Oke, so I have the following use case. On some of my entities I use a file entity for example with the organization logo.
Now I want users to post either a link (I will then async get the file) or a base64 has of the file. But when the user does a get I want to present an JSON representation of the file entity (that also includes size, a thumbnail link etc).
The current setup that I have is two different properties on my entity, one for reading and one for posting with different logic. And then an event listener that handels the logic. That’s all fine and all but it causes the user to post a postLogo property in their json file, I would hower like them to post to a logo property in their json file.
Is there an annotation that I can use (for example name on ApiProperty) to achieve this or do I need to override the serializer?
/**
* #var File The logo of this organisation
*
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="File")
* #ApiProperty(
* attributes={
* "openapi_context"={
* "type"="#/components/schemas/File"
* }
* }
* )
* #Groups({"read"})
*/
public $logo;
/**
* #var string The logo of this organisation, a logo can iether be posted as a valid url to that logo or a base64 reprecentation of that logo.
*
* #ApiProperty(
* attributes={
* "openapi_context"={
* "type"="url or base64"
* }
* }
* )
* #Groups({"write"})
*/
public $postLogo;
You can add a setter with a SerializedName annotation. Something like this should work
/**
* #Groups({"write"})
* #SerializedName("logo")
*
*/
public function setPostLogo($value)
{
$this->postLogo = $value;
}
Related
currently i'm struggle with the identifier because i not need it.
i only need an get request without anything and returning some system infos.
/**
* #ApiResource(
* itemOperations={
* "info"={
* "method"="GET",
* "path"="/system/info",
* "controller"=GetInfo::class,
* "read"=false
* }
* },
* collectionOperations={
*
* }
* )
*/
thats my current config but it always requires an identifier.
It sounds as if you're after not an ApiPlatform resource, but simply a standard endpoint.
Have a look at this documentation from Symfony on how to define a route.
To me it sounds like you're after something like this:
config/routes.yaml
system_info:
path: /system/info
method: GET
controller: App\System\Info
With controller:
namespace App\System;
class Info
{
public function __invoke(): JsonResponse
{
return new JsonResponse(['pc' => 'master race']);
}
}
Remember that ApiPlatform is supposed to be working with Resources (aka: DTO's and Entities), and as you're use-case does not do either, you end up struggling to make it work.
I want to check the entity variable and check if it is allowed to delete the entity. For example if the owner entity of the association is linked to another entity, I want to make the deletion impossible.
I've looked in the documentation of api-platform bu I could not find any help regarding my problems. Either you give the right to delete or not. I could not find how to control it (equivalent to validation for POST, PUT and PATCH).
You can use the access control feature of Api-Platform and Symfony Expression Language to achieve what you want. This way you can write pretty complex expressions.
I hope this example makes it clear.
user is the currently logged in user.
object is the resource user is trying to delete.
/**
* #ApiResource(
* itemOperations={
* "delete"={
* "access_control"="is_granted('ROLE_USER') and object.getUsers().contains(user),
* }
* }
* )
*/
class Entity
{
/**
* #var ArrayCollection
*
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="User", inversedBy="entities")
* #ORM\JoinTable(name="entity_users")
*/
private $users;
/**
* #return ArrayCollection
*/
public function getUsers(): ArrayCollection
{
return $this->users;
}
}
In this case only users who are stored in users Array of Entity can delete this resource.
I just started to play with AngularJS and I got error below.
Error: Argument '?' is not a function, got Object
at assertArg (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:1039:11)
at assertArgFn (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:1049:3)
at http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:4802:9
at http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:4384:17
at forEach (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:137:20)
at nodeLinkFn (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:4369:11)
at compositeLinkFn (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:4015:15)
at compositeLinkFn (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:4018:13)
at publicLinkFn (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:3920:30)
at update (http://localhost/angular/project/scripts/vendor/angular.js:14202:11)
Now, my question is: Is there a way I can find line in .js file where error occurred?
I get line number in angular.js file on raised exception but there is too many files where
error can occur.
I tried with AngularJS Batarang, but this is more for debugging semantic not syntax errors.
Thanks.
It'll be easier if you link to the js files that would have caused this error.
From the angular.js source, https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/angularjs/1.0.7/angular.js
it looks like a problem with instantiating the controller.
Here's the line that's causing assertion failure:
/**
* #ngdoc function
* #name ng.$controller
* #requires $injector
*
* #param {Function|string} constructor If called with a function then it's considered to be the
* controller constructor function. Otherwise it's considered to be a string which is used
* to retrieve the controller constructor using the following steps:
*
* * check if a controller with given name is registered via `$controllerProvider`
* * check if evaluating the string on the current scope returns a constructor
* * check `window[constructor]` on the global `window` object
*
* #param {Object} locals Injection locals for Controller.
* #return {Object} Instance of given controller.
*
* #description
* `$controller` service is responsible for instantiating controllers.
*
* It's just a simple call to {#link AUTO.$injector $injector}, but extracted into
* a service, so that one can override this service with {#link https://gist.github.com/1649788
* BC version}.
*/
return function(constructor, locals) {
if(isString(constructor)) {
var name = constructor;
constructor = controllers.hasOwnProperty(name)
? controllers[name]
: getter(locals.$scope, name, true) || getter($window, name, true);
======> assertArgFn(constructor, name, true);
}
return $injector.instantiate(constructor, locals);
};
It's unable to find the constructor for the controller.
I have a Symfony 2/Doctrine 2 entity with a UniqueEntity constraint. As show in the documentation, it should be possible to set a custom error message. I tied the following syntax, but that dose not work:
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="User")
* #UniqueEntity("email", message="Your E-Mail adress has already been registered")
*/
class User
What is the correct notation for the UniqueEntity constraint message? Or is the documentation simply wrong?
If you use only fields option in this annotaion, it can be used as the default option (the only option without name). However when you specify additional settings, you have to specify fields property.
/**
* #ORM\Entity
* #ORM\Table(name="User")
* #UniqueEntity(
* fields={"email"},
* message="Your E-Mail adress has already been registered"
* )
*/
class User
I want to add routes dynamically. I am storing tree of documents in database. Based on document's position in that tree i can generate url for specific document. Problem is, whenever I add document to that tree, I have to clean cache because url matcher is precached. But if I clean cache inside controller by deleting of content of cache directory error is thrown. Is there any way, how to solve it?
more problem specification:
I need more routes to create, because based on documents type, its called specific controller and action (even with specific parameters). In tree item entity i store url_part and some parameters to create particular route (like controller and action), then parameters, which are passed to that controller. Entity has method getRoute() which knows how to build route from its data. Then i have for example page document, it is entity called page and it has relation to tree item (i did not wanted to mess with inheritance). When i create page, it knows how to fill data for related tree item. Problem is, when i create page, its not unvalidated cache with existing routes. I wanna have routes cached, so after creating page i wanna reset cached routes.
Why do you want to generate routes dynamically? Can't you create a single route with a pattern which allows slashes?
I've made a similar CMS using Symfony2 before, and I used StofDoctrineExtensionsBundle (have a look at Tree and Sluggable).
My Document entity had the following fields to support tree structure:
/**
* #Gedmo\TreeLeft
* #ORM\Column(name="`left`", type="integer")
*/
private $left;
/**
* #Gedmo\TreeLevel
* #ORM\Column(name="level", type="integer")
*/
private $level;
/**
* #Gedmo\TreeRight
* #ORM\Column(name="`right`", type="integer")
*/
private $right;
/**
* #Gedmo\TreeRoot
* #ORM\Column(name="root", type="integer", nullable=true)
*/
private $root;
/**
* #Gedmo\TreeParent
* #ORM\ManyToOne(targetEntity="Page", inversedBy="children")
* #ORM\JoinColumn(name="parent_id", referencedColumnName="id", onDelete="SET NULL")
*/
private $parent;
/**
* #ORM\OneToMany(targetEntity="Page", mappedBy="parent")
* #ORM\OrderBy({"left" = "ASC"})
*/
private $children;
And a slug field which reflected the hierarchy:
/**
* #var string $slug
*
* #ORM\Column(name="slug", type="string", length=255, unique=true)
* #Gedmo\Slug(handlers={
* #Gedmo\SlugHandler(class="Gedmo\Sluggable\Handler\TreeSlugHandler", options={
* #Gedmo\SlugHandlerOption(name="parentRelationField", value="parent"),
* #Gedmo\SlugHandlerOption(name="separator", value="/")
* })
* }, fields={"title"})
*/
private $slug;
Isn't this what you're looking for?