck.
CPU
Last but not least: your mobile device specs are always critical.
Trying to render a complex scene on a Cortex A5, given that "it is the smallest, lowest cost and lowest power ARMv7 application processor", or using a very old Android 4.1.1, can't perform as well as running it on a brand new device with higher specs.
As you also mentioned, running on a Cortex A7 performs "way better". Have a look at this comparison, and find the right architecture for the job.
Anyway, there's always room for improvement, and a lot of effort is put into it. Your feedback is always welcome.
I'm analyzing my approach with Gmail's android developer's team approach in order to optimize drawing times and generally create more efficient apps.
My approach:
Below is the hierarchy inside a listview. It's quite straightforward. ExpandableListContentItem extends a Relative layout which has 3 Views:
Gmail app:
The following screenshot is how the listview in Gmail app works (SwipableListView). It's interesting to see that there is only one View (I guess aY extends ConvertationItemView) which in reality is quite more complicated than mine (I see 3 texts, 1 photo, 1 icon/button).
Question:
I would assume that this is a more lightweight approach to get rendered, is it so? Even if it takes me more time to code an optimal single customview per listview item it is worth the performance that it offers?
Finally the only way I know so far is to inflate an existing view inside another which is basically the first approach. I guess now my challenge would be to combine that relativeLayout with the 3 nested views into one. Is that correct?
PS:examples, open source code are welcome.
I would assume that this is a more lightweight approach to get rendered, is it so?
Yes it is. When you consider hierarchy, every parent measures their dimensions and passes it to child views from top to bottom. Reducing layers and having more flat view will save time.
Even if it takes me more time to code an optimal single customview per listview item it is worth the performance that it offers?
Depends on application you are developing. Depends on number of items in a list and how you get them. When you scroll through the list, if you think it is slow you might want to try that approach. I tried it on my previous applications and I could see the difference.
I guess now my challenge would be to combine that relativeLayout with the 3 nested views into one.
I don't know what you mean by combining them but the way Gmail does it that they have their Custom View. You can create your custom view.
Besides that, another thing to consider is overdraw. It is as important as having flat views. If you activate GPU Overdraw from developer tools and look at Gmail app row, you will see 0 overdraw. Make sure your code has no overdraw.
For further reading I would recommend you to check these blogs :
Performance Tuning On Android
Android Performance Case Study
What are some best practices on enabling a web application to support multiple resolutions? Specifically resolutions that are wide-screen vs. normal aspect ratio.
It doesn't seem like there is an easy answer - other than simply supporting a few fixed resolutions and using some absolute positioning to get the layout to work correctly.
This of course gets even more difficult to make it cross browser.
Does anyone have any good resources of this problem?
You can always try to use a liquid layout structure where the width of your elements are scaled proportionate to how wide their browser window is.
here is a good article explaining different layouts including liquid layout.
http://www.maxdesign.com.au/presentation/liquid/
PS. the above mentioned site (maxdesign.com.au) is using liquid layout itself, so try and change the size of your browser when reading the article.
One fast, simple, fairly robust way is to use a framework like Blueprint or 960gs to lay out the site. They're browser-independent so you don't need to worry about that, and they make most column layouts pretty easy.
They both work on the idea of creating a fixed-size container somewhere between 900 and 1000 pixels wide for your content. Most people run in at least 1024x768 nowadays. If you need more width than that for your content, you're probably doing it wrong.
The one area where ~960px might not work is mobile phones... but that's what mobile stylesheets are for, right?
In Opera and Safari (esp. their mobile versions) you can use CSS3 media queries, which let you declare completely different styles for different screen resolutions.
This can be emulated in other browsers using Javascript – Alistapart: Switchy McLayout
You can use percentages to set width and heights also, but this is also difficult sometimes.
You have two options here:
Fixed Width Layout
Flow Layout
Both have benefits and drawbacks, and in the end, it's a design decision as to which is the best choice.
See here: http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/
Does anyone have any experience or remarks about this javascript? Is it worth including? Do you recommend it?
I know many people, myself included that are using various IE hacks to get transparent PNG support. THis looks like a little bit more help, and as long as it works, and the size is fairly small, I wouldn't see much against using it.
I've used it before, and my results are mixed. Those scripts cause IE to churn for a bit on page load. Basically, you have to think of it as iterating through Elements and stylesheet rules to apply "fixes" for areas that are deficient in that particular rendering engine. In some cases, depending on how complicated your markup or stylesheets are, that can take a bit of time and you will see the browser hang.
That said, if you can trade off that performance cost, you will save development time as you'll spend less time hacking around IE6 quirks; IE7/IE8 will provide enough missing functionality that you can avoid certain edge cases, can develop using standards better (min-width/min-height, multiple className selectors, etc.), and certain rendering issues will disappear.
However, if you just need 24-bit transparent PNG support, use a tool built for that. Including IE7/IE8.js for PNG support alone is like pounding in a nail with a tank. Use DD_belatedPNG for that.
It works, but its worth keeping in mind that ie7.js and ie8.js do much more than provide transparent PNG support. Even with the transparent PNG support, its worth keeping in mind that transparent background images cannot be tiled (repeated) using background-repeat or positioned using background-position. This hinders any ability to use CSS rollovers using background-position. I've only used it on one site I've done, and now that I'm updating the site I can't remove the ie8.js because if I do the entire website breaks layout in IE. I don't believe I'll be using it in the future, and instead rely on simple CSS hacks or simply allow my sites to "degrade gracefully" in IE6.
I know that there are some tools for fixing the transparent PNG problem which are more flexible than this. For instance, the jQuery plugin ifixpng2 will support background position, which ie7-js doesn't do.
As long as you are aware of exactly what it fixes, I would say go for it. I'm not sure about this lib exactly, but some libs get very expensive if you have a large DOM, as they tend to hook in HTC file base behaviors on EVERY DOM Element. This causes the dreaded "Loading x of y" status bar message to flash constantly on the initial load, and any newly generated DOM content.
well its beautiful and works grate way u can use cs3 features like li:hover. we did lost of project last time using ie8.js and it works great way.