Closed. This question needs details or clarity. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Add details and clarify the problem by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I am new to software engineering and also I like to learn whatever new. I must be very thankful if someone help me to provide further information about How is a UI evaluated?.
Any help regarding to this matter is highly appreciated.
In common, evaluation of User Interface can be based on three common elements
• Functionality
• Aesthetics
• Performance
Functionality
Is the application usable?
Does it enable users to complete tasks?
Aesthetics
Style
How it influencing the users
How shown and presented?
How colors complement each other?
How UI elements convey their meaning?
Performance
Measured not only by speed, but also reliability.
Reliability (Even though an application looks good and feels great, crashes repeatedly, it likely won’t be very successful)
Should provide a user with full confidence.
Related
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
I can't say I'm weak in programming but I can't come up with the logic faster. I can analyse others code and get to know the logic. But I can't do it on my own. How can I improve my programming skills?
Quite a broad question but from my own, 30yr experience I can tell you there is no way around starting to
analyze existing code,
modify some things (play with it until it feels like it's your own code)
see what the changes do
develop your own ideas on how to do things faster/better/more beautiful
implement your ideas
see if it works
go on to more complex tasks
read books (very important, because many things can't just be discovered by trial'n'error)
be very passionate and determined about what you want to become reality
if you want to learn faster, then write more code
One very important item. You should have fun with what you do is always the best guarantee for success
If you fail at these items then I'm afraid you will never succeed with programming. But then maybe it's like any other field of knowledge.
I experience the same difficulties during my learning journey, too. When I complete challenge tasks I create more complex tasks for myself to see what I can do. It takes me to the next levels of solving problems.
Practice, Practice, Practice!
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I have seen in FHIR CI site there is a new split of current Careplan and specially their components in several new Resources (Careplan2, CareActivity, Goal, ...)
Really, this is good because monolithic Careplan is very heavy for Careplan editors, and Careplan schedulers. We are finishing a Careplan Editor and a Careplan scheduler and really it´s heavy to keep all of this info related in a careplan or only one resource, specially for searching Careplan activities.
We will be very interested for modifying our CarePlan editors and scheduler because we could get better management.
My questions are:
- will these experimental Care plan proposals substitute the current Care plan? is there some scheduled proposal for this?
- Which group is defining this for collaborate with them?
Thanks in advance
Regards
Discussions around the scope of care plan are on-going. The alternatives you've found are definitely experimental, and I don't know what their standing is in terms of the editorial process. I do think that in the end, some kind of unpackaging is more likely than not doing it, whether it's this or not.
The work is being carried out by the patient care work group and HL7 (http://www.hl7.org/Special/committees/patientcare/index.cfm) and you should subscribe to the group email list.
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 8 years ago.
Improve this question
I was just wondering- is there an automated way that the "report abuse" (for profane or inappropriate posts) feature works for a large website like, say, Amazon? Is it just a simple game of numbers (e.g. 100 ppl report the link so it should be taken down) or something more sophisticated?
It is a link on a website that the website-owner implemented? I don't think there is a some sort of top-down regulated method of implementing this, everyone does it's own thing. Some will be 'just simple numbers', some will be more sophisticated.
SO does both I guess: the more flags, the more a problem (spam for instance) gets attention of people who can lock, and flags of some users way heavier then others...
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 3 years ago.
Improve this question
Someone within my organization has started pushing for us to pilot the CMU SEI's TSP process (see website here). I have an instinctual aversion to any attempts to cure software development illnesses with alphabet soup, but I would like to know if anyone has experience with this process and can provide tangible facts.
I used to be a fan of SEI's CMM. I even read Watts Humphrey's "Managing the Software Process" book cover to cover. I haven't used TSP but I suspect it has similar strenghts and weaknesses as the other software processes.
Definitely read about it and what they claim it can do and how to implement it, but be vigilant about keeping your software process small and flexible. You need one, but be careful about taking processes from someone else.
good luck.
We've been using this process for a few months now and I'm not particularly impressed. This process is only suitable for a strict command and control style of management where programmers are essentially bean counters. Most of the good parts of this process (size estimates rather than time estimates, self reviews, detailed plans, logging time against plans, and keeping a log of defects and errors for later review) can be implemented without throwing a bunch of money at SEI.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
In your practice, how do you effectively track and manage technical debt?
Is there a specific metric, like SLOC, that you use?
How do you visually display your results to stakeholders and management?
What benefits have you seen in the process?
We write story cards for technical debt. They are BLACK, with big yellow warning signs on them. Get too many on the wall, and it's REAL obvious.
Anyone who walks past can see them :)
We use #todo comments.
In Python, the epydoc tools format the #todo nicely.
We have a little code scanner that extracts the #todo comment lines. We push them into the backlog as work to be done.
I talk a little about some of the metrics used to identify technical debt in my blog entry below. Technical debt can mean much more than just code clean up items highlighted by TODO statements in code. The tracking mechanism will change depending on which risk indicator you're focused on.
http://blog.acrowire.com/technical-debt/technical-debt-part-2-identification/
There is a plug-in for Sonar that translates technical debt into $.
I haven't used it myself yet, but it looks promising.