I want to create a calculated column that increments by 1 every time it meets a true in bool column. any ideas ?
in the image at left is the data table and at right the desired result
Something like the formula below should work
case when [bool]=True then sum(If([bool]=True,1,0)) over (AllPrevious([id])) else 0 end
Related
I am trying to find out the loss of portfolios from the current month to the prior month.
What I want to see is what missing, basically when we compare the two months together I want to display what is not matching between the two
I have put this expression.
If([portfolio_code Current ]=[portfolio_code_Prior])
Then(Count([portfolio_code Current ])
Else(0)
I am not sure my if syntax is incorrect I just wanted to give an example
any insights?
[enter image description here]
Assuming there is one portfolio per row the count of portfolios that were in last month and not this month is...
total(
If ( [portfolio_code Current ] <> [portfolio_code_Prior] && [portfolio_code_Prior] is not null)
Then ( 1 )
Else ( 0 )
)
or
total(
case
when [portfolio_code Current ] <> [portfolio_code_Prior] and
[portfolio_code_Prior] is not null
then 1
else 0
end
)
If you want to see how many were "lost" from this month to last month (how many were added form last month to this month) you would need to reverse the logic.
If you want to see how many more or less, that is much simpler:
count(distinct [portfolio_code_Prior]) -
count(distinct [portfolio_code Current ])
If you want 0 when they don't match otherwise the portfolio code, then your logic looks okay.
If you want to ONLY see the rows that do not match then add a detail filter for the custom data item, let's call it compare, like this:
[Compare] <> 0
as far as counting, you can just select the column and use count (or count distinct) depending on what you want.
I have a clickhouse table that has one Array(UInt16) column. I want to be able to filter results from this table to only get rows where the values in the array column are above a threshold value. I've been trying to achieve this using some of the array functions (arrayFilter and arrayExists) but I'm not familiar enough with the SQL/Clickhouse query syntax to get this working.
I've created the table using:
CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS ArrayTest (
date Date,
sessionSecond UInt16,
distance Array(UInt16)
) Engine = MergeTree(date, (date, sessionSecond), 8192);
Where the distance values will be distances from a certain point at a certain amount of seconds (sessionSecond) after the date. I've added some sample values so the table looks like the following:
Now I want to get all rows which contain distances greater than 7. I found the array operators documentation here and tried the arrayExists function but it's not working how I'd expect. From the documentation, it says that this function "Returns 1 if there is at least one element in 'arr' for which 'func' returns something other than 0. Otherwise, it returns 0". But when I run the query below I get three zeros returned where I should get a 0 and two ones:
SELECT arrayExists(
val -> val > 7,
arrayEnumerate(distance))
FROM ArrayTest;
Eventually I want to perform this select and then join it with the table contents to only return rows that have an exists = 1 but I need this first step to work before that. Am I using the arrayExists wrong? What I found more confusing is that when I change the comparison value to 2 I get all 1s back. Can this kind of filtering be achieved using the array functions?
Thanks
You can use arrayExists in the WHERE clause.
SELECT *
FROM ArrayTest
WHERE arrayExists(x -> x > 7, distance) = 1;
Another way is to use ARRAY JOIN, if you need to know which values is greater than 7:
SELECT d, distance, sessionSecond
FROM ArrayTest
ARRAY JOIN distance as d
WHERE d > 7
I think the reason why you get 3 zeros is that arrayEnumerate enumerates over the array indexes not array values, and since none of your rows have more than 7 elements arrayEnumerates results in 0 for all the rows.
To make this work,
SELECT arrayExists(
val -> distance[val] > 7,
arrayEnumerate(distance))
FROM ArrayTest;
I got this selection of data from my sql:
I would like to add Cancelled, Disputed and Resolved together and then divide the result with the total shipped. All of this should be done with an Expression.
So x / 303 where x is the sum of the desired values.
Goal would be to get a % where I can tell how good my shipping is.
I would then like to display the result in a text label next to a graph.
How do I do that?
You should use computed columns in your data set:
Add a SUM on the column Total and a filter only matching the rows based on the column Status you want to select. The expression should look like:
if (row["Status"] == "Cancelled" || row["Status"] == "Disputed"
|| row["Status"] == "Resolved")
true
else
false
create a second computed column only containing the "Total" value where the Status is Shipped.
if (row["Status"] == "Shipped")
row["Total"]
Then create a third computed column where you divide both computed values and you are done.
row["sum"] / row["shipped"]
create a new parameter and refer the image
create new static values and allow multiple values to be selected.
So, accordingly edit your SQL queries
I'm having trouble using XPath to find a row in a table where a specific column contains a value. The table has 10 columns where 2 of them will show Yes|No but I'm only interested in finding the value in one of the columns (the 4th one). My initial attempt was this:
//table[#id='myTable']/tbody/tr/td[text() = 'Yes']
but it finds it rows from both columns. I thought I could try something like this but it's not a valid expression:
//table[#id='myTable']/tbody/tr/td[4]/text()='Yes'
Any suggestions? Thanks.
You can try this way :
//table[#id='myTable']/tbody/tr[td[4][. = 'Yes']]
The XPath return row (tr) having the forth td child value equals "Yes".
Ok, say I have a subreport that populates a chart I have from data in a table. I have a summary sum field that adds up the total of each row displayed. I am about to add two new rows that need to be displayed but not totaled up in the sum. There is a field in the table that has a number from 1-7 in it. If I added these new fields into the database, I would assign a negative number to this like -1 and -2 to differentiate it between the other records. How can I set up a formula so that it will sum up all of the amount fields except for the records that have an 'order' number we will call it of either -1 or -2? Thanks!
Use a Running Total Field and set the evaluate formula to something like {new_field} >= 0. So it will only sum the value when it passes that test.
The way to accomplish this without a running total is with a formula like this:
if {OrderNum} >= 0 Then {Amount}