i'm trying to implement binary tree, pre order traversal using stack.
here its popping the last left node and after that root=root->right doesnt seem to work. Pls help. here 7 is being popped out and is being displayed and after the the program is ending.
all the functions are working yet not the desired output
#include<stdio.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#define maxsize 100
int a[maxsize];
int top=-1;
struct node{
int data;
struct node *left, *right;
};
struct node *newNode(int data)
{
struct node *nn;
nn=(struct node *)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
if(!nn)
return;
nn->data=data;
nn->left=nn->right=NULL;
return nn;
};
void push(struct node *root)
{
printf("pushcalled\n");
if(top!=maxsize-1)
a[++top]=root;
}
int isempty()
{
return(top==-1);
}
struct node *pop()
{
printf("popcalled\n");
if(top!=-1)
{
return a[top];
top--;
}
}
void deleteStack()
{
free(a[top--]);
}
void preorder(struct node *root)
{
while(1)
{
while(root)
{
printf("%d\t",root->data);
push(root);
root=root->left;
}
printf("hello\n");
if(isempty())
break;
printf("hello\n");
root=pop();
printf("Popped data is:%d\n",root->data);
root=root->right;
printf("right data is:%d\n",root->data);
}
deleteStack();
}
int main()
{
int data;
struct node *root=newNode(10);
root->left = newNode(11);
root->left->left = newNode(7);
root->right = newNode(9);
root->right->left = newNode(15);
root->right->right = newNode(8);
preorder(root);
return 0;
}
Your logic is correct but there are some errors in your code.
root=root->right;
printf("right data is:%d\n",root->data);
you should check whether the root is null or not before you try to access root->data. That is why you are getting a segmentation fault. So put a condition if(root!=NULL) above printf() statement.
Another mistake is in the implementation of stack's pop.
struct node *pop()
{
printf("popcalled\n");
if(top!=-1)
{
return a[top];
top--;
}
}
it should be like this,
struct node *pop()
{
printf("popcalled\n");
if(top!=-1)
{
struct node* temp = a[top];
top--;
return temp;
}
}
In your code, when you return a[top]; the line below it i.e. top--; never executes and the value of top remains same.
Related
I am making a binary search tree code, in that 'am facing an issue in the deletion function. After executing the function, the code is showing inorder display incorrectly. Basically, it is incorrect, and I'am not able to understand where the problem is.
In the delete function, I have used a search function that will find the node which the user has to delete. And I have used inorder successor method for deletion so the minimum function will find the successor. All other functions like insertion, minimum, and inorder are working fine.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
struct node
{
int data;
struct node *left;
struct node *right;
} node;
struct node *insert(struct node *tnode, int data)
{
if (tnode == NULL)
{
struct node *ptr;
ptr = (struct node *)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
ptr->data = data;
ptr->left = NULL;
ptr->right = NULL;
return ptr;
}
if (data > (tnode->data))
{
tnode->right = insert(tnode->right, data);
return tnode;
}
if (data < (tnode->data))
{
tnode->left = insert(tnode->left, data);
return tnode;
}
}
void in_order(struct node *tnode)
{
if (tnode == NULL)
return;
else
{
in_order(tnode->left);
printf("%d\t", tnode->data);
in_order(tnode->right);
}
}
struct node *search(struct node *tnode, int data)
{
if (tnode == NULL)
{
return NULL;
}
else
{
if (data == tnode->data)
{
return tnode;
}
else
{
if (data > tnode->data)
{
search(tnode->right, data);
}
else
{
search(tnode->left, data);
}
}
}
}
struct node *minimum(struct node *tnode)
{
if (tnode == NULL)
{
printf("No node present\n");
return NULL;
}
else
{
if (tnode->left == NULL)
return tnode;
else
minimum(tnode->left);
}
}
struct node *deletenode(struct node *tnode, int data)
{
struct node *s;
s = search(tnode, data);
if (s == NULL)
{
printf("Value not found\n");
return NULL;
}
else
{
if (s->left == NULL && s->right == NULL) // No child case
{
free(s);
return NULL;
}
else
{
if (s->left == NULL && s->right != NULL) // single child case(right child)
{
struct node *temp = s->right;
free(s);
return temp;
}
else if (s->right == NULL && s->left != NULL) // single child case(left child)
{
struct node *temp = s->left;
free(s);
return temp;
}
else
{
struct node *temp;
temp = minimum(s->right);
s->data = temp->data;
s->right = deletenode(s->right, temp->data);
}
}
}
return s;
}
int main()
{
struct node *root = NULL, *del;
int n, i, data, key;
printf("Enter how many nodes you have to enter in a tree\n");
scanf("%d", &n);
for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
{
printf("Enter data\n");
scanf("%d", &data);
root = insert(root, data);
}
printf("\nIN-Order display\n");
in_order(root);
int d;
printf("\nEnter data to be delete\n");
scanf("%d", &d);
del=deletenode(root, d);
printf("\nIN-Order display\n");
in_order(root);
return 0;
}
There are several places missing return (in minimum, search and deletenode). You can easily find them if you compile with -Wall -Wextra compiler options.
It is not clear, what do you want to return from deletenode. I assume that it is a tree with deleted element. Then either search should return a parent node (so it is possible to change pointers to freed node), or deletenode should move to parent node.
Also, use in_order(del) instead of in_order(root) because root can be changed while deleting.
struct node {
int data{};
node *right{nullptr};
node *left{nullptr};
};
class BTree {
private:
node *root;
void insert(node *sr, int num);
public:
BTree();
void buildTree(int num);
};
void BTree::insert(node *sr, int num) {
if (sr == nullptr) {
sr = new node;
sr->data = num;
} else {
if (num < sr->data)
insert(sr->left, num);
else
insert(sr->right, num);
}
}
int main() {
BTree tree;
tree.buildTree(3);
return 0;
}
I am using the above insert method to add a node to Binary Search Tree. But this method is unable to add the node , if i add a number as its root or first node the root remains nullptr.
How do i resolve this issue.
At the first root is nullptr , and I am sending root i.e the nullptr as the argument. As nullptr does refer to any node therefor the root is not getting updated by the operation in the method.
possible solution:
use pointer to pointer, so that address of the node can be passed and and changed.
directly acces the root to do changes.
PROTOTYPE
void insert(node **sr, int num);
BUILD TREE METHOD
void BTree::buildTree(int num) {
insert(&root, num);
}
INSERT METHOD
void BTree::insert(node **sr, int num) {
if (*sr == nullptr) {
*sr = new node;
(*sr)->data = num;
} else {
if (num < (*sr)->data)
insert(&((*sr)->left), num);
else
insert(&((*sr)->right), num);
}
}
I have just started learning Binary Trees and went ahead and tried to implement my own in C. I am kinda lost as to why only InOrder Traversal is displaying correctly while the other two are wrong. I really can't figure this out. I even directly tried inserting nodes, and the result is the same.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdbool.h>
struct Node
{
int val;
struct Node *left;
struct Node *right;
};
//Allocate Memory for New Node
struct Node* getNewNode(int val)
{
struct Node * ptr = (struct Node*)malloc(sizeof(struct Node));
ptr->val = val;
ptr->left = NULL;
ptr->right = NULL;
return ptr;
}
//Insert Node in Binary Search Tree
struct Node* insertNode(struct Node* root,int val)
{
if(root == NULL)
{
root = getNewNode(val);
}
else if(val <= root->val)
{
root->left = insertNode(root->left,val);
}
else
{
root->right = insertNode(root->right,val);
}
return root;
}
void printInorder(struct Node* root)
{
if(root == NULL) return;
printInorder(root->left);
printf("%d ",root->val);
printInorder(root->right);
}
void printPostOrder(struct Node* root)
{
if(root == NULL) return;
printInorder(root->left);
printInorder(root->right);
printf("%d ",root->val);
}
void printPreOrder(struct Node*root)
{
if(root == NULL) return;
printf("%d ",root->val);
printInorder(root->left);
printInorder(root->right);
}
bool search(struct Node* root,int val)
{
if(root == NULL)
{
return false;
}
else if(val == root->val)
{
return true;
}
else if(val < root->val)
{
return search(root->left,val);
}
else
{
return search(root->right,val);
}
}
int main(void)
{
struct Node * root = NULL; //Tree is Empty
root = insertNode(root,15);
root = insertNode(root,10);
root = insertNode(root,8);
root = insertNode(root,12);
root = insertNode(root,20);
root = insertNode(root,17);
root = insertNode(root,25);
printf("Printing In-Order: \n");
printInorder(root);
printf("\nPrinting Post-Order: \n");
printPostOrder(root);
printf("\nPrinting Pre-Order: \n");
printPreOrder(root);
// if(search(root,11))
// {
// printf("\nValue Found\n");
// }
// else
// {
// printf("\nValue Not Found\n");
// }
return 0;
}
Please help me understand if I am doing this wrong or my understanding of traversals is faulty.
The output is as follows:
output terminal
You have copy-paste errors in printPostOrder and printPreOrder - they both call printInorder where they should be calling themselves.
i am deleting a (3 or 4 th) node using double linked list...every time only first element is deleting ?what is the problem with the following code?
#include<stdio.h>
#include<malloc.h>
struct node
{
int data;
struct node *pre;
struct node *link;
};
//void addafter(struct node*,int,int);
main()
{
struct node *p=NULL;
add(&p,2);
add(&p,3);
add(&p,4);
add(&p,5);
add(&p,6);
add(&p,27);
add(&p,8);
add(&p,9);
add(&p,10);
//addafter(&p,7,20);
delete(&p ,6);
display(&p);
}
add(struct node **q,int n)
{
struct node *temp,*r;
temp=*q;
if(temp==NULL)
{
temp=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
temp->pre=NULL;
temp->data=n;
temp->link=NULL;
#include<stdio.h>
#include<malloc.h>
struct node
{
int data;
struct node *pre;
struct node *link;
};
//void addafter(struct node*,int,int);
main()
{
struct node *p=NULL;
add(&p,2);
add(&p,3);
add(&p,4);
add(&p,5);
add(&p,6);
add(&p,27);
add(&p,8);
add(&p,9);
add(&p,10);
//addafter(&p,7,20);
delete(&p ,6);
display(&p);
}
add(struct node **q,int n)
{
struct node *temp,*r;
temp=*q;
if(temp==NULL)
{
temp=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
temp->pre=NULL;
temp->data=n;
temp->link=NULL;
*q=temp;
}
else
{
while(temp->link!=NULL)
temp=temp->link;
r=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
r->pre=temp;
r->data=n;
r->link=NULL;
temp->link=r;
}
}
/*
addafter(struct node **q,int m,int n)
{
struct node *temp,*r,*s;
int i;
temp=*q;
for(i=1;i<m;i++)
temp=temp->link;
s=temp->link;
r=(struct node*)malloc(sizeof(struct node));
r->data=n;
r->link=temp->link;
r->pre=temp;
temp->link=r;
s->pre=r;
}
*/
/*display(struct node **q)
{
struct node *temp;
temp=*q;
while(temp!=NULL)
{
printf("\n %d\n",temp->data);
temp=temp->link;
}
}
*/
delete(struct node **q,int n)
{
struct node *temp,*old,*s;
temp=*q;
while(temp!=NULL)
{
if(temp->data=n)
{
if(temp == *q)
{
*q=temp->link;
free(temp);
return;
}
else
{
// s=temp->link;
old->link=temp->link;
// s->pre=old;
free(temp);
return;
}
}
else
{
old=temp;
temp=temp->link;
}
}
printf("data not found");
}
display(struct node **q)
{
struct node *temp;
temp=*q;
while(temp!=NULL)
{
printf("\n %d\n",temp->data);
temp=temp->link;
}
}
At first glance I see this mistake:
old->link=temp->link;
temp->link->pre=temp->pre; // or old.
free(temp);
You should set the pointers for next and previous nodes too. You can make this change in your add method which is also wrong.
I have read the following code of using CRITICAL_SECTION when working with multiple threads to grow a linked list. what would be the main() part which uses two threads to add to linked list?
#include <windows.h>
typedef struct _Node
{
struct _Node *next;
int data;
} Node;
typedef struct _List
{
Node *head;
CRITICAL_SECTION critical_sec;
} List;
List *CreateList()
{
List *pList = (List*)malloc(sizeof(pList));
pList->head = NULL;
InitializeCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
return pList;
}
void AddHead(List *pList, Node *node)
{
EnterCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
node->next = pList->head;
pList->head = node;
LeaveCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
}
void Insert(List *pList, Node *afterNode, Node *newNode)
{
EnterCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
if (afterNode == NULL)
{
AddHead(pList, newNode);
}
else
{
newNode->next = afterNode->next;
afterNode->next = newNode;
}
LeaveCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
}
Node *Next(List *pList, Node *node)
{
Node* next;
EnterCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
next = node->next;
LeaveCriticalSection(&pList->critical_sec);
return next;
}
It will likely involve one or more calls to CreateThread