I've followed Gatsby tutorial for Working With Images in Markdown Posts and Pages which is working well but what I want to achieve is to fetch image from a static location instead of using a relative path for the image.
Would like to reference image like this (in frontmatter)
featuredImage: img/IMG_20190621_112048_2.jpg
Where IMG_20190621_112048_2.jpg is in /src/data/img instead of same directory as markdown file under /src/posts
I've tried to setup gatsby-source-filesystem like this :
{
resolve: `gatsby-source-filesystem`,
options: {
name: `posts`,
path: `${__dirname}/src/posts`,
},
},
{
resolve: `gatsby-source-filesystem`,
options: {
name: `data`,
path: `${__dirname}/src/data/`,
},
},
but graphQL query in post template fails :
export const query = graphql`
query($slug: String!) {
markdownRemark(fields: { slug: { eq: $slug } }) {
html
frontmatter {
title
featuredImage {
childImageSharp {
fluid(maxWidth: 800) {
...GatsbyImageSharpFluid
}
}
}
}
}
}
GraphQL Error Field "featuredImage" must not have a selection since
type "String" has no subfields.
Any idea how I could fetch image from a location distinct to the post markdown directory ?
Achieving this in Gatsby used to be pretty troublesome, but thanks to the new createSchemaCustomization Node API docs (since Gatsby 2.5) it's relatively easy.
Here's a demo where I replicate your repo structure: github
Here's where the relevant code lives: github
Here's the code to make it work:
// gatsby-node.js
const path = require('path')
exports.createSchemaCustomization = ({ actions }) => {
const { createFieldExtension, createTypes } = actions
createFieldExtension({
name: 'fileByDataPath',
extend: () => ({
resolve: function (src, args, context, info) {
const partialPath = src.featureImage
if (!partialPath) {
return null
}
const filePath = path.join(__dirname, 'src/data', partialPath)
const fileNode = context.nodeModel.runQuery({
firstOnly: true,
type: 'File',
query: {
filter: {
absolutePath: {
eq: filePath
}
}
}
})
if (!fileNode) {
return null
}
return fileNode
}
})
})
const typeDefs = `
type Frontmatter #infer {
featureImage: File #fileByDataPath
}
type MarkdownRemark implements Node #infer {
frontmatter: Frontmatter
}
`
createTypes(typeDefs)
}
How it works:
There are 2 parts to this:
Extend markdownRemark.frontmatter.featureImage so graphql resolves to a File node instead of a string via createTypes
Create a new field extension #fileByDataPath via createFieldExtension
createTypes
Right now Gatsby's inferring frontmatter.featureImage as a string. We'll ask Gatsby to read featureImage as a string instead, by modifying its parent type:
type Frontmatter {
featureImage: File
}
This is not enough however, we'll also need to pass this Frontmatter type to its parent as well:
type Frontmatter {
featureImage: File
}
type MarkdownRemark implements Node {
frontmatter: Frontmatter
}
We'll also add the #infer tag, which lets Gatsby know that it can infer other fields of these types, i.e frontmatter.title, markdownRemark.html, etc.
Then pass these custom type to createTypes:
exports.createSchemaCustomization = ({ actions }) => {
const { createTypes } = actions
const typeDefs = `
type Frontmatter #infer {
featureImage: File
}
type MarkdownRemark implements Node #infer {
frontmatter: Frontmatter
}
`
createTypes(typeDefs)
}
Now, we can fire up localhost:8000/___graphql and try to query the image
query Post {
markdownRemark {
frontmatter {
featureImage {
id
}
}
}
}
and we get...
Error: Cannot return null for non-nullable field File.id.
That is because while Gatsby now understands featureImage should be a File node, it has no idea where to get that file.
At this point, we can either use createResolvers to manually resolve the field to a File node, or createFileExtension to do the same thing. I choose createFileExtension because it allows more code reuse (you can extend any fields), while createResolvers, in this case, is more useful for a specific field. Seeing that all you want is to resolve a file from the src/data directory, I'll call this extension fieldByDataPath.
createFileExtension
Let's just look at the resolve attribute. It is a function that takes in the following:
source: The data of the parent field (in this case, frontmatter)
args: The arguments passed to featureImage in a query. We won't need this
context: contains nodeModel, which we'll use to get nodes from Gatsby node store
info: metadata about this field + the whole schema
We will find the original path (img/photo.jpg) from src.featureImage, then glue it to src/data to get a complete absolute path. Next, we query the nodeModel to find a File node with the matching absolute path. Since you have already pointed gatsby-source-filesystem to src/data, the image (photo.jpg) will be in Gatsby node store.
In case we can't find a path or a matching node, return null.
resolve: async function (src, args, context) {
// look up original string, i.e img/photo.jpg
const partialPath = src.featureImage
if (!partialPath) {
return null
}
// get the absolute path of the image file in the filesystem
const filePath = path.join(__dirname, 'src/data', partialPath)
// look for a node with matching path
const fileNode = await context.nodeModel.runQuery({
firstOnly: true,
type: 'File',
query: {
filter: {
absolutePath: {
eq: filePath
}
}
}
})
// no node? return
if (!fileNode) {
return null
}
// else return the node
return fileNode
}
We've done 99% of the work. The last thing to do is to move this to pass this resolve function to createFieldExtension; as well as add the new extension to createTypes
createFieldExtension({
name: 'fileByDataPath' // we'll use it in createTypes as `#fileByDataPath`
extend: () => ({
resolve, // the resolve function above
})
})
const typeDef = `
type Frontmatter #infer {
featureImage: File #fileByDataPath // <---
}
...
`
With that, you can now use relative path from src/data/ in frontmatter.
Extra
The way fileByDataPath implemented, it'll only work with fields named featureImage. That's not too useful, so we should modify it so that it'll work on any field that, say, whose name ended in _data; or at the very least accept a list of field names to work on.
Edit had a bit of time on my hand, so I wrote a plugin that does this & also wrote a blog on it.
Edit 2 Gatsby has since made runQuery asynchronous (Jul 2020), updated the answer to reflect this.
In addition to Derek Answer which allow assets of any type to be use anywhere (sound, video, gpx, ...), if looking for a solution only for images, one can use :
https://www.gatsbyjs.org/packages/gatsby-remark-relative-images/
The reason in your server schema you may have declared the featuredImage variable as string and in your client graphql query you are trying to call subobjects of the featuredImage variable and that subobjects is not existing.
You may have to check the graphql schema definition and align the query with the schema definition
you current schema might be like this
featuredImage: String
and you need to change it by declaring the proper types based on the requirements in the server side.
For more information about graphql types. please refer this url - https://graphql.org/learn/schema/#object-types-and-fields
Thanks
Rigin Oommen
Related
I've got a very simple Nuxt app with Strapi GraphQL backend that I'm trying to use and learn more about GraphQL in the process.
One of my last features is to implement a search feature where a user enters a search query, and Strapi/GraphQL performs that search based on attributes such as image name and tag names that are associated with that image. I've been reading the Strapi documentation and there's a segment about performing a search.
So in my schema.graphql, I've added this line:
type Query {
...other generated queries
searchImages(searchQuery: String): [Image
}
Then in the /api/image/config/schema.graphql.js file, I've added this:
module.exports = {
query: `
searchImages(searchQuery: String): [Image]
`,
resolver: {
Query: {
searchImages: {
resolverOf: 'Image.find',
async resolver(_, { searchQuery }) {
if (searchQuery) {
const params = {
name_contains: searchQuery,
// tags_contains: searchQuery,
// location_contains: searchQuery,
}
const searchResults = await strapi.services.image.search(params);
console.log('searchResults: ', searchResults);
return searchResults;
}
}
}
},
},
};
At this point I'm just trying to return results in the GraphQL playground, however when I run something simple in the Playground like:
query($searchQuery: String!) {
searchImages(searchQuery:$searchQuery) {
id
name
}
}
I get the error: "TypeError: Cannot read property 'split' of undefined".
Any ideas what might be going on here?
UPDATE:
For now, I'm using deep filtering instead of the search like so:
query($searchQuery: String) {
images(
where: {
tags: { title_contains: $searchQuery }
name_contains: $searchQuery
}
) {
id
name
slug
src {
url
formats
}
}
}
This is not ideal because it's not an OR/WHERE operator, meaning it's not searching by tag title or image name. It seems to only hit the first where. Ideally I would like to use Strapi's search service.
I actually ran into this problem not to recently and took a different solution.
the where condition can be combined with using either _and or _or. as seen below.
_or
articles(where: {
_or: [
{ content_contains: $dataContains },
{ description_contains: $dataContains }
]})
_and
(where: {
_and: [
{slug_contains: $categoriesContains}
]})
Additionally, these operators can be combined given that where in this instance is an object.
For your solution I would presume you want an or condition in your where filter predicate like below
images(where: {
_or: [
{ title_contains: $searchQuery },
{ name_contains: $searchQuery }
]})
Lastly, you can perform a query that filters by a predicate by creating an event schema and adding the #search directive as seen here
I'm using GraphQL from within a Gatsby project. I have a set of markdown files for a blog-like section of the site. In the frontmatter of each markdown file, there's an image property.
What I'd like to do is use Gatsby's fine image api to load the image in the frontmatter. When viewing an individual post (the ones created via createPage api), this works just fine because I can provide the frontmatter.image in the context. Here's what that query looks like.
export const pageQuery = graphql`
query($slug: String!, $image: String) {
markdownRemark(frontmatter: { slug: { eq: $slug } }) {
html
frontmatter {
date(formatString: "MMMM DD, YYYY")
slug
title
image
}
}
coverImage: file(relativePath: { eq: $image }) {
childImageSharp {
fluid(maxWidth: 1440) {
...GatsbyImageSharpFluid
}
}
}
}
`
On my index page where I'm displaying all these posts though, I want to display a smaller version of this image. I can get the image from the front matter easy enough, but I'm not sure how to integrate that into the query.
export const pageQuery = graphql`
query {
allMarkdownRemark(sort: { order: DESC, fields: [frontmatter___date] }) {
edges {
node {
id
excerpt(pruneLength: 250)
frontmatter {
date(formatString: "MMMM DD, YYYY")
slug
title
image # <--- want to use this in a file query
}
}
}
}
}
`
As far as I understand, I can't use string interpolation in a static query in the component where the image is actually used, so I need to get it here in the page query. Is what I'm trying to do possible? Is there a better way to handle this?
This "link" between your frontmatter's image string and an actual image file node (processed with Sharp) is called a foreign-key relationship.
Creating foreign-key relationships in Gatsby
There are two ways of doing this:
Using mappings in gatsby-config.js
Using a GraphQL #link directive through Gatsby's schema customization (from v2.2)
I recommend the second option, since it's a more GraphQL way of doing things, and happens in gatsby-node.js where most node operations are taking place. However, if you're starting out with Gatsby and GraphQL, the first option might be easier to set up.
Implementing the #link directive in gatsby-node.js
In your case, using the #link GraphQL directive, you would probably end up with something like this in your gatsby-node.js:
exports.createSchemaCustomization = ({ actions }) => {
const { createTypes } = actions
const typeDefs = [
`type MarkdownRemark implements Node { frontmatter: Frontmatter }`,
`type Frontmatter {
# you may need to adapt this line depending on the node type and key
# that you want to create the relationship for
image: File #link(by: "relativePath")
}`
]
createTypes(typeDefs)
}
If you want to see an example in the wild, check out gatsby-node.js in robinmetral/eaudepoisson.com.
Query processed images via your frontmatter
Finally, you'll be able to query like this:
{
allMarkdownRemark {
edges {
node {
frontmatter {
date
slug
title
# image now points to the image file node
image {
childImageSharp {
fluid(maxWidth: 1024) {
...GatsbyImageSharpFluid
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
I think I'm missing something obvious in the way GraphQL resolvers work. This is a simplified example of my schema (a Place that can have AdditionalInformation):
import { ApolloServer, gql } from 'apollo-server';
const typeDefs = gql`
type Place {
name: String!
additionalInformation: AdditionalInformation
}
type AdditionalInformation {
foo: String
}
type Query {
places: [Place]
}
`;
And the associated resolvers:
const resolvers = {
Query: {
places: () => {
return [{name: 'Barcelona'}];
}
},
AdditionalInformation: {
foo: () => 'bar'
}
};
const server = new ApolloServer({typeDefs, resolvers});
server.listen().then(({ url }) => {
console.log(`API server ready at ${url}`);
});
When I execute a basic query:
{
places {
name,
additionalInformation {
foo
}
}
}
I always get null as the additionalInformation:
{
"data": {
"places": [
{
"name": "Barcelona",
"additionalInformation": null
}
]
}
}
It's my first GraphQL app, and I still don't get why the AdditionalInformation resolver is not automatically executed. Is there some way to let GraphQL know it has to fire it?
I've found this workaround but I find it a bit tricky:
Place: {
additionalInformation: () => { return {}; }
}}
Let's assume for a moment that additionalInformation was a Scalar, and not an Object type:
type Place {
name: String!
additionalInformation: String
}
The value returned by the places resolver is:
[{name: 'Barcelona'}]
If you were to make a similar query...
query {
places {
name
additionalInformation
}
}
What would you expect additionalInformation to be? It's value will be null because there is no additionalInformation property on the Place object returned by the places resolver.
Even if we make additionalInformation an Object type (like AdditionalInformation), the result is the same -- the additionalInformation field will resolve to null. That's because the default resolver (the one used when you don't specify a resolver function for a field) simply looks for a property with the same name as the field on the parent object. If it fails to find that property, it returns null.
You may have specified a resolver for a field on AdditionalInformation (foo), but this resolver is never fired because there's no need -- the whole additionalInformation field is null so all of the resolvers for any fields of the associated type are skipped.
To understand why this is a desirable behavior, imagine a different schema:
type Article {
title: String!
content: String!
image: Image
}
type Image {
url: String!
copyright: String!
}
type Query {
articles: [Article!]!
}
We have a database with an articles table and an images table as our data layer. An article may or may not have an image associated with it. My resolvers might look like this:
const resolvers = {
Query: {
articles: () => db.getArticlesWithImages()
}
Image: {
copyright: (image) => `©${image.year} ${image.author}`
}
}
Let's say our call getArticlesWithImages resolves to a single article with no image:
[{ title: 'Foo', content: 'All about foos' }]
As a consumer of the API, I request:
query {
articles {
title
content
image
}
}
The image field is optional. If I get back an article object with a null image field, I understand there was no associated image in the db. As a front end client, I know not to render any image.
What would happen if GraphQL returned a value for the image regardless? Obviously, our resolver would break, since it would not be passed any kind of parent value. Moreover, however, as a consumer of the API, I would have to now parse the contents of image and somehow determine whether an image was in fact associated with the article and I should do something with it.
TLDR;
As you already suggested, the solution here is to specify a resolver for additionalInfo. You can also simply return that value in your places resolver, i.e.:
return [{name: 'Barcelona', additionalInfo: {}}]
In reality, if the shape of your schema aligns with the shape of your underlying data layer, it's unlikely you'll encounter this sort of issue when working with real data.
Bu default, Gatsby uses frontmatter for defining paths, like:
---
path: /example-page
---
and then works with it via GraphQL.
What is the best way to define those paths for all markdown files by not writing frontmatter part in every file, but in one file, as an instance, like this:
[
{
"title": "Example",
"path": "/example-page.md"
}
]
You can do that by adding the path when the page is created.
Add this in gatsby-node :
const { createFilePath } = require(`gatsby-source-filesystem`);
exports.onCreateNode = ({ node, getNode, boundActionCreators }) => {
const { createNodeField } = boundActionCreators
if (node.internal.type === `MarkdownRemark`) {
const slug = createFilePath({
node,
getNode,
basePath: `pages`
})
createNodeField({
node,
name: `slug`,
value: `/pages${slug}`
})
}
};
createFilePath turn markdown files in pages directory into /pages/slug.
createNodeField creates new query'able field with name of 'slug'.
Now in graphql you can access the slug :
{
allMarkdownRemark {
edges {
node {
fields {
slug
}
}
}
}
}
Then you can create your pages as usual using the new slug field as page path.
With that you can add your title and all you want in data accessible in graphql.
Example here : https://www.gatsbyjs.org/tutorial/part-seven/
I am building a site in Gatsbyjs that pulls information in via the gatsby-source-contentful plugin, but I'm struggling with the graphql side of things.
If I have a Content model in Contentful that contains a field to override the default description for example - then if none of the content uses that yet graphql throws an error if I try to include it in my query.
Is there anyway to short circuit the graphql queries?
Examples
{
allContentfulPage {
edges {
node {
title
description {
description
}
}
}
}
}
This will break if there is no Page model that exists with a description, but as soon as one page gets a description it works.
Gatsby pulls data from Contentful and then it builds an internal "model" of what the data from Contenful looks like. The Contentful API is REST but internally Gatsby uses GraphQL.
If a field does not have a value on Contentful then it will not be a part of the generated GraphQL query in Gatsby. The solution is to push a single value in one of your records.
The other solution would be to create and define the ContentfulPage type in your gatsby-node.js file. here is the link to gatsby documentation if you need to read more .
To create types you could add this to your gatsby-node.js file:
const createSchemaCustomization = ({ actions }) => {
const types = [
`
type ContentfulPage implements Node {
description : ContentfullDescription
}
type ContentfullDescription implements Node {
description : String
}
`,
];
actions.createTypes(types);
};
const gatsbyNode = {
createSchemaCustomization,
};
export default gatsbyNode;
this is only the case if the description is a string, if it is some other type such as rich text you should add its type the createTypes api. then it would be:
const createSchemaCustomization = ({ actions }) => {
const types = [
`
type ContentfulPage implements Node {
description : ContentfullDescription
}
type ContentfullDescription implements Node {
description : ContentfulRichText
}
type ContentfulRichText {
raw: String
references: [Node] #link(from: "references___NODE")
}
`,
];
actions.createTypes(types);
};
const gatsbyNode = {
createSchemaCustomization,
};
export default gatsbyNode;
Please take note that I am just guessing the type of description it might be some other types that you need to create yourself.