Today I've created Amazon Aurora Serverless cluster for PostGreSql in us-west-2, ensured the VPC and security groups in
a way that, it should be publicly accessibly. But I'm not able to connect that cluster using the aurora endpoint from my Navicat/PgAdmin4 desktop client. Then I tried from the EC2 instance that are in same security group/vpc as like as Aurora Serverless, then it worked.
From AWS froum,
You can't give an Aurora Serverless DB cluster a public IP address.
You can access an Aurora Serverless DB cluster only from within a
virtual private cloud (VPC) based on the Amazon VPC service.
Source: https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=862860&tstart=0
Seems it uses an internal AWS networking setup that currently only supports connections from inside a VPC, and it must be the same VPC where the serverless cluster is deployed.
So now basically my question is that,
Is there any workaround to connect Aurora Serverless with any client like Navicat or PgAdmin4?
I found a cool hack that is working perfectly for my development purpose with some tweaks and I know I don't need this on my production environment.
So as we know Aurora Serverless works only inside VPC. So make sure you are attempting to connect to Aurora within the VPC and the security group assigned to the Aurora cluster has the appropriate rules to allow access. As I mention earier that I already have an EC2 instance, Aurora Serverless and a VPC around both. So I can access it from my EC2 but not from my local pc/ local sql client. To fix that I did below two steps.
1. To access from any client(Navicat in my case),
a. First need to add GENERAL db configurations like aurora endpoint host, username, password etc.
b. Then, need to add SSH configuration, like EC2 machine username, hostip and .pem file path
2. To access from project,
First I create a ssh tunnel from my terminal like this way,
ssh ubuntu#my_ec2_ip_goes_here -i rnd-vrs.pem -L 5555:database-1.my_aurora_cluster_url_goes_here.us-west-2.rds.amazonaws.com:5432
Then run my project with db configuration like this way test.php,
$conn = pg_connect("host=127.0.0.1 port=5555 dbname=postgres user=postgres password=password_goes_here");
// other code goes here to get data from your database
if (!$conn) {
echo "An error occurred.\n";
exit;
}
$result = pg_query($conn, "SELECT * FROM brands");
if (!$result) {
echo "An error occurred.\n";
exit;
}
while ($row = pg_fetch_row($result)) {
echo "Brand Id: $row[0] Brand Name: $row[1]";
echo "<br />\n";
}
This question comes up over and over for multiple AWS services (most new ones are VPC only by default). The short answer is - you can hack up something and expose the DB outside of the VPC, but it is not recommended for a production setup. Assuming this is for a dev setup, by all means try the recommendations from [1]. It is for Neptune, but you can do the exact same thing for Aurora.
[1] Connect to Neptune on AWS from local machine
Related
I’ve now tried to create a serverless Aurora (MySQL compatible) database and connect to it for two days, and I just can’t seem to get it to work. Supposedly I should have been able to get it up and running in five minutes.
In any case, I created am Aurora Serverless database in the US East (N. Virginia) region (us-east-1), and have been able to connect to it with the AWS Query Editor. I also have an EC2 server in the same region, and have given the Aurora database the same security group (under RDS > Security Group), and in the security group I have opened for MYSQL/Aurora (TCP, 3306) from all sources. When I click the modify button on the database, there is also another (VPC) Security Group listed (rds-launch-wizard-4), which was created automatically. This one I also located under my EC2 dashboard and gave access to all ports from all sources (inbound), and to all ports (outbound). And there is a networking VPC & subnet group, which I don’t know what to do with, if anything.
I try to connect to the database, using this command line command:
mysql -h hest2.cluster-xxxxx.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com -P 3306 -u root –p
It generates an error “ERROR 2003 (HY000): Can't connect to MySQL server on” on both my EC2 instance, my local computer and on other online servers.
From the EC2 instance, try doing a telnet on the DB port to test if all your security group settings are applied correctly.
telnet hest2.cluster-xxxxx.us-east-1.rds.amazonaws.com 3306
If the connection does go through, then the issue is with your client code. Cross check that you have wired the right endpoint in your code.
If the telnet connection does not group (I'm guessing that it would not), then it is guaranteed that your security group settings are not set correctly. In order to debug this further, we would need more details on:
The list of vpc security groups associated with your cluster.
The details of each of these vpc security groups (You've mentioned that
you've opened up everything, but I'd like to see the exact rules in
place)
As for laptop and other servers - If they are outside the VPC, then it would not work. Aurora Serverless is accessible only from within the VPC as of now.
I have one application deployed on Red Hat Linux and Oracle 12c.
As part of the application, there is an implementation of Oracle Database Change Notification. Whenever there is a change in the database, that triggers a notification back to the application server. Based on that, the application makes some decisions. Here everything is working well.
Now we are migrating application to amazon EC2 instance with our Red Hat Linux box converted into an EC2 instance and the Oracle Database migrated to cloud. I don’t know what that means, but I do have connection parameters and I'm able to connect though the JDBC driver from my application deployed in the EC2 instance.
Somehow the database change notification functionality is not working in EC2and nothing can be tracked from the application log.
Oracle Database in cloud in aws, which I consider it has to be RDS.
You need to understand the basic on how the application is deployed in aws cloud.
The EC2(with app server) must be in public subnet with security group allowing http/https traffic.
The RDS is kept in private subnet with security group attached which only allows incoming traffic from EC2 instance ( or public subnet).This is general scenario in most of the cases.
The RDS security group only allows the incoming traffic from ec2. but any traffic from your DB (Outgoing traffic) has to be explicitly allowed from the security group attached to Your RDS.
The same traffic needs to be allowed in your Ec2 instance security group.
I am unaware of your specific feature, whether it is supported in AWS RDS or not, you should take a look at AWS RDS Oracle docs
I launched one RDS instance,s3 and EC2 in AWS and its is triggered properly using lambda. Now I wish to change the change the RDS and EC2 from AWS to local machine. My lambda is triggered from s3.
How do I connect the local database through lambda in AWS?
It appears that your requirement is:
You wish to run an AWS Lambda function
Within the function, you wish to connect to a database running on your own computer (outside of AWS)
Firstly, I would not recommend this strategy. To maintain good performance, you should always have an application as close as possible to the database. This means on the same network, in the same location and not going across remote network connections or the Internet.
However, if you wish to do this, then here's some things you would need to do:
Your database will need to be accessible on the Internet, so that you can connect to it remotely. To test this, try accessing it from an Amazon EC2 instance.
The AWS Lambda function should either be configured without VPC connectivity (which means that it is connected to the Internet) or, if you have configured it for VPC connectivity, it needs to be in a Private Subnet with a NAT Gateway enabling Internet access.
(Optional) For added security, you could lock-down your database to only accept connections from a known IP address. To achieve this, you would need to use the VPC + NAT Gateway so that all traffic is coming from the Elastic IP address assigned to the NAT Gateway.
I agree with John Rotenstein that connecting your local machine to a Lambda running on AWS is probably a bad idea.
If your intention is to develop or test locally, I recommend the serverless framework, and the serverless-offline plugin. It will allow you to simulate Lambda locally, and you can pass database config values through as environment variables.
See: Running AWS Lambda and API Gateway locally: serverless-offline
I am planning to migrate from Ec2 classic to EC2 VPC. My application reads messages from SQS, download assets from S3 and perform actions mentioned in the SQS messages and then updates RDS. I have following queries
Is it beneficial for me to migrate to Amazon VPC from Classic
I create my EC2 machines using ruby scripts, and deploy code on them using capistrano. In classic mode I used the IP address to deploy code using capistrano. But in VPC there is a concept of private IP address and you cannot access a machine inside a subnet.So my question is:
How should I deploy code on the EC2 instances or rather how should I connect to them?
Thank You.
This questions is pretty broad but I'll take stab at it:
Is it beneficial for me to migrate to Amazon VPC from Classic
It's beneficial if you care about security of your data in transit and at rest. In a VPC none of your traffic is exposed to the outside and you can chose which components you want to expose in case you want to receive traffic/data from the outside. i.e Your ELB or ELBs.
I create my EC2 machines using ruby scripts, and deploy code on them using capistrano. In classic mode I used the IP address to deploy
code using capistrano. But in VPC there is a concept of private IP
address and you cannot access a machine inside a subnet. So my question
is: How should I deploy code on the EC2 instances or rather how should
I connect to them?
You can actually assign a public IP to your EC2 machines in a VPC if you choose to. You can use that IP to deploy your code from the outside.
You can read about it here: http://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonVPC/latest/UserGuide/vpc-ip-addressing.html
If you want more security you can always deploy from a machine in your VPC (that has SSH access to the outside). You can ssh to that machine and then run cap deploy from there.
Do I need to create an EC2 instance in order to remotely connect to my Amazon RDS instance?
I understand that setting up an Amazon RDS instance automagically creates an EC2 instance 'in the background'. But when looking into my EC2 console I don't see that hidden instance so I can't find the details for the public DNS or Elastic IP, neither the EC2 instance key that I need to connect through SSH.
Yes, an RDS instance creates an EC2 instance to run the database but you don't have direct access to it via ssh, which is kind of the point.
RDS is a service that is managed for you and the idea is to hide the implementation details and simply provide an endpoint to connect to from another EC2 instance. You can find the endpoint name in the EC2 console - just use this as the hostname to connect to from your application and you can treat RDS just like any other database.
Amazon need to maintain a level of control over the server in order to provide it as a service and ssh access would interfere with that. There are a few things you miss out on because of this (e.g. direct access to DB files) but these are far outweighed by having Amazon manage upgrades, backups and replication for you.