When switching from "normal" subgraphs to clusters, rank=same doesn't apprear to work anymore.
To show my problem, please have a look at the following example graph.
digraph INV_X1 {
rankdir = "LR";
edge [penwidth="2"];
/* Component styles */
M_i_0 [shape=none;image="res/nmos.jpg"];
M_i_1 [shape=none;image="res/pmos.jpg"];
/* Node styles */
A [style=filled;color=green];
ZN [style=filled;color=green];
/* Connections */
M_i_0:n -> ZN;
A -> M_i_0:w;
/* Put M_i_0 and _VSS_0 on the same rank. */
subgraph g_VSS_0 {
rank=same;
label="_VSS_0";
_VSS_0 [shape=none;image="res/gnd.jpg";label=""];
M_i_0 -> _VSS_0 [arrowhead=none];
}
M_i_1:s -> ZN;
A -> M_i_1:w;
/* Put M_i_1 and _VDD_1 on the same rank. */
subgraph g_VDD_1 {
rank=same;
label="_VDD_1";
_VDD_1 [shape=none;image="res/pwr.jpg";label=""];
_VDD_1 -> M_i_1 [arrowhead=none];
}
}
The output is shown in the following picture. I hope it's not too confusing as I used some images for nodes. I created two subgraphs to group two nodes each and put them on the same rank. One subgraph is at the center top, the other on the center bottom.
Now I want to switch from subgraphs to clusters to make sure that the grouped nodes are always placed close to one another, and I want to have borders and labels to make the clusters visible. But when I just change the subgraph names to "cluster_..." it looks like this.
What is the problem here? Why is rank=same no longer working as expected? Also the given port position is no longer working as expected (edge is no longer connected on the south/north of the node).
I tried to pull rank=same out of the cluster into an own statement but that seems to completely overwrite the previous cluster statement as border and labels disappear. Also, I tried to use constraint=false on the node connections but that messes up the node order so I wasn't really satisfied with that approach.
Any help is appreciated. You can find the used images here if you want to recreate the graph.
You are right, as documentation states, "rank" attribute works only with subgraphs (cluster is not a subgraph anymore). But what's the problem, put another subgraph inside your cluster!
digraph INV_X1 {
rankdir = "LR";
edge [penwidth="2"];
/* Component styles */
M_i_0 [shape=none;image="res/nmos.jpg"];
M_i_1 [shape=none;image="res/pmos.jpg"];
/* Node styles */
A [style=filled;color=green];
ZN [style=filled;color=green];
/* Connections */
M_i_0:n -> ZN;
A -> M_i_0:w;
subgraph cluster_a{
/* Put M_i_0 and _VSS_0 on the same rank. */
label="_VSS_0";
subgraph g_VSS_0 {
rank=same;
_VSS_0 [shape=none;image="res/gnd.jpg";label=""];
_VSS_0 -> M_i_0 [arrowhead=none];
}
}
M_i_1:s -> ZN;
A -> M_i_1:w;
/* Put M_i_1 and _VDD_1 on the same rank. */
subgraph cluster_b {
label="_VDD_1";
subgraph g_VDD_1 {
rank=same;
_VDD_1 [shape=none;image="res/pwr.jpg";label=""];
M_i_1 -> _VDD_1 [arrowhead=none];
}
}
}
Also note that I've changed the order of your edges M_i_1 -> _VDD_1 and _VSS_0 -> M_i_0, for some reason they were inversed.
Result:
Related
I would like to create several clusters inside a subgraph like the following :
subgraph sub {
rank=same;
subgraph cluster_test {
p4;
p5;
p6;
}
subgraph cluster_t {
p1;
p2;
p3;
}
}
My aim is to have several clusters (which group the nodes together) at the same rank. However it seems clusters do not work inside subgraphs. Is there a way around that ?
rank=same can't apply across clusters. (yes, it would be nice). Clusters are laid out independently, rank=same would require dependent layout.
Also rank=same really applies to nodes within a subgraph, not a cluster, that can consist of nodes in multiple ranks.
Clusters are positioned based on the ranks of the enclosed nodes, but to try to get multiple clusters horizontally aligned, try embedding then within a parental cluster, like so (or using invisible edges to adjust ranking):
digraph D {
subgraph cluster_outer{
subgraph cluster_test {
p4;
p5;
p6;
}
subgraph cluster_t {
p1;
p2;
p3;
}
graph [peripheries=0] // if you don't want the extra box
}
}
Giving:
[
I've the following output currently I want to place a label below the edge between p and z in the figure.Is it possible to do in graphviz I've tried using xlabels but it doesn't work.
Current Code:
digraph GPG{
node [shape=box];
subgraph cluster0{
node[shape=circle];
0[label=0,style=invis];
}
subgraph cluster1{
node[shape=circle];
1[label=1,style=invis];
p->z [label="2 | 1",minlen=1];
{
rank = same;
p;z;
}
}
subgraph cluster2{
node[shape=circle];
2[label=2,style=invis];
}
0->1
1->2
}
I want a label below edge p->z as well above the edge.Is it possible in graphviz?
Kind of ugly, but:
digraph overunder{
splines=false
{ rank=same
a -> b [label=" over " ]
a -> b [label="under" penwidth=0.0 dir=none]
}
}
Produces:
You may have to add the non-breaking space characters (see above) because Graphviz seems to position labels based on the length of the text - longer labels are placed above shorter labels.
In the attached figure, the nodes are arranged in a circle around the node. Is there a (possibly generic) way to arrange the nodes only in the lower semi-circle, without having to provide fixed coordinates for the nodes?
Edit: Would like to achieve something like shown in the image attached below. As one can see - all the nodes are arranged in the lower semi-circular region (this figure was made using CMap Tools).
The code is trivial, but pasting it anyway.
digraph semicircle {
rankdir="TD"
graph [nodesep="0.1", ranksep="0.3", center=true]
mindist="0.4"
S [label="Root", style="filled", fillcolor="greenyellow", shape="box"]
subgraph cluster1 {
rank="same"
A; B; C; D;
S -> {A, B, C, D};
} }
using dot/circo : graphviz version 2.40.1
I noted that circo placed nodes counter-clockwise, starting at 3 o'clock.
I added enough invisible nodes to fill the 2 through 10 o'clock positions.
To make the inter-nodal distances even more uniform I added:
node [shape=square style=rounded]
The result I got is this:
Try this:
digraph semicircle {
rankdir="TD"
graph [nodesep="0.1", ranksep="0.3", center=true, root=S]
mindist="0.4"
S [label="Root", style="filled", fillcolor="greenyellow", shape="box"]
subgraph cluster1 {
rank="same"
A
z1[style=invis label=""]
z2[style=invis label=""]
B; C; D;
S -> A
S -> z1,z2 [style=invis]
S -> { B, C, D};
}
}
I want control over the positioning of some elements in the following sample:
digraph {
graph [splines=ortho];
/* Node customization. */
node [shape=box];
join [shape=point];
set [label="set\npoint"];
/* Define node levels; driving elements on top, feed back below. */
{ rank = min; set; PID; P1; P2; join; OUT;}
{ rank = max; M1;}
/* Edges */
set -> PID -> P1 -> P2;
P2-> join [arrowhead=none];
join -> {OUT; M1};
PID -> M1 [dir=back];
}
If I add more elements to the M1 rank the edges connect to random points (north/top side). I would like to keep them connect horizontally. Can this be done?
How can I increase spacing (edge length) between PID/P1/P2?
It would be nice to align P1/M1 vertically. Can this be done?
Traditional control system diagrams don't have the join node and an edge just comes out of another edge. Is this possible? I removed the arrow head for this.
Maybe some of the questions are extraneous as proper positioning of one will make the others happen naturally.
Generally you can control the point where the arrow enters node with headport attribute. But with ortho splines this rarely works. Ortho splines live their own life and can cause a variety of different problems, including disappearing edge labels. So there's no definite answer to your first question, each situation has to be handled specifically.
You can increase distance between all nodes by setting a nodesep graph attribute. But if you need to increase distance only between specific nodes, you can use a trick: Add a label with big number of spaces for value.
You can accomplish it with invisible edges.
Points 2 and 3 illustrated in edited example below:
digraph {
graph [splines=ortho];
/* Node customization. */
node [shape=box];
join [shape=point];
set [label="set\npoint"];
/* Define node levels; driving elements on top, feed back below. */
{ rank = min; set; PID; P1; P2; join; OUT;}
{ rank = max; M1;}
/* Edges */
set -> PID;
P2-> join [arrowhead=none];
join -> {OUT; M1}
PID -> M1 [dir=back];
PID -> P1 -> P2 [label=" "] /* #2 increase space between specific nodes */
P1 -> M1 [style=invis] /* #3 align P1 an M1 */
}
result:
My ultimate aim is to write a python script that will automatically generate graphviz graphs based on some input data. However, I'm first focusing just on the graphviz.
This is currently what I have:
digraph G {
compound=true;
node [shape=box];
edge [dir=none];
subgraph cluster_overall{
subgraph cluster_top{
apple;
banana;
}
subgraph clustermsc{
basket1;
basket2;
label="Baskets";
}
subgraph cluster_bottom{
orange;
kiwi;
}
label="Test";
}
apple -> basket1;
banana -> basket2;
orange -> basket1;
kiwi -> basket2;
}
Current: https://i.imgur.com/76GCx0f.png
This is what I want my final graph to look like. With the number of fruits evenly distributed between the top and bottom section (based on the input date):
Final: https://i.imgur.com/OHFsAdd.png
How do I structure the page to have 3 static, separate sections. Currently the fruit's placement constantly changes based on node they point to.
Please let me know if I wasn't clear in my explanation, I'll try better explaining it. Thanks.
Don't have enough repuation to directly post images.
In graphviz, it is important to produce the hierarchy as the tool sees it, not reproducing the logic that is on your mind. simply reversing the edges from your baskets to the "lower" fruits does the job:
digraph G {
compound=true;
node [shape=box];
edge [dir=none];
subgraph cluster_overall{
subgraph cluster_top{
apple;
banana;
}
subgraph clustermsc{
basket1;
basket2;
label="Baskets";
}
subgraph cluster_bottom{
orange;
kiwi;
}
label="Test";
}
apple -> basket1;
banana -> basket2;
basket1 -> orange; // !!!
basket2-> kiwi; // !!!
}
gives you
If you want to force a certain order of items (such as apple being to the left of banana), you can do so by replacing your definition with
subgraph cluster_top{
{ rank = same; apple -> banana[ style = invis ] }
}
If I correctly understood you, you need to connect clusters with invisible edges to force their position.
Here I've added a dummy node into each cluster (because to connect clusters you have to connect nodes in these clusters and then add lhead and ltail attributes).
Then I've connected these clusters in the correct order with invisible edges. Also I've added an extremely big weight to these edges to give them priority over other edges.
Is that what you need?
digraph G {
compound=true;
node [shape=box];
edge [dir=none];
subgraph cluster_overall{
subgraph cluster_top{
dummy_top [shape=point width=0 style=invis]
apple;
banana;
}
subgraph clustermsc{
dummy_msc [shape=point width=0 style=invis]
basket1;
basket2;
label="Baskets";
}
subgraph cluster_bottom{
dummy_bottom [shape=point width=0 style=invis]
orange;
kiwi;
}
label="Test";
}
dummy_top -> dummy_msc [
style=invis
weight=100
lhead="clustermsc"
ltail="cluster_top"
]
dummy_msc -> dummy_bottom [
style=invis
weight=100
lhead="cluster_bottom"
ltail="clustermsc"
]
apple -> basket1;
banana -> basket2;
orange -> basket1;
kiwi -> basket2;
}