Just got started with Nix (version 2.2.1), and while installing darcs (version 2.14.1) i encountered my first problem: I get the following error message (preceded by the callstack):
Setup: Encountered missing dependencies:
base >=4.9 && <4.12,
network >=2.6 && <2.8,
stm >=2.1 && <2.5,
zip-archive ==0.3.*
I have the haskell tool stack installed as well as a global ghc (though both should not be needed to build darcs i think).
I also had no problem with installing darcs with 'apt'
Am i making a classic nix beginner mistake or whats going on here?
Nix is very different from package managers like 'apt'. Derivations (which are like packages) are designed to be built in an isolated environment, where the derivation is responsible for providing its own dependencies by referencing other derivations. Because of this, you do not need to explicitly install anything in order to build a package.
Note also that although Nixpkgs uses the Cabal library to build Haskell packages, installing a package via Nix is quite different from installing with cabal-install. In fact it is closer to Stack, because Nixpkgs defines its haskellPackages based on stackage and it avoids cabal-style dependency resolution. It does however let you use the Cabal solver to check whether the dependencies match the versions specified in the cabal files. This check can be disabled using the doJailbreak function in Nixpkgs.
I don't think we need to get into the details of Haskell packaging in Nixpkgs though, because you should be able to get a pre-built darcs from the nixos-18.09 channel. The Nix expression from the nixos-unstable produces exactly your error message.
I recommend you to use the latest release channel, nixos-18.09, because nixos-unstable will break regularly. See the Nix manual for changing your channel configuration.
Related
I'm trying to compile the libxkbcommon library for kodi for my Raspberry Pi 2.
The host machine is a dedicated Server running Ubuntu 16.04 x64.
Now there are two errors when I'm trying to compile libxkbcommon, depending on what yacc I'm using:
byacc:
YACC src/xkbcomp/parser.c
yacc: e - line 219 of
"/opt/kodi/xbmc/tools/depends/target/libxkbcommon/raspberry-pi2-release/src/xkbcomp/parser.y", syntax error
%destructor { FreeStmt((ParseCommon *) $$); }
^
Makefile:1637: recipe for target 'src/xkbcomp/parser.c' failed
btyacc:
parser.y:85: syntax error
Here is the source code of libxkbcommon:
https://github.com/xkbcommon/libxkbcommon
The xbcomp/parser.y file requires a number of (very useful) bison extensions, so it can't be processed by all yacc variants.
btyacc does not support bison-compatible pure-parser declarations. (It has a different, not entirely compatible mechanism which implements the same feature.) So it fails on the first instance of one of those declarations.
It should be possible to use byacc, but not the version which is available in the Ubuntu package repository. Although the Ubuntu package repository change history seems to suggest that the intention was to include the build option which allows %destructor, the actual binary currently available in the byacc repository was built without that option. (It is also several years old, and I think it would be useful to use a more recent version.) I reported this as launchpad bug 1776270, along with a suggestion for a possible fix.
I'm sure you'll be able to build the software using Gnu bison, which is available as the Ubuntu package bison. Since that's the most popular yacc version installed on developer machines, a failure to build with bison would probably have been noticed long ago.
If you would prefer to use byacc, for whatever reason, you'll have to download and build it yourself. You can get the most recent version from Thomas Dickey's byacc page, and then build it with the usual procedure: untar, configure, make, make install. When I tested this, I used the following configure line:
./configure --enable-btyacc --program-prefix=b --prefix=/usr
Only the first option is mandatory
* --program-prefix=b Install it as `byacc` rather than `yacc`
* --enable-btyacc Necessary for %destructor support
* --prefix=/usr Install it in /usr/bin and /usr/man. The default
is /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/man, which failed on
my Ubuntu install because of a missing -D option in the
install command in the Makefile.
I am using Coq (versions 8.5-6), installed w/ Nix. I want to install ssreflect, preferably also w/ Nix. The only information I found about this is here. However, this is not about installing ssreflect, merely trying it out. Nevertheless, I tried to try it out, but ended up w/ hundreds of warnings (about the contents of various .v and .ml4 files) and couldn't wait for the process to end. A fairly typical warning looked like this:
File "./algebra/ssralg.v", line 856, characters 0-39: Warning:
Implicit Arguments is deprecated; use Arguments instead
So the question: How on earth do I install ssreflect w/ Nix?
EDIT: After reading ejgallego's comments, it seems it may be impossible to install ssreflect w/ Nix -- esp. if one wants install only ssreflect w/out the other modules (fingroup, algebra, etc.). So I've also the following question:
Would the standard Opam or make install installation of ssreflect work w/ a Nix-installed Coq?
There are a few things that you need to be aware of:
Nix is a source-based package manager with a binary cache. A lot of packages are pre-built and available in the binary cache, thus their installation doesn't take long; some packages (in particular development libraries) are not pre-built and Nix, when installing them will take the time it needs to compile them. Please be patient: you will only need to wait for the full compilation the first time (and yes, math-comp emits lots of warning upon compilation); next times, the package will be already available in your local Nix store.
Since OPAM is also source-based, using OPAM instead of Nix won't make you save time. You can't mixup Nix-installed Coq with OPAM installed SSReflect because the latter will want the former as an OPAM dependency.
The Nix way to use libraries is not to install them but to load them with nix-shell instead. nix-shell will "install" the libraries and set some environment variables for you (e.g. $COQPATH in this case).
You can also compile the package from source yourself using a Nix-installed Coq but you cannot run make install because this would try to install SSReflect at the same place where Coq is installed but the Nix store is non-mutable. Instead you could skip this step, and set up $COQPATH manually.
Indeed, the compilation of the full math-comp takes very long. There is a Coq ssreflect package which is lighter. You can get it using:
nix-shell -p coqPackages_8_6.ssreflect
If there a relatively simple way to make go + libxml2 + gokogiri work on windows?
I mean that I may be can install it (but at the moment I can not, stuck with Package libxml-2.0 was not found in the pkg-config search path), but then I need to provide my utilite to other people, who will never be able (or would wish ) to install lall libxml2 dependencies, modify PATH etc on windows...
It work flawless on Ubuntu...
I found this https://github.com/moovweb/gokogiri/issues/49 thats funny with installation of Gimp 2 (what?!), but I still cannot make it run with such error, I guess might be issue with PATH, but all PATH are set
$ go get github.com/moovweb/gokogiri
# github.com/moovweb/gokogiri/help
Documents\go\src\github.com\moovweb\gokogiri\help\help.go:6:25: fatal error: lib
xml/tree.h: No such file or directory
#include <libxml/tree.h>
^
compilation terminated.
# github.com/moovweb/gokogiri/xpath
Documents\go\src\github.com\moovweb\gokogiri\xpath\expression.go:4:26: fatal err
or: libxml/xpath.h: No such file or directory
#include <libxml/xpath.h>
^
compilation terminated.
You are struggling because it is hard to combine packages that were built by different people for different purposes and get your environment set up correctly. I think it is best to use MSYS2, an environment for Windows that provides a consistent set of packages for things like gcc, go, libxml2, and iconv. MSYS2 has a package manager (pacman) that helps you easily install them and keep them updated.
I don't do much programming with Go, but I am familiar with MSYS2 and it seems like I was able to get gokogiri installed using MSYS2. You should open MSYS2's "MinGW-w64 Win64 Shell" from the Start menu (mingw64_shell.bat), and try running these commands:
pacman -S mingw-w64-x86_64-{gcc,go,libxml2,iconv}
export GOROOT=/mingw64/
export GOPATH=/c/Users/David/Documents/goproj/
mkdir -p $GOPATH
go get github.com/moovweb/gokogiri
I think GOPATH should be set to the directory of your project. If you run into an error, it might be because some pacman package is required that I didn't list here.
The string mingw-w64-x86_64-{gcc,go,libxml2,iconv} gets expanded by Bash into the following list of packages:
mingw-w64-x86_64-gcc
mingw-w64-x86_64-go
mingw-w64-x86_64-libxml2
mingw-w64-x86_64-iconv
If you are actually using 32-bit Windows, replace x86_64 with i686 in the instructions above.
If you are curious, the scripts for building those packages are here: https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages
As a disclaimer, I haven't actually compiled any go programs in MSYS2, so there could be big problems I am unaware of.
Also, one of the main developers of MSYS2 (alexpux) said this in the #msys2 IRC chat on 2015-06-21:
We not build go for a long time.
This package in very WIP state
Also see
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/issues/421
So you might need to fix some issues with the MSYS2 Go package and recompile it yourself to really make this work. But you have the PKGBUILD script that was used to build it, so maybe that will be less hard than what you are trying to do right now, which involves compiling/collecting every dependency of gokogiri.
MSYS2 would make your other installation of go, libxml2, and iconv obsolete. You can delete those things once you get your MSYS2 environment working.
If you are using visual studio and want to add dependency to your project then just install it using NuGet Package Manager it's easiest method.
Install command: Install-Package libxml2
How can I put my Go binary into a Debian package? Since Go is statically linked, I just have a single executable--I don't need a lot of complicated project metadata information. Is there a simple way to package the executable and resource files without going through the trauma of debuild?
I've looked all over for existing questions; however, all of my research turns up questions/answers about a .deb file containing the golang development environment (i.e., what you would get if you do sudo apt-get install golang-go).
Well. I think the only "trauma" of debuild is that it runs lintian after building the package, and it's lintian who tries to spot problems with your package.
So there are two ways to combat the situation:
Do not use debuild: this tool merely calls dpkg-buildpackage which really does the necessary powerlifting. The usual call to build a binary package is dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -b. You still might call debuild for other purposes, like debuild clean for instance.
Add the so-called "lintian override" which can be used to make lintian turn a blind eye to selected problems with your package which, you insist, are not problems.
Both approaches imply that you do not attempt to build your application by the packaging tools but rather treat it as a blob which is just wrapped to a package. This would require slightly abstraining from the normal way debian/rules work (to not attempt to build anything).
Another solution which might be possible (and is really way more Debian-ish) is to try to use gcc-go (plus gold for linking): since it's a GCC front-end, this tool produces a dynamically-linked application (which links against libgo or something like this). I, personally, have no experience with it yet, and would only consider using it if you intend to try to push your package into the Debian proper.
Regarding the general question of packaging Go programs for Debian, you might find the following resources useful:
This thread started on go-nuts by one of Go for Debian packagers.
In particular, the first post in that thread links to this discussion on debian-devel.
The second thread on debian-devel regarding that same problem (it's a logical continuation of the former thread).
Update on 2015-10-15.
(Since this post appears to still be searched and found and studied by people I've decided to update it to better reflec the current state of affairs.)
Since then the situation with packaging Go apps and packages got improved dramatically, and it's possible to build a Debian package using "classic" Go (the so-called gc suite originating from Google) rather than gcc-go.
And there exist a good infrastructure for packages as well.
The key tool to use when debianizing a Go program now is dh-golang described here.
I've just been looking into this myself, and I'm basically there.
Synopsis
By 'borrowing' from the 'package' branch from one of Canonical's existing Go projects, you can build your package with dpkg-buildpackage.
install dependencies and grab a 'package' branch from another repo.
# I think this list of packages is enough. May need dpkg-dev aswell.
sudo apt-get install bzr debhelper build-essential golang-go
bzr branch lp:~niemeyer/cobzr/package mypackage-build
cd mypackage-build
Edit the metadata.
edit debian/control file (name, version, source). You may need to change the golang-stable dependency to golang-go.
The debian/control file is the manifest. Note the 'build dependencies' (Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), golang-stable) and the 3 architectures. Using Ubuntu (without the gophers ppa), I had to change golang-stable to golang-go.
edit debian/rules file (put your package name in place of cobzr).
The debian/rules file is basically a 'make' file, and it shows how the package is built. In this case they are relying heavily on debhelper. Here they set up GOPATH, and invoke 'go install'.
Here's the magic 'go install' line:
cd $(GOPATH)/src && find * -name '*.go' -exec dirname {} \; | xargs -n1 go install
Also update the copyright file, readme, licence, etc.
Put your source inside the src folder. e.g.
git clone https://github.com/yourgithubusername/yourpackagename src/github.com/yourgithubusername/yourpackagename
or e.g.2
cp .../yourpackage/ src/
build the package
# -us -uc skips package signing.
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc
This should produce a binary .deb file for your architecture, plus the 'source deb' (.tgz) and the source deb description file (.dsc).
More details
So, I realised that Canonical (the Ubuntu people) are using Go, and building .deb packages for some of their Go projects. Ubuntu is based on Debian, so for the most part the same approach should apply to both distributions (dependency names may vary slightly).
You'll find a few Go-based packages in Ubuntu's Launchpad repositories. So far I've found cobzr (git-style branching for bzr) and juju-core (a devops project, being ported from Python).
Both of these projects have both a 'trunk' and a 'package' branch, and you can see the debian/ folder inside the package branch. The 2 most important files here are debian/control and debian/rules - I have linked to 'browse source'.
Finally
Something I haven't covered is cross-compiling your package (to the other 2 architectures of the 3, 386/arm/amd64). Cross-compiling isn't too tricky in go (you need to build the toolchain for each target platform, and then set some ENV vars during 'go build'), and I've been working on a cross-compiler utility myself. Eventually I'll hopefully add .deb support into my utility, but first I need to crystallize this task.
Good luck. If you make any progress then please update my answer or add a comment. Thanks
Building deb or rpm packages from Go Applications is also very easy with fpm.
Grab it from rubygems:
gem install fpm
After building you binary, e.g. foobar, you can package it like this:
fpm -s dir -t deb -n foobar -v 0.0.1 foobar=/usr/bin/
fpm supports all sorts of advanced packaging options.
There is an official Debian policy document describing the packaging procedure for Go: https://go-team.pages.debian.net/packaging.html
For libraries: Use dh-make-golang to create a package skeleton. Name your package with a name derived from import path, with a -dev suffix, e.g. golang-github-lib-pq-dev. Specify the dependencies ont Depends: line. (These are source dependencies for building, not binary dependencies for running, since Go statically links all source.)
Installing the library package will install its source code to /usr/share/golang/src (possibly, the compiled libraries could go into .../pkg). Building depending Go packages will use the artifacts from those system-wide locations.
For executables: Use dh-golang to create the package. Specify dependencies in Build-Depends: line (see above regarding packaging the dependencies).
I recently discovered https://packager.io/ - I'm quite happy with what they're doing. Maybe open up one of the packages to see what they're doing?
After making cabal install of the darcsden code I get this message:
cabal: The following packages are likely to be broken by the reinstalls:
bin-package-db-0.0.0.0
ghc-7.4.1
Use --force-reinstalls if you want to install anyway.
How do I get around this? What does it mean?
Why does it happen?
If you look at the full output of cabal install darcsden, you will find several lines that look like this:
binary-0.5.1.0 -bytestring-in-base (reinstall) changes: array-0.4.0.0 ->
0.3.0.3, containers-0.4.2.1 -> 0.4.1.0
This means that cabal has found an install plan that involves (destructively) reinstalling packages that you already have on your system.
Now, GHC packages are rather sensitive when it comes to their (reflexive) dependencies, and generally only work if exactly the right version of all dependencies is available, compiled against the right versions of their dependencies and so on. Therefore, replacing an already installed package with a new version of changed dependencies can cause some packages on your system to become unusable. Since version 0.14.0, cabal warns you about such a situation in advance to prevent you from accidentally breaking your system.
In your case, ghc and bin-package-db are among the potentially broken packages, because they depend on binary which gets reinstalled. So you should not try to use the --force-reinstalls flag, because it might really break your GHC.
What can you do?
If you scan what is going to be reinstalled, you see that quite a few dependencies are downgraded. This hints at the fact that the package you are trying to install might not be properly updated to GHC 7.4.1 yet.
You can in general try to call cabal install darcsden --avoid-reinstalls to explicitly try to find an install plan that has no reinstalls. Unfortunately, in this case, it fails (for me).
I've briefly looked at the darcsden package description, but it looks like quite a few dependencies of darcsden need to be updated. So the remaining options are: Convince the author(s) of darcsden to release an updated version, or install darcsden using an older version of GHC (such as 7.0.4), which should just work.