How can I solve T(n) = T(n-3)+n^2 using iteration?By master theorem answer is O(n^3) but I am having trouble solving it by iteration.
By direct resolution of the recurrence:
This is a linear recurrence of the first order. We first solve the homogeneous part,
T(n) = T(n - 3)
which is solved by a constant (more precisely three constants as three intertwined sequences form the solution).
Now for the non-homogeneous part, we use the Ansatz T(n) = an³ + bn² + cn + d, because we know that the difference of two cubic polynomials is a quadratic one.
Then
a(n³ - (n-3)³) + b(n² - (n-3)²) + c(n - (n-3)) = 9an² + 3(-9a + 2b)n + 3(9a - 3b + c) = n²
gives
a = 1/9, b = 1/2, c = 1/2.
Finally
T(n) = (2n³ + 9n² + 9n)/18 + T(0)
and similarly for the two other sequences.
Just try to expand the equation:
T(n) = n^2 + (n-3)^2 + (n-6)^2 + ... + 1 = \Theta(n^3)
T(3) = T(0) + 3²
T(6) = T(3) + 6² = T(0) + 3² + 6²
T(9) = T(6) + 9² = T(0) + 3² + 6² + 9²
...
More generally, T(3N) is the sum of T(0) and nine times the sum of the squared naturals up to N. The well-known Faulhaber formula justifies O(N³).
Similar results hold for T(3N+1) and T(3N+2).
Related
Can anybody please explain the time complexity of T(n)=2T(n/4)+O(1) using recurrence tree? I saw somewhere it says O(n^1/2).
Just expand the equation for some iteration, and use the mathematical induction to prove the observed pattern:
T(n) = 2T(n/4) + 1 = 2(2T(n/4^2) + 1) + 1 = 2^2 T(n/4^2) + 2 + 1
Hence:
T(n) = 1 + 2 + 2^2 + ... + 2^k = 2^(k+1) - 1 \in O(2^(k+1))
What is k? from the expansion 4^k = n. So, k = 1/2 log(n). Thus, T(n) \in O(2^(1/2 log(n) + 1)) = O(sqrt(n)). Note that 2^log(n) = n.
I need help in solving T(n) = T(n/4) + T(n/3) + 2n using iteration method (recursion tree. I am thinking it would be either Θ(2n) or Θ(n)?
It's straightforward. We have two following inequalities:
T(n) > 2T(n/4) + 2n
and
T(n) < 2T(n/3) + 2n
Now, try to find upper bound and lower bound by expansion. Based on both cases, you will find that T(n) = Theta(n).
For example, for T'(n) = 2T(n/3) + 2n we have the following expansion:
T'(n) = 2T(n/3) + 2n = 2^2 T(n/3^2) + (1 + 2/3) * 2n
By induction we can show that:
T'(n) = 2^log_3(n) T(0) + (1 + 2/3 + 2^2/3^2 + ...) * 2n
< n + 6 * n = 7n
Because 2^log_3(n) < 2^log_2(n) = n and (1 + 2/3 + 2^2/3^2 + ...) is a geometric sum with factor 2/3. Hence, the sum will be 1/(1-2/3) = 3 when n goes to infinity.
You can do the same analysis for the lower bound of T(n).
Therefore, as c1 * n <= T(n) <= c_2 * n, we can conclude that T(n) is in Theta(n).
I am not familiar with recurrence-solving techniques outside of the master theorem, recursion trees, and the substitution method. I am guessing that solving the following recurrence for a big-O bound does not utilize one of those methods:
T(n) = T(n-1) + 2T(n-2) + 1
We can make the substitution U(n) = T(n) + 1/2 and then get a recurrence
U(n) = T(n) + 1/2
= T(n-1) + 2T(n-2) + 1 + 1/2
= T(n-1) + 1/2 + 2(T(n-2) + 1/2)
= U(n-1) + 2U(n-2),
which is a little magic but, as templatetypedef mentions, the magic can be created with the annihilator method. Now we just have to solve the linear homogeneous recurrence. The characteristic polynomial x^2 - x - 2 factors as (x+1)(x-2), so the solutions are U(n) = a(-1)^n + b2^n where a and b are any constants. Equivalently, T(n) = a(-1)^n + b2^n - 1/2, which is Theta(2^n) except in special cases.
This recursion is called non-homogeneous linear recurrence. and it is solved by converting it to a homogeneous one:
T(n) = T(n-1) + 2T(n-2) + 1
T(n+1) = T(n) + 2T(n-1) + 1
Subtracting 1 from 2 and changing the base, you get T(n) = 2 T(n-1) + T(n-2) - 2 T(n-3). The corresponding characteristic equation is:
x^3 - 2x^2 - x + 2 = 0
which has solutions x = {-1, 1, 2}. This means that the recursion looks like:
c1 * (-1)^n + c2 * 2^n + c3 * 1^n = c1 * 2^n + c2 (-1)^n + c3
Where all these constants can be found knowing T(0) and T(1). For your complexity analysis it is clear that this is exponential O(2^n).
I thought it would be something like this...
T(n) = 2T(n-1) + O(n)
= 2(2T(n-2)+(n-1)) + (n)
= 2(2(2T(n-3)+(n-2))+(n-1))+(n)
= 8T(n-3) + 4(n-2) + 2(n-1) + n
Which ends up being something like the summation of 2i * (n-i), and my book says this ends up being O(2n). Could anybody explain this to me? I don't understand why it's 2n and not just O(n) as the (n-i) will continue n times.
This recurrence has already been solved on Math Stack Exchange. As I solve this recurrence, I get:
T(n) = n + 2(T(n-1))
= n + 2(n - 1 + 2T(n-2)) = 3n - 2 + 2^2(T(n-2))
= 3n - 2 + 4(n - 2 + 2(T(n-3))) = 7n - 10 + 2^3(T(n-3))
= 7n - 10 + 8(n - 3 + 2(T(n-4))) = 15n - 34 + 2^4(T(n-4))
= (2^4 - 1)n - 34 + 2^4(T(n-4))
...and so on.
Effectively the recurrence boils down to:
T(n) = (2n+1) * T(1) − n − 2
See the Math Stack Exchange link for how we arrive at this solution. Taking T(1) to be constant, the dominating factor in the above recurrence is (2(n + 1)).
Therefore, the rate of growth of given recurrence is O(2n).
I can find the sum of each row (n/log n-i) and also I can draw its recursive tree but I can't calculate sum of its rows.
T(n)=2T(n/2)+n/logn
T(1) = 1
Suppose n = 2^k;
We know for harmonic series (euler formula):
Sum[i = 1 to n](1/i) ~= log(n) [n -> infinity]
t(n) = 2t(n/2) + n/log(n)
= 2(2t(n/4) + n/2/log(n/2)) + n/log(n)
= 4t(n/4) + n/log(n/2) + n/log(n)
= 4(2t(n/8) + n/4/log(n/4)) + n/log(n/2) + n/log(n)
= 8t(n/8) + n/log(n/4) + n/log(n/2) + n/log(n)
= 16t(n/16) + n/log(n/8) + n/log(n/4) + n/log(n/2) + n/log(n)
= n * t(1) + n/log(2) + n/log(4) + ... + n/log(n/2) + n/log(n)
= n(1 + Sum[i = 1 to log(n)](1/log(2^i)))
= n(1 + Sum[i = 1 to log(n)](1/i))
~= n(1 + log(log(n)))
= n + n*log(log(n)))
~= n*log(log(n)) [n -> infinity]
When you start unrolling the recursion, you will get:
Your base case is T(1) = 1, so this means that n = 2^k. Substituting you will get:
The second sum behaves the same as harmonic series and therefore can be approximated as log(k). Now that k = log(n) the resulting answer is:
Follow Extended Masters Theorem Below.
Using Extended Masters Theorem T(n)=2T(n/2)+n/logn can be solved easily as follows.
Here n/log n part can be rewritten as n * (logn)^-1,
Effictively maaking value of p=-1.
Now Extended Masters Theorem can be applied easily, it will relate to case 2b of Extended Masters Theorem .
T(n)= O(nloglogn)
Follow this for more detailed explanation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aude2ZqQjUI