I am looking for some value in Excel spreadsheet but it's not obligatory thus in the middle of the flow I added parallel operation with two following parallel Set Variable steps: when the previous operation succeeds (var = excel_cell_value) and when it fails (var = default_value).
Unfortunately, when there is no such value in a spreadsheet the whole flow is marked as FAILED despite it ran successfully in fact.
How to solve that, guys? Thanks in advance
Related
Firstly, I am using visual basic 6 because that is what my school teaches.
We are meant to do a practice project for a supposed client that wants a program that allows employees to interact with a database.
I have made the First, prev,next and last button for record navigation, however, the issue is that the user is allowed beyond existing records using prev or next and it crashes the program with the error that there is no value
I have tried things like:
Making 2 counters, one for the current record that you are on and one for how many records are in the selected recordset. What I thought it would do is that if your current record tries to surpass the recordcount, it will cancel the action, but in the end the recordset.recordcount always returned 1 or 0 for some reason
I have also tried testing for if the primary key field is blank, but it returns the error that there is no such record
So how would I go about limiting the user from going beyond the records?
In the end, I was able to use an error handler for my problem to handle the error of the user trying to go beyond existing records.
What I did was:
On Error GoTo ErrHandler 'If any error happens go to ErrHandler
recordset.movenext
setFields 'Subroutine for setting the text boxes to their values
ErrHandler:
recordset.movelast 'If the user tries to go beyond the last record move him back
Update 2: I have also tried using the BOF and EOF people have been saying in the comments. I first had some confusion regarding them because I thought these properties were checking if it was the first record or the last record, but actually it was checking if you were outside of the file.
recordset.movenext 'move to the next record
If recordset.EOF = True Then 'If the user is outside the file
recordset.moveprevious 'Move him back
Else 'If he is not
setFields 'Set the fields
End If 'End the if
This is much simpler than the error handler.
Edit 2
It was a Microsoft bug. My CRM updated recently and the query is now executing as expected
Server version: 9.1.0000.21041
Client version: 1.4.1144-2007.3
Edit
If it is a Microsoft bug, which looks likely thanks to Arun's research, then for future reference, my CRM versions are
Server version: 9.1.0000.20151
Client version: 1.4.1077-2007.1
Original question below
I followed the example as described in the MSDN Documentation here.
Specify a positive number that indicates the number of entity records to be returned per page. If you do not specify this parameter, the value is defaulted to the maximum limit of 5000 records.
If the number of records being retrieved is more than the specified maxPageSize value or 5000 records, nextLink attribute in the returned promise object will contain a link to retrieve the next set of entities.
However, it doesn't appear to be working for me. Here's my sample JavaScript code:
Xrm.WebApi.retrieveMultipleRecords('account', '?$select=name', 20).then
(
result => console.log(result.entities.length),
error => console.error(error.message)
);
You can see that my query doesn't include any complex filter or expand expressions
maxPageSize is 20
When I run this code, it's returning the full set of results, not limiting the page size at all:
I noticed this too, but this happens only in UCI. Whereas this issue wont be reproduced when you run the same code in classic web UI.
Probably this is a bug in MS side, pls create a ticket so they can fix it.
UCI
Classic
Just wanna know if this scenario is possible in jmeter:
I will create a website using docker image then i will have to check the exact accessibility time(from creating up to launching/checking the site). Once the requirement is met, the timer will stop and it will give me the exact time on when it is actually up. Also, in the view result tree, i only want to get the last successful status. The View Result Tree will only show the last successful status and will disregard the failed status. This is the sample of my thread that i am using: enter image description here
If you really want to discard non-successful results you can do this using JSR223 Assertion and the following Groovy code:
if (!prev.isSuccessful()) {
prev.setIgnore()
}
where prev is a shorthand for parent SampleResult and setIgnore() function tells the listener to ignore the result in case of failure.
More information: Scripting JMeter Assertions in Groovy - A Tutorial
I'm currently coding an app that utilizes Parse as a backend, but have run into a '124' error. I admit that I do a lot in my cloud functions, but, from what I've observed, it doesn't appear over 15 seconds. Could someone please confirm this? Below is the output.
E2015-03-06T03:49:52.644Z] v286: Ran cloud function createEvent for
user puZNjFVfSm with:
Input:
{"RSVPDate":{"__type":"Date","iso":"2015-03-06T04:49:52.000Z"},"description":"Sample event to showcase
functionality","group":{"max":5,"min":4},"max":50,"reoccur":{"day":1,"month":1,"stop":{"__type":"Date","iso":"2015-03-06T04:49:52.000Z"},"week":1},"title":"SampleFCFS"}
Failed with: Execution timed out I2015-03-06T03:49:52.716Z] begin
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.717Z] creating Event - initial checks completed
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.718Z] Finished advanced checks
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.719Z] Event creation start
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.770Z] begin event creation
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.873Z] Finding role: company_employee_z0Zx39OyuY
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.875Z] Added and secured event
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.931Z] attaching role to 425Qy9v9e4
I2015-03-06T03:49:52.934Z] Adding participant
From what I can tell, it looks like I'm only getting 300Z (is that milliseconds?) on all my runs. Shouldn't I be getting 15 seconds?
Update: I found that the issue was caused by using the addUnique function of Parse Objects with an array of pointers. By inserting ids instead of pointers, the issue was resolved.
Thank you for your help.
Is it possible to troubleshoot HBase batch puts? I'm using HBase batch puts of 5000 records at a time, and I would like to, on put failure, find out which row or rows is causing a problem and to log it.
The method HTable.batch(List actions) receives a list of Puts and returns an array in the same size of actions list (your puts list you gave to the function). If actions(i) failed, then the result[i] will be null.
Please note that when the failure inside batch() is due to maximum number of attempts to write, you need to catch RetriesExhaustedWithDetailsException, and call getExceptions(), to get the array which contains the mapping of the error to the put causing it.
See code here