I'm working on Laravel project where I need to fetch some data, sum the columns and group the results in M-y (Jan-19) format to show in a monthly bar graph chart.
I was able to successfully get the data sum'ed and grouped but the problem is, for the months without any records, I still want to show up in the graph with a total equals to 0.
This is my current approach:
$data = $this->user->income()
->whereBetween('game_date', ['2019-01-01', '2019-04-30'])
->selectRaw('sum(total_score) as score,
sum(total_stars) as stars,
MONTH(game_date) as month,
DATE_FORMAT(game_date,"%b") as month_name
')
->groupBy('month', 'month_name')
->get();
This gives me the following result (missing months without any records):
[
{
"score": "707",
"stars": "64",
"month": 1,
"month_name": "Jan"
},
{
"score": "200",
"stars": "29",
"month": 3,
"month_name": "Mar"
}
]
And the expected result is including missing months to making visually clear chart as:
[
{
"score": "707",
"stars": "64",
"month": 1,
"month_name": "Jan"
},
{
"score": "0",
"stars": "0",
"month": 2,
"month_name": "Feb"
},
{
"score": "200",
"stars": "29",
"month": 3,
"month_name": "Mar"
},
]
Please note that the ->whereBetween('game_date', []) will aways have dates from start of month and end of month (covering full monthly records).
you have to use COALESCE() function. It's because at the month of Feb you get null at sum(total_score) as score instead of 0. look at
here and here
hop it help
Related
Hello everyone i have some information and i want to order them by the bill number
here is the array of data
[
{
"id": 162,
"bill_number": "9",
"created_at": "2020-09-15T16:21:47.000000Z",
"updated_at": "2020-09-15T16:28:40.000000Z"
},
{
"id": 161,
"bill_number": "8",
"created_at": "2020-09-15T16:06:56.000000Z",
"updated_at": "2020-09-15T16:07:09.000000Z"
},
{
"id": 164,
"bill_number": "10",
"created_at": "2020-09-15T16:28:51.000000Z",
"updated_at": "2020-09-15T16:29:24.000000Z"
},
{
"id": 151,
"bill_number": "1",
"created_at": "2020-09-15T15:18:47.000000Z",
"updated_at": "2020-09-15T15:19:13.000000Z"
}
]
basically its a punch of bills
i am retrieving them like this
$paid_bills = Bill::where([
['grand_total' , '!=' , 'null'],
['status' , 'payed']
])->orderBy('bill_number' , 'desc')
->get();
the what i am getting is like this
9
8
10
1
the simple question is why it is ordering it like this and how to fix it.
Thanks for your time
Note: i removed non-relevant data to save time
you can use orderByRaw
and you can convert string column to integer by multiple it by 1 ...
$paid_bills = Bill::where([
['grand_total' , '!=' , 'null'],
['status' , 'payed']
])->orderByRaw('bill_number*1 desc')
->get();
Your bill_number is currently string. To order them in DESC, you should use them as integer.
Use "bill_number": 9, instead of "bill_number": "9", on your bills, and apply this to all of them.
Remove the quotation mark.
I just started exploring the elastic search and I stuck with a requirement in my project. I tried multiple thing but nothing worked for me. I have saved a sample document in elastic search index
"orderData": {
"lines": [
{
"lineNbr": 1,
"quantity": {
"amount": 1,
"uom": "EACH"
},
"weight": null,
"Qty": null
},
{
"lineNbr": 2,
"quantity": {
"amount": 1,
"uom": "EACH"
},
"weight": null,
"Qty": null
}
]
}
Next time I want to update only some of the data in line nbr one but here the problem is I dont want to do fields wise update. I get full Line Nbr 1 json again something like
{
"lineNbr": 1,
"quantity": {
"amount": 10,
"uom": "EACH"
},
"weight": 5,
"Qty": 5
}
But if I am performing update line nbr 2 tag is removed and only line nbr 1 tag is left with the updated data but I never wanted to touch line nbr 2
How can I achieve this? Any help will be appreciated. Thanks In Advance.
I used builtin.number in my LUIS app trying to collect a 4 digit pin number. The following is what's returned from LUIS when my input is "one two three four".
"entities": [
{
"entity": "one",
"type": "builtin.number",
"startIndex": 0,
"endIndex": 2,
"resolution": {
"value": "1"
}
},
{
"entity": "two",
"type": "builtin.number",
"startIndex": 4,
"endIndex": 6,
"resolution": {
"value": "2"
}
},
{
"entity": "three",
"type": "builtin.number",
"startIndex": 8,
"endIndex": 12,
"resolution": {
"value": "3"
}
},
{
"entity": "four",
"type": "builtin.number",
"startIndex": 14,
"endIndex": 17,
"resolution": {
"value": "4"
}
},
As you can see, it's returning individual digits in both text and digit format. Seems to me that it's more important to return the whole digit than the individual ones. Is there a way to do it so that I get '1234' as result for builtin.number?
Thanks!
It's not possible to do what you're asking for by only using LUIS. The way LUIS does its tokenization is that it recognizes each word/number individually due to the whitespace. It goes without saying that 'onetwothreefour' will also not return 1234.
Additionally, users are unable to modify the recognition of the prebuilt entities on an individual model level. The recognizers for certain languages are open-source, and contributions from the community are welcome.
All of that said, a way you could achieve what you're asking for is by concatenating the numbers. A JavaScript example might be something like the following:
var pin = '';
entities.forEach(entity => {
if (entity.type == 'builtin.number') {
pin += entity.resolution.value;
}
}
console.log(pin); // '1234'
After that you would need to perform your own handling/regexp, but I'll leave that to you. (after all, what if someone provides "seven eight nine ten"? Or "twenty seventeen"?)
Basically, no bubbles are displayed because the group which I use for the chart is empty.
what my data structure looks like :
[{
"site": "Site",
"service": "Long Term Care",
"value": 67.52,
"quarter": "Q1",
"date": "2015-02-13T22:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 1
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Long Term Care",
"value": 67.19,
"quarter": "Q2",
"date": "2015-05-15T21:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 1
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Long Term Care",
"value": 66.87,
"quarter": "Q3",
"date": "2015-08-14T21:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 1
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Long Term Care",
"value": 66.57,
"quarter": "Q4",
"date": "2015-11-14T22:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 1
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Assisted Living",
"value": 75.36,
"quarter": "Q1",
"date": "2015-02-13T22:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 2
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Assisted Living",
"value": 75,
"quarter": "Q2",
"date": "2015-05-15T21:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 2
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Assisted Living",
"value": 74.65,
"quarter": "Q3",
"date": "2015-08-14T21:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 2
}, {
"site": "Site",
"service": "Assisted Living",
"value": 74.31,
"quarter": "Q4",
"date": "2015-11-14T22:00:00.000Z",
"groupId": 2
}]
I want to display a bubble for each row in my data source. I created a dimension based on the quarters (I've also tried using the date field but with the same result) and a group based on the value field (each value is a unique float number). But when printing the resulting group in the console, it returns an empty array. Now I'm not sure if it is even possible to do what I have in mind.
Rest of the code:
ndx = crossfilter(myData);
dateDimension = ndx.dimension(dc.pluck('quarter'));
print_filter(dateDimension);
valueGroup = dateDimension.group(dc.pluck('value'));
print_filter(valueGroup);
minValue = dateDimension.bottom(1)[0].value;
maxValue = dateDimension.top(1)[0].value;
testChart = dc.bubbleChart("#test-chart");
testChart.width(850).height(350).dimension(dateDimension).group(valueGroup)
.renderLabel(false)
.maxBubbleRelativeSize(0.3)
.radiusValueAccessor(function (p) {
return p.value.value;
})
.x(d3.scale.ordinal().domain(["Q1", "Q2", "Q3", "Q4"]))
.xUnits(dc.units.ordinal)
.y(d3.scale.linear().domain([0, maxValue + 10])).yAxisLabel("", 20);
dc.renderAll();
Here is the JsFiddle
Here is a picture of what I expected the chart be like.
Lots of issues here, but the main thing is getting your groups properly defined for the visualization you want to do. Here's an update to your JSFiddle that may get you started: https://jsfiddle.net/yewk7c0r/15/
Basic idea for groups is to define your dimension at the level of granularity you need for your visualization and then define your group using reduceSum (or a custom grouping if you want to do average or something like that):
ndx = crossfilter(myData);
dateDimension = ndx.dimension(function(d) {
return [d.quarter, d.service];
});
valueGroup = dateDimension.group().reduceSum(dc.pluck('value'));
I've looked through the documentation, but perhaps I've overlooked what I assume to be a straightforward task. Is it possible to provide a custom binding function so that, in an array of objects, each object corresponds to one cell, rather than each object corresponding to a full row? Would this binding maintain the reference to the original object so that the data would change after being modified in the spreadsheet?
For example, I'd want to create the following sheet:
With JSON in this structure:
[
{
"name": "USA",
"year": 2015,
"sales": 1,
},
{
"name": "USA",
"year": 2016,
"sales": 2,
},
{
"name": "USA",
"year": 2017,
"sales": 3,
},
{
"name": "Canada",
"year": 2015,
"sales": 4,
},
{
"name": "Canada",
"year": 2016,
"sales": 5,
},
{
"name": "Canada",
"year": 2017,
"sales": 6,
}
]
You should look at the columns definition. In there you can define the data source for each column such that it will iterate through your objects and set the values of each column given the id for that column. And yes, it uses references so if you edit them, your objects get edited as well.