I start a wiremock server in a integration test.
The IT pass in my local BUT some case failed in jenkins server, the error is
localhost:8089 failed to respond; nested exception is org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException: localhost:8089 failed to respond
I try to add sleep(3000) in my test, that can fix the issue, But I don’t know the root cause of the issue, so the work around not a good idea
I also try to use #AutoConfigureWireMock(port=8089) to replace WireMockServer to start wiremock server, that could fix the problem, BUT I don't know how to do some configuration to the wiremock server using the annotation #AutoConfigureWireMock(port=8089).
Here my code to start a wiremock server, any suggestion to fix "NoHttpResponseException"?
#ContextConfiguration(
initializers = ConfigFileApplicationContextInitializer.class)
#SpringBootTest(webEnvironment = SpringBootTest.WebEnvironment.DEFINED_PORT)
class BaseSpec extends Specification {
#Shared
WireMockServer wireMockServer
def setupSpec() {
wireMockServer = new WireMockServer(options().port(PORT).jettyHeaderBufferSize(12345)
.notifier(new ConsoleNotifier(new Boolean(System.getenv(“IT_WIREMOCK_LOG”) ?: ‘false’)))
.extensions(new ResponseTemplateTransformer(true)))
wireMockServer.start()
}
Apache HttpClient suffers from NoHttpResponseException from time to time. This is a very old problem.
Anyway, I guess in your case the problem might be caused by restarting the WireMock server between tests, and at the same time, Apache HttpClient pools HTTP connections and tries to reuse them between tests. If this is the case, there are two solutions:
Disable pooling HTTP connections in your tests. This makes sense because it's considered normal that the WireMock server can be restarted during tests execution. Alternatively, craft your WireMock stubs to always send "Connection": "close" among the headers. The outcome will be the same.
Switch from Apache HttpClient to Square OkHttp. OkHttp, although it pools http connections by default, is always able to gracefully recover from situations like a stale connection. Unfortunately the library from Apache is not so smart.
Coorect, as already written by G. Demecki it's not related to Wiremock.
It’s related to your application server, which is calling wiremock. Today it’s common, to reuse a connection to improve the performance in a micro service infrastructure. So connection-close-header, RequestScoped client, etc is not useful.
Check the apache http client:
httpclient-4.5.2 - PoolingHttpClientConnectionManager
documentation
The handling of stale connections was changed in version 4.4. Previously, the code would check every connection by default before re-using it. The code now only checks the connection if the elapsed time since the last use of the connection exceeds the timeout that has been set. The default timeout is set to 2000ms
Each time a wiremock-endpoint was destroyed and a new one was created for a new test class, it takes 2 seconds, until your application detects, that the previous connection is broken and a new one has to be opened.
If you don’t wait 2 seconds, such a NoHttpResponseException could be thrown, depends on the last check.
So a Thread.sleep(2000); looks ugly. But it's not so bad, as long we know why this is required.
Each time a wiremock endpoint is destroyed (because the wiremock server is restarted between tests) and a new one is created for a new test, it takes 2 seconds (as stated in documentation), until the application detects that the previous http connection is broken and a new one has to be opened.
The solution is to simply override the default keep-alive connection behaviour for every stub using .withHeader("Connection", "close"). Something like:
givenThat(get("/endpoint_path")
.withHeader("Authorization", equalTo(authHeader))
.willReturn(
ok()
.withBody(body)
.withHeader(HttpHeaders.CONNECTION, "close")
)
)
Also possible to do it globally using a transformer:
public class NoKeepAliveTransformer extends ResponseDefinitionTransformer {
#Override
public ResponseDefinition transform(Request request,
ResponseDefinition responseDefinition,
FileSource files,
Parameters parameters) {
return ResponseDefinitionBuilder
.like(responseDefinition)
.withHeader(CONNECTION, "close")
.build();
}
#Override
public String getName() {
return "keep-alive-disabler";
}
}
Then this transformer have to be registered when you create the wiremock server:
new WireMockServer(
options()
.port(port)
.extensions(NoKeepAliveTransformer.class)
)
Solution that worked for us in this situation was just adding retry to apache client:
#Configuration
public class FeignTestConfig {
#Bean
#Primary
public HttpClient testClient() {
return HttpClientBuilder.create().setRetryHandler((exception, executionCount, context) -> {
if (executionCount > 3) {
return false;
}
return exception instanceof org.apache.http.NoHttpResponseException || exception instanceof SocketException;
}).build();
}
}
Socket exception is there as well, because sometimes this exception is thrown instead of NoHttpResponse
Related
I'm consuming data from a REST endpoint with in the middle of the route a proxy. I'm having CNTLM running locally (localhost:3128 ): it will authenticate for me on the corporate proxy, so I don't need to pass my credentials.
I have been unable to get my rest call to work, despite numerous attempts. For e.g., getting:
SSLException: Unrecognized SSL message
Connection handshake abruptly terminated
Connection reset
you name it, have got it
Below the simplest version of the many attempts made.
Apparently (from internet reading), that should work, but it doesn't.
How should Camel be configured, in particular camel-http ?
Notes:
The REST API I'm calling is using HTTPS but doesn't require a certificate.
The code works on my local machine when no proxy is involved. It fails on the intranet where there is a proxy
#Component
public class MyRoute extends RouteBuilder
public void configure() throws Exception {
//Tried different way to set the proxy, including inline with toD(...)
System.setProperty("https.proxyHost", "localhost");
System.setProperty("https.proxyPort", "3128");
getCamelContext().getGlobalOptions().put("http.proxyHost", "localhost");
getCamelContext().getGlobalOptions().put("https.proxyPort", "3128");
getContext().getGlobalOptions().put("https.proxyHost", "localhost");
getContext().getGlobalOptions().put("https.proxyPort", "3128");
from("timer:credentials?repeatCount=1")
.setHeader(Exchange.HTTP_METHOD, constant("POST"))
.setBody(simple(jsonAuth))
.to(baseUrlApi +"/v1/auth/tokens/?bridgeEndpoint=true")
.unmarshal().json(JsonLibrary.Jackson, AuthResponseDto.class)
.setHeader("Authorization", simple("Bearer ${body.data.accessToken.token}"))
// etc..
}
}
I am attempting to send data through IOWebSocketChannel in Flutter.io to a WebSocket created in Spring-Boot.
In spring-boot I have created the typical WebSocket config and controllers that are dealing with client's manipulation of my servers WebSocket. I will post them below just for reference.
WebSocketConfiguration.java
#Configuration
#EnableWebSocketMessageBroker
public class WebSocketConfiguration implements WebSocketMessageBrokerConfigurer{
#Override
public void registerStompEndpoints(StompEndpointRegistry registry){
registry.addEndpoint("/websocket")
.setAllowedOrigins("*") // allow us to connect to ws://localhost:8080/websocket with the default Spring port configuration.
.withSockJS(); // allows a client which does not support WebSocket natively mimic a WebSocket over an HTTP connection
}
#Override
public void configureMessageBroker(MessageBrokerRegistry registry){ //The configureMessageBroker method sets up a simple (in-memory) message broker for our application
registry.enableSimpleBroker("/topic"); //topic to be routed back to client
registry.setApplicationDestinationPrefixes("/app"); //This configuration allows Spring to understand that any message sent to a WebSocket channel name prefixed with /app should be routed to a #MessageMapping in our application.
}
}
WebSocketController.java
#Controller
public class WebSocketController {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(WebSocketController.class);
#MessageMapping("/send")
#SendTo("/topic/messages")
public Message send(Message message) {
LOGGER.info(String.format("Received message [%s]", message.toString()));
LocalDateTime timestamp = LocalDateTime.now();
return new Message(message.getFrom(), message.getMessage(), timestamp);
}
}
Now When I try using IOWebSocketChannel I perform the typical protocol of connecting to my configured websocket. Below is the code
final channel = IOWebSocketChannel.connect(
"ws://10.0.2.2:8080/websocket"
);
I have then created a method that is supposed to send data to my websocket so I attempt to connect to that endpoint which you see is created in WebSocketController.java called app/send/. Below is the code:
void _sendMessage() {
IOWebSocketChannel channel = IOWebSocketChannel.connect('ws://10.0.2.2:8080/app/send');
channel.sink.add(
json.encode({
"message": "bars",
})
);
}
Now when I check my Spring-Boot server nothing is logged, however, whenever I hot reload in Flutter Spring Boot and my connection to the websocket times out, tomcat server returns this:
So my question is if anybody has been able to make a breakthrough with sending data through websockets from Flutter into Spring-Boot using IOWebSocketChannel? I am also wondering if anyone has found a way to successfully use a STOMP protocol in Flutter.io? I was using stomp_client as it seemed like it was going to do the trick, however correct if I'm wrong, but flutter was giving me errors saying that there doesn't exist any html files, so I'm assuming that library is only for dart in the web.
Your Spring configuration looks good. But client-side you need some tweaks.
I spent some time to figure this out with the https://pub.dev/packages/stomp package. Use a modified version of the connect function provided here. Make sure to use this custom implementation of the connect function.
Future<StompClient> client = customStomp.connect('ws://10.0.2.2:8080/websocket', ...)
Once connected, according to your configuration, you can then send message on the following destination: /app/send.
I have a JAX-RS (Jersey) server with which I register and bind my stuff.
I want to print a banner when the server starts up. I want to do this using the JAX-RS framework not the web server's platform (i.e., no Jetty, Netty, Thorntail, etc hooks).
I saw the following which mentions the tried and true Servlet way of doing things:
Jax rs: How can I run a method automatically everytime my server restarts? , but that does not work because I am not running a servlet container in my server so that lifecycle call is never made.
I figured there must be a JCA-ish type object that I can register with Application/ResourceConfig that has such a lifecycle call, but I am unable to even find any kind of list of the things you can actually register.
Not to complain (but I will), but I cannot decide if this is so difficult because when they moved the project to eclipse, they broke every hyperlink to the old official documentation or that it is simply so implicit, like Spring, that it only works by github'ing other people's code and realizing, 'oh, I did not know you could do that'.
Jersey has Event Listeners. You'll want to use the ApplicationEventListener and the ApplicationEvent.Type you'll probably want to listen for to print the banner is the INITIALIZATION_FINISHED
public class MyApplicationEventListener
implements ApplicationEventListener {
#Override
public void onEvent(ApplicationEvent event) {
switch (event.getType()) {
case INITIALIZATION_FINISHED:
printBanner();
break;
}
}
#Override
public RequestEventListener onRequest(RequestEvent requestEvent) {
return null;
}
}
We are deploying our spring boot applications in OpenShift.
Currently we are trying to run a potentially long running task (database migration) before the webcontext is fully set up.
It is especially important that the app does not accept REST requests or process messages before the migration is fully run.
See the following minimal example:
// DemoApplication.java
#SpringBootApplication
public class DemoApplication {
public static void main(String[] args) {
SpringApplication.run(DemoApplication.class, args);
}
}
// MigrationConfig.java
#Configuration
#Slf4j
public class MigrationConfig {
#PostConstruct
public void run() throws InterruptedException {
log.info("Migration...");
// long running task
Thread.sleep(10000);
log.info("...Migration");
}
}
// Controller.java
#RestController
public class Controller {
#GetMapping("/test")
public String test() {
return "test";
}
}
// MessageHandler.java
#EnableBinding(Sink.class)
public class MessageHandler {
#StreamListener(Sink.INPUT)
public void handle(String message) {
System.out.println("Received: " + message);
}
}
This works fine so far: the auto configuration class is processed before the app responds to requests.
What we are worried about, however, is OpenShifts readiness probe: currently we use an actuator health endpoint to check if the application is up and running.
If the migration takes a long time, OpenShift might stop the container, potentially leaving us with inconsistent state in the database.
Does anybody have an idea how we could communicate that the application is starting, but prevent REST controller or message handlers from running?
Edit
There are multiple ways of blocking incoming REST requests, #martin-frey suggested a servletfilter.
The larger problem for us is stream listener. We use Spring Cloud Stream to listen to a RabbitMQ queue.
I added an exemplary handler in the example above.
Do you have any suggestions on how to "pause" that?
What about a servletfilter that knows about the state of the migration? That way you should be able to handle any inbound request and return a responsecode to your liking. Also there would be no need to prevent any requesthandlers until the system is fully up.
I think it can run your app pod without influence if you set up good enough initialDelaySeconds for initialization of your application.[0][1]
readinessProbe:
httpGet:
path: /_status/healthz
port: 8080
initialDelaySeconds: 10120
timeoutSeconds: 3
periodSeconds: 30
failureThreshold: 100
successThreshold: 1
Additionally, I recommend to set up the liveness probes with same condition (but more time than the readiness probes' value), then you can implement automated recovery of your pods if the application is failed until initialDelaySeconds.
[0] [ https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/configure-liveness-readiness-probes/#define-readiness-probes ]
[1] [ https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/latest/dev_guide/application_health.html ]
How about adding an init container which only role is the db migration stuffs without the application.
Then another container to serve the application. But be careful when deploying the application with more than 1 replica. The replicas will also execute the initcontainer at the same time if you are using Deployment.
If you need multiple replicas, you might want to consider StatefulSets instead.
Such database migrations are best handled by switching to a Recreate deployment strategy and doing the migration as a mid lifecyle hook. At that point there are no instances of your application running so it can be safely done. If you can't have downtime, then you need to have the application be able to be switched to some offline or read/only mode against a copy of your database while doing the migration.
Don't keep context busy doing a long task in PostConstruct. Instead start migration as fully asynchronous task and allow Spring to build the rest of the context meanwhile. At the end of the task just set some shared Future with success or failure. Wrap controller in a proxy (can be facilitated with AOP, for example) where every method except the health check tries to get value from the same future within a timeout. If it succeeds, migration is done, all calls are available. If not, reject the call. Your proxy would serve as a gate allowing to use only part of API that is critical to be available while migration is going on. The rest of it may simply respond with 503 indicating the service is not ready yet. Potentially those 503 responses can also be improved by measuring and averaging the time migration typically takes and returning this value with RETRY-AFTER header.
And with the MessageHandler you can do essentially same thing. You wait for result of the future in the handle method (provided message handlers are allowed to hang indefinitely). Once the result is set, it will proceed with message handling from that moment on.
I created Spring Boot 2.0 demo application which contains two applications that communicate using WebClient. And I'm suffering that they often stop communicating when I use block() method of Flux from the WebClient's response. I want to use List not Flux by some reasons.
The server side application is like this. It just returns Flux object.
#GetMapping
public Flux<Item> findAll() {
return Flux.fromIterable(items);
}
And the client side (or BFF side) application is like this. I get Flux from the server and convert it to List by calling block() method.
#GetMapping
public List<Item> findBlock() {
return webClient.get()
.retrieve()
.bodyToFlux(Item.class)
.collectList()
.block(Duration.ofSeconds(10L));
}
While it works well at first, findBlock() won't respond and timeouts after several times access. When I modify the findBlock() method to return Flux deleting collectList() and block(), it works well. Then I assume that block() method cause this problem.
And, when I modify the findAll() method to return List, nothing changes.
Source code of the entire example application is here.
https://github.com/cero-t/webclient-example
"resource" is the server application, and "front" is the client application. After running both application, when I access to localhost:8080 it works well and I can reload any times, but when I access to localhost:8080/block it seems to work well but after several reloads it won't respond.
By the way, when I add "spring-boot-starter-web" dependency to the "front" applications's (not resource application's) pom.xml, which means I use tomcat, this problem never happens. Is this problem due to Netty server?
Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.
First, let me point that using Flux.fromIterable(items) is advised only if items has been fetched from memory, no I/O involved. Otherwise chances are you'd be using a blocking API to get it - and this can break your reactive application. In this case, this is an in-memory list, so no problem. Note that you can also go Flux.just(item1, item2, item3).
Using the following is the most efficient:
#GetMapping("/")
public Flux<Item> findFlux() {
return webClient.get()
.retrieve()
.bodyToFlux(Item.class);
}
Item instances will be read/written, decoded/encoded on the fly in a very efficient way.
On the other hand, this is not the preferred way:
#GetMapping("/block")
public List<Item> findBlock() {
return webClient.get()
.retrieve()
.bodyToFlux(Item.class)
.collectList()
.block(Duration.ofSeconds(10L));
}
In this case, your front application is buffering in memory the whole items list with collectList but is also blocking one of the few server threads available. This might cause very poor performance because your server might be blocked waiting for that data and can't service other requests at the same time.
In this particular case it's worse, since the application totally breaks.
Looking at the console, we can see the following:
WARN 3075 --- [ctor-http-nio-7] io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultPromise : An exception was thrown by reactor.ipc.netty.channel.PooledClientContextHandler$$Lambda$532/356589024.operationComplete()
reactor.core.Exceptions$BubblingException: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Channel [id: 0xab15f050, L:/127.0.0.1:59350 - R:localhost/127.0.0.1:8081] was not acquired from this ChannelPool
at reactor.core.Exceptions.bubble(Exceptions.java:154) ~[reactor-core-3.1.3.RELEASE.jar:3.1.3.RELEASE]
This is probably linked to a reactor-netty client connection pool issue that should be fixed in 0.7.4.RELEASE. I don't know the specifics of this, but I suspect the whole connection pool gets corrupted as HTTP responses aren't properly read from the client connections.
Adding spring-boot-starter-web does make your application use Tomcat, but it mainly turns your Spring WebFlux application into a Spring MVC application (which now supports some reactive return types, but has a different runtime model). If you wish to test your application with Tomcat, you can add spring-boot-starter-tomcat to your POM and this will use Tomcat with Spring WebFlux.