The following script.sh is executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -eu
# code ...
su buser
mkdir /does/not/work
echo $?
echo This should not be printed
Output:
1
This should not be printed
How i execute the script:
docker exec -i fancy_container bash < script.sh
Question: Why does the script not terminate after the failing command even when set -e was defined and how can i get the script to exit on any failing command? I think the key point is the '<' operator, which i do not understand exactly how it executes the script.
Notes:
-e means: Abort script at first error, when a command exits with non-zero status (except in until or while loops, if-tests, list constructs)
Possible solution:
docker exec -i fancy_container bash -c "cat > tmp.sh; bash tmp.sh" < script.sh
How it works:
< script.sh - Pipe all rows of this file from the host, to the docker exec command.
cat > tmp.sh - Save the incoming piped content to a file inside the container.
bash tmp.sh - Execute the file as-whole inside the container, which means -e works again as expected!
But i still don't know why the initial approach isn't working.
how to run shell script in background in unix?
My script
#!/bin/sh
while [ true ]
do
ps -fu $USER>>/home/axway/trace.log 2>&1
sleep 10
done
running above script (shellEx1.sh) in background by nohup command on promt
nohup ./shellEX1.sh &
having below isuue:
$ nohup ./shellEX1.sh &
[3] 19520
$ nohup: ignoring input and appending output to `nohup.out'
Its warning to say like the output of the script will be written in file 'nohup.out'. In order to remove this warning, you can try
nohup ./shellEX1.sh >/tmp/output.txt &
or
nohup ./shellEX1.sh >/dev/null &
Just a thought, you could make it connect or create a screen instance at the start.
screen -S bashscript
my bash script
Let's say I have two servers, A and B. I also have a bash script that is executed on server A that looks like this:
build_test.sh
#!/bin/bash
ssh user#B <<'ENDSSH'
echo "doing test"
bash -ex test.sh
echo "completed test"
ENDSSH
test.sh
#!/bin/bash
docker exec -i my_container /bin/bash -c "echo hi!"
The problem is that completed test does not get printed to the terminal.
Here's the output of running build_test.sh:
$ ./build_test
doing test
+ docker exec -i my_container /bin/bash -c "echo hi!"
hi!
I'm expecting completed test to be output after hi!, but it isn't. How do I fix this?
docker is consuming, though not using, its standard input, which it inherits from test.sh. test.sh inherits its standard input from bash, which inherits its standard input from ssh. This means that docker itself is reading the last line of the script before the remote shell can.
To fix, just redirect docker's standard input from /dev/null.
docker exec -i my_container /bin/bash -c "echo hi!" < /dev/null
I'm trying to run a script that is required to have an exit code of 0. Unfortunalty I cannot use an init.d or other startup script to control this this, so I must make this work.
Basically if I understand AWS's docs correctly (elastic beanstalk), I need be able to run the following two commands and exit with a 0 and provide no other output to stdout.
As the root user I need to cd to a particular dir and run these two commands:
pkill -f que
bundle exec que
In my actually script I have:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
su -s /bin/bash -c "cd /some/dir && nohup pkill -f que &>/dev/null &"
sleep 10
su -s /bin/bash -c "cd /some/dir && nohup bundle exec que &"
Which still causes this error to be raised:
returned non-zero exit status 1 (Executor::NonZeroExitStatus)
Any tips for how to silently run those commands correctly?
I'm also looking at these for ideas:
https://blog.eq8.eu/article/aws-elasticbeanstalk-hooks.html
http://www.dannemanne.com/posts/post-deployment_script_on_elastic_beanstalk_restart_delayed_job
But its still not clear to me how this is supposed to exit successfully
Perhaps I'm missing something, but wouldn't this be easily solved by using two shell scripts? One with cd, pkill, and bundle. Call this script (foo.sh) something like:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
su -c ./foo.sh > /dev/null 2>&1 < /dev/null
exit 0
This is a follow-on question to the How do you use ssh in a shell script? question. If I want to execute a command on the remote machine that runs in the background on that machine, how do I get the ssh command to return? When I try to just include the ampersand (&) at the end of the command it just hangs. The exact form of the command looks like this:
ssh user#target "cd /some/directory; program-to-execute &"
Any ideas? One thing to note is that logins to the target machine always produce a text banner and I have SSH keys set up so no password is required.
I had this problem in a program I wrote a year ago -- turns out the answer is rather complicated. You'll need to use nohup as well as output redirection, as explained in the wikipedia artcle on nohup, copied here for your convenience.
Nohuping backgrounded jobs is for
example useful when logged in via SSH,
since backgrounded jobs can cause the
shell to hang on logout due to a race
condition [2]. This problem can also
be overcome by redirecting all three
I/O streams:
nohup myprogram > foo.out 2> foo.err < /dev/null &
This has been the cleanest way to do it for me:-
ssh -n -f user#host "sh -c 'cd /whereever; nohup ./whatever > /dev/null 2>&1 &'"
The only thing running after this is the actual command on the remote machine
Redirect fd's
Output needs to be redirected with &>/dev/null which redirects both stderr and stdout to /dev/null and is a synonym of >/dev/null 2>/dev/null or >/dev/null 2>&1.
Parantheses
The best way is to use sh -c '( ( command ) & )' where command is anything.
ssh askapache 'sh -c "( ( nohup chown -R ask:ask /www/askapache.com &>/dev/null ) & )"'
Nohup Shell
You can also use nohup directly to launch the shell:
ssh askapache 'nohup sh -c "( ( chown -R ask:ask /www/askapache.com &>/dev/null ) & )"'
Nice Launch
Another trick is to use nice to launch the command/shell:
ssh askapache 'nice -n 19 sh -c "( ( nohup chown -R ask:ask /www/askapache.com &>/dev/null ) & )"'
If you don't/can't keep the connection open you could use screen, if you have the rights to install it.
user#localhost $ screen -t remote-command
user#localhost $ ssh user#target # now inside of a screen session
user#remotehost $ cd /some/directory; program-to-execute &
To detach the screen session: ctrl-a d
To list screen sessions:
screen -ls
To reattach a session:
screen -d -r remote-command
Note that screen can also create multiple shells within each session. A similar effect can be achieved with tmux.
user#localhost $ tmux
user#localhost $ ssh user#target # now inside of a tmux session
user#remotehost $ cd /some/directory; program-to-execute &
To detach the tmux session: ctrl-b d
To list screen sessions:
tmux list-sessions
To reattach a session:
tmux attach <session number>
The default tmux control key, 'ctrl-b', is somewhat difficult to use but there are several example tmux configs that ship with tmux that you can try.
I just wanted to show a working example that you can cut and paste:
ssh REMOTE "sh -c \"(nohup sleep 30; touch nohup-exit) > /dev/null &\""
You can do this without nohup:
ssh user#host 'myprogram >out.log 2>err.log &'
Quickest and easiest way is to use the 'at' command:
ssh user#target "at now -f /home/foo.sh"
I think you'll have to combine a couple of these answers to get what you want. If you use nohup in conjunction with the semicolon, and wrap the whole thing in quotes, then you get:
ssh user#target "cd /some/directory; nohup myprogram > foo.out 2> foo.err < /dev/null"
which seems to work for me. With nohup, you don't need to append the & to the command to be run. Also, if you don't need to read any of the output of the command, you can use
ssh user#target "cd /some/directory; nohup myprogram > /dev/null 2>&1"
to redirect all output to /dev/null.
This worked for me may times:
ssh -x remoteServer "cd yourRemoteDir; ./yourRemoteScript.sh </dev/null >/dev/null 2>&1 & "
You can do it like this...
sudo /home/script.sh -opt1 > /tmp/script.out &
It appeared quite convenient for me to have a remote tmux session using the tmux new -d <shell cmd> syntax like this:
ssh someone#elsewhere 'tmux new -d sleep 600'
This will launch new session on elsewhere host and ssh command on local machine will return to shell almost instantly. You can then ssh to the remote host and tmux attach to that session. Note that there's nothing about local tmux running, only remote!
Also, if you want your session to persist after the job is done, simply add a shell launcher after your command, but don't forget to enclose in quotes:
ssh someone#elsewhere 'tmux new -d "~/myscript.sh; bash"'
Actually, whenever I need to run a command on a remote machine that's complicated, I like to put the command in a script on the destination machine, and just run that script using ssh.
For example:
# simple_script.sh (located on remote server)
#!/bin/bash
cat /var/log/messages | grep <some value> | awk -F " " '{print $8}'
And then I just run this command on the source machine:
ssh user#ip "/path/to/simple_script.sh"
If you run remote command without allocating tty, redirect stdout/stderr works, nohup is not necessary.
ssh user#host 'background command &>/dev/null &'
If you use -t to allocate tty to run interactive command along with background command, and background command is the last command, like this:
ssh -t user#host 'bash -c "interactive command; nohup backgroud command &>/dev/null &"'
It's possible that background command doesn't actually start. There's race here:
bash exits after nohup starts. As a session leader, bash exit results in HUP signal sent to nohup process.
nohup ignores HUP signal.
If 1 completes before 2, the nohup process will exit and won't start the background command at all. We need to wait nohup start the background command. A simple workaroung is to just add a sleep:
ssh -t user#host 'bash -c "interactive command; nohup backgroud command &>/dev/null & sleep 1"'
The question was asked and answered years ago, I don't know if openssh behavior changed since then. I was testing on:
OpenSSH_8.6p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1g FIPS 21 Apr 2020
I was trying to do the same thing, but with the added complexity that I was trying to do it from Java. So on one machine running java, I was trying to run a script on another machine, in the background (with nohup).
From the command line, here is what worked: (you may not need the "-i keyFile" if you don't need it to ssh to the host)
ssh -i keyFile user#host bash -c "\"nohup ./script arg1 arg2 > output.txt 2>&1 &\""
Note that to my command line, there is one argument after the "-c", which is all in quotes. But for it to work on the other end, it still needs the quotes, so I had to put escaped quotes within it.
From java, here is what worked:
ProcessBuilder b = new ProcessBuilder("ssh", "-i", "keyFile", "bash", "-c",
"\"nohup ./script arg1 arg2 > output.txt 2>&1 &\"");
Process process = b.start();
// then read from process.getInputStream() and close it.
It took a bit of trial & error to get this working, but it seems to work well now.
YOUR-COMMAND &> YOUR-LOG.log &
This should run the command and assign a process id you can simply tail -f YOUR-LOG.log to see results written to it as they happen. you can log out anytime and the process will carry on
If you are using zsh then use program-to-execute &! is a zsh-specific shortcut to both background and disown the process, such that exiting the shell will leave it running.
A follow-on to #cmcginty's concise working example which also shows how to alternatively wrap the outer command in double quotes. This is how the template would look if invoked from within a PowerShell script (which can only interpolate variables from within double-quotes and ignores any variable expansion when wrapped in single quotes):
ssh user#server "sh -c `"($cmd) &>/dev/null </dev/null &`""
Inner double-quotes are escaped with back-tick instead of backslash. This allows $cmd to be composed by the PowerShell script, e.g. for deployment scripts and automation and the like. $cmd can even contain a multi-line heredoc if composed with unix LF.
First follow this procedure:
Log in on A as user a and generate a pair of authentication keys. Do not enter a passphrase:
a#A:~> ssh-keygen -t rsa
Generating public/private rsa key pair.
Enter file in which to save the key (/home/a/.ssh/id_rsa):
Created directory '/home/a/.ssh'.
Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase):
Enter same passphrase again:
Your identification has been saved in /home/a/.ssh/id_rsa.
Your public key has been saved in /home/a/.ssh/id_rsa.pub.
The key fingerprint is:
3e:4f:05:79:3a:9f:96:7c:3b:ad:e9:58:37:bc:37:e4 a#A
Now use ssh to create a directory ~/.ssh as user b on B. (The directory may already exist, which is fine):
a#A:~> ssh b#B mkdir -p .ssh
b#B's password:
Finally append a's new public key to b#B:.ssh/authorized_keys and enter b's password one last time:
a#A:~> cat .ssh/id_rsa.pub | ssh b#B 'cat >> .ssh/authorized_keys'
b#B's password:
From now on you can log into B as b from A as a without password:
a#A:~> ssh b#B
then this will work without entering a password
ssh b#B "cd /some/directory; program-to-execute &"
I think this is what you need:
At first you need to install sshpass on your machine.
then you can write your own script:
while read pass port user ip; do
sshpass -p$pass ssh -p $port $user#$ip <<ENDSSH1
COMMAND 1
.
.
.
COMMAND n
ENDSSH1
done <<____HERE
PASS PORT USER IP
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
PASS PORT USER IP
____HERE