Can you use a domain name while transferring it - domain-name

I am transferring a domain name from one hosting company to another. The new hosting site has a website ready to use. How can I use the domain name now while it’s being moved. They say it could take up to 10 days ( I have never had to wait that long before.). I know there is a way but can’t remember.

The domain name will resolve to the current DNS entry until it is updated after being moved to the new host. In other words, you don’t need to do anything.
If you want to experiment with the new host before the DNS entry has been updated then use the URL usually provided by the new hosting service for that purpose.

Related

Connect an Heroku app to a Ionos domain Name

I have developed an app and make it available via Heroku. Now I would like to add a custom domain name via Ionos however I don't know how to configure it. When using EC2 instances I would configure an static ip address but for Heroku, I don't know what to do. I have checked other post about this but none a precise or recent about what to do.
Thanks for you attention and have a Great day.
Had the exact same issue and here's how I made it work (just specifying I'm not an expert, so take this answer with a grain of salt):
First you'd have to go to Heroku in your app setting and then add the domain name you bought. It's important that you write the host when adding it, like put either www. or *. at the beginning of the domain. It will give you back a DNS target which you will then need to use on Ionos.
Secondly, you'd have to bind this DNS target on Ionos using a CNAME. Just go to your domains, click the one in your list, then open DNS and click Add a record. Choose CNAME and then put www as provider and past the DNS target you copied in target field. Finally, confirm the changes
Wait a few seconds/minutes, navigate to www.yourdomain.whatever and tada!
About static IP address, Heroku made some docs, and that won't work, you'd have to use dynamic ones. So in a nutshell, use CNAMEs instead of A records
Here are some docs if you want to dig more into this

Domain name registrar performance or rather differences?

Does it make a difference in performance at which domain name registrar I register a domain?
As an example, DigitalOcean does not offer a domain registration but what does this comparison at https://www.dnsperf.com/ show?
You are mixing completely different things.
You have at least the following roles:
a domain name registrar, connecting to domain name registries to provision domain names, and at least maintain a whois server, besides its web interface (and optional API) to let clients act on their domain names
a DNS provider, allowing any domain to use its nameservers and providing clients ways (website, API) to change the records served in their zone by the provider nameserver
a webhosting company, providing webservers for clients to server their content (dynamic or static)
(and you can have even more of them, but unrelated, like CDN provider, X.509 certificates seller, domain name marketplace, etc.)
You seem to mix at least the first two points.
It is difficult to define the "performance" of a pure domain name registrar. You come to it to buy a domain name, and that is all. How its website and whois server works have no operational consequences on your domain name, and you may need to come again to its website only if you need to do some changes, like on contacts and nameservers, but maybe nothing at all, and just one year after creation come again to renew the domain (or even not that if you already bought it for like 10 years like it is possible in gTLDs). You can always judge its customer service I guess, but that will be highly subjective.
On the other hand, a DNS provider has to provide a constant service as its nameservers must reply properly at all time for your domain name. So you can assess their availability worldwide, their time to reply, the time it takes to see them updated after a change you made in the zone (and how you provision the zone), how they react under a DDOS for your domain or for other domains they make host but which could impact you as well, etc.
So
Does it make a difference in performance at which domain name registrar I register a domain?
Probably no, but, replace domain name registrar by DNS provider and then the answer is probably yes.

Map my domain name with my own server

Hi I am having my own domain mydomain.ac.in and i am having my own server (windows 2008) and a Public static IP.
Now i want to host my site in my own server.
Please give me the step by step information to get it done.
Thanks.
You need to register your domain with some DNS hosting service (DNS provider), there is such an astronomic number of these on the web that I do not want to spam the site. Google.
Also, collocation center where you keep this server (and from where you have probably obtained that public IP) may also provide DNS services.
From the other side, any computer can be configured as the name server but this will probably not work Internet wide and can be used inside the local network only (combined with DHCP service). If there is an easy way to make this Internet wide, I would also be very interested in, but I doubt.
Your operating system is not much relevant to this question.
I registered my domain already in ernet by indian Government and I got my Public Static IP from BSNL India. I hosted my site already and i am able to access my site already using the ip. Now i want to map my domain with the server that i have so that i can access my domain using a domain name.
I tried the steps in http://www.hosting.com/support/dedicated/dns/setdns#additional.. But when i add the name server information it says cannot resolve hostname??? that s why i want to know where i am making mistake..
I once again tried the steps at http://www.hosting.com/support/dedicated/dns/setdns and got it right..Now i have updated the name server info at my domain registrar ernet and waiting for it to be updated. Thanks fo the people helped me

Ensuring folder name doesn't show up in the domain name

our hosting account is set up with the domain www.nashman.ca, and our application is at www.nashman.ca/hub. We have another domain that forwards to www.nashman.ca/hub and that's hub.mhn.co. The problem i'm having with this is that the forwarded domain adds on the /hub whenever you navigate to another page from hub.mhn.co, so the domain shows as hub.mhn.co/hub/admin when you're in the admin area, for example. I need the domain to stay consistent, and never show that folder name, because its breaking some of the javascript I use. What is the best way to set this up?
edit
I've been doing some reading about URL Rewriting, and looking into it - my hosting provider supports the IIS7 URL Rewrite module. All the tutorials I've found so far detail how to set up rules using the IIS config tools, but I don't have access to them. Is there a way to do it by editing my web.config in my apps root directory? And will this solve my issue?
Is the default page for hub.mhn.co using a redirect to www.nashman.ca? If so, what is happening is that the forwarding software basically returns a new URI that the browser requests, and the new URI will replace the old one in the browser window and thus in all future requests. You're probably redirecting to ~/hub/ (the hub subdirectory of the site root) which will result in the browser requesting a new URI that keeps the domain name but tacks on the subdirectory.
If you have direct control over the DNS and your webservers, you can use the DNS configuration to direct a request for the hub.mhn.co domain directly to the /hub subdirectory of your webserver. That way, the browser never knows that hub.mhn.co is actually www.nashman.ca/hub/. You might have to direct to an alternate port on the webserver and map that port to the subdirectory, depending on your DNS software (IIRC, most can deal with ipaddress/subdir routes, but some can only handle routing to ipaddress:port).
If your IT department does not have direct control/ownership over your DNS routing, or your exact hosting environment, you are more or less at the mercy of your hosting provider. They may be able to set up their environment to do the same thing, or not; all you can do is ask.
EDIT: Basically you have two options left if you're hosting remotely and can't use their DNS to reroute silently.
First option: clone (copy all files from) the web layer of nashman.ca/hub as hub.mhn.co under a different root space in your hosting environment (try to keep any hooks to service-layer code over at nashman so you don't have to copy the whole vertical slice). If you must also keep the UI under the /hub/ subdirectory, you're repeating code, but you may be able to mitigate this with deploy scripts that will allow you to deploy one local copy of your codebase to various locations. This may also cost more as your hosting environment is now hosting two non-trivial sites.
Second option: host the site and/or resolve the calls on your own hardware. As long as you have a public, static IP address through your ISP, you can provide a DNS server that will be the "authoritative" server for nashman.ca and hub.mhn.co domains. Your ISP or a third party domain name registry can provide a "pass-down" route to get requests from the TLD servers down to you. Then, you can route requests to whatever IP address, port and/or subfolder you like; that can be a remote webhosting provider (as long as they don't mind JUST hosting your site) or your own webservers. This will require the hardware, and a static IP from your ISP. If you lose power to this server, your site will be unreachable until power's restored. If the IP address of your DNS server changes, your site will be unaccessible by DNS until the server that routes requests to you updates its routing table with the new IP (which can be up to 24 hours).

hosts file in windows and my developer

One of my sites - mediadeals.co.uk is showing a blank page.
So I went back to my developer. He asked me to add this on my hosts file
in windows->system32->drivers->etc->hosts
74.86.205.232 mediadeals.co.uk
After doing this the site started working. What does this mean?
Thats crazy. All he did was make it work on YOUR machine. The hosts file simply maps names to IP addresses. Its like a local DNS. What needs to happen for the outside world to see this the DNS servers that are authoritative for mediadeals.co.uk need to have an A record pointing to 74.86.205.232.
How long ago did you register that site name? Don't forget that DNS entries may take a while to propagate across the web. 24 hrs+ sometimes.
And btw, that "fix" will ONLY work on your machine. It maps the friendly URL to an IP address for you, not for the world.
The reason its not working is there is no DNS record for it.
The hosts file is allowing you to point via a local DNS replacement.
All you need is to get the site hosted somewhere and a DNS entry setup.
If you like the site and he is willing to host for $150 then go for it, depending on your contract, if he should have done in the initial budget then you should question this.
RE

Resources