i am confuse about database relationship...I am creating website like classified ads..without registartion how user can post??
Registration users and without registration users form are same...but how to store data without registartion user
This is form
This is database
user.id is required on your Advertise table only. So, what you can do is first set the user_id on Advertise table that way you can have advertises from registered users and non users.
So if a particular user can check his ads then he can check his ads.
About the unauthenticated users they wont have the deligacy of viewing their ads.
Or you can do something like :
Check auth()->check() if auth exists then give that form if doesn't then get the unregistered user email and give the services of checking ads with email
Related
i am working on a multi user application where i have two tables for authentication, admins table and users table.
currently when a user registers, their information gets saved in the admins
table(which automatically makes them admins for the registered account) and are authenticated using the same table.
These admins can create other users and assign roles and permisions to restrict them from accessing certain information associated with that account.
These users are saved in the users table with admin_id to track which account they belong to,they are authenticated using the same users table.
Now my issue is how to track all records created by all these different users of the account.
For instance when and admin creates a post, the admin_id will be used to track the post and when a user creates a post the user_id will be used to track the post and with the help of a hasManyThrough relationship between the Admin,User and Post models all posts associated with the account can be obtained and displayed to the admin.
But for a case where a user is given the permision to view all posts associated with the account i do not know how this is going to work.
Initially, what i wanted to do to avoid all these confusion was, during authentication,i would just get the id (if admins table is being used for auth) or admin_id (if users table is being used) and store as account_id in localstorage or session.
This way, account_id will be the same for all the different users of the account and posts created by an admin of an account will be tracked with the same id as posts created by different users of the same account.
So is this approach good enough?
Is there a better approach to this problem?
and finally is this a dumb question?
Help me out guys!
Thanks in advance.
I'm building an employee self service portal via Dynamics 365, and when I use the lookup field to display my name in a form other employee names are displayed too:
I've been fiddling with the security roles for a while now and still cant seem to get it to display a single employee name.
I'm also planning to do it a different way by filling up the employee name based on the username on the upper right.
How do you guys suggest I go about this?
First things first. Portals won't use any CRM Security role concepts as it's for CRM users. Portal is built on top of Contact entity. Contact is Portal user & Web role will control his/her access.
You have to Entity Form Metadata to populate the fields per your need. The contact lookup can be filled in by current login Portal user this way. Even you can implement something like manage/restrict the Contacts only from your parent Account in that lookup easily.
We have developed an app that let user login with facebook. The app has been granted all required permissions to retrieve name, email, gender and age range etc. But our app developer stored only id,name and email while user login. Now we need to retrieve gender and age range of all those users who have logged in the app.
Is there a way to rerun user query to retrieve those data? I am looking to develop an program using Spring-social and RestFB but it needs user login action to retrieve required data which is problem in our case since we cannot recreate login action again.
As long as the user granted public_profile permission to your app, and you have their app-scoped user id, you can make the API call using your app access token.
And if you are looking to request this data for a lot of users, then you should optimize your requests in the following ways:
request the fields you need only: /user-id?fields=id,gender
request data for multiple users in one go: /?ids=user-id-1,user-id-2,user-id-3&fields=fields=id,gender – https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/using-graph-api/v2.5#multirequests
perhaps even use Batch Requests if necessary, https://developers.facebook.com/docs/graph-api/making-multiple-requests/
Is there something similar to the email verifcation feature where a system admin could validate user sign-up/registration requests?
Background: We're building a system with a closed community, where new users can join only if an admin has verified their sing-up data.
Ideally the admin should just receive an email that there's a new registration request and validate the request directly from the email.
The emailVerified column is protected - it can only be updated by the system in response to the target user clicking the link in the validation email.
An admin can not "tick" this field on behalf of another user.
However. From your brief description of the background I would suggest that you want the users to click the link - after all it serves to validate their email address. If you are creating your own app there is nothing to stop you adding your own column to the user model (or preferably a related table) and implement code in your sign up that also checks this extra column. Of course this is more work - but likely not excessive - and you get the desired workflow.
Not sure if this is possible or if anyone has managed to do this. I have user with super admin access, with which I can create a new user for my domain. However I also want to add a couple of calenders to the created user's calendar list. When I create a user I authenticate using my super admin, but then I can't add a calendar to the user's calendar list since I am not logged in as the user. Is it possible to do this as the super admin, or do I have to logout and authenticate as the created user in order to add calendars to their list? This is the base url to which the post request is made:
https://www.googleapis.com/calendar/v3/users/me/calendarList
in the place of me could I pass in the id of the user? I couldn't find any parameter in the documentation with which I can specify the user to whose list I want to add a calender.
Thanks
Two options:
Each user much login to google calendar and share thier calendar to a single user. You can then use this account to update their calendars. Note that google has limitations to how many calendars and request you are allowed before the account goes to read-only mode.
Buy a google apps domain (5$per user per month) and create a service account at console.developers.google.com. Create a project and give it domain wide delgation at admin.google.com. In Apps engine you should be able to give access for admin to modify all users calendars.
No matter what case you choose, you also need to enable CalendarAPI at dev console site. Now with private key created from website request OAuth2 access token, where sub field is set for the users that you want to change calendar for. With returned access token use CalendarAPI to modify calendar.
Sry for bad english and short description, i'm in a hurry. /conner ;)