Related
I have:
event = {"first_type_a" => 100, "first_type_b" => false, "second_type_a" => "abc", "second_type_b" => false}
I am trying to change the keys of event based on the original. If the name contains a substring, the name will be changed, and the new key, pair value should be added, and the old pair should be removed. I expect to get:
event = {"important.a_1" => 100, "important.b_1" => false, "second_type_a" => "abc", "second_type_b" => false}
What would be the most efficient way to update event?
I expected this to work:
event.each_pair { |k, v|
if !!(/first_type_*/ =~ k) do
key = "#{["important", k.split("_", 3)[2]].join(".")}";
event.merge!(key: v);
event.delete(k)
end
}
but it raises an error:
simpleLoop.rb:5: syntax error, unexpected keyword_do, expecting keyword_then or ';' or '\n'
... if !!(/first_type_*/ =~ k) do
... ^~
simpleLoop.rb:9: syntax error, unexpected keyword_end, expecting '}'
end
^~~
simpleLoop.rb:21: embedded document meets end of file
I thought to approach it differently:
if result = event.keys.find { |k| k.include? "first_type_" } [
key = "#{["important", k.split("_", 3)[2]].join(".")}"
event.merge!(key: v)
event.delete(k)
]
but still no luck. I am counting all brackets, and as the error indicates, it is something there, but I can't find it. Does the order matter?
I will just show how this can be done quite economically in Ruby. Until recently, when wanting to modify keys of a hash one usually would do one of two things:
create a new empty hash and then add key/values pairs to the hash; or
convert the hash to an array a of two-element arrays (key-value pairs), modify the first element of each element of a (the key) and then convert a to the desired hash.
Recently (with MRI v2.4) the Ruby monks bestowed on us the handy methods Hash#transform_keys and Hash#transform_keys!. We can use the first of these profitably here. First we need a regular expression to match keys.
r = /
\A # match beginning of string
first_type_ # match string
(\p{Lower}+) # match 1+ lowercase letters in capture group 1
\z # match the end of the string
/x # free-spacing regex definition mode
Conventionally, this is written
r = /\Afirst_type_(\p{Lower}+)\z/
The use of free-spacing mode makes the regex self-documenting. We now apply the transform_keys method, together with the method String#sub and the regex just defined.
event = {"first_type_a"=>100, "first_type_b"=>false,
"second_type_a"=>"abc", "second_type_b"=>false}
event.transform_keys { |k| k.sub(r, "important.#{'\1'}_1") }
#=> {"important.a_1"=>100, "important.b_1"=>false,
# "second_type_a"=>"abc", "second_type_b"=>false}
In the regex the p{} construct expression \p{Lower} could be replaced with \p{L}, the POSIX bracket expression [[:lower:]] (both match Unicode letters) or [a-z], but the last has the disadvantage that it will not match letters with diacritical marks. That includes letters of words borrowed from other languages that are used in English text (such as rosé, the wine). Search Regexp for documentation of POSIX and \p{} expressions.
If "first_type_" could be followed by lowercase or uppercase letters use \p{Alpha}; if it could be followed by alphanumeric characters, use \p{Alnum}, and so on.
The if starts a block, such as other structures if ... else ... end do ... end begin ... rescue ... end
Therefore your first example remove the do after the if, the block is already open. I also made it clearer by changing the block after each_pair to use do ... end rather than braces to help avoid confusing a hash with a block.
event = { 'first_type_a' => 100, 'first_type_b' => false, 'second_type_a' => 'abc', 'second_type_b' => false }
new_event = {}
event.each_pair do |k, v|
if !!(/first_type_*/ =~ k)
important_key = ['important', k.split('_', 3)[2]].join('.')
new_event[important_key] = v
else
new_event[k] = v
end
end
You could define a method to be used inside the transform key call:
def transform(str)
return ['important.', str.split('_').last, '_1'].join() if str[0..4] == 'first' # I checked just for "first"
str
end
event.transform_keys! { |k| transform(k) } # Ruby >= 2.5
event.map { |k, v| [transform(k), v] }.to_h # Ruby < 2.5
Using Hash#each_pair but with Enumerable#each_with_object:
event.each_pair.with_object({}) { |(k, v), h| h[transform(k)] = v }
Or use as one liner:
event.transform_keys { |str| str[0..4] == 'first' ? ['important.', str.split('_').last, '_1'].join() : str }
I am trying to call the first duplicate character in my string in Ruby.
I have defined an input string using gets.
How do I call the first duplicate character in the string?
This is my code so far.
string = "#{gets}"
print string
How do I call a character from this string?
Edit 1:
This is the code I have now where my output is coming out to me No duplicates 26 times. I think my if statement is wrongly written.
string "abcade"
puts string
for i in ('a'..'z')
if string =~ /(.)\1/
puts string.chars.group_by{|c| c}.find{|el| el[1].size >1}[0]
else
puts "no duplicates"
end
end
My second puts statement works but with the for and if loops, it returns no duplicates 26 times whatever the string is.
The following returns the index of the first duplicate character:
the_string =~ /(.)\1/
Example:
'1234556' =~ /(.)\1/
=> 4
To get the duplicate character itself, use $1:
$1
=> "5"
Example usage in an if statement:
if my_string =~ /(.)\1/
# found duplicate; potentially do something with $1
else
# there is no match
end
s.chars.map { |c| [c, s.count(c)] }.drop_while{|i| i[1] <= 1}.first[0]
With the refined form from Cary Swoveland :
s.each_char.find { |c| s.count(c) > 1 }
Below method might be useful to find the first word in a string
def firstRepeatedWord(string)
h_data = Hash.new(0)
string.split(" ").each{|x| h_data[x] +=1}
h_data.key(h_data.values.max)
end
I believe the question can be interpreted in either of two ways (neither involving the first pair of adjacent characters that are the same) and offer solutions to each.
Find the first character in the string that is preceded by the same character
I don't believe we can use a regex for this (but would love to be proved wrong). I would use the method suggested in a comment by #DaveNewton:
require 'set'
def first_repeat_char(str)
str.each_char.with_object(Set.new) { |c,s| return c unless s.add?(c) }
nil
end
first_repeat_char("abcdebf") #=> b
first_repeat_char("abcdcbe") #=> c
first_repeat_char("abcdefg") #=> nil
Find the first character in the string that appears more than once
r = /
(.) # match any character in capture group #1
.* # match any character zero of more times
? # do the preceding lazily
\K # forget everything matched so far
\1 # match the contents of capture group 1
/x
"abcdebf"[r] #=> b
"abccdeb"[r] #=> b
"abcdefg"[r] #=> nil
This regex is fine, but produces the warning, "regular expression has redundant nested repeat operator '*'". You can disregard the warning or suppress it by doing something clunky, like:
r = /([^#{0.chr}]).*?\K\1/
where ([^#{0.chr}]) means "match any character other than 0.chr in capture group 1".
Note that a positive lookbehind cannot be used here, as they cannot contain variable-length matches (i.e., .*).
You could probably make your string an array and use detect. This should return the first char where the count is > 1.
string.split("").detect {|x| string.count(x) > 1}
I'll use positive lookahead with String#[] method :
"abcccddde"[/(.)(?=\1)/] #=> c
As a variant:
str = "abcdeff"
p str.chars.group_by{|c| c}.find{|el| el[1].size > 1}[0]
prints "f"
I was wondering how you construct the regular expression to check if the string has a variation of a pattern with the same length. Say the string is "door boor robo omanyte" how do I return the words that have the variation of [door]?
You can easily get all the possible words using Array#permutation. Then you can scan for them in provided string. Here:
possible_words = %w[d o o r].permutation.map &:join
# => ["door", "doro", "door", "doro", "droo", "droo", "odor", "odro", "oodr", "oord", "ordo", "orod", "odor", "odro", "oodr", "oord", "ordo", "orod", "rdoo", "rdoo", "rodo", "rood", "rodo", "rood"]
string = "door boor robo omanyte"
string.scan(possible_words.join("|"))
# => ["door"]
string = "door close rood example ordo"
string.scan(possible_words.join("|"))
# => ["door", "rood", "ordo"]
UPDATE
You can improve scan further by looking for word boundary. Here:
string = "doorrood example ordo"
string.scan(/"\b#{possible_words.join('\b|\b')}\b"/)
# => ["ordo"]
NOTE
As Cary correctly pointed out in comments below, this process is quite inefficient if you intend to find permutation for a fairly large string. However it should work fine for OP's example.
If the comment I left on your question correctly interprets the question, you could do this:
str = "door sit its odor to"
str.split
.group_by { |w| w.chars.sort.join }
.values
.select { |a| a.size > 1 }
#=> [["door", "odor"], ["sit", "its"]]
This assumes all the letters are the same case.
If case is not important, just make a small change:
str = "dooR sIt itS Odor to"
str.split
.group_by { |w| w.downcase.chars.sort.join }
.values
.select { |a| a.size > 1 }
#=> [["dooR", "Odor"], ["sIt", "itS"]]
In my opinion the fastest way to find this will be
word_a.chars.sort == word_b.chars.sort
since we are using the same characters inside the words
IMO, some kind of iteration is definitely necessary to build a regular expression to match this one. Not using a regular expression is better too.
def variations_of_substr(str, sub)
# Creates regexp to match words with same length, and
# with same characters of str.
patt = "\\b" + ( [ "[#{sub}]{1}" ] * sub.size ).join + "\\b"
# Above alone won't be enough, characters in both words should
# match exactly.
str.scan( Regexp.new(patt) ).select do |m|
m.chars.sort == sub.chars.sort
end
end
variations_of_substr("door boor robo omanyte", "door")
# => ["door"]
I want my output to search and count the frequency of the words "candy" and "gram", but also the combinations of "candy gram" and "gram candy," in a given text (whole_file.)
I am currently using the following code to display the occurrences of "candy" and "gram," but when I aggregate the combinations within the %w, only the word and frequencies of "candy" and "gram" display. Should I try a different way? thanks so much.
myArray = whole_file.split
stop_words= %w{ candy gram 'candy gram' 'gram candy' }
nonstop_words = myArray - stop_words
key_words = myArray - nonstop_words
frequency = Hash.new (0)
key_words.each { |word| frequency[word] +=1 }
key_words = frequency.sort_by {|x,y| x }
key_words.each { |word, frequency| puts word + ' ' + frequency.to_s }
It sounds like you're after n-grams. You could break the text into combinations of consecutive words in the first place, and then count the occurrences in the resulting array of word groupings. Here's an example:
whole_file = "The big fat man loves a candy gram but each gram of candy isn't necessarily gram candy"
[["candy"], ["gram"], ["candy", "gram"], ["gram", "candy"]].each do |term|
terms = whole_file.split(/\s+/).each_cons(term.length).to_a
puts "#{term.join(" ")} #{terms.count(term)}"
end
EDIT: As was pointed out in the comments below, I wasn't paying close enough attention and was splitting the file on each loop which is obviously not a good idea, especially if it's large. I also hadn't accounted for the fact that the original question may've need to sort by the count, although that wasn't explicitly asked.
whole_file = "The big fat man loves a candy gram but each gram of candy isn't necessarily gram candy"
# This is simplistic. You would need to address punctuation and other characters before
# or at this step.
split_file = whole_file.split(/\s+/)
terms_to_count = [["candy"], ["gram"], ["candy", "gram"], ["gram", "candy"]]
counts = []
terms_to_count.each do |term|
terms = split_file.each_cons(term.length).to_a
counts << [term.join(" "), terms.count(term)]
end
# Seemed like you may need to do sorting too, so here that is:
sorted = counts.sort { |a, b| b[1] <=> a[1] }
sorted.each do |count|
puts "#{count[0]} #{count[1]}"
end
Strip punctuation and convert to lower-case
The first thing you probably want to do is remove all punctuation from the string holding the contents of the file and then convert what's left to lower case, the latter so you don't have worry about counting 'Cat' and 'cat' as the same word. Those two operations can be done in either order.
Changing upper-case letters to lower-case is easy:
text = whole_file.downcase
To remove the punctuation it is probably easier to decide what to keep rather than what to discard. If we only want to keep lower-case letters, you can do this:
text = whole_file.downcase.gsub(/[^a-z]/, '')
That is, substitute an empty string for all characters other than (^) lowercase letters.1
Determine frequency of individual words
If you want to count the number of times text contains the word 'candy', you can use the method String#scan on the string text and then determine the size of the array that is returned:
text.scan(/\bcandy\b/).size
scan returns an array with every occurrence of the string 'candy'; .size returns the size of that array. Here \b ensures 'candy gram' has a word "boundary" at each end, which could be whitespace or the beginning or end of a line or the file. That's to prevent `candycane' from being counted.
A second way is to convert the string text to an array of words, as you have done2:
myArray = text.split
If you don't mind, I'd like to call this:
words = text.split
as I find that more expressive.3
The most direct way to determine the number of times 'candy' appears is to use the method Enumberable#count, like this:
words.count('candy')
You can also use the array difference method, Array#-, as you noted:
words.size - (words - ['candy']).size
If you wish to know the number of times either 'candy' or 'gram' appears, you could of course do the above for each and sum the two counts. Some other ways are:
words.size - (myArray - ['candy', 'gram']).size
words.count { |word| word == 'candy' || word = 'gram' }
words.count { |word| ['candy', 'gram'].include?(word) }
Determine the frequency of all words that appear in the text
Your use of a hash with a default value of zero was a good choice:
def frequency_of_all_words(words)
frequency = Hash.new(0)
words.each { |word| frequency[word] +=1 }
frequency
end
I wrote this as a method to emphasize that words.each... does not return frequency. Often you would see this written more compactly using the method Enumerable#each_with_object, which returns the hash ("object"):
def frequency_of_all_words(words)
words.each_with_object(Hash.new(0)) { |word, h| h[word] +=1 }
end
Once you have the hash frequency you can sort it as you did:
frequency.sort_by {|word, freq| freq }
or
frequency.sort_by(&:last)
which you could write:
frequency.sort_by {|_, freq| freq }
since you aren't using the first block variable. If you wanted the most frequent words first:
frequency.sort_by(&:last).reverse
or
frequency.sort_by {|_, freq| -freq }
All of these will give you an array. If you want to convert it back to a hash (with the largest values first, say):
Hash[frequency.sort_by(&:last).reverse]
or in Ruby 2.0+,
frequency.sort_by(&:last).reverse.to_h
Count the number of times a substring appears
Now let's count the number of times the string 'candy gram' appears. You might think we could use String#scan on the string holding the entire file, as we did earlier4:
text.scan(/\bcandy gram\b/).size
The first problem is that this won't catch 'candy\ngram'; i.e., when the words are separated by a newline character. We could fix that by changing the regex to /\bcandy\sgram\b/. A second problem is that 'candy gram' might have been 'candy. Gram' in the file, in which case you might not want to count it.
A better way is to use the method Enumerable#each_cons on the array words. The easiest way to show you how that works is by example:
words = %w{ check for candy gram here candy gram again }
#=> ["check", "for", "candy", "gram", "here", "candy", "gram", "again"]
enum = words.each_cons(2)
#=> #<Enumerator: ["check", "for", "candy", "gram", "here", "candy",
# "gram", "again"]:each_cons(2)>
enum.to_a
#=> [["check", "for"], ["for", "candy"], ["candy", "gram"],
# ["gram", "here"], ["here", "candy"], ["candy", "gram"],
# ["gram", "again"]]
each_cons(2) returns an enumerator; I've converted it to an array to display its contents.
So we can write
words.each_cons(2).map { |word_pair| word_pair.join(' ') }
#=> ["check for", "for candy", "candy gram", "gram here",
# "here candy", "candy gram", "gram again"]
and lastly:
words.each_cons(2).map { |word_pair|
word_pair.join(' ') }.count { |s| s == 'candy gram' }
#=> 2
1 If you also wanted to keep dashes, for hyphenated words, change the regex to /[^-a-z]/ or /[^a-z-]/.
2 Note from String#split that .split is the same as both .split(' ') and .split(/\s+/)).
3 Also, Ruby's naming convention is to use lower-case letters and underscores ("snake-case") for variables and methods, such as my_array.
I have a string:
s="123--abc,123--abc,123--abc"
I tried using Ruby 1.9's new feature "named groups" to fetch all named group info:
/(?<number>\d*)--(?<chars>\s*)/
Is there an API like Python's findall which returns a matchdata collection? In this case I need to return two matches, because 123 and abc repeat twice. Each match data contains of detail of each named capture info so I can use m['number'] to get the match value.
Named captures are suitable only for one matching result.
Ruby's analogue of findall is String#scan. You can either use scan result as an array, or pass a block to it:
irb> s = "123--abc,123--abc,123--abc"
=> "123--abc,123--abc,123--abc"
irb> s.scan(/(\d*)--([a-z]*)/)
=> [["123", "abc"], ["123", "abc"], ["123", "abc"]]
irb> s.scan(/(\d*)--([a-z]*)/) do |number, chars|
irb* p [number,chars]
irb> end
["123", "abc"]
["123", "abc"]
["123", "abc"]
=> "123--abc,123--abc,123--abc"
Chiming in super-late, but here's a simple way of replicating String#scan but getting the matchdata instead:
matches = []
foo.scan(regex){ matches << $~ }
matches now contains the MatchData objects that correspond to scanning the string.
You can extract the used variables from the regexp using names method. So what I did is, I used regular scan method to get the matches, then zipped names and every match to create a Hash.
class String
def scan2(regexp)
names = regexp.names
scan(regexp).collect do |match|
Hash[names.zip(match)]
end
end
end
Usage:
>> "aaa http://www.google.com.tr aaa https://www.yahoo.com.tr ddd".scan2 /(?<url>(?<protocol>https?):\/\/[\S]+)/
=> [{"url"=>"http://www.google.com.tr", "protocol"=>"http"}, {"url"=>"https://www.yahoo.com.tr", "protocol"=>"https"}]
#Nakilon is correct showing scan with a regex, however you don't even need to venture into regex land if you don't want to:
s = "123--abc,123--abc,123--abc"
s.split(',')
#=> ["123--abc", "123--abc", "123--abc"]
s.split(',').inject([]) { |a,s| a << s.split('--'); a }
#=> [["123", "abc"], ["123", "abc"], ["123", "abc"]]
This returns an array of arrays, which is convenient if you have multiple occurrences and need to see/process them all.
s.split(',').inject({}) { |h,s| n,v = s.split('--'); h[n] = v; h }
#=> {"123"=>"abc"}
This returns a hash, which, because the elements have the same key, has only the unique key value. This is good when you have a bunch of duplicate keys but want the unique ones. Its downside occurs if you need the unique values associated with the keys, but that appears to be a different question.
If using ruby >=1.9 and the named captures, you could:
class String
def scan2(regexp2_str, placeholders = {})
return regexp2_str.to_re(placeholders).match(self)
end
def to_re(placeholders = {})
re2 = self.dup
separator = placeholders.delete(:SEPARATOR) || '' #Returns and removes separator if :SEPARATOR is set.
#Search for the pattern placeholders and replace them with the regex
placeholders.each do |placeholder, regex|
re2.sub!(separator + placeholder.to_s + separator, "(?<#{placeholder}>#{regex})")
end
return Regexp.new(re2, Regexp::MULTILINE) #Returns regex using named captures.
end
end
Usage (ruby >=1.9):
> "1234:Kalle".scan2("num4:name", num4:'\d{4}', name:'\w+')
=> #<MatchData "1234:Kalle" num4:"1234" name:"Kalle">
or
> re="num4:name".to_re(num4:'\d{4}', name:'\w+')
=> /(?<num4>\d{4}):(?<name>\w+)/m
> m=re.match("1234:Kalle")
=> #<MatchData "1234:Kalle" num4:"1234" name:"Kalle">
> m[:num4]
=> "1234"
> m[:name]
=> "Kalle"
Using the separator option:
> "1234:Kalle".scan2("#num4#:#name#", SEPARATOR:'#', num4:'\d{4}', name:'\w+')
=> #<MatchData "1234:Kalle" num4:"1234" name:"Kalle">
I needed something similar recently. This should work like String#scan, but return an array of MatchData objects instead.
class String
# This method will return an array of MatchData's rather than the
# array of strings returned by the vanilla `scan`.
def match_all(regex)
match_str = self
match_datas = []
while match_str.length > 0 do
md = match_str.match(regex)
break unless md
match_datas << md
match_str = md.post_match
end
return match_datas
end
end
Running your sample data in the REPL results in the following:
> "123--abc,123--abc,123--abc".match_all(/(?<number>\d*)--(?<chars>[a-z]*)/)
=> [#<MatchData "123--abc" number:"123" chars:"abc">,
#<MatchData "123--abc" number:"123" chars:"abc">,
#<MatchData "123--abc" number:"123" chars:"abc">]
You may also find my test code useful:
describe String do
describe :match_all do
it "it works like scan, but uses MatchData objects instead of arrays and strings" do
mds = "ABC-123, DEF-456, GHI-098".match_all(/(?<word>[A-Z]+)-(?<number>[0-9]+)/)
mds[0][:word].should == "ABC"
mds[0][:number].should == "123"
mds[1][:word].should == "DEF"
mds[1][:number].should == "456"
mds[2][:word].should == "GHI"
mds[2][:number].should == "098"
end
end
end
I really liked #Umut-Utkan's solution, but it didn't quite do what I wanted so I rewrote it a bit (note, the below might not be beautiful code, but it seems to work)
class String
def scan2(regexp)
names = regexp.names
captures = Hash.new
scan(regexp).collect do |match|
nzip = names.zip(match)
nzip.each do |m|
captgrp = m[0].to_sym
captures.add(captgrp, m[1])
end
end
return captures
end
end
Now, if you do
p '12f3g4g5h5h6j7j7j'.scan2(/(?<alpha>[a-zA-Z])(?<digit>[0-9])/)
You get
{:alpha=>["f", "g", "g", "h", "h", "j", "j"], :digit=>["3", "4", "5", "5", "6", "7", "7"]}
(ie. all the alpha characters found in one array, and all the digits found in another array). Depending on your purpose for scanning, this might be useful. Anyway, I love seeing examples of how easy it is to rewrite or extend core Ruby functionality with just a few lines!
A year ago I wanted regular expressions that were more easy to read and named the captures, so I made the following addition to String (should maybe not be there, but it was convenient at the time):
scan2.rb:
class String
#Works as scan but stores the result in a hash indexed by variable/constant names (regexp PLACEHOLDERS) within parantheses.
#Example: Given the (constant) strings BTF, RCVR and SNDR and the regexp /#BTF# (#RCVR#) (#SNDR#)/
#the matches will be returned in a hash like: match[:RCVR] = <the match> and match[:SNDR] = <the match>
#Note: The #STRING_VARIABLE_OR_CONST# syntax has to be used. All occurences of #STRING# will work as #{STRING}
#but is needed for the method to see the names to be used as indices.
def scan2(regexp2_str, mark='#')
regexp = regexp2_str.to_re(mark) #Evaluates the strings. Note: Must be reachable from here!
hash_indices_array = regexp2_str.scan(/\(#{mark}(.*?)#{mark}\)/).flatten #Look for string variable names within (#VAR#) or # replaced by <mark>
match_array = self.scan(regexp)
#Save matches in hash indexed by string variable names:
match_hash = Hash.new
match_array.flatten.each_with_index do |m, i|
match_hash[hash_indices_array[i].to_sym] = m
end
return match_hash
end
def to_re(mark='#')
re = /#{mark}(.*?)#{mark}/
return Regexp.new(self.gsub(re){eval $1}, Regexp::MULTILINE) #Evaluates the strings, creates RE. Note: Variables must be reachable from here!
end
end
Example usage (irb1.9):
> load 'scan2.rb'
> AREA = '\d+'
> PHONE = '\d+'
> NAME = '\w+'
> "1234-567890 Glenn".scan2('(#AREA#)-(#PHONE#) (#NAME#)')
=> {:AREA=>"1234", :PHONE=>"567890", :NAME=>"Glenn"}
Notes:
Of course it would have been more elegant to put the patterns (e.g. AREA, PHONE...) in a hash and add this hash with patterns to the arguments of scan2.
Piggybacking off of Mark Hubbart's answer, I added the following monkey-patch:
class ::Regexp
def match_all(str)
matches = []
str.scan(self) { matches << $~ }
matches
end
end
which can be used as /(?<letter>\w)/.match_all('word'), and returns:
[#<MatchData "w" letter:"w">, #<MatchData "o" letter:"o">, #<MatchData "r" letter:"r">, #<MatchData "d" letter:"d">]
This relies on, as others have said, the use of $~ in the scan block for the match data.
I like the match_all given by John, but I think it has an error.
The line:
match_datas << md
works if there are no captures () in the regex.
This code gives the whole line up to and including the pattern matched/captured by the regex. (The [0] part of MatchData) If the regex has capture (), then this result is probably not what the user (me) wants in the eventual output.
I think in the case where there are captures () in regex, the correct code should be:
match_datas << md[1]
The eventual output of match_datas will be an array of pattern capture matches starting from match_datas[0]. This is not quite what may be expected if a normal MatchData is wanted which includes a match_datas[0] value which is the whole matched substring followed by match_datas[1], match_datas[[2],.. which are the captures (if any) in the regex pattern.
Things are complex - which may be why match_all was not included in native MatchData.