I search to use spring boot, spring-cloud-gateway, netflix eureka.
Is there anything to do to have a load balancer and circuit breaker for micro-service instance?
I found few information ex ribbon when spring gateway is used instead of zuul.
Actually I have an application for the gateway, another for eureka, another for thymeleaf client
security is not yet choose, probabley jwt
With Spring Cloud Gateway, you can currently use the Hystrix Gateway Filter.
Consider using Hystrix. It is extremely good for microservices and aligns well with Spring cloud stack. Also, take a look at Feign, due to its simplistic approach to communication between microservices and integration with hystrix and ribbon.
Related
I'm implementing a microservices system with Spring Boot, and I want to have a service that using Rsocket to make real-time connecting between user and system. But in the document of Spring Cloud Gateway, that's seem not support Rsocket. Is this possible to using Rsocket in a microservices system with Spring Boot ? Or should I using websocket instead ?
Here is my idea
Don't try this, lost time. See authoritative article
https://spring.io/blog/2020/03/25/spring-tips-spring-cloud-loadbalancer
https://spring.io/guides/gs/spring-cloud-loadbalancer/
https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-gateway/reference/html/#the-websocket-routing-filter
https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-gateway/reference/html/#the-loadbalancerclient-filter
https://cloud.spring.io/spring-cloud-gateway/reference/html/#reactive-loadbalancer-client-filter
For load balancing with Spring Cloud Gateway, let use technology stack [Eureka Discovery Client + Cloud Loadbalancer + Reactive Web] or Ribbon (Netflix Open Source Software - Netflix OSS).
Rsocket for "... Reactive Streams", load balancing need something like request/response round robin, these are different.
In your opinion, in a hybrid architecture (WEBSOCKET + HTTP) is it good practice to use 2 gateways: Zuul for HTTP communication and Spring Cloud Gateway for WEBSOCKET communication in a Spring Boot application? Alternatively, in this scenario is it recommended to use only Spring Cloud Gateway?
Thanks.
is it recommended to use only Spring Cloud Gateway Yes because
Spring Cloud does not provide any out of the box integration with Zuul2. Gateway has many features that are not available in the public version of Zuul2 such as Rate limiting, etc. Also, with the gateway you can have custom filters defined per route and there are tons of built-in filters defined as well, which helps a lot to get started. Reference
Reference: I think SCG is the way to go due to the agreements between Netflix and Pivotal, with the former leaning more toward the spring boot/cloud ecosystem as stated in https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/netflix-oss-and-spring-boot-coming-full-circle-4855947713a0
I have a few synchronous microservices working on production using Spring Boot 2.X version. Soon, we need to implement a gateway if the number of instances of each microservice is going to be increased. I read that Zuul was in a maintenance phase and was replaced by Spring Cloud Gateway which is by default asynchronous technology. My question is, can I still implement Spring Cloud Gateway with my microservices?
Yes, you can use Spring Cloud Gateway without any doubts.
Basically, asynchronous technology means that your resources/threads on Api Gateway won't be blocked waiting for the response from downstream services and that increases a throughput.
Now, once your blocking services complete their internal logic they respond back to Api Gateway using an originally opened connection. Api Gateway in turn responds back to your client.
The setup:
I have a set of Spring Boot based microservices that are fronted by Spring Cloud Gateway, meaning every request that comes from UI or external API client first comes to Spring Cloud Gateway and is then forwarded to appropriate microservice.
The routes are configured in Consul, and Spring Cloud Gateway communicates with Consul to get the routes accordingly.
Requirement:
There is a need of some microservices communicating with each other with REST APIs. I would prefer this communication to happen via the Spring Cloud Gateway as well. This will help in reducing multiple services going to Consul for getting other service's details.
This means every service should know Gateway's detail at least. And there can be multiple instances of Gateways as well. How is this dealt with in bigger architectures?
Any example that I look up contains one service using Consul, or Gateway using the consul with one microservice. Couldn't understand how to extrapolate that design to a bigger system.
I'm new on microservices and I have seen a tutorial(from udemy) where shows technologies like eureka, feign,spring cloud config,hystrix and zuul, but after make some examples I don't understand very well how hystrix monitor and zuul works, In the examples I noticed that hystrix is used by a main application that it access to microservices and in that way I can monitoring my microservices, but with zuul I noticed that it works like a proxy but this is calling the same microservices like the other application, so my question is how can I monitoring the microservices with hystrix if are called by zuul and by the another application, am I need two hystrix monitor or can I have one general?
Thanks in advance.
After read some examples I noticed that zuul is always the start for applications so I can add hystrix monitor to zuul and call the microservices, but I still have doubt about the circuit breaker in use with zuul so I will keep searching.