https://www.hl7.org/fhir/parameters.html
is it right to add the additional parameters in extended operation or can we add the add the parameters in patient resource type . because if we have multiple values we are not able to map the patient data with the extended operation parameter.
how to add additional parameters in patient resource type???
Short Answer:
Every element in a resource can have extension child elements to represent additional information that is not part of the basic definition of the resource.
Here is the post on HL7 FHIR with detailed info and samples on Extensibility
Every element in a resource or data type includes an optional "extension" child element that may be present , So we can add the additional parameter with an extension
Eg:
{
"resourceType" : "Patient",
"extension" : [{
"url" : "http://hl7.org/fhir/StructureDefinition/patient-citizenship",
"extension" : [{
"url" : "code",
"valueCodeableConcept" : {
"coding" : [{
"system" : "urn:iso:std:iso:3166",
"code" : "DE"
}]
}
}, {
"url" : "period",
"valuePeriod" : {
"start" : "2009-03-14"
}
}]
}]
}
Related
Issue:
I am using Prismic to send data through to my website.
In Prismic I have a Type (testimonial_list) that consists of a group of content-relation fields (Prismic Type testimonials).
To query the data on the inner Types I need to access them via the document field in graphql and use inline-fragments.
I have followed as instructed here:
https://github.com/angeloashmore/gatsby-source-prismic#Query-Content-Relation-fields
Inside graphql I have managed to navigate to the testimonial data-fields (on the document field) but the document field returns null, this is where I'm stuck. I can't work out why it would return null as the content exists and the fields are clearly being found in graphql.
Info:
My project is built using Gatsby and I'm using the plugin gatsby-source-prismic v3.1.1
Here you can see I can access the correct field data and I am getting the right number of nodes returned but document is empty:
This is the JSON for the testimonial_list Type on Prismic:
{
"Main" : {
"prismic_title" : {
"type" : "StructuredText",
"config" : {
"single" : "heading6",
"label" : "Title (only used to name entry in Prismic list)",
"placeholder" : "Prismic list title (otherwise \"undefined\")"
}
},
"page" : {
"type" : "Select",
"config" : {
"options" : [ "Homepage", "Option 2", "Option 3" ],
"label" : "Website page to appear on:"
}
},
"testimonial_list" : {
"type" : "Group",
"config" : {
"fields" : {
"testimonial" : {
"type" : "Link",
"config" : {
"select" : "document",
"customtypes" : [ "testimonial" ],
"label" : "testimonial"
}
}
},
"label" : "Testimonial List"
}
}
}
}
Thank you for any help, if there is any more info I can supply to help deduce the issue please let me know.
In the end, the issue turned out to be a typo in my gatsby-config where I was requiring the schema.
It was a daft mistake but stare at something too long and these things happen I guess.
In case anybody else has a similar issue you must ensure the property names of your Prismic schemas inside your gatsby-config are exactly the same as in Prismic.
For example if your Type in Prismic is called "my_type" then you must use that exact syntax - so for example don't use "myType".
Hey it might be something related to the gatsby-source-prismic plugin
I would directly open an issue for it here if I were you: https://github.com/angeloashmore/gatsby-source-prismic/issues
Context:
1) We are building a CDC pipeline (using kafka & connect framework)
2) We are using debezium for capturing mysql Tx logs
3) We are using Elastic Search connector to add documents to ES index
Sample change event generated by Debezium:
{
"source" : {
"before" : {
"Id" : 97,
"name" : "Northland",
"code" : "NTL",
"country_id" : 6,
"is_business_mapped" : 0
},
"after" : {
"Id" : 97,
"name" : "Northland",
"code" : "NTL",
"country_id" : 6,
"is_business_mapped" : 1
},
"source" : {
"version" : "0.7.5",
"name" : "__",
"server_id" : 252639387,
"ts_sec" : 1547805940,
"gtid" : null,
"file" : "mysql-bin-changelog.000570",
"pos" : 236,
"row" : 0,
"snapshot" : false,
"thread" : 614,
"db" : "bazaarify",
"table" : "state"
},
"op" : "u",
"ts_ms" : 1547805939683
}
What we want :
We want to visualize only 3 columns in kibana :
1) before - containing the nested JSON as string
2) after - containing the nested JSON as string
3) source - containing the nested JSON as string
I can think below possibilities here :
a) Either converting nested JSON as string
b) Combining column data in elastic search
I am a newbie to elastic search . Can someone please guide me how to do that.
I tried defining custom mapping as well but it is giving me exception.
You can always view your document as a Raw JSON in Kibana.
You don't need to manipulate it before indexing in elastic.
As this is related to visualization, handle this in Kibana only.
Check this link for a screenshot.
Refer this to add the columns which you want to see onto the results
I don't fully understand your use case, but if you would like to turn some json's to their representing strings, then you can use logstash for that, or even Elasticsearch ingest capabilities to convert an object (json) to a string.
From the link above, an example:
PUT _ingest/pipeline/my-pipeline-id { "description": "converts the
content of the id field to an integer", "processors" : [
{
"convert" : {
"field" : "source",
"type": "string"
}
} ] }
Already read this but with no lucky.
All examples I've found just show how to create a single value tag like this:
{
"name" : "jvm.gc.memory.allocated",
"measurements" : [ {
"statistic" : "COUNT",
"value" : 1.98180864E8
} ],
"availableTags" : [ {
"tag" : "stack",
"values" : [ "prod" ]
}, {
"tag" : "region",
"values" : [ "us-east-1" ]
} ]
}
But I need to create a multi value tag like this:
availableTags: [
{
tag: "method",
values: [
"POST",
"GET"
]
},
My code so far:
List<Tag> tags = new ArrayList<Tag>();
tags.add( Tag.of("test", "John") );
tags.add( Tag.of("test", "Doo") );
tags.add( Tag.of("test", "Foo Bar") );
Metrics.gauge("my.metric", tags, new AtomicLong(3) );
As you can see I think I can just repeat the key but this is not the case and the second parameter of Tag.of is a String and not a String Array.
I don't think this was the real intent of authors of these metering libraries - to provide a multi-value tag for a metric.
The whole point of metrics tags is to provide a "discriminator" - something that can be used later to retrieve metrics whose tag has a specific, single, value.
Usually, this value is used in metrics storage systems, like Prometheus, DataDog, InfluxDB and so on. And above this Grafana can incorporate a single tag value in its queries.
The only possible use case of such a request that I see is that it will be possible to see the metrics value in an actuator in a kind of more convenient way, but again it's not the main point of the whole capability here, so, bottom line I doubt that its possible at all.
comments : {
byId : {
"comment1" : {
id : "comment1",
author : "user2",
comment : ".....",
},
"comment2" : {
id : "comment2",
author : "user3",
comment : ".....",
},
"comment3" : {
id : "comment3",
author : "user3",
comment : ".....",
},
"comment4" : {
id : "comment4",
author : "user1",
comment : ".....",
},
"comment5" : {
id : "comment5",
author : "user3",
comment : ".....",
},
},
allIds : ["comment1", "comment2", "comment3", "commment4", "comment5"]
}
In the above example, is there any reason my needs to include it api include it. I assume this way you can do a count faster, you can probably sort but generally I am not understanding if there is a performance hit.
This isn't anything that's required by Redux, this is a normalizr thing. To answer your question, JavaScript objects can't be replied upon to retain sort order in certain situations. Putting the ids in an array allows you to retain the sort order that was present before you normalized.
Quote from co-maintainer of Redux and author of "normalizing state shape section" of Redux docs:
As for the ID arrays, while JS engines now have a fairly standardized process for iterating across keys in an object, you shouldn't rely on that to define ordering. Storing arrays of IDs allows you to define an order for items.
DSTU2 documentation does not describe ability to search resources by internal references. Is there any way to find the below resource having contained Practitioner resource and internal reference on it like:
[base]/fhir/Patient?careprovider:Practitioner=ContainedId or
[base]/fhir/Patient?careprovider=ContainedId
{
"resourceType" : "Patient",
"id" : "ContainedTestPatient",
"careProvider" : [{
"reference" : "#ContainedId"
}],
"contained" : [{
"resourceType": "Practitioner",
"id": "ContainedId",
"name": {"text": "Good doctor INC"}
}]
}
Actually DSTU2 documentation does specify how to search for values in contained resources, see http://www.hl7.org/fhir/search.html#contained. It's done with a chained search and looks like this:
[base]/Patient?careprovider._id=ContainedId