Adding file to nuget package [duplicate] - visual-studio

I have installed AsyncUsageAnalyzers for my common project (which is a NuGet package), and I want the rules to be enforced in all of my packages/applications that depends on it.
I have changed the severity of the UseConfigureAwait rule, and a .ruleset has been created.
I have read on https://stackoverflow.com/a/20271758/2663813 that I needed to have a NuGet package with a given structure. That assertion has been confirmed here https://stackoverflow.com/a/46115423/2663813
What I have now:
build/Common.ruleset
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<RuleSet Name="My common analyzer rules" Description="The rules that are enforced on all of my projects" ToolsVersion="10.0">
<Rules AnalyzerId="AsyncUsageAnalyzers" RuleNamespace="AsyncUsageAnalyzers">
<Rule Id="UseConfigureAwait" Action="Error" />
</Rules>
</RuleSet>
build/My.Package.Id.targets
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<PropertyGroup>
<CodeAnalysisRuleSet>$(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)Common.ruleset</CodeAnalysisRuleSet>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
In my .csproj
<Import Project="build\My.Package.Id.targets" />
My question is : Now that I've done that and that the rules are correctly applied on my project, how do I add the files under build/ inside the NuGet package, inside the build/ folder? I know that I could do that with a .nuspec file as mentionned in the links, but I'd like to do that with the new .csproj syntax.

Sorry for posting too quickly, I just found the solution right under my eyes:
In the page https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/tools/csproj#nuget-metadata-properties , in the comments, MarkPflug gives the translation, and quotes
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/nuget/schema/msbuild-targets#pack-scenarios for reference.
In my case, I need to use PackagePath as follows (Content would also work, but as Martin Ullrich pointed out, None is a better choice here):
<ItemGroup>
<None Include="build\**" Pack="True" PackagePath="build\" />
</ItemGroup>

Related

Why am I getting warning NU1507 with Central Package Management even with Package Source Mapping set?

I'm trying out the new Central Package Management feature in NuGet.
As stated in the documentation, if you use multiple NuGet sources (which I use), it is now required to configure the Package Source Mapping in a nuget.config file, otherwise you should get a NU1507 warning.
My simplified file tree is this:
MySolution.sln
Proj1.csproj
MyLibrary\ (this is an external repository with all my shared projects)
Directory.Packages.props
nuget.config
Proj2\ (an example library project)
Proj2.csproj
Here is the Proj1.csproj content:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
<TargetFramework>net7.0</TargetFramework>
<ImplicitUsings>enable</ImplicitUsings>
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup>
<DefaultItemExcludes>$(DefaultItemExcludes);MyLibrary\**\*</DefaultItemExcludes>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
Here is Directory.Packages.props:
<Project>
<PropertyGroup>
<ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>true</ManagePackageVersionsCentrally>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<PackageVersion Include="JetBrains.Annotations" Version="2022.1.0" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Here is nuget.config:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
<packageSources>
<clear/>
<add key="nuget.org" value="https://api.nuget.org/v3/index.json"/>
<add key="Custom NuGet" value="https://nuget.mydomain.net/"/>
</packageSources>
<packageSourceMapping>
<packageSource key="nuget.org">
<package pattern="*"/>
</packageSource>
<packageSource key="Custom NuGet">
<package pattern="MyNamespace.*"/>
</packageSource>
</packageSourceMapping>
</configuration>
and Proj2.csproj:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFramework>net7.0</TargetFramework>
<ImplicitUsings>enable</ImplicitUsings>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
In the official documentation the MyLibrary\nuget.config should be used when restoring the packages because it is in the parent directory of Proj2.csproj, and actually it works when I build the solution via dotnet build, but when I build it in Visual Studio I still get the NU1507 warning.
I know that I could work around the issue by copying the nuget.config file in the same directory as the solution file (the warning goes away), but I have hundreds of projects that include the MyLibrary directory and I'd like to keep all the configuration centralized.
Moreover it works as expected when it's built from the command line, so what am I doing wrong?
Everything seems like correct from your configure file.But MS doc has mentioned this note:Central package management is in active development. You can provide any feedback you may have at Nuget/Home
Here’re suggestions you can have a try to check :
1 check your visual studio version and this feature is available for Visual Studio 2022.17.2 and later.Because older tooling will ignore central package management configurations and features.See more information please refer to doc:CPM
2 If you are unable to onboard to Package Source Mapping but want to use central package management, can suppress the warning. Please refer to doc:
<PropertyGroup>
<NoWarn>$(NoWarn);NU1507</NoWarn>
</PropertyGroup>
3 use dotnet nuget list source to get package source list and check whether they are enabled.

How do you specify common package versions in a common.props file?

We've got a simple common.props file that is basically doing what Directory.Build.props appears to do. It specifies various settings and is then imported to the csproj files that need it.
Here's the basics of the MyProject.common.props file:
<Project>
<PropertyGroup>
// some settings
</PropertyGroup>
<PropertyGroup>
<LangVersion>8.0</LangVersion>
//some more settings...
<MyNewVariable>3.1.22</MyNewVariable>
</PropertyGroup>
</Project>
Here's the basics of the csproj:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<Import Project="..\..\folderA\MyProject.common.props" />
<PropertyGroup>
<OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.WindowsServices" Version="$(MyNewVariable)" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
When I use this approach I get the error:
Project dependency Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.WindowsServices does
not contain an inclusive lower bound. Include a lower bound in the
dependency version to ensure consistent restore results.
However, if I just input 3.1.22 where the variable is it works fine. This suggests to me that the variable is coming through empty or not being picked up. If I remove the variable altogether and leave the Version blank I get the same error. I also double checked the path to the file by misspelling the import and I get a different error, so I know it can at least find the common.props file.

Package third party dll in context of multi target framework project, .Net Framework & .Net Core

I'm using next configuration within csproj :
<ItemGroup Condition="$(TargetFramework.StartsWith('net4'))">
<Reference Include="amqmdnet">
<HintPath>..\bin\amqmdnet.dll</HintPath>
</Reference>
<Content Include="..\bin\amqmdnet.dll">
<CopyToOutputDirectory>Always</CopyToOutputDirectory>
<Pack>true</Pack>
<PackagePath>lib\$(TargetFramework)</PackagePath>
</Content>
</ItemGroup>
<ItemGroup Condition="$(TargetFramework.StartsWith('netstandard2')) or $(TargetFramework.StartsWith('netcoreapp3'))">
<Reference Include="amqmdnetstd">
<HintPath>..\bin\amqmdnetstd.dll</HintPath>
</Reference>
<Content Include="..\bin\amqmdnetstd.dll">
<CopyToOutputDirectory>Always</CopyToOutputDirectory>
<Pack>true</Pack>
<PackagePath>lib\$(TargetFramework)</PackagePath>
</Content>
</ItemGroup>
each part of it working fine when the project is set with a concrete framework, for example :
<TargetFramework>netcoreapp3.1</TargetFramework>
but when the project is multi framework noting happened, dlls are not included
<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp3.1;net451</TargetFrameworks>
I'm getting this message in multi framework scenario, this is the only context:
How I proceeded
For some reason nuget spec doesn't fill metadata; I test it with nuget version 5.5.1.6542.
I build the project with VS, how it is.
Change extension of {project folder}\bin\Release\xxx.nupkg to .zip
Extract xxx.nuspec file from xxx.zip. It will contain also dependencies metadata.
Edit xxx.nuspec with NuGet Package Explorer
Build nuget xxx.nuspec
.nuspec documentation
Answer
See this link. NuGet doc
I will post it and here:
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetsForTfmSpecificBuildOutput>$(TargetsForTfmSpecificBuildOutput);GetMyPackageFiles</TargetsForTfmSpecificBuildOutput>
</PropertyGroup>
<Target Name="GetMyPackageFiles">
<ItemGroup Condition="$(TargetFramework.StartsWith('net4'))">
<BuildOutputInPackage Include="amqmdnet.dll">
<FinalOutputPath>..\bin\amqmdnet.dll</FinalOutputPath>
</BuildOutputInPackage>
</ItemGroup>
<ItemGroup Condition="$(TargetFramework.StartsWith('netstandard2')) or $(TargetFramework.StartsWith('netcoreapp3'))">
<BuildOutputInPackage Include="amqmdnetstd.dll">
<FinalOutputPath>..\bin\amqmdnetstd.dll</FinalOutputPath>
</BuildOutputInPackage>
</ItemGroup>
</Target>
Package third party dll in context of multi target framework project,
.Net Framework & .Net Core
I tried your sample and face the same issue in my side. When I use TargetFrameworks to set such dll into multi target framework projects and face the same situation.
And the <pack>true</pack> does not work due to your condition. But when I looked into output folder in such project, <CopyToOutputDirectory>Always</CopyToOutputDirectory> works. And according to the conditions, copy the two types of dll to the corresponding target framework folder.
However, pack does not work,still quite be strange.
So l report this issue to our DC Forum. See this link. You can vote this issue and add any comments if I did not describe the issue in detailed. And anyone who is interested in this issue will vote for you so that it will get more attention from the staff.
Suggestion
As a suggestion, you can use nuspec file with nuget.exe cli to pack your project which I have tested successfully.
1) download nuget.exe from this link and config its path into System Environment Variable PATH.
2) call Developer Command Prompt for VS or CMD and then cd your project path(which xxx.csproj exists)
Then call nuget spec and get xxx.nuspec file
3) open xxx.nuspec file and modify like these:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<package >
<metadata>
......
</metadata>
<files>
<file src="bin\Debug\net451\amqmdnet.dll" target="lib\net451" />
<file src="bin\Debug\net451\PRCB.IBM.MQ.dll" target="lib\net451"/>
<file src="bin\Debug\netcoreapp3.1\amqmdnetstd.dll" target="lib\netcoreapp3.1" />
<file src="bin\Debug\netcoreapp3.1\PRCB.IBM.MQ.dll" target="lib\netcoreapp3.1" />
</files>
</package>
4) Finally, type nuget pack xxx.nuspec and you will get the xxx.nupkg file.

PackageReference condition is ignored

In my VS 2017 project I reference docfx.console package and I want it to be used only when certain condition is met. But the package gets used for all builds.
Here is a part of my project. I want docfx.console to be used when configuration is Installer/AnyCPU and VS is building net40 flavor.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<TargetFrameworks>net40;netstandard1.3;netstandard2.0</TargetFrameworks>
<!-- ... -->
<Configurations>Debug;Release;Installer</Configurations>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup Condition=" '$(TargetFramework)'=='net40' ">
<!-- ... -->
<PackageReference Include="docfx.console" Version="2.30.0" Condition="'$(Configuration)|$(Platform)'=='Installer|AnyCPU'" />
</ItemGroup>
<!-- ... -->
</Project>
Is there a way to use docfx.console in Installer build for net40 only?
To summarize, even with the condition "false", the package will be imported.
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp2.2;net472</TargetFrameworks>
<Platforms>x64;x86</Platforms>
</PropertyGroup>
<ItemGroup Condition="false">
<PackageReference Include="MyPackage" Version="1.0.0" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
We found that we can work around this issue by putting the packagereference in a different file, and making the import of the file conditional.
Separate file: packagerefs.targets
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="MyPackage" Version="1.0.0" />
</ItemGroup>
</Project>
Project file:
<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">
<PropertyGroup>
<OutputType>Exe</OutputType>
<TargetFrameworks>netcoreapp3.0;netcoreapp2.2;net472</TargetFrameworks>
<Platforms>x64;x86</Platforms>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="packagerefs.targets" Condition="false" />
</Project>
Even i was looking for referencing nuget packages on condition based (load only when expected constant is set in DefineConstants). Though #Luke Schoen Solution worked for me, I could make it work without the external targets file.
Solution is to include your PackageReference using Choose > When
Make sure to have this block after your PropertyGroup which has DefineConstants.
<Choose>
<When Condition="$(DefineConstants.Contains('My_CONST'))">
<ItemGroup>
<PackageReference Include="MyPackage">
<Version>1.0.6</Version>
</PackageReference>
</ItemGroup>
</When> </Choose>
PackageReference condition is ignored
This is an known issue about the new style csproj PackageReference to work with content/Tools files in a nuget package.
In the package docfx.console, it looks like docfx.console has "content", "build" and "tools" without .NET code in it, just random files:
In this case, when we install this nuget package, nuget does not do anything. So it seems gets used for all builds. That because:
NuGet packages that work with Packages.config, don't always work in
transitive NuGet environments (projects using Project.json or
PackageReferences). Packages that work in transitive NuGet
environments must use "contentFiles" instead of "content" -- you can
have both, if a package would like to work in both environments. Also,
install.ps1/uninstall.ps1 doesn't execute in transitive NuGet
environments -- however, init.ps1 will work in both Packages.config
and transitive environments.
At this moment, there is not a perfect solution, so the issue 4837 is still open.
To resolve this issue, the NuGet docfx.console package needs to be changed to use contentFiles and define targets and would typically reference a tool by using $(MSBuildThisFileDirectory)..\tools\MyTool.exe. If you put this PackageName.targets file into the a build directory, it will be automatically included into the project referencing the NuGet package.
Hope this helps.
In my case I had also same kind of problem - but root cause was that some of msbuild properties were not defined when nuget package building was performed - in particular $(SolutionName) was not defined. Condition still gets evaluated, only it's returning true for some reason. (You can test this by putting Condition="false" - it will be omitted).
Solution for me was to check if property is defined, for example like this:
<ItemGroup Condition="'$(SolutionName)' != '' and $(SolutionName.Contains('SolutionCustomTag'))">
<Reference Include="...">
Te first statement '$(SolutionName)' != '' and - tests that property is defined.

App.Config Transformation for projects which are not Web Projects in Visual Studio?

For Visual Studio 2010 Web based application we have Config Transformation features by which we can maintain multiple configuration files for different environments. But the same feature is not available for App.Config files for Windows Services/WinForms or Console Application.
There is a workaround available as suggested here: Applying XDT magic to App.Config.
However it is not straightforward and requires a number of steps. Is there an easier way to achieve the same for app.config files?
I tried several solutions and here is the simplest I personally found.
Dan pointed out in the comments that the original post belongs to Oleg Sych—thanks, Oleg!
Here are the instructions:
1. Add an XML file for each configuration to the project.
Typically you will have Debug and Release configurations so name your files App.Debug.config and App.Release.config. In my project, I created a configuration for each kind of environment, so you might want to experiment with that.
2. Unload project and open .csproj file for editing
Visual Studio allows you to edit .csproj files right in the editor—you just need to unload the project first. Then right-click on it and select Edit <ProjectName>.csproj.
3. Bind App.*.config files to main App.config
Find the project file section that contains all App.config and App.*.config references. You'll notice their build actions are set to None and that's okay:
<None Include="App.config" />
<None Include="App.Debug.config" />
<None Include="App.Release.config" />
Next, make all configuration-specific files dependant on the main App.config so Visual Studio groups them like it does designer and code-behind files.
Replace XML above with the one below:
<None Include="App.config" />
<None Include="App.Debug.config" >
<DependentUpon>App.config</DependentUpon>
</None>
<None Include="App.Release.config" >
<DependentUpon>App.config</DependentUpon>
</None>
4. Activate transformations magic (still necessary for Visual Studio versions such as VS2019)
In the end of file after
<Import Project="$(MSBuildToolsPath)\Microsoft.CSharp.targets" />
and before final
</Project>
insert the following XML -- please note there are two steps for the proper transformation to occur:
<UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath32)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll" />
<Target Name="BeforeBuild" Condition="Exists('App.$(Configuration).config')">
<!-- Generate transformed app config and replace it: will get the <runtime> node and assembly bindings properly populated -->
<TransformXml Source="App.config" Destination="App.config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" />
</Target>
<Target Name="AfterBuild" Condition="Exists('App.$(Configuration).config')">
<!-- Generate transformed app config in the intermediate directory: this will transform sections such as appSettings -->
<TransformXml Source="App.config" Destination="$(IntermediateOutputPath)$(TargetFileName).config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" />
<!-- Force build process to use the transformed configuration file from now on.-->
<ItemGroup>
<AppConfigWithTargetPath Remove="App.config" />
<AppConfigWithTargetPath Include="$(IntermediateOutputPath)$(TargetFileName).config">
<TargetPath>$(TargetFileName).config</TargetPath>
</AppConfigWithTargetPath>
</ItemGroup>
</Target>
Now you can reload the project, build it and enjoy App.config transformations!
FYI
Make sure that your App.*.config files have the right setup like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<!--magic transformations here-->
</configuration>
This works now with the Visual Studio AddIn treated in this article: SlowCheetah - Web.config Transformation Syntax now generalized for any XML configuration file.
You can right-click on your web.config and click "Add Config
Transforms." When you do this, you'll get a web.debug.config and a
web.release.config. You can make a web.whatever.config if you like, as
long as the name lines up with a configuration profile. These files
are just the changes you want made, not a complete copy of your
web.config.
You might think you'd want to use XSLT to transform a web.config, but
while they feels intuitively right it's actually very verbose.
Here's two transforms, one using XSLT and the same one using the XML
Document Transform syntax/namespace. As with all things there's
multiple ways in XSLT to do this, but you get the general idea. XSLT
is a generalized tree transformation language, while this deployment
one is optimized for a specific subset of common scenarios. But, the
cool part is that each XDT transform is a .NET plugin, so you can make
your own.
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<xsl:stylesheet xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" version="1.0">
<xsl:template match="#*|node()">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="#*|node()"/>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
<xsl:template match="/configuration/appSettings">
<xsl:copy>
<xsl:apply-templates select="node()|#*"/>
<xsl:element name="add">
<xsl:attribute name="key">NewSetting</xsl:attribute>
<xsl:attribute name="value">New Setting Value</xsl:attribute>
</xsl:element>
</xsl:copy>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Or the same thing via the deployment transform:
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<appSettings>
<add name="NewSetting" value="New Setting Value" xdt:Transform="Insert"/>
</appSettings>
</configuration>
Another solution I've found is NOT to use the transformations but just have a separate config file, e.g. app.Release.config. Then add this line to your csproj file.
<PropertyGroup Condition=" '$(Configuration)|$(Platform)' == 'Release|x86' ">
<AppConfig>App.Release.config</AppConfig>
</PropertyGroup>
This will not only generate the right myprogram.exe.config file but if you're using Setup and Deployment Project in Visual Studio to generate MSI, it'll force the deployment project to use the correct config file when packaging.
Inspired by Oleg and others in this question, I took the solution https://stackoverflow.com/a/5109530/2286801 a step further to enable the following.
Works with ClickOnce
Works with Setup and Deployment projects in VS 2010
Works with VS2010, 2013, 2015 (didn't test 2012 although should work as well).
Works with Team Build. (You must install either A) Visual Studio or B) Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets and Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll)
This solution works by performing the app.config transformation before the app.config is referenced for the first time in the MSBuild process. It uses an external targets file for easier management across multiple projects.
Instructions:
Similar steps to the other solution. I've quoted what remains the same and included it for completeness and easier comparison.
0. Add a new file to your project called AppConfigTransformation.targets
<Project xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/developer/msbuild/2003">
<!-- Transform the app config per project configuration.-->
<PropertyGroup>
<!-- This ensures compatibility across multiple versions of Visual Studio when using a solution file.
However, when using MSBuild directly you may need to override this property to 11.0 or 12.0
accordingly as part of the MSBuild script, ie /p:VisualStudioVersion=11.0;
See http://blogs.msdn.com/b/webdev/archive/2012/08/22/visual-studio-project-compatability-and-visualstudioversion.aspx -->
<VisualStudioVersion Condition="'$(VisualStudioVersion)' == ''">10.0</VisualStudioVersion>
</PropertyGroup>
<Import Project="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.targets" />
<Target Name="SetTransformAppConfigDestination" BeforeTargets="PrepareForBuild"
Condition="exists('app.$(Configuration).config')">
<PropertyGroup>
<!-- Force build process to use the transformed configuration file from now on. -->
<AppConfig>$(IntermediateOutputPath)$(TargetFileName).config</AppConfig>
</PropertyGroup>
<Message Text="AppConfig transformation destination: = $(AppConfig)" />
</Target>
<!-- Transform the app.config after the prepare for build completes. -->
<Target Name="TransformAppConfig" AfterTargets="PrepareForBuild" Condition="exists('app.$(Configuration).config')">
<!-- Generate transformed app config in the intermediate directory -->
<TransformXml Source="app.config" Destination="$(AppConfig)" Transform="app.$(Configuration).config" />
</Target>
</Project>
1. Add an XML file for each configuration to the project.
Typically you will have Debug and Release configurations so name your files App.Debug.config and App.Release.config. In my project, I created a configuration for each kind of enironment so you might want to experiment with that.
2. Unload project and open .csproj file for editing
Visual Studio allows you to edit .csproj right in the editor—you just need to unload the project first. Then right-click on it and select Edit .csproj.
3. Bind App.*.config files to main App.config
Find the project file section that contains all App.config and App.*.config references and replace as follows. You'll notice we use None instead of Content.
<ItemGroup>
<None Include="app.config"/>
<None Include="app.Production.config">
<DependentUpon>app.config</DependentUpon>
</None>
<None Include="app.QA.config">
<DependentUpon>app.config</DependentUpon>
</None>
<None Include="app.Development.config">
<DependentUpon>app.config</DependentUpon>
</None>
</ItemGroup>
4. Activate transformations magic
In the end of file after
<Import Project="$(MSBuildToolsPath)\Microsoft.CSharp.targets" />
and before final
</Project>
insert the following XML:
<Import Project="AppConfigTransformation.targets" />
Done!
In my experience, the things I need to make environment-specific are things like connection strings, appsettings and often smpt settings. The config system allows to specify these things in separate files. So you can use this in your app.config/web.config:
<appSettings configSource="appsettings.config" />
<connectionStrings configSource="connection.config" />
<system.net>
<mailSettings>
<smtp configSource="smtp.config"/>
</mailSettings>
</system.net>
What I typically do is to put these config-specific sections in separate files, in a subfolder called ConfigFiles (either in the solution root or at the project level, depends). I define a file per configuration, e.g. smtp.config.Debug and smtp.config.Release.
Then you can define a pre-build event like so:
copy $(ProjectDir)ConfigFiles\smtp.config.$(ConfigurationName) $(TargetDir)smtp.config
In team development, you can tweak this further by including the %COMPUTERNAME% and/or %USERNAME% in the convention.
Of course, this implies that the target files (x.config) should NOT be put in source control (since they are generated). You should still add them to the project file and set their output type property to 'copy always' or 'copy if newer' though.
Simple, extensible, and it works for all types of Visual Studio projects (console, winforms, wpf, web).
You can use a separate config file per configuration, e.g. app.Debug.config, app.Release.config and then use the configuration variable in your project file:
<PropertyGroup>
<AppConfig>App.$(Configuration).config</AppConfig>
</PropertyGroup>
This will then create the correct ProjectName.exe.config file depending on the configuration you are building in.
I wrote nice extension to automate app.config transformation like the one built in Web Application Project Configuration Transform
The biggest advantage of this extension is that you don’t need to install it on all build machines
Install "Configuration Transform Tool" in Visual Studio from Marketplace and restart VS. You will be able to see menu preview transform for app.config as well.
https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GolanAvraham.ConfigurationTransform
Just a little improvement to the solution that seems to be posted everywhere now:
<UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll" />
that is, unless you are planning to stay with your current VS version forever
So I ended up taking a slightly different approach. I followed Dan's steps through step 3, but added another file: App.Base.Config. This file contains the configuration settings you want in every generated App.Config. Then I use BeforeBuild (with Yuri's addition to TransformXml) to transform the current configuration with the Base config into the App.config. The build process then uses the transformed App.config as normal. However, one annoyance is you kind of want to exclude the ever-changing App.config from source control afterwards, but the other config files are now dependent upon it.
<UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll" />
<Target Name="BeforeBuild" Condition="exists('app.$(Configuration).config')">
<TransformXml Source="App.Base.config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" Destination="App.config" />
</Target>
I have created another alternative to the one posted by Vishal Joshi where the requirement to change the build action to Content is removed and also implemented basic support for ClickOnce deployment. I say basic, because I didn't test it thoroughly but it should work in the typical ClickOnce deployment scenario.
The solution consists of a single MSBuild project that once imported to an existent windows application project (*.csproj) extends the build process to contemplate app.config transformation.
You can read a more detailed explanation at Visual Studio App.config XML Transformation and the MSBuild project file can be downloaded from GitHub.
If you use a TFS online(Cloud version) and you want to transform the App.Config in a project, you can do the following without installing any extra tools.
From VS => Unload the project => Edit project file => Go to the bottom of the file and add the following:
<UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll" />
<Target Name="AfterBuild" Condition="Exists('App.$(Configuration).config')">
<TransformXml Source="App.config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" Destination="$(OutDir)\$(AssemblyName).dll.config" />
AssemblyFile and Destination works for local use and TFS online(Cloud) server.
proposed solution will not work when a class library with config file is referenced from another project (in my case it was Azure worker project library). It will not copy correct transformed file from obj folder into bin\##configuration-name## folder. To make it work with minimal changes, you need to change AfterCompile target to BeforeCompile:
<Target Name="BeforeCompile" Condition="exists('app.$(Configuration).config')">
Note: Due to reputation I cannot comment on bdeem's post. I'm posting my findings as an answer instead.
Following bdeem's post, I did the following (in order):
1. I modified the [project].csproj file. Added the <Content Include="" /> tags to the ItemGroup for the different config files and made them dependent on the original config file.
Note: Using <None Include="" /> will not work with the transformation.
<!-- App.config Settings -->
<!-- Create App.($Configuration).config files here. -->
<Content Include="App.config" />
<Content Include="App.Debug.config">
<DependentUpon>App.config</DependentUpon>
</Content>
<Content Include="App.Release.config">
<DependentUpon>App.config</DependentUpon>
</Content>
2. At the bottom of the [project].csproj file (before the closing </Project> tag), I imported the ${MSBuildToolsPath\Microsoft.CSharp.targets file, added the UsingTask to transform the XML and added the Target to copy the transformed App.config file to the output location.
Note: The Target will also overwrite the App.Config in the local directory to see immediate changes working locally. The Target also uses the Name="Afterbuild" property to ensure the config files can be transformed after the executables are generated. For reasons I do not understand, when using WCF endpoints, if I use Name="CoreCompile", I will get warnings about the service attributes. Name="Afterbuild" resolved this.
<!-- Task to transform the App.config using the App.($Configuration).config file. -->
<UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll" />
<!-- Only compile the App.config if the App.($Configuration).config file exists. -->
<!-- Make sure to use the AfterBuild name instead of CoreCompile to avoid first time build errors and WCF endpoint errors. -->
<Target Name="AfterBuild" Condition="exists('App.$(Configuration).config')">
<!-- Generate transformed App.config in the intermediate output directory -->
<TransformXml Source="App.config" Destination="$(IntermediateOutputPath)$(TargetFileName).config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" />
<!-- Modify the original App.config file with the transformed version. -->
<TransformXml Source="App.config" Destination="App.config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" />
<!-- Force build process to use the transformed configuration file from now on. -->
<ItemGroup>
<AppConfigWithTargetPath Remove="App.config" />
<AppConfigWithTargetPath Include="$(IntermediateOutputPath)$(TargetFileName).config">
<TargetPath>$(TargetFileName).config</TargetPath>
</AppConfigWithTargetPath>
</ItemGroup>
</Target>
</Project>
3. Went back into Visual Studio and reloaded the modified files.
4. Manually added the App.*.config files to the project. This allowed them to group under the original App.config file.
Note: Make sure the App.*.config files have the proper XML structure.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!-- For more information on using web.config transformation visit https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=125889 -->
<configuration xmlns:xdt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/XML-Document-Transform">
<connectionStrings>
<add name="myConn" connectionString=""; Initial Catalog=; User ID=; Password=;" xdt:Transform="SetAttributes" xdt:Locator="Match(name)" />
</connectionStrings>
</configuration>
5. Re-built the project.
Yet another variation on #bdeem's answer using Visual Studio 2019 and 2022. My issue was that using that solution, App.config was getting overwritten, and since it's in source control that's not really an option.
The solution for me was to transform the config file directly into the output directory.
<UsingTask TaskName="TransformXml" AssemblyFile="$(MSBuildExtensionsPath32)\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v$(VisualStudioVersion)\Web\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.Tasks.dll" />
<Target Name="AfterBuild" Condition="Exists('App.$(Configuration).config')">
<!-- Generate transformed app config to the output directory -->
<TransformXml Source="App.config" Destination="$(OutDir)\$(TargetFileName).config" Transform="App.$(Configuration).config" />
</Target>
It has the added benefit of being quite a bit shorter than the original solution.

Resources