I'm writing a little extension that tells me in my log when a test starts, so i know which logs are related to which tests:
public class LoggingExtension implements Extension, BeforeEachCallback, AfterTestExecutionCallback {
protected final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(getClass());
#Override
public void beforeEach(final ExtensionContext context) throws Exception {
log.info("-- Test #before: {}::{} ----------------------------------------",
context.getDisplayName(),
context.getTestClass().map(x -> x.getSimpleName()).orElse("no test class available"));
}
/**
* (non-Javadoc) ${see_to_overridden}
*/
#Override
public void afterTestExecution(final ExtensionContext context) throws Exception {
context.getExecutionException()
.ifPresent(ex -> {
log.error("-- Test #after: {}::{} ----------------------------------------",
context.getDisplayName(),
context.getTestClass().map(x -> x.getSimpleName()).orElse("no test class available"),
ex);
// log.error("", ex);
});
}
}
I wanted to change this like so:
log -- Test #start: ... when the test itself starts (ie. use BeforeTestExecutionCallback)
and use the BeforeEachCallback to mark the start of #BeforeEach execution(s) but only iff there is actually before-code being executed, as to avoid cluttering.
So the question is: How can i tell if there are actually 1..n #BeforeEach methods that are being executed?
I investigated the the ExtensionContext but came up empty.
So the question is: How can i tell if there are actually 1..n #BeforeEach methods that are being executed?
As of JUnit Jupiter 5.4, there is no official way to find that out. That information is not exposed in any user-facing API: it's internal to the JUnit Jupiter TestEngine.
However, the new InvocationInterceptor extension API coming in JUnit Jupiter 5.5 will provide a way to determine if a #BeforeEach method is about to be executed.
Related
I'm using XQuery 3.0 to transform an incoming message to fit my system.
The XQuery is called from an Apache Camel Route via the transform EIP.
Example:
transform().xquery("resource:classpath:xquery/myxquery.xquery",String.class)
While the transformation works without problems it would be nice, since it's partly very complex, to be able to log some informations directly during the transformation process.
So I wanted to ask if it is possible to log "into" logback directly from XQuery?
I already searched stackoverflow and of course https://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30-use-cases/ and other sources, but I just couldn't find any information about how to log in Xquery.
My project structure is:
Spring-Boot 2 application
Apache-Camel as Routing framework
Logback as Logging framework
Update: For the integration of XQuery in the Apache-Camel Framework I use the org.apache.camel:camel-saxon-starter:2.22.2.
Update: Because the use of fn:trace was kind of ugly I searched further and now I use the extension mechanism from Saxon to provide different logging functions which can be accessed via xquery:
For more information see the documentation: http://www.saxonica.com/documentation/#!extensibility/integratedfunctions/ext-full-J
Here is what I did for logging (tested with Saxon-HE, Camel is not mandatory, I just use it by coincidence):
First step:
Extend the class net.sf.saxon.lib.ExtensionFunctionDefinition
public class XQueryInfoLogFunctionDefinition extends ExtensionFunctionDefinition{
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(XQueryInfoLogFunctionDefinition.class);
private final XQueryInfoExtensionFunctionCall functionCall = new XQueryInfoExtensionFunctionCall();
private static final String PREFIX = "log";
#Override
public StructuredQName getFunctionQName() {
return new StructuredQName(PREFIX, "http://thehandofnod.com/saxon-extension", "info");
}
#Override
public SequenceType[] getArgumentTypes() {
return new SequenceType[] { SequenceType.SINGLE_STRING };
}
#Override
public SequenceType getResultType(SequenceType[] suppliedArgumentTypes) {
return SequenceType.VOID;
}
#Override
public ExtensionFunctionCall makeCallExpression() {
return functionCall;
}
}
Second step:
Implement the FunctionCall class
public class XQueryInfoExtensionFunctionCall extends ExtensionFunctionCall {
private static final Logger log = LoggerFactory.getLogger(XQueryInfoLogFunctionDefinition.class);
#Override
public Sequence call(XPathContext context, Sequence[] arguments) throws XPathException {
if (arguments != null && arguments.length > 0) {
log.info(((StringValue) arguments[0]).getStringValue());
} else
throw new IllegalArgumentException("We need a message");
return EmptySequence.getInstance();
}
}
Third step:
Configure the SaxonConfiguration and bind it into the camel context:
public static void main(String... args) throws Exception {
Main main = new Main();
Configuration saxonConfig = Configuration.newConfiguration();
saxonConfig.registerExtensionFunction(new XQueryInfoLogFunctionDefinition());
main.bind("saxonConfig", saxonConfig);
main.addRouteBuilder(new MyRouteBuilder());
main.run(args);
}
Fourth step:
Define the SaxonConfig in your XQueryEndpoint:
.to("xquery:test.xquery?configuration=#saxonConfig");
Fifth step:
Call it in your xquery:
declare namespace log="http://thehandofnod.com/saxon-extension";
log:info("Das ist ein INFO test")
Original post a.k.a How to overwrite the fn:trace Funktion:
Thanks to Martin Honnen I tried the fn:trace function. Problem was that by default it logs into the System.err Printstream and that's not what I wanted, because I wanted to combine the fn:trace function with the Logback Logging-Framework.
So I debugged the net.sf.saxon.functions.Trace methods and came to the following solution for my project setup.
Write a custom TraceListener which extends from net.sf.saxon.trace.XQueryTraceListener and implement the methods enter and leave in a way that the InstructionInfo with constructType == 2041 (for user-trace) is forwarded to the SLF4J-API. Example (for only logging the message):
#Override
public void enter(InstructionInfo info, XPathContext context) {
// no call to super to keep it simple.
String nachricht = (String) info.getProperty("label");
if (info.getConstructType() == 2041 && StringUtils.hasText(nachricht)) {
getLogger().info(nachricht);
}
}
#Override
public void leave(InstructionInfo info) {
// no call to super to keep it simple.
}
set the custom trace listener into your net.sf.saxon.Configuration Bean via setTraceListener
Call your xquery file from camel via the XQueryEndpoint because only there it is possible to overwrite the Configuration with an option: .to("xquery:/xquery/myxquery.xquery?configuration=#saxonConf"). Unfortunately the transform().xquery(...) uses it's own objects without the possibility to configure them.
call {fn:trace($element/text(),"Das ist ein Tracing Test")} in your xquery and see the message in your log.
I am trying to write unit tests for a camel route - its for importing and processing a file
from(fullImportFTP)
.routeId(STUB_FILE_DOWNLOAD_ROUTE_ID)
.onException(Exception.class)
.handled(false)
.log(LoggingLevel.ERROR, STUB_IMPORT_ERROR_CODE)
.end()
.log("Processing Stub file:[${header.CamelFileName}]")
.to(ROUTE_TO_MACE);
from(ROUTE_TO_MACE)
.routeId(STUB_FILE_IMPORT_ROUTE_ID)
.onException(Exception.class)
.handled(false)
.log(LoggingLevel.ERROR, STUB_IMPORT_ERROR_CODE)
.end()
.onException(IOException.class)
.maximumRedeliveries(routesConfig.camelMaximumRetries).redeliveryDelay(routesConfig.camelRedeliveryDelay)
.handled(false)
.log(LoggingLevel.ERROR, STUB_IMPORT_ERROR_CODE)
.end()
.split().tokenizeXML(ITEM).streaming()
.process(processor)
.to("log:route.StubRoute?level=DEBUG")
.end()
.log("Stub file sucessfully processed:[${header.CamelFileName}]");
And below is the unit test:
#RunWith(CamelSpringBootRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
#DirtiesContext(classMode = DirtiesContext.ClassMode.AFTER_EACH_TEST_METHOD)
public class CamelRouteTest {
#EndpointInject(uri = "mock:success_result")
private MockEndpoint successResultEndpoint;
#EndpointInject(uri = "direct:mock-import-stub-download")
private FluentProducerTemplate producer;
#Autowired
private CamelContext camelContext;
#MockBean
RestTemplate restTemplate;
private static final String MOCK_IMPORT_STUB_DOWNLOAD = "direct:mock-import-stub-download";
private static final String TEST_STUB_FILE_LOCATION = "src/test/resources";
#Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
camelContext.getRouteDefinition(STUB_FILE_DOWNLOAD_ROUTE_ID).autoStartup(true).adviceWith(camelContext,
new AdviceWithRouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
replaceFromWith(MOCK_IMPORT_STUB_DOWNLOAD);
interceptSendToEndpoint("log:route.StubRoute?level=DEBUG").skipSendToOriginalEndpoint().to(successResultEndpoint);
}
});
camelContext.start();
}
#Test
public void testFileDownloadRouter() throws Exception {
File file = new File(TEST_STUB_FILE_LOCATION + "/Stub_11092018_162149_59642501.xml");
successResultEndpoint.expectedMessageCount(1);
producer.withBody(file).withHeader(Exchange.FILE_NAME, "Stub_24102018_162149_59642501.xml").send();
successResultEndpoint.assertIsSatisfied();
}
I always get the message count as 0. Here is the ERROR
java.lang.AssertionError: mock://success_result Received message
count. Expected: <1> but was: <0> Expected :<1> Actual :<0>
What am I doing wrong here? I have 2 routes as you can see - the first one actually goes to the second one, so in the unit tests should I have 2 routes too? I haven't added 2 routes because if I debug I can see that it actually goes through the processor and returning the correct result.
First of all: you are using AdviceWith, so you should put the annotation #UseAdviceWith on your testclass. Otherwise the automatic start of the Camel context and the route advice could overlap.
For the missing message on the Mock: Perhaps your test just asserts too early. I guess the producer does not block while the message is processed, but the MockEndpoint assert follows immediately after sending the message. Right after sending the message the received message count is still 0.
To check if waiting helps, you could insert a Thread.sleep(). If it works, you should get rid of the Thread.sleep() and replace it with a Camel NotifyBuilder
Just saw another point. The final to() in your interceptSendToEndpoint chain points to the MockEndpoint instance variable. I think this should point to the MockEndpoint URI, i.e. .to("mock:success_result")
And even one more: you get the first route to advice with getRouteDefinition(STUB_FILE_DOWNLOAD_ROUTE_ID) but in this advice block you advice both routes. That is probably the reason for your problem. The second route is not adviced and therefore your mock is not in place. You have to advice the second route in its own advice block.
#Before
public void setup() throws Exception {
camelContext.getRouteDefinition(STUB_FILE_DOWNLOAD_ROUTE_ID).autoStartup(true).adviceWith(camelContext, new AdviceWithRouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
replaceFromWith(MOCK_IMPORT_STUB_DOWNLOAD);
}
});
camelContext.getRouteDefinition(STUB_FILE_IMPORT_ROUTE_ID).autoStartup(true).adviceWith(camelContext, new AdviceWithRouteBuilder() {
#Override
public void configure() throws Exception {
interceptSendToEndpoint("log:route.StubRoute?level=DEBUG").skipSendToOriginalEndpoint().to("mock:success_result");
}
});
camelContext.start();
}
I have a simple scenario in which am trying to verify some behavior when a method is called (i.e. that a certain method was called with given parameter, a function pointer in this scenario). Below are my classes:
#SpringBootApplication
public class Application {
public static void main(String[] args) {
ConfigurableApplicationContext context = SpringApplication.run(Application.class, args);
AppBootStrapper bootStrapper = context.getBean(AppBootStrapper.class);
bootStrapper.start();
}
}
#Component
public class AppBootStrapper {
private NetworkScanner networkScanner;
private PacketConsumer packetConsumer;
public AppBootStrapper(NetworkScanner networkScanner, PacketConsumer packetConsumer) {
this.networkScanner = networkScanner;
this.packetConsumer = packetConsumer;
}
public void start() {
networkScanner.addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
networkScanner.startScan();
}
}
#Component
public class NetworkScanner {
private List<Consumer<String>> consumers = new ArrayList<>();
public void startScan(){
Executors.newSingleThreadExecutor().submit(() -> {
while(true) {
// do some scanning and get/parse packets
consumers.forEach(consumer -> consumer.accept("Package Data"));
}
});
}
public void addConsumer(Consumer<String> consumer) {
this.consumers.add(consumer);
}
}
#Component
public class PacketConsumer {
public void consumePacket(String packet) {
System.out.println("Packet received: " + packet);
}
}
#RunWith(JUnit4.class)
public class AppBootStrapperTest {
#Test
public void start() throws Exception {
NetworkScanner networkScanner = mock(NetworkScanner.class);
PacketConsumer packetConsumer = mock(PacketConsumer.class);
AppBootStrapper appBootStrapper = new AppBootStrapper(networkScanner, packetConsumer);
appBootStrapper.start();
verify(networkScanner).addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
verify(networkScanner, times(1)).startScan();
}
}
I want to verify that bootStrapper did in fact do proper setup by registering the packet consumer(there might be other consumers registered later on, but this one is mandatory) and then called startScan. I get the following error message when I execute the test case:
Argument(s) are different! Wanted:
networkScanner bean.addConsumer(
com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapperTest$$Lambda$8/438123546#282308c3
);
-> at com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapperTest.start(AppBootStrapperTest.java:24)
Actual invocation has different arguments:
networkScanner bean.addConsumer(
com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapper$$Lambda$7/920446957#5dda14d0
);
-> at com.spring.starter.AppBootStrapper.start(AppBootStrapper.java:12)
From the exception, clearly the function pointers aren't the same.
Am I approaching this the right way? Is there something basic I am missing? I played around and had a consumer injected into PacketConsumer just to see if it made a different and that was OK, but I know that's certainly not the right way to go.
Any help, perspectives on this would be greatly appreciated.
Java doesn't have any concept of "function pointers"; when you see:
networkScanner.addConsumer(packetConsumer::consumePacket);
What Java actually compiles is (the equivalent of):
networkScanner.addConsumer(new Consumer<String>() {
#Override void accept(String packet) {
packetConsumer.consumePacket(packet);
}
});
This anonymous inner class happens to be called AppBootStrapper$$Lambda$7. Because it doesn't (and shouldn't) define an equals method, it will never be equal to the anonymous inner class that the compiler generates in your test, which happens to be called AppBootStrapperTest$$Lambda$8. This is regardless of the fact that the method bodies are the same, and are built in the same way from the same method reference.
If you generate the Consumer explicitly in your test and save it as a static final Consumer<String> field, then you can pass that reference in the test and compare it; at that point, reference equality should hold. This should work with a lambda expression or method reference just fine.
A more apt test would probably verify(packetConsumer, atLeastOnce()).consumePacket(...), as the contents of the lambda are an implementation detail and you're really more concerned about how your component collaborates with other components. The abstraction here should be at the consumePacket level, not at the addConsumer level.
See the comments and answer on this SO question.
I have a Spring application listener implementing ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent> as follows:
#Profile({ Profiles.DEFAULT, Profiles.CLOUD, Profiles.TEST, Profiles.DEV })
#Component
public class BootstrapLoaderListener implements ApplicationListener<ContextRefreshedEvent>, ResourceLoaderAware, Ordered {
private static final Logger log = Logger.getLogger(BootstrapLoaderListener.class);
#Override
public int getOrder() {
return HIGHEST_PRECEDENCE;
}
#Autowired
private DayToTimeSlotRepository dayToTimeSlotRepository;
#Autowired
private LanguageRepository languageRepository;
private ResourceLoader resourceLoader;
#Override
#Transactional
public void onApplicationEvent(ContextRefreshedEvent contextRefreshedEvent) {
initApplication();
}
private void initApplication() {
if (dayToTimeSlotRepository.count() == 0) {
initDayToTimeSlots();
}
if (languageRepository.count() == 0) {
initLanguages();
}
}
private void initDayToTimeSlots() {
for (Day day : Day.values()) {
for (TimeSlot timeSlot : TimeSlot.values()) {
DayToTimeSlot dayToTimeSlot = new DayToTimeSlot();
dayToTimeSlot.setDay(day);
dayToTimeSlot.setTimeSlot(timeSlot);
dayToTimeSlot.setDisabled(isDayToTimeSlotDisabled(timeSlot, day));
dayToTimeSlotRepository.save(dayToTimeSlot);
}
}
}
...
I rely on this listener class to insert reference data that is not updated nor deleted and I have a number of Spring integration tests that use this class, one of which fails because the listener is not notified (initDayToTimeSlots is not invoked).
I am trying to pinpoint where the problem comes from by debugging the tests and I noticed that when I run the problematic test class on its own, the tests contained in the class pass (indicating that the listener is notified) but when I run all of my application test classes together, the listener is not notified causing the test to fail (indicating that some other test changes/dirties the context).
Here is the problematic test class:
#ActiveProfiles({ Profiles.TEST })
#RunWith(SpringJUnit4ClassRunner.class)
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { FullIntegrationTestConfiguration.class, BaseTestConfiguration.class })
public class RegularDayToTimeSlotsTest {
private static int NUMBER_OF_REGULAR_DAY_TO_TIME_SLOTS_IN_WEEK = 25;
#Before
public void setup() {
//org.hsqldb.util.DatabaseManagerSwing.main(new String[] { "--url", "jdbc:hsqldb:mem:bignibou", "--noexit" });
}
#Autowired
private AdvertisementService advertisementService;
#Test
public void shouldNotContainSaturdayNorSunday() {
Set<DayToTimeSlot> regularDayToTimeSlots = advertisementService.retrieveRegularDayToTimeSlots();
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("day").excludes(Day.SATURDAY, Day.SUNDAY);
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("day").contains(Day.MONDAY, Day.THUESDAY);
}
#Test
public void shouldNotContainEveningNorNighttime() {
Set<DayToTimeSlot> regularDayToTimeSlots = advertisementService.retrieveRegularDayToTimeSlots();
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("timeSlot").excludes(TimeSlot.EVENING, TimeSlot.NIGHTTIME);
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).onProperty("timeSlot").contains(TimeSlot.MORNING, TimeSlot.LUNCHTIME);
}
#Test
public void shouldContainCorrectNumberOfDayToTimeSlots() {
Set<DayToTimeSlot> regularDayToTimeSlots = advertisementService.retrieveRegularDayToTimeSlots();
assertThat(regularDayToTimeSlots).hasSize(NUMBER_OF_REGULAR_DAY_TO_TIME_SLOTS_IN_WEEK);
}
}
I am puzzled to see that both the prepareRefresh() and finishRefresh() methods within AbstractApplicationContext.refresh method are indeed called but that my listener is not notified...
Has anyone got any clue?
P.S. I know I could use #DirtiesContext in order to get a fresh context and I also know it would be preferable not to rely on an application listener for my tests but I am very anxious to understand what is going wrong here. Hence this post.
edit 1: When I debug the problematic test class in isolation, I notice that the event source is of type GenericApplicationContext and as explained above the test passes OK because the listener is notified. However when all test classes are run together, the event source is, oddly enough, of type GenericWebApplicationContext and no listener is found here in SimpleApplicationEventMulticaster:
#Override
public void multicastEvent(final ApplicationEvent event) {
for (final ApplicationListener<?> listener : getApplicationListeners(event)) {
Executor executor = getTaskExecutor();
if (executor != null) {
executor.execute(new Runnable() {
#Override
public void run() {
invokeListener(listener, event);
}
});
}
else {
invokeListener(listener, event);
}
}
}
edit 2: my comments in edit 1 make me asks myself what is responsible for determining the uniqueness of context configuration...
For instance, I have only two test classes with the following context configuration:
#ContextConfiguration(classes = { FullIntegrationTestConfiguration.class, BaseTestConfiguration.class })
I guess they both will use the same cached context, won't they? Now can a third class use the same cached context even though it does not have exactly the same context configuration?
Why does my test get a GenericWebApplicationContext above?
my comments in edit 1 make me asks myself what is responsible for
determining the uniqueness of context configuration...
The elements that make up the context cache key are described in the Context caching section of the "Testing" chapter in the reference manual.
For instance, I have only two test classes with the following context
configuration:
#ContextConfiguration(classes = {
FullIntegrationTestConfiguration.class, BaseTestConfiguration.class })
I guess they both will use the same cached context, won't they?
If they declare only those two configuration classes in that exact order, then yes.
Now can a third class use the same cached context even though it does not
have exactly the same context configuration?
No.
Why does my test get a GenericWebApplicationContext above?
A GenericWebApplicationContext is only loaded if your test class (or one of its superclasses) is annotated with #WebAppConfiguration.
If you are experiencing behavior that contradicts this, then you have discovered a bug in which case we would appreciate it if you could produce a scaled down test project in the issue repository and create a corresponding JIRA issue against the "Spring Framework" and its "Test" component.
Thanks,
Sam (author of the Spring TestContext Framework)
I'm trying to unit test the custom events that I've created in Spring and am running into an interesting problem. If I create a StaticApplicationContext and manually register and wire the beans I can trigger events and see the program flow through the publisher (implements ApplicationEventPublisherAware) through to the listener (implements ApplicationListener<?>).
Yet when I try to create a JUnit test to create the context using the SpringJunit4ClassRunner and #ContextConfiguration everything works well except that the ApplicationEvents are not showing up in the listener (I have confirmed that they are getting published).
Is there some other way to create the context so that ApplicationEvents will work correctly? I haven't found much on the web about unit testing the Spring events framework.
The events will not fire because your test classes are not registered and resolved from the spring application context, which is the event publisher.
I've implemented a workaround for this where the event is handled in another class that is registered with Spring as a bean and resolved as part of the test. It isn't pretty, but after wasting the best part of a day trying to find a better solution I am happy with this for now.
My use case was firing an event when a message is received within a RabbitMQ consumer. It is made up of the following:
The wrapper class
Note the Init() function that is called from the test to pass in the callback function after resolving from the container within the test
public class TestEventListenerWrapper {
CountDownLatch countDownLatch;
TestEventWrapperCallbackFunction testEventWrapperCallbackFunction;
public TestEventListenerWrapper(){
}
public void Init(CountDownLatch countDownLatch, TestEventWrapperCallbackFunction testEventWrapperCallbackFunction){
this.countDownLatch = countDownLatch;
this.testEventWrapperCallbackFunction = testEventWrapperCallbackFunction;
}
#EventListener
public void onApplicationEvent(MyEventType1 event) {
testEventWrapperCallbackFunction.CallbackOnEventFired(event);
countDownLatch.countDown();
}
#EventListener
public void onApplicationEvent(MyEventType2 event) {
testEventWrapperCallbackFunction.CallbackOnEventFired(event);
countDownLatch.countDown();
}
#EventListener
public void onApplicationEvent(OnQueueMessageReceived event) {
testEventWrapperCallbackFunction.CallbackOnEventFired(event);
countDownLatch.countDown();
}
}
The callback interface
public interface TestEventWrapperCallbackFunction {
void CallbackOnEventFired(ApplicationEvent event);
}
A test configuration class to define the bean which is referenced in the unit test. Before this is useful, it will need to be resolved from the applicationContext and initialsed (see next step)
#Configuration
public class TestContextConfiguration {
#Lazy
#Bean(name="testEventListenerWrapper")
public TestEventListenerWrapper testEventListenerWrapper(){
return new TestEventListenerWrapper();
}
}
Finally, the unit test itself that resolves the bean from the applicationContext and calls the Init() function to pass assertion criteria (this assumes you have registered the bean as a singleton - the default for the Spring applicationContext). The callback function is defined here and also passed to Init().
#ContextConfiguration(classes= {TestContextConfiguration.class,
//..., - other config classes
//..., - other config classes
})
public class QueueListenerUnitTests
extends AbstractTestNGSpringContextTests {
private MessageProcessorManager mockedMessageProcessorManager;
private ChannelAwareMessageListener queueListener;
private OnQueueMessageReceived currentEvent;
#BeforeTest
public void Startup() throws Exception {
this.springTestContextPrepareTestInstance();
queueListener = new QueueListenerImpl(mockedMessageProcessorManager);
((QueueListenerImpl) queueListener).setApplicationEventPublisher(this.applicationContext);
currentEvent = null;
}
#Test
public void HandleMessageReceived_QueueMessageReceivedEventFires_WhenValidMessageIsReceived() throws Exception {
//Arrange
//Other arrange logic
Channel mockedRabbitmqChannel = CreateMockRabbitmqChannel();
CountDownLatch countDownLatch = new CountDownLatch(1);
TestEventWrapperCallbackFunction testEventWrapperCallbackFunction = (ev) -> CallbackOnEventFired(ev);
TestEventListenerWrapper testEventListenerWrapper = (TestEventListenerWrapper)applicationContext.getBean("testEventWrapperOnQueueMessageReceived");
testEventListenerWrapper.Init(countDownLatch, testEventWrapperCallbackFunction);
//Act
queueListener.onMessage(message, mockedRabbitmqChannel);
long awaitTimeoutInMs = 1000;
countDownLatch.await(awaitTimeoutInMs, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
//Assert - assertion goes here
}
//The callback function that passes the event back here so it can be made available to the tests for assertion
private void CallbackOnEventFired(ApplicationEvent event){
currentEvent = (OnQueueMessageReceived)event;
}
}
EDIT 1: The sample code has been updated with CountDownLatch
EDIT 2: Assertions didn't fail tests so the above was updated with a different approach**
I just run my app as SpringBootTest, application events working fine:
#TestComponent
public class EventTestListener {
#EventListener
public void handle(MyCustomEvent event) {
// nothing to do, just spy the method...
}
}
#RunWith(SpringRunner.class)
#SpringBootTest
public class MyEventTest {
#SpyBean
private EventTestListener testEventListener;
#Test
public void testMyEventFires() {
// do something that fires the event..
verify(testEventListener).handle(any(MyCustomEvent.class));
}
}
use the #Captor / ArgumentCaptor to verify the content of your event.
You can create a context manually.
For example: I had needed to check if my ApplicationListener<ContextClosedEvent> closed Cassandra connections:
#Test
public void testSpringShutdownHookForCassandra(){
ConfigurableApplicationContext ctx = new AnnotationConfigApplicationContext(CassandraConfig.class);
CassandraConnectionManager connectionManager = ctx.getBean(CassandraConnectionManager.class);
Session session = connectionManager.openSession(testKeySpaceName);
Assert.assertFalse( session.isClosed() );
ctx.close();
Assert.assertTrue( session.isClosed() );
}