I am quit new in Azure function.
I found it as a interesting topic.right now,I have already develped azure function and works fine.
BUT my story will not end here. In the Function Method, I am trying to Autowiring my Repository class in spring in order to access to my DB layer.
but it gives me a null pointer exception. means that , "#Autowired" annotation is not working and not initiate my HotelController Class.
Any Idea , why I am not able to get the instance in Azure function?
I think you should take a look at:
spring-cloud-function-adapter-azure
This project provides an adapter layer for a Spring Cloud Function application onto Azure. You can write an app with a single #Bean of type Function and it will be deployable in Azure if you get the JAR file laid out right.
There is an AzureSpringBootRequestHandler which you must extend, and provide the input and output types as annotated method parameters (enabling Azure to inspect the class and create JSON bindings). The base class has two useful methods (handleRequest and handleOutput) to which you can delegate the actual function call, so mostly the function will only ever have one line.
And the sample that shows how to use it.
Hope it helps!
Related
Project structure:
Here is the repository (no class exceeds 20 lines of code): https://github.com/MoskovchenkoD/spring5-jokes
Here is the problem: Service implementation isn't used, and 'joke' attribute doesn't get printed on the page (just '123'). Controller's #RequestMapping method is simply ignored or bypassed.
How to fix it? I was following a step-by-step video from generating a project at start.spring.io to launching it.
Much appreciated!
Yet another childish error =(
I moved the Application class one level up and now it works fine.
I have develop a new Connector. This connector requires to be configured with two parameters, lets say:
default_trip_timeout_milis
default_trip_threshold
Challenge is, I want read ${myValue_a} and ${myValue_a} from an API, using an HTTP call, not from a file or inline values.
Since this is a connector, I need to make this API call somewhere before connectors are initialized.
FlowVars aren't an option, since they are initialized with the Flows, and this is happening before in the Mule app life Cycle.
My idea is to create an Spring Bean implementing Initialisable, so it will be called before Connectors are init, and here, using any java based libs (Spring RestTemplate?) , call API, get values, and store them somewhere (context? objectStore?) , so the connector can access them.
Make sense? Any other ideas?
Thanks!
mmm you could make a class that will create the properties in the startup and in this class obtain the API properties via http request. Example below:
public class PropertyInit implements InitializingBean,FactoryBean {
private Properties props = new Properties();
#Override
public Object getObject() throws Exception {
return props;
}
#Override
public Class getObjectType() {
return Properties.class;
}
}
Now you should be able to load this property class with:
<context:property-placeholder properties-ref="propertyInit"/>
Hope you like this idea. I used this approach in a previous project.
I want to give you first a strong warning on doing this. If you go down this path then you risk breaking your application in very strange ways because if any other components depend on this component you are having dynamic components on startup, you will break them, and you should think if there are other ways to achieve this behaviour instead of using properties.
That said the way to do this would be to use a proxy pattern, which is a proxy for the component you recreate whenever its properties are changed. So you will need to create a class which extends Circuit Breaker, which encapsulates and instance of Circuit Breaker which is recreated whenever its properties change. These properties must not be used outside of the proxy class as other components may read these properties at startup and then not refresh, you must keep this in mind that anything which might directly or indirectly access these properties cannot do so in their initialisation phase or your application will break.
It's worth taking a look at SpringCloudConfig which allows for you to have a properties server and then all your applications can hot-reload those properties at runtime when they change. Not sure if you can take that path in Mule if SpringCloud is supported yet but it's a nice thing to know exists.
In the Spring Data I have found very helpful interface called JpaRepository. Because I need more functionality I decided to create my own interface of repository:
public interface BaseRepository<T, ID extends Serializable>
extends JpaRepository<T, ID> {
public <TA, TV> int deleteBy(SingularAttribute<T, TA> attr, TV val);
}
As you can see this is a generic interface. It works fine, but I would like to know how I can test it? Of course I can write integration test for each concrete repository but I am looking for better way.
As usual with testing, you should make sure you know what you're testing. Find answers to these questions:
Do you want to test the underlying database?
Do you want to test the Spring Data repository connector for this respository?
Do you want to test whether your code calls the correct methods on the interface?
Doing #1 is useless: The database vendor has already run thousands of tests on its product. There is rarely a reason to do this effort again.
Doing #2 is useless unless you suspect a bug in the code for Spring Data.
Which leaves us with #3. Use a mocking framework to make sure the method is called at the appropriate places (and maybe check the arguments, too).
That way, you can make sure your code behaves correctly.
If you notice the framework throwing errors or you notice that objects aren't deleted correctly, you can add more tests. But most of the time, this won't happen because of bugs in the database or Spring Data. Instead, your code won't call deleteBy() or it will call the method with the wrong arguments.
I have an WebApi application that contains some controllers (they are registered using the extension method RegisterApiControllers). This application references another assembly that contains other controllers that I don't want to expose(I have checked that they are not registered in the container). It happens that both have an OrderController, and when I try to access the /api/Order url, I get an exception "Multiple types were found that match the controller named 'order'." and the stack trace shows that I was in DefaultHttpControllerSelector.
I have seen that AutofacControllerFactory used to exist and there was even a ConfigureWebApi that registered it, but it is not anymore present in the default branch.(you can see it here http://alexmg.com/post/2012/03/09/Autofac-ASPNET-Web-API-(Beta)-Integration.aspx)
It seems also that we can not filter the namespace of the route definition in WebApi (it is possible to MVC).
So any idea on how I can use only the Controller registered in my Autofac container and not use the DefaultHttpControllerSelector that seems to scan all referenced assemblies to discover controller?
Thanks
The problem is that registering the controller with autofac is not really related to the routing process. Only once the routing process has identified which controller to dispatch to will Autofac be called to resolve the type.
It looks like, from digging around in the source, that you would need to write a replacement IHttpControllerSelector in order to handle two controllers with the same name. (which really sucks BTW).
You might be able replace the DefaultHttpControllerTypeResolver with an instance that is passed a predicate that filters out the controllers from the assembly that you want to ignore. It's a bit of a kludgy solution but might work.
Actually, you might be able to replace the DefaultHttpControllerTypeResolver completely with one that is based on registrations in your Autofac container. It is a very simple interface, so as long as Autofac have a some kind of discovery mechanism, you should be golden.
public interface IHttpControllerTypeResolver
{
ICollection<Type> GetControllerTypes(IAssembliesResolver assembliesResolver);
}
I'm trying to get myself familiar with MVC3 and autofac but I've encountered small problem that I'm having trouble resolving.
I am using autofac integrated with MVC3 and all works well, pages are loading correctly, dependencies are being injected and that's cool. What's bugging me is how to use autofac's Container or MVC's DependencyResover in class library project.
I'm trying to create static class that will help me handle domain events. I simply want to be able to call the method with event parameter and everything should be handeled by this class. Here is code:
public static IContainer Container { get; set; }
public static void Raise<T>(T e) where T : IDomainEvent
{
foreach (var eventHandler in DomainEventManager.Container.Resolve<IEnumerable<EventHandlers.Handles<T>>>())
{
eventHandler.Handle(e);
}
}
As you can see it's pretty straightforward and everything would work great if it wasn't MVC approach. Some of my dependencies are registeres as InstancePerHttpRequest (NHibernate' session), while other are registered as InstancePerDependency or SingleInstance. Thus when I try to use container created in my UI project, I get exception that there is no httpRequest tag available.
How can i reuse the Container created in web project to get access to all of it's features, including InstancePerHttpRequest and httpRequest tag?
Or maybe there is other solution to my problem? I was thinking about using delegate function to obtain event handlers, but I cannot (can I?) create generic delegate that I would not need to initialize with concrete type at time of assignment.
Why I want to do this using static class is basically every entity and aggregate or service needs to be able to raise domain event. Injecting EventManager into every one of these would be troublesome and static class is exactly what would resolve all my problems.
If anyone could help me get my head around it I would be grateful.
Cheers, Pako
You shouldn't be referencing your container directly from your app code. This looks like the Service Locator anti-pattern. The correct action is to pass your objects the services they need to do their jobs, usually done through constructor parameters. BUT... if you are going to insist on depending on a global static, then at least model EventManager as a singleton, such that usage would look like:
EventManager.Current.Raise<SomeEvent>(someObject);
and then you can set EventManager.Current equal to a properly constructed instance when your app is initialized.