I have found two questions, but they received answers saying to set a default: one for the file extension, and the other for the specific file name.
It feels implied by those answers that this was impossible at the time to specify language with ad hoc, file-by-file specificity.
Is it possible? If so, how do I do it?
I happened to accidentally do something like this and was trying to figure out how to undo it. RubyMine had somehow put a specific filename in the file name pattern list. This might be close enough to what this question was asking.
Related
I have an issue, I wouldn't say it's a problem at the moment, but I can see how it could turn into one in the future.
I'm following some tutorials from Ruby, so I have a folder with a bunch of different files. In one of them, I was studying Hashes, and they showed that I could name its keys like :key. No problem so far.
The issue came when I was studying Classes and I had to declare the class attributes, IntelliSense (I guess, maybe it is another extension) would recommend code completion with the keys I declared in that Hashes ruby file.
So I tested some stuff and:
It wasn't unique to that file (of course).
It's not just in hashes, it will recommend any type of :attribute I create. Whether it is classes or hashes (which is what I have tried so far), it doesn't matter.
It isn't unique to that folder. If I have the files in different folders, with different depths let's say, it will still appear.
The only way I found to get rid of that was to erase the file, and that's no solution at all.
I guess my precise question is: How can I disable that code completion characteristic?
You can ignore file or folder in code completion by adding it to files.watcherExclude setting.
Files must be closed in editor: if ignored file is open, it will still be used for autocomplete.
I am wondering if it is possible to accomplish the following, given some context and example.
I have files in "Server\Share\Folder\File##.ext"
Sometimes the "File##.ext" can be "File01.ext" through "File20.ext", and other times it may be "File01.ext" through "File40.ext"
Sometimes there are less of these files, sometimes there are more.
I want a batch file to take the files from "Server\Share\Folder\File##.ext" and move them to "Server\Share\OtherFolder\File##.ext". I know I can accomplish this easily with:
copy /y "Server\Share\Folder\File01.ext" "Server\Share\OtherFolder\File01.ext"
Then just add another line for each extra "File02.ext, File03.ext, etc., but I am wondering if it is possible to make it so that any file that resembles "File##.ext" can be included, so that no matter how many ## I have, it always works without issue.
Thanks in advance for any and all advice!
EDIT
Someone mentioned using Wildcards, but my question with that is - lets say those files are File01.ext through File05.ext, will it match what it finds to the newly moved file? Like will it find File01 from File?? on the source and Make it File01 from File?? at the destination?
You can accomplish this task with a FORloop program in batch-file.
You can also loop through the Commands using : and variable name.
Combining these two would help you get what you want.
We can help you with Ideas and little bit of the coding. But the Efforts must be done by you. So U can learn programming better
I'm rather new to Objective C (I'm using Xcode, if it's relevant). I tried to find an answer to this, but couldn't find anywhere...
My question is: Is there a possible way to change a variable name in the Localizable.strings file, so that it would change in the entire app?
I do not want to use the "search and replace" option, since if there are more instances of that string which are not this variable's name, they would change too (which is something I'm interested to avoid).
Basically I'm interested in finding the parallel function to java's "refactor", while using eclipse. Thanks to all helpers!
No, not possible to do it automatically. At least not in XCode - maybe AppCode can offer something, but I doubt it. Localizable.strings is not code - it's a text file which contains key-value pairs. Thus there are no real references to keys in your code, just same string values in your code and in the file.
Hi I am using poedit editor and i am not able to edit the original string column. I want to edit few words on original string column. Thanks in Advance
(Oh well, I'll answer it here as well, for the benefit of the people who may find this post. But you won't like the answer any more than when I replied to you yesterday, when you asked on the Poedit mailing and in personal email to me.)
Short answer is: you can't. Read the introductory sections of the GNU gettext manual -- it explains the basic concepts of gettext translations very well, from both the programmer's and translator's perspectives, and it's clear you don't understand the concept of gettext.
Really, I mean it: please, please, read at the lest the intro part of the manual. The fine folks from the GNU gettext project put a lot of effort into it and if you've spent 5-10 minutes with it, you wouldn't need to ask this question.
Longer version:
Gettext uses text strings (typically in English) in the source code as translation keys. And it has tools to extract the strings and put them into a PO file. This ensures that only strings that are actually used are translated.
Changing the original string (called msgid -- it really is an ID) makes no sense. You would then have a translation of a string that is never used in the source code and so the translation would be guaranteed to never be used. Way to waste the translator's time, wouldn't it?
Want to "edit a few words"? Edit them in the source code. That's the only way that can ever work with gettext.
What Vaclav is saying is very true. If you change the actual source string, the system won't read it.
In Poedit, simply select the string from the long list that you want to edit then you will see that string in the Source Text at the bottom of the screen. Then in the Translation box, enter your preferred wording. Don't forget to include any variable aswell otherwise your change won't work.
What Vaclav is saying is very false.
You can change it. Open the file with notepad. Ctrl + F the original text that you want to change. Change it, and then save it. Then open the file with po edit again, and you will see the changed text.
While in a folder with lots of files, one can select many and rename only one. This one will get the name NewName (1) and the rest will follow as NewName (2) etc..
Is there a way to use this algorithm?
I mostly interested in using WinApi methods in general. It is easy to implement this specific algorithm. I don't know how to dig into explorer.exe and see what method it uses but probably it would be something reusable.
I mostly use c# but any language example would be accepted.
Not with a single function call, no. But you can loop through the files one at a time using SHFileOperation() with the FOF_RENAMEONCOLLISION flag to rename each file to the same target filename so Windows will generate its own unique filenames.
As pointed out by Remy Lebeau I came up with the official way to do it.
IFileOperation::RenameItems
Declares a set of items that are to be given a new display name.
All items are given the same name.
...
If more than one of the items in the collection at pUnkItems is
in the same folder, the renamed files are appended with a number in
parentheses to differentiate them, for instance newfile(1).txt,
newfile(2).txt, and newfile(3).txt.
Here is the referenced link.
This also answers my question on where to start to using windows shell api to do stuff. The answer is here.
Yes it is possible see here http://blog.gadodia.net/stupid-windows-trick-mass-renaming/ I used this to oganized and Number files in mass