How can a Guid be associated with a Runtime Class to be used in the function call winrt::create_instance, so a winrt Runtime Class can be late bound? I don't see how in MIDL 3.0--though Interfaces work with uuid and version. Is this the answer to late binding in WinRT?
I still don't know how to use winrt::create_instance, but I took a really deep look into base.h. I found plenty of guts to late bind to a WinRT component dll using def calls and interop. This is my solution to the problem. It works. Choosing the right way to hold IUnknown was important, and there was some specifics I'm still working out; like why I have to wrap the IUnknown in a winrt::impl::abi_t<> (WinRT/COM conversion?). Using the following code you simply load the dll by file name (with qualified path if not in in the executable directory), and call the class according to it's runtime namespace.classname. It is absolutely not necessary to add the activatableclass to the Packackage.appxmanifest or to reference the winmd. A search shows a lot of people looking for this, but there is a general reluctance to point this out. It's just like COM really, with its own quirks.
UINT32 ret = 0;
void* dllHandle = WINRT_IMPL_LoadLibraryW(L"Project.dll");
if (!dllHandle) { throw; };
void* pProc = WINRT_IMPL_GetProcAddress(dllHandle, "DllGetActivationFactory");
auto DllGetActivationFactory = reinterpret_cast<int32_t(__stdcall*)(void* classId, void** factory)>(pProc);
static const WCHAR* cname = L"namespace.classname";
const UINT32 cnamelen = wcslen(cname);
HSTRING hcname = NULL;
HSTRING_HEADER header;
HRESULT hr = WindowsCreateStringReference(cname, cnamelen, &header, &hcname);
com_ptr< winrt::impl::abi_t<winrt::Windows::Foundation::IActivationFactory> > oCOMActivationFactory{ nullptr };
ret = (*DllGetActivationFactory)(&header, oCOMActivationFactory.put_void());
com_ptr< winrt::impl::abi_t<winrt::Windows::Foundation::IUnknown> > iObj{ nullptr };
ret = oCOMActivationFactory.get()->ActivateInstance(iObj.put_void());
winrt::com_ptr<ProxyServer::ImplementationInterface> iImplementationInterface{ nullptr };
winrt::copy_from_abi(iImplementationInterface, iObj.as<ProxyServer::ImplementationInterface>());
iImplementationInterface.get()->MyFunction();
oCOMActivationFactory.detach();
WindowsDeleteString(hcname);
Docs for CF_HDROP says:
The data consists of an STGMEDIUM structure that contains a global
memory object. The structure's hGlobal member points to a DROPFILES
structure as its hGlobal member.
but in fact when you use GetClipboardData() it returns data to the DROPFILES itself. That is you don't get the data as a STGMEDIUM that you then have to access via the hGlobal member. Why is that? Docs wrong? Missing docs/details of automatic conversion? or am I reading something wrong?
typedef struct tagSTGMEDIUM {
DWORD tymed;
union {
HBITMAP hBitmap;
HMETAFILEPICT hMetaFilePict;
HENHMETAFILE hEnhMetaFile;
HGLOBAL hGlobal;
LPOLESTR lpszFileName;
IStream *pstm;
IStorage *pstg;
} DUMMYUNIONNAME;
IUnknown *pUnkForRelease;
} uSTGMEDIUM;
suppose I have a class like this and I would like to create a string with a
specific capacity. I tried doing the following but that did not work.
Any suggestions ? I know I could do it in the constructor but would like to do it during the declaration if possible.
class foo
{
std::string bar = std::string().resize(45);
}
I get the error
main.cpp: In function 'int main()':
main.cpp:8:46: error: conversion from 'void' to non-scalar type 'std::__cxx11::string {aka std::__cxx11::basic_string}' requested
std::string test = std::string().resize(45);
In C++, you probably don't want to "chain" methods unless previous methods have the correct return type.
As suggested by #James Maa, you can do simply use the constructor.
In c++11 we have new feature called move constructor so
string str = string();
doesn't cause extra time.
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/move_constructor
with move constructor, the program would directly use the address of the temporary constructed string after = sign, without making a copy.
The problem is that resize()function in c++ actually returns void
basic_string( size_type count,
CharT ch,
const Allocator& alloc = Allocator() );
This constructor might be something you are directly interested in.
You can do something with
std::string str(45, ' ');
I'm looking for a way of checking whether a std::function pointer is bound to a member function of a particular object. I'm aware that std::function itself has no '==' operator. I have however come across the std::function::target method which should be able, in principle, to give me the address of the function to which the pointer is pointing. My starting point was therefore this:
bool MyClass::isThePointerSetToMyMethod(std::function<void (const char*, string)> const& candidate)
{
// Create a pointer to the local reportFileError function using the same syntax that we did in the constructor:
std::function<void (const char *, string)> localFn = std::bind(&MyClass::theLocalMember, this,
std::placeholders::_1, std::placeholders::_2);
// Find the target
auto ptr1 = localFn.target< std::function<void (const char *, string)> >();
// Find the target of the candidate
auto ptr2 = candidate.target< std::function<void (const char *, string)> >();
// Compare the two pointers to see whether they actually point to the same function:
if (!ptr1 || !ptr2) return false;
if (*ptr1 == *ptr2)
return true;
else
return false;
}
This doesn't work, and the reason is that the values of 'ptr1' and 'ptr2' are always returned as null. According to the documentation for the std::function::target method, this must be because the type that I've specified for the target is not correct.
If I look at what target_type(localFn) actually is (using Visual C++ 2013), it's a bit frightening:
class std::_Bind<1,void,struct std::_Pmf_wrap<void (__thiscall MyClass::*)(char const *, string),void,class MyClass,char const *,string>,class MyClass * const,class std::_Ph<1> &,class std::_Ph<2> &>
Nevertheless, target_type(candidate) gives the same result, so I thought I'd try a typedef:
bool MyClass::isThePointerSetToMyMethod(std::function<void (const char*, string)> const& candidate)
{
typedef class std::_Bind<1,void,struct std::_Pmf_wrap<void (__thiscall MyClass::*)(char const *, string),void,class MyClass,char const *,string>,class MyClass * const,class std::_Ph<1> &,class std::_Ph<2> &> wally;
// Create a pointer to the local reportFileError function using the same syntax that we did in the constructor:
std::function<void (const char *, string)> localFn = std::bind(&MyClass::theLocalMember, this,
std::placeholders::_1, std::placeholders::_2);
// Find the target
auto ptr1 = localFn.target< wally >();
// Find the target of the candidate
auto ptr2 = candidate.target< wally >();
// Compare the two pointers to see whether they actually point to the same function:
if (!ptr1 || !ptr2) return false;
if (*ptr1 == *ptr2)
return true;
else
return false;
}
Alas this gets me no further; the values of ptr1 and ptr2 are still null.
So for now I've run out of ideas. Is there anyone reading this who knows either:
(1) The appropriate form for a typedef for a std::function pointer to the member function of a class, or
(2) A better way to achieve my ultimate objective, which is to tell whether a std::function pointer is pointing to a particular object's member function or whether it isn't?
[Background, in case anyone is interested: the reason I'm doing this is that I have a callback table where different callbacks are set to different functions depending on the state that the system is in; this makes state control very simple, as it means that in a given context I can call a given callback and know that the actions taken by the function I've called will be appropriate for the current state, without having to know anything about what that state actually is. Usually, when an object is instantiated which will change the system state, it takes control of the relevant callback(s) and binds them to whatever local member functions are appropriate for whatever state it's in. Under these circumstances, however, the object's destructor ought to return the callbacks to their status quo ante so that they are not left pointing to nothing.
Very rarely, an object may bind the callbacks to its member functions in its constructor, but before its destructor is called another object may take control of the same callbacks itself, and re-bind them to member functions of its own. If this happens, then the first object's destructor needs to be able to recognise that this has happened, and exit without affecting the callbacks' assignment to the second object's methods. The obvious way to do this is for the destructor to be able to check whether the callbacks are still assigned to its own methods or not, and if they are not then to leave well alone.]
Flesh out the callback table into a class which manages the table. All modifications to the table should be done through this class's interface. Internally, you would maintain a stack-like structure which lets you undo the changes done to the callback table. Barebones interface would look something like:
class CallbackTable
{
public:
bool ApplyChanges(...)
{
//Push the old values of the entries that would be changed here into your change-tracker stack and modify the table
}
bool UnApplyChanges(...)
{
//Pop the change-tracker stack and restore the table to the state it was in before the most recent change was applied.
}
};
I have a COM object interface in midl like
interface InterfaceName : IDispatch
{
[id(1)] HRESULT FunA(...);
[id(2)] HRESULT FunB(...);
[id(3)] HRESULT FunC(...);
}
Are the ids required to be consecutive? Or can I define it like
interface InterfaceName : IDispatch
{
[id(1)] HRESULT FunA(...);
[id(3)] HRESULT FunB(...);
[id(5)] HRESULT FunC(...);
}
Compiling the second version seems to be fine but will there occur any problems at runtime?
Actual id values are arbitrary numbers. They do not have to be consecutive; they just have to be unique. Zero and negative values are, by convention, reserved for certain special methods. Apart from that, there are no rules.