How to convert multipart.File to io.Reader - go

Maybe I'm just not understanding how to use the Read method for the File object, but I see in docs that io.Reader is within the multipart.File interface, but I don't understand how to access it. Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.

That means that the multipart.File interface includes the io.Reader interface, so any object that is a valid multipart.File is also a valid io.Reader. Therefore, you can call the Read method (as defined by io.Reader) on an object of type multipart.File.

Related

How does resp.Body implements the Read function?

I'm currently studying Go and trying to understand the concept of Interfaces.
What I understand about it is that whatever type implements the functions specified in the interface is part of it.
My question is about the Body of type io.ReadCloser inside of the Response struct. How does it implement the Read function? I've searched through the documentation and couldn't find it.
io.ReadCloser does not implement the Read function. io.ReadCloser is an interface type, so it by itself cannot implement any methods. However, an interface T can implement another interface I if T's type set is a subset of I.
The io.ReadCloser interface embeds the io.Reader and io.Closer interfaces. Therefore the method set of io.ReadeCloser is the combined method set of io.Reader and io.Closer.
Thanks to embedding the type set of io.ReadCloser is the intersection of io.Reader's and io.Closer's type sets. In other words the type set of io.ReadCloser is the set of all types that implement the io.Reader and io.Closer interfaces.
The above also means that the type set of io.ReadCloser is a subset of io.Reader's type set and io.Closer's type set.
The io.ReadCloser interface implements io.Reader because:
A type T implements an interface I if
T is not an interface and is an element of the type set of I; or
T is an interface and the type set of T is a subset of the type set of I.

Can I pass an *io.ReadCloser to a parameter with the type of *io.Reader

I am trying to write a function with a parameter of type *io.Reader
func ReadSomething(r *io.Reader) {
<do something with a reader>
}
but then when I try to pass in a pointer to a reader closer to it
func GetWebPage() {
resp, _ := http.Get(<url>)
ReadSomething(&(resp.Body))
}
I get the following error: cannot use &(resp.Body) (value of type *io.ReadCloser) as *io.Reader value.
This makes no sense to me, a dereferenced pointer to a read closer type should implement the methods of Reader, so why am I not able then to pass it in as an argument to a function that expects a pointer to an io.Reader?
io.ReadCloser is an interface type that is a superset of io.Reader interface type. So whenever an io.Reader is required, you may pass a value of io.ReadCloser.
*io.Reader is not an interface type though, it's a pointer (a pointer to interface), so you can't pass *io.ReadCloser.
Please note that these function signatures are a terrible design. You rarely need a pointer to interface (you'll know when you do, see this for an example). Just use interface types, interfaces may wrap pointers if needed.
It's a common misconception in Go that interfaces are more magical and gluey than they really are. As a starting point, all conversions between distinct types must be explicit, and interfaces are distinct types.
Interfaces only carve out a narrow exception to this rule:
Assignability Rules in the Go Specification (which extends to parameter passing).
A value x is assignable to a variable of type T ("x is assignable to T") if [...]
T is an interface type and x implements T.
Or in other words, simple and plain:
x is assignable to T if x implements T.
That's really the whole entire exception, and it makes no expansive effort to generally mesh interfaces, implementations, and structures thereof. As soon as you indirect your interface value through a pointer, you have stepped out of the enumerated territory.

When using gob to serialiaze structs over the wire, why do we need to Register() any fields that are interfaces inside the transmitted struct?

If we were to send
type ABC struct{
i interface{}
}
gob requires us to register the concrete type hidden behind our interface{}.
Why can't gob use reflection to identify the underlying concrete class in the field by itself.
That is, we need to use the Register method to tell gob what the concrete type is.
Given the method signature looks like this Register(value interface{}), gob already uses reflection to fully identify the type passed to the method.
Why doesn't gob iterate through the instantiated ABC struct at runtime and perform Register automatically?

How can Go type ExitError in package os/exec support the Sys() method if it's not in the documentation?

Based on various examples on the web and in the answer to this SO question, I am trying to figure out how it is possible for type ExitError from package os/exec to support the Sys() method even if the docs only mention the Error() method for this type.
I've guessed that the Sys() method in question is from type ProcessState in package os, but how does ExitError get to use it directly (exiterror.Sys()) without having to use the full (exiterror.ProcessState.Sys())?
This must be a basic Go question but I've yet to figure out the answer to this one one my own...
cmd.Wait() already returns error of type *ExitError. If you look at ExitError's definition, you can see that it embeds *os.ProcessState:
type ExitError struct {
*os.ProcessState
// other fields
}
It is through *os.ProcessState that a value of type ExitError can call Sys() method.
Note that within the definition of ExitError, there is no field name associated with *os.ProcessState, which means that a value of type ExitError can directly call any method on *os.ProcessState (sort of like inheritance, where ExitError inherits *os.ProcessState. But this is only to give you a very basic idea. Read the docs for clarification.) as long as there is no method defined on ExitError with the same name.
There is of course more to it. You can read about it here.

Passing http.ResponseWriter by value or reference?

Assume I'm having a central method which adds a specific header to the http.ResponseWriter. I don't want to use a HandleFunc wrapper.
I wonder, whether I'd send in the ResponseWriter by reference. So, what would be correct:
addHeaders(&w)
or
addHeaders(w)
Asked differently:
func addHeaders(w *http.ResponseWriter) {...}
or
func addHeaders(w http.ResponseWriter) {...}
From my understanding, I'd say the first version would be correct, as I don't want to create a copy of ResponseWriter. But I haven't seen any code where ResponseWriter is passed by reference and wonder why.
Thanks!
http.ResponseWriter is an interface. You want to pass its value, since it internally contains a pointer to the actual Writer. You almost never want a pointer to an interface.
Look at what a standard handler func's signature is:
func(http.ResponseWriter, *http.Request)
Notice that ResponseWriter isn't a pointer.

Resources