Get Tenant Id from RabbitMq Message for Db Connection - events

I have a microservice architecture with ASP.Net Core applications and RabbitMq as the event bus between the microservices.
I also want to support multi tenancy.
So I have following dependency injection service defined in the Startup.cs to open a connection to the Database on every request based on the user's tenant id.
services.AddScoped<IDocumentSession>(ds =>
{
var store = ds.GetRequiredService<IDocumentStore>();
var httpContextAccessor = ds.GetRequiredService<IHttpContextAccessor>();
var tenant = httpContextAccessor?.HttpContext?.User?.Claims.FirstOrDefault(c => c.Type == "tid")?.Value;
return tenant != null ? store.OpenSession(tenant) : store.OpenSession();
});
The problem is when the service processes an event bus message (like UserUpdatedEvent).
In that case when it tries to open the Db connection, it obviously does not have the user information from the http context.
How do I send/access the tenant id of the respective user when injecting the scoped service and processing an event with RabbitMq?
Or rephrasing my question:
Is there any way to access the RabbitMQ message (and for example its headers) when the dependency injection code is executed?

Since there is no HttpContext, because a RabbitMq request is not a Http request, as pointed out in #istepaniuk's answer, I created my own context and called it AmqpContext:
public interface IAmqpContext
{
void ClearHeaders();
void AddHeaders(IDictionary<string, object> headers);
string GetHeaderByKey(string headerKey);
}
public class AmqpContext : IAmqpContext
{
private readonly Dictionary<string, object> _headers;
public AmqpContext()
{
_headers = new Dictionary<string, object>();
}
public void ClearHeaders()
{
_headers.Clear();
}
public void AddHeaders(IDictionary<string, object> headers)
{
foreach (var header in headers)
_headers.Add(header.Key, header.Value);
}
public string GetHeaderByKey(string headerKey)
{
if (_headers.TryGetValue(headerKey, out object headerValue))
{
return Encoding.Default.GetString((byte[])headerValue);
}
return null;
}
}
And when sending the RabbitMq message I send the tenant id via the headers like this:
var properties = channel.CreateBasicProperties();
if (tenantId != null)
{
var headers = new Dictionary<string, object>
{
{ "tid", tenantId }
};
properties.Headers = headers;
}
channel.BasicPublish(exchange: BROKER_NAME,
routingKey: eventName,
mandatory: true,
basicProperties: properties,
body: body);
Then when on the receiving service I register the AmqpContext as a scoped service in the Startup.cs:
services.AddScoped<IAmqpContext, AmqpContext>();
When receiving the RabbitMq message, within the consumer channel, a scope and the Amqp context is created:
consumer.Received += async (model, ea) =>
{
var eventName = ea.RoutingKey;
var message = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(ea.Body);
var properties = ea.BasicProperties;
using (var scope = _serviceProvider.CreateScope())
{
var amqpContext = scope.ServiceProvider.GetService<IAmqpContext>();
if (amqpContext != null)
{
amqpContext.ClearHeaders();
if (properties.Headers != null && amqpContext != null)
{
amqpContext.AddHeaders(properties.Headers);
}
}
var handler = scope.ServiceProvider.GetService(subscription.HandlerType);
if (handler == null) continue;
var eventType = _subsManager.GetEventTypeByName(eventName);
var integrationEvent = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject(message, eventType);
var concreteType = typeof(IIntegrationEventHandler<>).MakeGenericType(eventType);
await (Task)concreteType.GetMethod("Handle").Invoke(handler, new object[] { integrationEvent });
}
channel.BasicAck(ea.DeliveryTag, multiple: false);
};
Then when the scoped Db connection service is created (see my question) I can access the tenant id from the message headers:
services.AddScoped<IDocumentSession>(ds =>
{
var store = ds.GetRequiredService<IDocumentStore>();
string tenant = null;
var httpContextAccessor = ds.GetRequiredService<IHttpContextAccessor>();
if (httpContextAccessor.HttpContext != null)
{
tenant = httpContextAccessor.HttpContext.User?.Claims.FirstOrDefault(c => c.Type == "tid")?.Value;
}
else
{
var amqpContext = ds.GetRequiredService<IAmqpContext>();
tenant = amqpContext.GetHeaderByKey("tid");
}
return tenant != null ? store.OpenSession(tenant) : store.OpenSession();
});

You can't
Or maybe, but not if your design depends on the HTTP context. As the .NET documentation on service lifetime states:
Scoped lifetime services are created once per client request
(connection).
So from the point of view of your (HTTP) service, the request is an entry point that used container magic to, by means of the global HTTP context, set up your database per request, before any of your business logic. This does not seem to be the best design choice, especially if you plan to use this same logic outside of an HTTP request.
In contrast, your message consumer service is long-running; In this lifetime cycle, if your connection setup requires information from each message (tenant id) you can't solely rely on dependency injection.
The "right" way would be not to rely on global state in the HTTP context to set up the database connection. Set up a database context that works for all your tenants instead.

Related

How to mock response in FHIR Http Client calls to CreateAsync

When implementing calls to CreateAsync in the Hl7.Fhir.Rest.FhirClient library I'm struggling with how to mock a valid response. I know how to mock the dotnet-httpclient using a Mock HttpMessageHandler object and noticed there is a message handler argument that can be specified when creating the FhirClient. What I have tried to do is specify a message handler to the creation step that is a mock message handler object.
This simplified unit test attempts to mock the HttpMessageHandler and cause it to return a valid body and result code from the FhirClient's CreateAsync method call.
[Fact]
public async Task SubscribeAndReturnSubscriptionIdAsync()
{
var mockHttpMessageHandler = MockFhirHttpClientMessageHandler.MockSubscribeMessageResponse(new StringContent("{'id':'abc123','status':'active'}"), HttpStatusCode.Created);
var subscriptionResource = new Subscription()
{
Criteria = "https://server.fire.ly/CareTeam",
Status = Subscription.SubscriptionStatus.Active,
Reason = "test",
Channel = new Subscription.ChannelComponent()
{
Type = Subscription.SubscriptionChannelType.RestHook,
Endpoint = "http://localhost:9999/AscomFhirApi/UpdateCareTeam",
Payload = "application/fhir+json"
},
};
var serverUri = new Uri("http://server.fire.ly");
var clientSettings = new FhirClientSettings()
{
PreferredFormat = ResourceFormat.Json
};
var fhirHttpClient = new Hl7.Fhir.Rest.FhirClient(serverUri, clientSettings, mockHttpMessageHandler.Object);
var subscription = await fhirHttpClient.CreateAsync<Subscription>(subscriptionResource);
Assert.NotEmpty(subscription.Id);
}
The MockSubscribeMessageResponse method shown below creates the HttpMessageHandler that is passed to the FhirClient in the above test.
public static Mock<HttpMessageHandler> MockSubscribeMessageResponse(
HttpContent content,
HttpStatusCode code = HttpStatusCode.OK)
{
var mockHttpMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();
mockHttpMessageHandler.Protected()
.Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>("SendAsync", ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(),
ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
.ReturnsAsync(new HttpResponseMessage
{
StatusCode = code,
Content = content
});
return mockHttpMessageHandler;
}
The error I'm getting is a Null Reference Exception in what looks like the HttpResponseMessage or response body.
System.NullReferenceException
Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
at Hl7.Fhir.Rest.HttpToEntryExtensions.ToEntryResponse(HttpResponseMessage response, Byte[] body)
at Hl7.Fhir.Rest.HttpClientRequester.ExecuteAsync(EntryRequest interaction)
at Hl7.Fhir.Rest.BaseFhirClient.executeAsync[TResource](Bundle tx, IEnumerable`1 expect)
at Tests.Unit.Core.Services.FirelyHttpClientShould.SubscribeAndReturnSubscriptionIdAsync() in C:\src\AscomIASharedAssignFHIRApi5\Tests.Unit.Core\Services\FirelyHttpClientShould.cs:line 60
You have probably figured this out long time ago, but the source of error is most probably missing RequestMessage, implementation of ToEntryResponse depends on response.RequestMessage.RequestUri being set. So I guess that what you need to do is:
var mockHttpMessageHandler = new Mock<HttpMessageHandler>();
mockHttpMessageHandler.Protected()
.Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>("SendAsync", ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(), ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
.ReturnsAsync(new HttpResponseMessage
{
StatusCode = code,
RequestMessage = new HttpRequestMessage(HttpMethod.Get, "http://localhost"),
Content = content
});
return mockHttpMessageHandler;
A long time later again ...
In version 3.8.3 of the Firely SDK the FhirClient now has support for taking the HttpClient in its constructor, so this may make unit testing apis much easier. It wasn't clear from your post what you were testing here...
I wrote a blog post on using it for this type of testing
Roughly something like ...
[TestMethod]
public async Task SubscribeAndReturnSubscriptionIdAsync()
{
using (var fhirServerFactory = new UnitTestFhirServerApplication())
using (var httpclient = fhirServerFactory.CreateClient())
{
var server = new FhirClient("http://server.fire.ly", httpclient);
var subscriptionResource = new Subscription()
{
Criteria = "https://server.fire.ly/CareTeam",
Status = Subscription.SubscriptionStatus.Active,
Reason = "test",
Channel = new Subscription.ChannelComponent()
{
Type = Subscription.SubscriptionChannelType.RestHook,
Endpoint = "http://localhost:9999/AscomFhirApi/UpdateCareTeam",
Payload = "application/fhir+json"
},
};
var subscription = await server.CreateAsync(subscriptionResource);
// ...
}
}

Getting Masstransit to use scoped lifetime

I'm having an issue with getting the same instance of the IIdentityService(my own class) or IServiceProvider in my consumer observer. I have an identity service where I set the credentials for the user, which is used later in the consumer pipeline.
I have tried the code below along with other code and configuration changes.
_serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IIdentityService>()
_serviceProvider.CreateScope()
var consumerScopeProvider = _serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IConsumerScopeProvider>();
using (var scope = consumerScopeProvider.GetScope(context))
{
// this next line of code is where we must access the payload
// using a container specific interface to get access to the
// scoped IServiceProvider
var serviceScope = scope.Context.GetPayload<IServiceScope>();
var serviceProviderScoped = serviceScope.ServiceProvider;
IIdentityService identityService = _serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IIdentityService>();
}
// Also tried this as Scoped
services.AddTransient<CustomConsumer>();
var busControl = Bus.Factory.CreateUsingRabbitMq(cfg =>
{
var host = cfg.Host(new Uri(busConfiguration.Address), h =>
{
h.Username(busConfiguration.Username);
h.Password(busConfiguration.Password);
});
cfg.ReceiveEndpoint(host, "queue_1", endpointCfg => ConfigureConsumers(endpointCfg, provider));
cfg.UseServiceScope(provider);
});
busControl.ConnectConsumeObserver(new ConsumeObserver(provider));
public class ConsumeObserver : IConsumeObserver
{
private readonly IServiceProvider _serviceProvider;
public ConsumeObserver(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
_serviceProvider = serviceProvider;
}
Task IConsumeObserver.PreConsume<T>(ConsumeContext<T> context)
{
var identityMessage = (IIdentityMessage)context.Message;
if (identityMessage == null)
{
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
// Here I get a "Cannot resolve scoped service '' from root provider." error
IIdentityService identityService = _serviceProvider.GetRequiredService<IIdentityService>();
var task = identityService.SetIdentityAsync(identityMessage.Identity.TenantIdentifier, identityMessage.Identity.UserIdentifier);
// This gets a different instance of the IIdentityService.cs service.
//IIdentityService identityService = _serviceProvider.CreateScope().ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IIdentityService>();
// called before the consumer's Consume method is called
return task;
}
Task IConsumeObserver.PostConsume<T>(ConsumeContext<T> context)
{
// called after the consumer's Consume method is called
// if an exception was thrown, the ConsumeFault method is called instead
return TaskUtil.Completed;
}
Task IConsumeObserver.ConsumeFault<T>(ConsumeContext<T> context, Exception exception)
{
// called if the consumer's Consume method throws an exception
return TaskUtil.Completed;
}
}
// This is where I need to identity credentials
services.AddScoped<UserContext>((provider =>
{
// This gets a different instance of IIdentityService
var identityService = provider.GetRequiredService<IIdentityService>();
var contextProvider = provider.GetRequiredService<IContextProvider>();
var identity = identityService.GetIdentity();
return contextProvider.GetContext(identity.UserId);
}));
var task = identityService.SetIdentityAsync(identityMessage.Identity.TenantIdentifier, identityMessage.Identity.UserIdentifier);
The setting of the identity above should be retrievable below.
var identity = identityService.GetIdentity();
What I get is null reference as the service provider is of a different instance.
Can anyone tell me how to get the same instance of the service provider through out the consumer pipeline?

Calling Dynamics Web API with Entity metadata early binding

I would like to consume my organizations dynamics oData endpoint but with early bound classes. However, there are a lot of early bound tools out there and I wanted to know which one provides the best developer experience/least resistance?
For example, there is this one:
https://github.com/daryllabar/DLaB.Xrm.XrmToolBoxTools
https://github.com/yagasoft/DynamicsCrm-CodeGenerator
and so on. Is there a developer preference/method out there?
Early bound classes are for use with the Organization Service which is a SOAP service. The normal way to generate those classes is using CrmSvcUtil.
OData can be used in Organization Data Service or Web API, but those don't have Early Bound classes.
Further reading: Introducing the Microsoft Dynamics 365 web services
It's not impossible to use with standard SOAP Early bound class. We just have to be creative. If we work just with basic attributes (fields, not relationships, ecc) it seems possible. For example. for create and update, OData will not accept the entire early bounded class, just pass the attibutes:
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string token = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Run(() => GetToken()).Result;
CRMWebAPI dynamicsWebAPI = new CRMWebAPI("https:/ORG.api.crm4.dynamics.com/api/data/v9.1/",
token);
CRMGetListOptions listOptions = new CRMGetListOptions
{
Select = new string[] { "EntitySetName" },
Filter = "LogicalName eq 'contact'"
};
dynamic entityDefinitions = dynamicsWebAPI.GetList<ExpandoObject>("EntityDefinitions", listOptions).Result;
Contact contact = new Contact
{
FirstName = "Felipe",
LastName = "Test",
MobilePhone = "38421254"
};
dynamic ret = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Run(async () => await dynamicsWebAPI.Create(entityDefinitions.List[0].EntitySetName, KeyPairValueToObject(contact.Attributes))).Result;
}
public static async Task<string> GetToken()
{
string api = "https://ORG.api.crm4.dynamics.com/";
ClientCredential credential = new ClientCredential("CLIENT_ID", "CLIENT_SECRET");
AuthenticationContext authenticationContext = new AuthenticationContext("https://login.microsoftonline.com/commom/oauth2/authorize");
return authenticationContext.AcquireTokenAsync(api, credential).Result.AccessToken;
}
public static object KeyPairValueToObject(AttributeCollection keyValuePairs)
{
dynamic expando = new ExpandoObject();
var obj = expando as IDictionary<string, object>;
foreach (var keyValuePair in keyValuePairs)
obj.Add(keyValuePair.Key, keyValuePair.Value);
return obj;
}
}
It's a simple approach and I didn't went further.
Maybe we have to serealize other objects as OptionSets, DateTime (pass just the string) and EntityReferences but this simple test worked fine to me. I'm using Xrm.Tools.WebAPI and Microsoft.IdentityModel.Clients.ActiveDirectory. Maybe it's a way.
[Edit]
And so I decided to go and created a not well tested method to cast the attributes. Problems: We have to follow OData statments to use the API. To update/create an entity reference we can use this to reference https://www.inogic.com/blog/2016/02/set-values-of-all-data-types-using-web-api-in-dynamics-crm/
So
//To EntityReference
entityToUpdateOrCreate["FIELD_SCHEMA_NAME#odata.bind"] = "/ENTITY_SET_NAME(GUID)";
So, it's the Schema name, not field name. If you use CamelCase when set you fields name you'll have a problem where. We can resolve that with a (to that cute) code
public static object EntityToObject<T>(T entity) where T : Entity
{
dynamic expando = new ExpandoObject();
var obj = expando as IDictionary<string, object>;
foreach (var keyValuePair in entity.Attributes)
{
obj.Add(GetFieldName(entity, keyValuePair), CastEntityAttibutesValueOnDynamicObject(keyValuePair.Value));
}
return obj;
}
public static object CastEntityAttibutesValueOnDynamicObject(object attributeValue)
{
if (attributeValue.GetType().Name == "EntityReference")
{
CRMGetListOptions listOptions = new CRMGetListOptions
{
Select = new string[] { "EntitySetName" },
Filter = $"LogicalName eq '{((EntityReference)attributeValue).LogicalName}'"
};
dynamic entitySetName = dynamicsWebAPI.GetList<ExpandoObject>("EntityDefinitions", listOptions).Result.List[0];
return $"/{entitySetName.EntitySetName}({((EntityReference)attributeValue).Id})";
}
else if (attributeValue.GetType().Name == "OptionSetValue")
{
return ((OptionSetValue)attributeValue).Value;
}
else if (attributeValue.GetType().Name == "DateTime")
{
return ((DateTime)attributeValue).ToString("yyyy-MM-dd");
}
else if (attributeValue.GetType().Name == "Money")
{
return ((Money)attributeValue).Value;
}
else if (attributeValue.GetType().Name == "AliasedValue")
{
return CastEntityAttibutesValueOnDynamicObject(((AliasedValue)attributeValue).Value);
}
else
{
return attributeValue;
}
}
public static string GetFieldName<T>(T entity, KeyValuePair<string, object> keyValuePair) where T : Entity
{
switch (keyValuePair.Value.GetType().Name)
{
case "EntityReference":
var entityNameList = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Run(async () => await dynamicsWebAPI.GetEntityDisplayNameList()).Result;
var firstEntity = entityNameList.Where(x => x.LogicalName == entity.LogicalName).FirstOrDefault();
var attrNameList = System.Threading.Tasks.Task.Run(async () => await dynamicsWebAPI.GetAttributeDisplayNameList(firstEntity.MetadataId)).Result;
return attrNameList.Where(x => x.LogicalName == keyValuePair.Key).Single().SchemaName + "#odata.bind";
case "ActivityParty":
throw new NotImplementedException(); //TODO
default:
return keyValuePair.Key;
}
}
Please, note that this approach do not seems fast or good in anyway. It's better if you have all this values as static so we can save some fetches
[Edit 2]
I just found on XRMToolBox a plugin called "Early bound generator for Web API" and it seems to be the best option. Maybe you should give it a try if you're still curious about that. I guess its the best approach.
The final code is this:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
string token = Task.Run(() => GetToken()).Result;
dynamicsWebAPI = new CRMWebAPI("https://ORG.api.crm4.dynamics.com/api/data/v9.1/",
token);
Contact contact = new Contact
{
FirstName = "Felipe",
LastName = "Test",
MobilePhone = "38421254",
new_Salutation = new EntityReference(new_salutation.EntitySetName, new Guid("{BFA27540-7BB9-E611-80EE-FC15B4281C8C}")),
BirthDate = new DateTime(1993, 04, 14),
};
dynamic ret = Task.Run(async () => await dynamicsWebAPI.Create(Contact.EntitySetName, contact.ToExpandoObject())).Result;
Contact createdContact = dynamicsWebAPI.Get<Contact>(Contact.EntitySetName, ret, new CRMGetListOptions
{
Select = new string[] { "*" }
}).Result;
}
and you have to change the ToExpandoObject on Entity.cs class (generated by the plugin)
public ExpandoObject ToExpandoObject()
{
dynamic expando = new ExpandoObject();
var expandoObject = expando as IDictionary<string, object>;
foreach (var attributes in Attributes)
{
if (attributes.Key == GetIdAttribute())
{
continue;
}
var value = attributes.Value;
var key = attributes.Key;
if (value is EntityReference entityReference)
{
value = $"/{entityReference.EntitySetName}({entityReference.EntityId})";
}
else
{
key = key.ToLower();
if (value is DateTime dateTimeValue)
{
var propertyForAttribute = GetPublicInstanceProperties().FirstOrDefault(x =>
x.Name.Equals(key, StringComparison.InvariantCultureIgnoreCase));
if (propertyForAttribute != null)
{
var onlyDateAttr = propertyForAttribute.GetCustomAttribute<OnlyDateAttribute>();
if (onlyDateAttr != null)
{
value = dateTimeValue.ToString(OnlyDateAttribute.Format);
}
}
}
}
expandoObject.Add(key, value);
}
return (ExpandoObject)expandoObject;
}
Links:
https://github.com/davidyack/Xrm.Tools.CRMWebAPI
https://www.xrmtoolbox.com/plugins/crm.webApi.earlyBoundGenerator/
We currently use XrmToolkit which has it's own version of early binding called ProxyClasses but will allow you to generate early binding using the CRM Service Utility (CrmSvcUtil). It does a lot more than just early binding which is why we use it on all of our projects but the early binding features alone would have me sold on it. in order to regenerate an entity definition all you do is right click the cs file in visual studio and select regenerate and it is done in a few seconds.
For my first 3 years of CRM development I used the XrmToolbox "Early Bound Generator" plugin which is really helpful as well.

Why Context.User.Identity.Name is empty from Xamarin?

I can't figure out why when I try to connect from Xamarin Context.User.Indetity.Name is empty. Is there anything special I need to do? I logged in to the server and the user has a connection stablished. After that I use the following code:
var Connection = new HubConnection(Url);
_hub = Connection.CreateHubProxy(hubName);
_hub.On(srvEvent, onData);
await Connection.Start();
But I never get the username. What am I doing wrong?
Here's the code for the server:
var name = Context.User.Identity.Name;
Connections.Add(name, Context.ConnectionId);
return base.OnConnected();
It works when it comes from the web app, not from the xamarin app.
Thanks!
Here is the code I was telling you about.
I'm using an external OAuth2 server for authentication, so I must pass the access token to SignalR somehow, because SignalR uses web sockets for the messages back and forth I can't pass the access token in the header because this is not supported by web sockets.
I'm passing that access token as a query string parameter this way (Javascript client)
$.connection.hub.qs = "access_token=" + mytoken;
Then on my SignalR I added a middleware that takes that query string and adds it to the header as an Authorization header using Bearer Token. This is done this way in my startup class
app.UseAuthQSTokenExtractor();
The code for the middleware is this one
namespace Owin
{
public static class AuthorizationQSTokenExtractorExtension
{
public static void UseAuthQSTokenExtractor(this IAppBuilder app)
{
app.Use<AuthorizationQsTokenExtractorMiddleware>();
}
}
}
namespace Chat.Middleware
{
public class AuthorizationQsTokenExtractorMiddleware : OwinMiddleware
{
public AuthorizationQsTokenExtractorMiddleware(OwinMiddleware next)
: base(next)
{
}
public override async Task Invoke(IOwinContext context)
{
Debug.WriteLine("signalr-auth-middleware");
string bearerToken = context.Request.Query.Get("access_token");
Debug.WriteLine("signar-bearer: " + bearerToken);
if (bearerToken != null)
{
TokenHelper.DecodeAndWrite(bearerToken);
string[] authorization = { "Bearer " + bearerToken };
context.Request.Headers.Add("Authorization", authorization);
}
await Next.Invoke(context);
}
}
My startup class then looks like this
app.UseCors(CorsOptions.AllowAll);
app.UseAuthQSTokenExtractor();
JwtSecurityTokenHandler.InboundClaimTypeMap = new Dictionary<string, string>();
app.UseIdentityServerBearerTokenAuthentication(
new IdentityServerBearerTokenAuthenticationOptions
{
Authority = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["api:idserver"],
RequiredScopes = new[]
{
"chat-hub"
}
});
var hubConfiguration = new HubConfiguration ();
hubConfiguration.EnableDetailedErrors = true;
app.RunSignalR(hubConfiguration);
You can see in the code above where I tell SignalR to use the Oauth2 Server, that code is this one
app.UseIdentityServerBearerTokenAuthentication(
new IdentityServerBearerTokenAuthenticationOptions
{
Authority = ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["api:idserver"],
RequiredScopes = new[]
{
"chat-hub"
}
});
After all this is set up I have access to my Context.User.Identity.Name and if you want to get the others IdentityClaim you can do this
var identity = Context.User.Identity as ClaimsIdentity;
Which I'm using that code above to get the subjectId (userid) like this
public static string[] GetIdentityClaimsIssSub(HubCallerContext Context)
{
var identity = Context.User.Identity as ClaimsIdentity;
if (identity == null)
return null;
var issuerFromIdentity = identity.FindFirst("iss");
var subFromIdentity = identity.FindFirst("sub");
if (issuerFromIdentity == null || subFromIdentity == null)
return null;
return new string[] { issuerFromIdentity.Value, subFromIdentity.Value };
}
I hope it helps

Implement HTTP Cache (ETag) in ASP.NET Core Web API

I am working on ASP.NET Core (ASP.NET 5) Web API application and have to implement HTTP Caching with the help of Entity Tags. Earlier I used CacheCow for the same but it seems it does not support ASP.NET Core as of now. I also didn't find any other relevant library or framework support details for the same.
I can write custom code for the same but before that I want to see if anything is already available. Kindly share if something is already available and what is the better way to implement that.
After a while trying to make it work with middleware I figured out that MVC action filters are actually better suited for this functionality.
public class ETagFilter : Attribute, IActionFilter
{
private readonly int[] _statusCodes;
public ETagFilter(params int[] statusCodes)
{
_statusCodes = statusCodes;
if (statusCodes.Length == 0) _statusCodes = new[] { 200 };
}
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context)
{
if (context.HttpContext.Request.Method == "GET")
{
if (_statusCodes.Contains(context.HttpContext.Response.StatusCode))
{
//I just serialize the result to JSON, could do something less costly
var content = JsonConvert.SerializeObject(context.Result);
var etag = ETagGenerator.GetETag(context.HttpContext.Request.Path.ToString(), Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(content));
if (context.HttpContext.Request.Headers.Keys.Contains("If-None-Match") && context.HttpContext.Request.Headers["If-None-Match"].ToString() == etag)
{
context.Result = new StatusCodeResult(304);
}
context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("ETag", new[] { etag });
}
}
}
}
// Helper class that generates the etag from a key (route) and content (response)
public static class ETagGenerator
{
public static string GetETag(string key, byte[] contentBytes)
{
var keyBytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(key);
var combinedBytes = Combine(keyBytes, contentBytes);
return GenerateETag(combinedBytes);
}
private static string GenerateETag(byte[] data)
{
using (var md5 = MD5.Create())
{
var hash = md5.ComputeHash(data);
string hex = BitConverter.ToString(hash);
return hex.Replace("-", "");
}
}
private static byte[] Combine(byte[] a, byte[] b)
{
byte[] c = new byte[a.Length + b.Length];
Buffer.BlockCopy(a, 0, c, 0, a.Length);
Buffer.BlockCopy(b, 0, c, a.Length, b.Length);
return c;
}
}
And then use it on the actions or controllers you want as an attribute:
[HttpGet("data")]
[ETagFilter(200)]
public async Task<IActionResult> GetDataFromApi()
{
}
The important distinction between Middleware and Filters is that your middleware can run before and after MVC middlware and can only work with HttpContext. Also once MVC starts sending the response back to the client it's too late to make any changes to it.
Filters on the other hand are a part of MVC middleware. They have access to the MVC context, with which in this case it's simpler to implement this functionality. More on Filters and their pipeline in MVC.
Building on Eric's answer, I would use an interface that could be implemented on an entity to support entity tagging. In the filter you would only add the ETag if the action is returning a entity with this interface.
This allows you to be more selective about what entities get tagged and allows you have each entity control how its tag is generated. This would be much more efficient than serializing everything and creating a hash. It also eliminates the need to check the status code. It could be safely and easily added as a global filter since you are "opting-in" to the functionality by implementing the interface on your model class.
public interface IGenerateETag
{
string GenerateETag();
}
[AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class | AttributeTargets.Method, AllowMultiple = false)]
public class ETagFilterAttribute : Attribute, IActionFilter
{
public void OnActionExecuting(ActionExecutingContext context)
{
}
public void OnActionExecuted(ActionExecutedContext context)
{
var request = context.HttpContext.Request;
var response = context.HttpContext.Response;
if (request.Method == "GET" &&
context.Result is ObjectResult obj &&
obj.Value is IGenerateETag entity)
{
string etag = entity.GenerateETag();
// Value should be in quotes according to the spec
if (!etag.EndsWith("\""))
etag = "\"" + etag +"\"";
string ifNoneMatch = request.Headers["If-None-Match"];
if (ifNoneMatch == etag)
{
context.Result = new StatusCodeResult(304);
}
context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("ETag", etag);
}
}
}
I am using a middleware that works fine for me.
It adds HttpCache headers to responses (Cache-Control, Expires, ETag, Last-Modified), and implements cache expiration & validation models.
You can find it on nuget.org as a package called Marvin.Cache.Headers.
You could find more information from its Github home page:
https://github.com/KevinDockx/HttpCacheHeaders
Here's a more extensive version for MVC Views (tested with asp.net core 1.1):
using System;
using System.IO;
using System.Security.Cryptography;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http;
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Http.Extensions;
using Microsoft.Net.Http.Headers;
namespace WebApplication9.Middleware
{
// This code is mostly here to generate the ETag from the response body and set 304 as required,
// but it also adds the default maxage (for client) and s-maxage (for a caching proxy like Varnish) to the cache-control in the response
//
// note that controller actions can override this middleware behaviour as needed with [ResponseCache] attribute
//
// (There is actually a Microsoft Middleware for response caching - called "ResponseCachingMiddleware",
// but it looks like you still have to generate the ETag yourself, which makes the MS Middleware kinda pointless in its current 1.1.0 form)
//
public class ResponseCacheMiddleware
{
private readonly RequestDelegate _next;
// todo load these from appsettings
const bool ResponseCachingEnabled = true;
const int ActionMaxAgeDefault = 600; // client cache time
const int ActionSharedMaxAgeDefault = 259200; // caching proxy cache time
const string ErrorPath = "/Home/Error";
public ResponseCacheMiddleware(RequestDelegate next)
{
_next = next;
}
// THIS MUST BE FAST - CALLED ON EVERY REQUEST
public async Task Invoke(HttpContext context)
{
var req = context.Request;
var resp = context.Response;
var is304 = false;
string eTag = null;
if (IsErrorPath(req))
{
await _next.Invoke(context);
return;
}
resp.OnStarting(state =>
{
// add headers *before* the response has started
AddStandardHeaders(((HttpContext)state).Response);
return Task.CompletedTask;
}, context);
// ignore non-gets/200s (maybe allow head method?)
if (!ResponseCachingEnabled || req.Method != HttpMethods.Get || resp.StatusCode != StatusCodes.Status200OK)
{
await _next.Invoke(context);
return;
}
resp.OnStarting(state => {
// add headers *before* the response has started
var ctx = (HttpContext)state;
AddCacheControlAndETagHeaders(ctx, eTag, is304); // intentional modified closure - values set later on
return Task.CompletedTask;
}, context);
using (var buffer = new MemoryStream())
{
// populate a stream with the current response data
var stream = resp.Body;
// setup response.body to point at our buffer
resp.Body = buffer;
try
{
// call controller/middleware actions etc. to populate the response body
await _next.Invoke(context);
}
catch
{
// controller/ or other middleware threw an exception, copy back and rethrow
buffer.CopyTo(stream);
resp.Body = stream; // looks weird, but required to keep the stream writable in edge cases like exceptions in other middleware
throw;
}
using (var bufferReader = new StreamReader(buffer))
{
// reset the buffer and read the entire body to generate the eTag
buffer.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
var body = bufferReader.ReadToEnd();
eTag = GenerateETag(req, body);
if (req.Headers[HeaderNames.IfNoneMatch] == eTag)
{
is304 = true; // we don't set the headers here, so set flag
}
else if ( // we're not the only code in the stack that can set a status code, so check if we should output anything
resp.StatusCode != StatusCodes.Status204NoContent &&
resp.StatusCode != StatusCodes.Status205ResetContent &&
resp.StatusCode != StatusCodes.Status304NotModified)
{
// reset buffer and copy back to response body
buffer.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin);
buffer.CopyTo(stream);
resp.Body = stream; // looks weird, but required to keep the stream writable in edge cases like exceptions in other middleware
}
}
}
}
private static void AddStandardHeaders(HttpResponse resp)
{
resp.Headers.Add("X-App", "MyAppName");
resp.Headers.Add("X-MachineName", Environment.MachineName);
}
private static string GenerateETag(HttpRequest req, string body)
{
// TODO: consider supporting VaryBy header in key? (not required atm in this app)
var combinedKey = req.GetDisplayUrl() + body;
var combinedBytes = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(combinedKey);
using (var md5 = MD5.Create())
{
var hash = md5.ComputeHash(combinedBytes);
var hex = BitConverter.ToString(hash);
return hex.Replace("-", "");
}
}
private static void AddCacheControlAndETagHeaders(HttpContext ctx, string eTag, bool is304)
{
var req = ctx.Request;
var resp = ctx.Response;
// use defaults for 404s etc.
if (IsErrorPath(req))
{
return;
}
if (is304)
{
// this will blank response body as well as setting the status header
resp.StatusCode = StatusCodes.Status304NotModified;
}
// check cache-control not already set - so that controller actions can override caching
// behaviour with [ResponseCache] attribute
// (also see StaticFileOptions)
var cc = resp.GetTypedHeaders().CacheControl ?? new CacheControlHeaderValue();
if (cc.NoCache || cc.NoStore)
return;
// sidenote - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7232#section-4.1
// the server generating a 304 response MUST generate any of the following header
// fields that WOULD have been sent in a 200(OK) response to the same
// request: Cache-Control, Content-Location, Date, ETag, Expires, and Vary.
// so we must set cache-control headers for 200s OR 304s
cc.MaxAge = cc.MaxAge ?? TimeSpan.FromSeconds(ActionMaxAgeDefault); // for client
cc.SharedMaxAge = cc.SharedMaxAge ?? TimeSpan.FromSeconds(ActionSharedMaxAgeDefault); // for caching proxy e.g. varnish/nginx
resp.GetTypedHeaders().CacheControl = cc; // assign back to pick up changes
resp.Headers.Add(HeaderNames.ETag, eTag);
}
private static bool IsErrorPath(HttpRequest request)
{
return request.Path.StartsWithSegments(ErrorPath);
}
}
}
As an addendum to Erik Božič's answer I found that the HttpContext object was not reporting back the StatusCode correctly when inheriting from ActionFilterAttribute, and applied controller-wide. HttpContext.Response.StatusCode was always 200, indicating it was probably not set by this point in the pipeline. I was instead able to grab the StatusCode from ActionExecutedContext context.Result.StatusCode.
I found an alternative solution which is "closer" to the web api controller method - so you can decide per method which ETag to set...
See my response here: How to use ETag in Web API using action filter along with HttpResponseMessage
We can write simple extension method on ControllerBase class
using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc;
namespace WebApiUtils.Caching
{
public static class ExtensionMethods
{
public static IActionResult OkOr304<T>(
this ControllerBase controller,
T resultObject,
Func<T, string> etagBuilder
)
{
var etag = etagBuilder(resultObject);
if (
// Add additional headers if needed
controller.Request.Headers.Keys.Contains("If-None-Match")
&& controller.Request.Headers["If-None-Match"].ToString() == etag
)
{
return controller.StatusCode(304);
}
controller.Response.Headers.Add("ETag", new[] { etag });
return controller.Ok(resultObject);
}
public static IActionResult OkOr304<T>(this ControllerBase controller, T resultObject)
{
return controller.OkOr304(
resultObject,
x =>
{
// Implement default ETag strategy
return "";
}
);
}
}
}
Then we can use it inside controller with
return this.OkOr304(resultObject, etagBuilder);
or
return this.OkOr304(resultObject);
this works very well if result objects have some version indicator e.g.
return this.OkOr304(resultObject, x => x.VersionNumber.ToString());

Resources