I understand that you can use ajax to populate the datatable. But can you use fetch?
Because I have this normal table, filled dynamically using fetch api.
$(document).ready(function(){
fillTable();
})
//fetch api (AJAX) to fill table
fillTable = () => {
fetch('http://localhost:3000/home.json')
.then(response => response.json())
.then(data => {
let html = '';
for (i = 0; i < data.length; i++){
html += '<tr>'+
'<td class="tdUsername pv3 w-35 pr3 bb b--black-20">'+ data[i].username + '</td>'+
'<td class="tdPassword pv3 w-35 pr3 bb b--black-20">'+ data[i].password + '</td>'+
'<td class="pv3 w-30 pr3 bb b--black-20">'+
'<div class="btn-group" role="group" aria-label="Basic example">'+
'<a class="editButton f6 grow no-underline ba bw1 ph3 pv2 mb2 dib black pointer" data-toggle="modal">EDIT</a>'+
'<a class="deleteButton f6 grow no-underline ba bw1 ph3 pv2 mb2 dib black pointer" data-toggle="modal">DELETE</a>'+
'</div>'+
'</td>'+
'</tr>'
}
$('#tblBody').html(html);
})
.catch(err => console.log("ERROR!: ", err))
}
So I am wondering if I can use fetch-api instead of using this to fill the datatable.
//syntax copied from the website
$('#myTable').DataTable( {
ajax: '/api/myData'
} );
It is possible to use 'ajax' option as a function, see https://datatables.net/reference/option/ajax#function
As a function, making the Ajax call is left up to yourself allowing complete control of the Ajax request. Indeed, if desired, a method other than Ajax could be used to obtain the required data, such as Web storage or a Firebase database.
When the data has been obtained from the data source, the second parameter (callback here) should be called with a single parameter passed in - the data to use to draw the table.
Example:
$('#example').dataTable( {
"ajax": function (data, callback, settings) {
callback(
JSON.parse( localStorage.getItem('dataTablesData') )
);
}
});
I was looking for this answer myself as I am trying to stay away from jquery as much as possible, but was unable to find an answer anywhere. I ultimately figured it out on my own and the implementation is not very different than using DataTable's suggested jquery ajax call.
var myTable = $('#myTable').DataTable({
ajax: async function (data, callback, settings) {
let response = await fetch("/api/v1/some/end/point", {headers: {Authorization: 'Bearer ' + sessionStorage.getItem("token")}});
if (response.ok) {
let msg = await response.json();
sessionStorage.setItem('token', msg.token);
console.table(msg.data);
delete msg['token'];
callback(msg);
} else {
console.log(response);
}
},
...... followed by the usual DataTable options
if someone is looking for an answer.
Yes, you can use fetch to populate datatable, here is an example.
fetchEndPointData(dc)
.then(aggregatedData => {
$('#table1').dataTable().api().rows.add(aggregatedData);
}).catch(error => {
// When fetch ends with a bad HTTP status, e.g. 404
console.log(error.message);
});
invoked method
async function fetchEndPointData(dc) {
const response = await fetch('/someEndPoint=' + dc);
const movies = await response.json();
return movies;
}
Note : the fetchEndPointData is returning a promise.
reference : https://dmitripavlutin.com/javascript-fetch-async-await/
Related
countSubcategories() function returns [object Promise] where it should return row counts of mapped subcategories.
This code is in vue.js & Laravel, Any suggestions on this?
<div v-for="(cat,index) in cats.data" :key="cat.id">
{{ countSubcategories(cat.id) }} // Here subcategories row counts should be displayed.
</div>
<script>
export default {
data() {
return {
cats: {},
childcounts: ""
};
},
created() {
this.getCategories();
},
methods: {
countSubcategories(id) {
return axios
.get("/api/user-permission-child-count/" + `${id}`)
.then(response => {
this.childcounts = response.data;
return response.data;
});
},
getCategories(page) {
if (typeof page === "undefined") {
page = 1;
}
let url = helper.getFilterURL(this.filterpartnerForm);
axios
.get("/api/get-user-permission-categories?page=" + page + url)
.then(response => (this.cats = response.data));
}
}
};
</script>
As Aron stated in the previous answer as you are calling direct from the template the information is not ready when the template is rendered.
As far as I understood you need to run getCategories first so then you can fetch the rest of your data, right?
If that's the case I have a suggestion:
Send an array of cat ids to your back-end and there you could send back the list of subcategories you need, this and this one are good resources so read.
And instead of having 2 getCategories and countSubcategories you could "merge" then like this:
fetchCategoriesAndSubcategories(page) {
if (typeof page === "undefined") {
page = 1;
}
let url = helper.getFilterURL(this.filterpartnerForm);
axios
.get("/api/get-user-permission-categories?page=" + page + url)
.then(response => {
this.cats = response.data;
let catIds = this.cats.map(cat => (cat.id));
return this.countSubcategories(catIds) // dont forget to change your REST endpoint to manage receiving an array of ids
})
.then(response => {
this.childcounts = response.data
});
}
Promises allow you to return promises within and chain .then methods
So in your created() you could just call this.fetchCategoriesAndSubcategories passing the data you need. Also you can update your template by adding a v-if so it doesn't throw an error while the promise didn't finish loading. something like this:
<div v-if="childCounts" v-for="(subcategorie, index) in childCounts" :key="subcategorie.id">
{{ subcategorie }} // Here subcategories row counts should be displayed.
</div>
Hello!
Based on the provided information, it could be 2 things. First of all, you may try replacing:
return response.data;
with:
console.log(this.childcounts)
and look in the console if you have the correct information logged. If not, it may be the way you send the information from Laravel.
PS: More information may be needed to solve this. When are you triggering the 'countSubcategories' method?
I would do all the intial login in the component itself, and not call a function in template like that. It can drastically affect the performance of the app, since the function would be called on change detection. But first, you are getting [object Promise], since that is exactly what you return, a Promise.
So as already mentioned, I would do the login in the component and then display a property in template. So I suggest the following:
methods: {
countSubcategories(id) {
return axios.get("..." + id);
},
getCategories(page) {
if (typeof page === "undefined") {
page = 1;
}
// or use async await pattern
axios.get("...").then(response => {
this.cats = response.data;
// gather all nested requests and perform in parallel
const reqs = this.cats.map(y => this.countSubcategories(y.id));
axios.all(reqs).then(y => {
// merge data
this.cats = this.cats.map((item, i) => {
return {...item, count: y[i].data}
})
});
});
}
}
Now you can display {{cat.count}} in template.
Here's a sample SANDBOX with similar setup.
This is happen 'cause you're trying to render a information who doesn't comeback yet...
Try to change this method inside created, make it async and don't call directly your method on HTML. Them you can render your variable this.childcounts.
Here is my predicament: I need to render json response received from controller method. I do this by calling clicking on navbar item "List Articles" which activate method ajaxIndex(). Then tat method makes request to route which in turn call controller method also called ajaxIndex(). That method then gater all articles and sends it as a response. After that, that response i can't control, it just renders raw json ...
Navbar item:
<a class="nav-link" href="/articles" onclick="ajaxIndex(this)"> List Articles </a>
Route:
Route::get('/articles', "ArticlesController#ajaxIndex");
Method in ArticlesController
public function ajaxIndex(Request $request)
{
$var1 = $request->var1;
$var2 = $request->var2;
$elem = $request->elem;
$currUser = auth()->user();
$currUri = Route::getFacadeRoot()->current()->uri();
$articles = Article::orderBy("created_at","desc")->paginate(5);
$html = view('articles.List Articles')->with(compact("articles", "var1", "var2", "elem", "currUser", "currUri"))->render();
//return $request;
return response()->json(["success"=> true, "html" => $html], 200);
//return response()->json(["success"=> $articles,"var1"=> $var1, "var2"=> $var2, "elem"=> $elem, "currUser" => $currUser, "currUri" => $currUri], 200);
}
and here my ajax method
function ajaxIndex(me,formId){
let var1 = "gg";
let var2 = "bruh";
let token = document.querySelector("meta[name='csrf-token']").getAttribute("content");
let url = "/articles";
if(formId){
let form = $("#"+formId).serialize();
console.log(form);
}
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: url,
headers:{
"X-CSRF-TOKEN": token
},
data: {/*
var1: var1,
var2: var2,
elem: {
id: me.id ? me.id : null,
class: me.className ? me.className : null,
value: me.value ? me.value : null,
innerHTML: me.innerHTML ? me.innerHTML : null,
}
*/},
success: (data) => {
console.log(data);
$('#maine').html(JSON.parse(data.html));
},
error: (data) => {
console.log(data);
}
});
}
How to render acquired data to particular view?
Now just renders json response alongside html.
My question is how to render response itself and where goes response from controller method. I tried console logging it when route is hit, but there is nothing in console. What is actual approach or what i need to change to achieve this?
Addendum: "For List Articles you will send ajax request to rest api where it returns array of objects(articles)". I assumed i needed to make ajax request, after being sent to appropriate blade, i should now display sent data? Am i getting wrong something? ...
Edit1:
Now when i go to any page in my app, for example:
http://articleapp.test/articles?page=2
it shows json response:
Edit2:
I also modified my ajax method to correctly display current page for article listing. Problem start when try to go to next page.
Here is the code:
function ajaxIndex(me,formId){
let token = document.querySelector("meta[name='csrf-token']").getAttribute("content");
let url = "/articles";
if(formId){
let form = $("#"+formId).serialize();
console.log(form);
}
$.ajax({
type: "GET",
url: url,
headers:{
"X-CSRF-TOKEN": token
},
data: {},
success: (data) => {
console.log(data);
let html = "<div class='container'>";
let articleBody = "";
let pagination = "<ul class='pagination'><li class='page-item'><a class='page-link' href='#'>Previous</a></li>";
if(data.articles.data.length > 0){
for(let i=0;i<data.articles.current_page;i++){
let created_at = data.articles.data[i].created_at.replace(/-/g,"/").split(" ")[0];
html += "<div class='row' style='background-color: whitesmoke;'><div class='col-md-4 col-sm-4'><a href='/articles/"+data.articles.data[i].id+"'><img class='postCover postCoverIndex' src='/storage/images/"+data.articles.data[i].image+"'></a></div><div class='col-md-8 col-sm-8'><br>";
if(data.articles.data[i].body.length > 400){
articleBody = data.articles.data[i].body.substring(0, 400);
html += "<p>"+articleBody+"<a href='/articles/"+data.articles.data[i].id+"'>...Read more</a></p>";
}
else{
html += "<p>"+data.articles.data[i].body+"</p>";
}
html += "<small class='timestamp'>Written on "+created_at+" by "+data.articles.data[i].user.name+"</small></div></div><hr class='hrStyle'></hr>";
history.pushState(null, null, "/articles?page="+(i+1));
}
for(let i=0;i<data.articles.total;i++){
//console.log(data.articles.data[i].id);
pagination += "<li class='page-item'><a class='page-link' href='/articles?page="+(i+1)+"'>"+(i+1)+"</a></li>";
}
pagination += "<li class='page-item'><a class='page-link' href='#'>Next</a></li></ul>";
}
html+="<div class='d-flex' style='margin: 10px 0px;padding-top: 20px;'><div class='mx-auto' style='line-height: 10px;'>"+pagination+"</div></div></div>";
$('#maine').html(html);
//?page=2
},
error: (data) => {
console.log(data);
}
});
}
When i go to next page, it shows json response as i previously stated. Look in the image above. It won't render ...
In this case ajax response should contain only the real content you want to get with the assynchronous request (html tags inside body). Your #maine element should be a div or another structure capable of having html child tags.
Ps.: If you want to render the ajax response like another page by changing header tags and maybe even the http content type then the response should be load inside an iframe tag.
**Edit: ** In pratice, delete the previous content before body tag in the view returned by ajax. And #maine must be a to contain the ajax response.
I have a Symfony 3 CRM and I use ajax calls to action the removal of items throughout the system. It uses a single call and then uses a switch statement to determine what it is the user is attempting to delete and handles it accordingly.
However, for some strange reason one particular type of item doesn't seem to work, it just reloads the page.
Here is the trigger button (I am implementing bootstrap confirmation):
<a href="" data-type="unit" id="{{ unit.id }}"
data-toggle="confirmation-singleton"
data-btn-ok-class="btn btn-xs btn-success"
data-btn-cancel-class="btn btn-xs btn-danger"
class="btn btn-xs btn-danger remove-item">
<i class="fa fa-remove no-override"> </i>
</a>
My ajax call for removal of items:
$('.remove-item').confirmation({
rootSelector: '[data-toggle=confirmation-singleton]',
container: 'body',
onConfirm: function() {
var type = $(this).attr('data-type');
var id = $(this).attr('id');
var data = type + '|' + id;
$.ajax( '/app_dev.php/ajax-call/remove-item/' + data )
.done( function(response) {
if(response != 'success') {
if(response == 'units_exist') {
alert("You cannot delete this item as there are units already linked to it.");
} else if(response == 'no_property') {
alert("Sorry! Property could not be found.");
} else if(response == 'bookings_exist') {
alert("Sorry! This unit has bookings. Please delete the bookings first.");
}
}
});
return false;
},
onCancel: function() {
return false;
}
});
And on the PHP side, for this particular example:
$data = $request->get('data');
$parts = explode("|",$data);
$type = $parts[0];
$id = $parts[1];
// using switch on $type
case 'unit':
$em = $this->getDoctrine()->getManager();
$repo = $em->getRepository('AppBundle:Unit');
$booking_repo = $em->getRepository('AppBundle:Booking');
$bookings = $booking_repo->findBy(array('unitId' => $id)); // check to see if any bookings exist
if(!empty($bookings)) {
return new Response('bookings_exist');
} else {
$item = $repo->findOneBy(array('id' => $id));
if(!empty($item)) {
$em->remove($item);
$em->flush();
}
}
break;
In this example, it SHOULD return 'bookings_exist' and if I directly go to the URL in the browser, it does display this message - however, all it does it reload the page instead of throwing the alert as stipulated in the ajax call. I know this call works as it does successfully delete other items in the CRM, it just seems to be when it cannot delete it due to a condition such as this.
I may be missing something really obvious here, so any help is appreciated.
For jQuery Ajax, use success and error handlers
Other handlers in jQuery's Ajax object are unreliable at best, and vary in their behavior and support between versions and browsers.
Prevent Default is generally a good idea with ajax handled events
Should jQuery fail, and NOT return false, the element will do it's default behavior, which in your case is which reloads the page.
onConfirm: function(e) {
e.preventDefault();
var type = $(this).attr('data-type');
var id = $(this).attr('id');
var data = type + '|' + id;
$.ajax( '/app_dev.php/ajax-call/remove-item/' + data )
.success( function(response) {
if (response.errorMessage) {
alert(response.errorMessage);
}
})
.error( function(xhr, status, error) {
console.log(status + '\n' + error);
})
;
return false;
}
PHP Side, build a JSONResponse
if(!empty($bookings)) {
return new JsonResponse([
'errorMessage' => 'Sorry! Property could not be found.'
);
}
instead of just adding .done() you should also use
.fail(function( jqXHR, textStatus, errorThrown ) {});
to catch any errors.
If the bookings is not empty then the function will return the new response 'booking_exist' and stop ... it will not proceed to next statments .
So if you need to delete the item use this code instead :
if(empty($bookings)) {
return new Response('bookings_not_exist');
} else {
$item = $repo->findOneBy(array('id' => $id));
if(!empty($item)) {
$em->remove($item);
$em->flush();
}
I have got this scheduler displayed but not binding to tasks. The scheduler in the view. I am using java script method to read/create call to web api
#(Html.Kendo().Scheduler<TaskViewModel> ()
.Name("AppointmentSearchScheduler")
.DataSource(dataSource => dataSource
.Custom()
.Schema(schema => schema
.Model(m => {
m.Id(f => f.TaskID);
m.Field(f => f.OwnerID).DefaultValue(1);
}))
.Transport(new {
read = new Kendo.Mvc.ClientHandlerDescriptor() {
HandlerName = "customRead"
},
create = new Kendo.Mvc.ClientHandlerDescriptor() {
HandlerName = "customCreate"
}
})))
Below is javascript handler method I am not including create handler for brevity.
function customRead(options){
//get the selected Row of the kendo grid
var selectedRow = $("#locationgridKendo").find("tbody tr.k-state-selected");
var scheduler = $("#AppointmentSearchScheduler").data("kendoScheduler")
//get SelectedRow data
var rowData = $('#locationgridKendo').data("kendoGrid").dataItem(selectedRow);
if (rowData !== null) {
//Convert data to JSON
var rowDataJson = rowData.toJSON();
//extract the location ID
var locationId = rowDataJson.LocationID;
var CalenderweekStartDate = new Date().toISOString();
baseUrl = $('base').attr('href');
$.ajax({
url: baseUrl + 'Schedular/api/GetAppPerLocation?locationId=' + locationId + '&date=' + CalenderweekStartDate,
type: 'GET',
cache: false,
contentType: 'application/json',
success: function (result) {
//This method is hitting and i can see the data being returned
console.log('data is received : ' + result.Data);
options.success(result.Data);
},
error: function (xhr, status, error) {
//alert("Error: Search - Index.js - submitAppointment()");
var err = eval("(" + xhr.responseText + ")");
alert(err.Message);
}
});
}
}
Here is the web API controller called by making ajax call . The controller works perfectly when i used the basic read/create syntax . The ajax call complete and it does hit back the success method and returns the data but scheduler for some reason is not binded to incoming data. Here is my controller code
[HttpGet]
[Route("api/GetAppPerLocation")]
public DataSourceResult GetAppointmentPerLocation([ModelBinder(typeof(Usps.Scheduling.Web.ModelBinders.DataSourceRequestModelBinder))] DataSourceRequest request, int locationId, DateTime date) {
List < TaskViewModel > locationAvailableAppointmentList = new List < TaskViewModel > ();
locationAvailableAppointmentList = data.Select(appt => new TaskViewModel() {
TaskID = appt.ServiceAppointmentId,
Title = "Appointment Available",
Start = DateTime.SpecifyKind(appt.AppointmentBegin, DateTimeKind.Local),
End = DateTime.SpecifyKind(appt.AppointmentEnd, DateTimeKind.Local),
Description = "",
IsAllDay = false
}).ToList();
return locationAvailableAppointmentList.ToDataSourceResult(request);
}
For some reason the scheduler is not binding to incoming data . the incoming data works perfectly when i use a basic binding approach but not using transport . My goal for using this approach is once i am done with read(scheduler is not binding now) , on create I need to grab the ID of the newly created task returned by my controller and then pass that id to another mvc controller to render a confirmation page. Any other approach to accomplish this goal will be highly recommended.
Please excuse me for any mistake since this is my first question on stackoverflow.
My goal for using this approach is once i am done with read(scheduler is not binding now) , on create I need to grab the ID of the newly created task returned by my controller and then pass that id to another mvc controller to navigate render a confirmation page.
I speculated that read was not returning correct result so i had to fix that .Also my basic goal was redirection to another page after with appointment id and displaying a confirmation screen. This is how accomplished it . I understand this is not the best approach but it has been more than a year no body answered by question. Here is the approach i took .
I added a error to the model state like this in my controller
if (!String.IsNullOrEmpty(task.TaskID.ToString()))//redirect to confirmation page if the appointment was added to the queue
ModelState.AddModelError("AppointmentID", confirmationNumber);
then on client side i configure the error event on grid like this
.Events(
events => events.Error("RedirectToConfirmationPage"))
Here is the Javascript method details
function RedirectToConfirmationPage(e) {
console.log('RedirecToConfirmationPage method......');
console.log(e);
if (e.errors) {
var appointmentID = "";
// Create a message containing all errors.
$.each(e.errors, function (key, value) {
console.log(key);
if ('errors' in value) {
$.each(value.errors, function () {
appointmentID += this + "\n";
});
}
});
console.log('Newly Generated AppointmentID = ' + appointmentID);
// Redirect URL needs to change if we're running on AWS instead of on local developer machines
if (window.location.href.indexOf('/TestProject.Scheduling') > 1) {
window.location.href = '/Scheduler/AppointmentConfirmation?confirmationNumber=' + appointmentID
}
else {
window.location.href = '/Scheduler/AppointmentConfirmation?confirmationNumber=' + appointmentID
}
}
}
Hope it is helpfull to someone down the road.
I'm using angular with the ionic framework beta 1.
Here's my ng-repeat html:
<a href="{{item.url}}" class="item item-avatar" ng-repeat="item in restocks | reverse" ng-if="!$first">
<img src="https://server/sup-images/mobile/{{item.id}}.jpg">
<h2>{{item.name}}</h2>
<p>{{item.colors}}</p>
</a>
</div>
And here's my controllers.js, which fetches the data for the ng-repeat from a XHR.
angular.module('restocks', ['ionic'])
.service('APIservice', function($http) {
var kAPI = {};
API.Restocks = function() {
return $http({
method: 'GET',
url: 'https://myurl/api/restocks.php'
});
}
return restockAPI;
})
.filter('reverse', function() {
//converts json to JS array and reverses it
return function(input) {
var out = [];
for(i in input){
out.push(input[i]);
}
return out.reverse();
}
})
.controller('itemController', function($scope, APIservice) {
$scope.restocks = [];
$scope.sortorder = 'time';
$scope.doRefresh = function() {
$('#refresh').removeClass('ion-refresh');
$('#refresh').addClass('ion-refreshing');
restockAPIservice.Restocks().success(function (response) {
//Dig into the responde to get the relevant data
$scope.restocks = response;
$('#refresh').removeClass('ion-refreshing');
$('#refresh').addClass('ion-refresh');
});
}
$scope.doRefresh();
});
The data loads fine but I wish to implement a refresh button in my app that reloads the external json and updates the ng-repeat. When I call $scope.doRefresh(); more than once, I get this error in my JS console:
TypeError: Cannot call method 'querySelectorAll' of undefined
at cancelChildAnimations (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:29151:22)
at Object.leave (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:28716:11)
at ngRepeatAction (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:26873:24)
at Object.$watchCollectionAction [as fn] (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:19197:11)
at Scope.$digest (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:19300:29)
at Scope.$apply (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:19553:24)
at done (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:15311:45)
at completeRequest (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:15512:7)
at XMLHttpRequest.xhr.onreadystatechange (http://localhost:8000/js/ionic.bundle.js:15455:11) ionic.bundle.js:16905
It looks like it's related to a bug, as per:
https://github.com/driftyco/ionic/issues/727
Which was referenced from:
http://forum.ionicframework.com/t/show-hide-ionic-tab-based-on-angular-variable-cause-error-in-background/1563/9
I'm guessing it's pretty much the same issue.
Maybe try instead using angular.element(document.getElementById('refresh')) for a possible workaround (guessing).