Is it possible to have partially federated gateway? - graphql

I'd like to federate services, but let the federation gateway also hold own schema and logic that would proxy REST API endpoints for simplicity. Now it looks like I need to have federation gateway service, federated graphql service(s) and the rest<->graphql bridge service separately. Anyhow in our case the rest-graphql gateway could be living in the federation-gateway at least for the time being to avoid unnecessary bootstrapping & maintenance.
Looks like Apollo federation gateway has localServiceList that seemingly serves exactly this purpose. An example config:
const gateway = new ApolloGateway({
serviceList: [
{ name: "some-service", url: "http://localhost:40001/graph" }
],
localServiceList: [
{ name: "rest-bridge", typeDefs }
]
});
But it does not do the trick: If there is localServiceList, it skips the serviceList.
So the question is: Is this possible to hold also own schema & logic in Apollo Federation gateway?

Yes, this can be done:
import { buildFederatedSchema } from '#apollo/federation';
import {
ApolloGateway,
LocalGraphQLDataSource,
RemoteGraphQLDataSource
} from '#apollo/gateway';
import gql from 'graphql-tag';
const localServices = {
foo: {
schema: {
typeDefs: gql`
// ...
`,
resolvers: {
// ...
}
}
},
bar: {
schema: {
typeDefs: gql`
// ...
`,
resolvers: {
// ...
}
}
}
};
const remoteServices = {
baz: {
url: 'http://baz.local/graphql'
},
qux: {
url: 'http://qux.local/graphql'
}
};
const services = {
...localServices,
...remoteServices
};
// By providing a protocol we trick ApolloGateway into thinking that this is a valid URL;
// otherwise it assumes it's a relative URL, and complains.
const DUMMY_SERVICE_URL = 'https://';
const gateway = new ApolloGateway({
// We can't use localServiceList and serviceList at the same time,
// so we pretend the local services are remote, but point the ApolloGateway
// at LocalGraphQLDataSources instead...
serviceList: Object.keys(services).map(name => ({
name,
url: services[name].url || DUMMY_SERVICE_URL
})),
buildService({ name, url }) {
if (url === DUMMY_SERVICE_URL) {
return new LocalGraphQLDataSource(
buildFederatedSchema(
services[name].schema
)
);
} else {
return new RemoteGraphQLDataSource({
url
});
}
}
});
const apolloServer = new ApolloServer({
gateway,
subscriptions: false
});

Related

Apollo federation can't start gateway

Hello I want to use federation.I followed this tutorial. I can start my subgraph but when I start my gateway, I get this error:
Error: A valid schema couldn't be composed. The following composition errors were found:
Cannot extend type "Query" because it is not defined. Did you mean "User"?
Cannot extend type "Mutation" because it is not defined.
I even extended Query and Mutation but got another error.
my gateway code:
import fastify from "fastify";
import { ApolloServer } from "apollo-server-fastify";
import { ApolloGateway } from "#apollo/gateway";
const PORT = process.env.PORT || 4000;
const IP = "0.0.0.0";
const app = fastify({ trustProxy: true });
const gateway = new ApolloGateway({
serviceList: [{ name: "amazon", url: "http://localhost:4001/graphql" }],
});
(async () => {
try {
const { schema, executor } = await gateway.load();
const server = new ApolloServer({ schema, executor });
server.start().then(() => {
app.register(server.createHandler({ path: "/graphql" }));
app.listen(PORT, IP, (err) => {
if (err) {
console.error(err);
} else {
console.log("Server is ready at port 4000");
}
});
});
} catch (error) {
console.log("dick");
console.log("err", error);
}
})();
my schema in subgraph:
type Query {
getUsers: [User]!
}
type Mutation {
createUser(name: String!): Boolean!
}
type User #key(fields: "id") {
id: ID!
name: String!
}
Most likely you're using graphql version 16. Following https://www.apollographql.com/docs/federation/gateway/ you must use 15 for now (December 2021). Try:
yarn add graphql#15
Another detail you can do on latest versions is simply pass the gateway to ApolloServer, like this:
const server = new ApolloServer({ gateway });

Data not returned from REST datasource in Apollo server for graphQL

I am trying out the basic implementation for Apollo server for GraphQL with my REST API calls as Data Sources. I do not see any data returned from the same even though there is data returned when I call the API separately. Can anyone help figure out what could be going wrong?
PS: I have CORS enabled on my API so not sure if I am passing that too correctly. I do not have any idea how to figure out what URL this is calling.
My sample code below:
const { ApolloServer, gql } = require('apollo-server');
const { RESTDataSource } = require('apollo-datasource-rest');
class Contact extends RESTDataSource {
constructor() {
super();
this.baseURL = 'http://localhost:8080/objects/';
}
async getContactById(id) {
return this.get(`contact/${id}`);
}
async getAllContacts() {
const data = await this.get(`contact`);
return data.results;
}
// an example making an HTTP PUT request
async newContact(contact) {
return this.put(
'contact', // path
contact, // request body
);
}
};
// Type definitions define the "shape" of your data and specify
// which ways the data can be fetched from the GraphQL server.
const typeDefs = gql`
# Comments in GraphQL are defined with the hash (#) symbol.
type Query {
allContacts: [Contact]
contactById(id: ID): Contact
}
type Contact {
id: ID
contact_name: String
}
`;
// Resolvers define the technique for fetching the types in the
// schema.
const resolvers = {
Query: {
contactById: async (_source, { id }, { dataSources }) => {
return dataSources.contact.getContactById(id);
},
allContacts: async (_source, _args, { dataSources }) => {
return dataSources.contact.getAllContacts();
},
},
};
// In the most basic sense, the ApolloServer can be started
// by passing type definitions (typeDefs) and the resolvers
// responsible for fetching the data for those types.
const server = new ApolloServer({
typeDefs,
resolvers,
dataSources: () => {
return {
contact : new Contact(),
};
},
cors : true,
});
// This `listen` method launches a web-server. Existing apps
// can utilize middleware options, which we'll discuss later.
server.listen().then(({ url }) => {
console.log(`🚀 Server ready at ${url}`);
});
Below is the request and response from the GraphQL playground:
query {
contactById (id : 5) {
id
contact_name
}
}
Response:
{
"data": {
"contactById": {
"id": null,
"contact_name": null
}
}
}

Stitching secure subscriptions using makeRemoteExecutableSchema

We have implemented schema stitching where GraphQL server fetches schema from two remote servers and stitches them together. Everything was working fine when we were only working with Query and Mutations, but now we have a use-case where we even need to stitch Subscriptions and remote schema has auth implemented over it.
We are having a hard time figuring out on how to pass authorization token received in connectionParams from client to remote server via the gateway.
This is how we are introspecting schema:
API Gateway code:
const getLink = async(): Promise<ApolloLink> => {
const http = new HttpLink({uri: process.env.GRAPHQL_ENDPOINT, fetch:fetch})
const link = setContext((request, previousContext) => {
if (previousContext
&& previousContext.graphqlContext
&& previousContext.graphqlContext.request
&& previousContext.graphqlContext.request.headers
&& previousContext.graphqlContext.request.headers.authorization) {
const authorization = previousContext.graphqlContext.request.headers.authorization;
return {
headers: {
authorization
}
}
}
else {
return {};
}
}).concat(http);
const wsLink: any = new WebSocketLink(new SubscriptionClient(process.env.REMOTE_GRAPHQL_WS_ENDPOINT, {
reconnect: true,
// There is no way to update connectionParams dynamically without resetting connection
// connectionParams: () => {
// return { Authorization: wsAuthorization }
// }
}, ws));
// Following does not work
const wsLinkContext = setContext((request, previousContext) => {
let authToken = previousContext.graphqlContext.connection && previousContext.graphqlContext.connection.context ? previousContext.graphqlContext.connection.context.Authorization : null
return {
context: {
Authorization: authToken
}
}
}).concat(<any>wsLink);
const url = split(({query}) => {
const {kind, operation} = <any>getMainDefinition(<any>query);
return kind === 'OperationDefinition' && operation === 'subscription'
},
wsLinkContext,
link)
return url;
}
const getSchema = async (): Promise < GraphQLSchema > => {
const link = await getLink();
return makeRemoteExecutableSchema({
schema: await introspectSchema(link),
link,
});
}
const linkSchema = `
extend type UserPayload {
user: User
}
`;
const schema: any = mergeSchemas({
schemas: [linkSchema, getSchema],
});
const server = new GraphQLServer({
schema: schema,
context: req => ({
...req,
})
});
Is there any way for achieving this using graphql-tools? Any help appreciated.
I have one working solution: the idea is to not create one instance of SubscriptionClient for the whole application. Instead, I'm creating the clients for each connection to the proxy server:
server.start({
port: 4000,
subscriptions: {
onConnect: (connectionParams, websocket, context) => {
return {
subscriptionClients: {
messageService: new SubscriptionClient(process.env.MESSAGE_SERVICE_SUBSCRIPTION_URL, {
connectionParams,
reconnect: true,
}, ws)
}
};
},
onDisconnect: async (websocket, context) => {
const params = await context.initPromise;
const { subscriptionClients } = params;
for (const key in subscriptionClients) {
subscriptionClients[key].close();
}
}
}
}, (options) => console.log('Server is running on http://localhost:4000'))
if you would have more remote schemas you would just create more instances of SubscriptionClient in the subscriptionClients map.
To use those clients in the remote schema you need to do two things:
expose them in the context:
const server = new GraphQLServer({
schema,
context: ({ connection }) => {
if (connection && connection.context) {
return connection.context;
}
}
});
use custom link implementation instead of WsLink
(operation, forward) => {
const context = operation.getContext();
const { graphqlContext: { subscriptionClients } } = context;
return subscriptionClients && subscriptionClients[clientName] && subscriptionClients[clientName].request(operation);
};
In this way, the whole connection params will be passed to the remote server.
The whole example can be found here: https://gist.github.com/josephktcheung/cd1b65b321736a520ae9d822ae5a951b
Disclaimer:
The code is not mine, as #josephktcheung outrun me with providing an example. I just helped with it a little. Here is the original discussion: https://github.com/apollographql/graphql-tools/issues/864
This is a working example of remote schema with subscription by webscoket and query and mutation by http. It can be secured by custom headers(params) and shown in this example.
Flow
Client request
-> context is created by reading req or connection(jwt is decoded and create user object in the context)
-> remote schema is executed
-> link is called
-> link is splitted by operation(wsLink for subscription, httpLink for queries and mutations)
-> wsLink or httpLink access to context created above (=graphqlContext)
-> wsLink or httpLink use context to created headers(authorization header with signed jwt in this example) for remote schema.
-> "subscription" or "query or mutation" are forwarded to remote server.
Note
Currently, ContextLink does not have any effect on WebsocketLink. So, instead of concat, we should create raw ApolloLink.
When creating context, checkout connection, not only req. The former will be available if the request is websocket, and it contains meta information user sends, like an auth token.
HttpLink expects global fetch with standard spec. Thus, do not use node-fetch, whose spec is incompatible (especially with typescript). Instead, use cross-fetch.
const wsLink = new ApolloLink(operation => {
// This is your context!
const context = operation.getContext().graphqlContext
// Create a new websocket link per request
return new WebSocketLink({
uri: "<YOUR_URI>",
options: {
reconnect: true,
connectionParams: { // give custom params to your websocket backend (e.g. to handle auth)
headers: {
authorization: jwt.sign(context.user, process.env.SUPER_SECRET),
foo: 'bar'
}
},
},
webSocketImpl: ws,
}).request(operation)
// Instead of using `forward()` of Apollo link, we directly use websocketLink's request method
})
const httpLink = setContext((_graphqlRequest, { graphqlContext }) => {
return {
headers: {
authorization: jwt.sign(graphqlContext.user, process.env.SUPER_SECRET),
},
}
}).concat(new HttpLink({
uri,
fetch,
}))
const link = split(
operation => {
const definition = getMainDefinition(operation.query)
return (
definition.kind === 'OperationDefinition' &&
definition.operation === 'subscription'
)
},
wsLink, // <-- Executed if above function returns true
httpLink, // <-- Executed if above function returns false
)
const schema = await introspectSchema(link)
const executableSchema = makeRemoteExecutableSchema({
schema,
link,
})
const server = new ApolloServer({
schema: mergeSchemas([ executableSchema, /* ...anotherschemas */]),
context: ({ req, connection }) => {
let authorization;
if (req) { // when query or mutation is requested by http
authorization = req.headers.authorization
} else if (connection) { // when subscription is requested by websocket
authorization = connection.context.authorization
}
const token = authorization.replace('Bearer ', '')
return {
user: getUserFromToken(token),
}
},
})

I would like to know a working exsample of graphql subscriptions

Recently they have deprecated the subscriptionManager. I would like to know how to setup resolvers, define subscribe and execute function.
You will need to upgrade to Apollo 2.0. I have recently done a write-up on how to use Apollo 2.0 since the official docs have not yet been updated.
In short, you have to use apollo-link now on the client and execute and subscribe from the graphql package now get passed directly to SubscriptionServer instead.
You will first need the right packages with the right versions:
npm install --save apollo-client#beta apollo-cache-inmemory#beta apollo-link#0.7.0 apollo-link-http#0.7.0 apollo-link-ws#0.5.0 graphql-subscriptions subscriptions-transport-ws apollo-server-express express graphql graphql-tools body-parser
If you're running Meteor, you might also need:
meteor add apollo swydo:blaze-apollo swydo:graphql webapp
Now for the code, the following was made in Meteor, but it can easily adapt to other server types, like Express. You can also download a working example app.
On the client:
import { ApolloClient } from 'apollo-client';
import { ApolloLink } from 'apollo-link';
import { HttpLink } from 'apollo-link-http';
import WebSocketLink from 'apollo-link-ws';
import Cache from 'apollo-cache-inmemory';
import { getOperationAST } from 'graphql';
const httpUri = 'http://localhost:3000/graphql';
const wsUri = 'ws://localhost:3000/subscriptions';
const link = ApolloLink.split(
operation => {
const operationAST = getOperationAST(operation.query, operation.operationName);
return !!operationAST && operationAST.operation === 'subscription';
},
new WebSocketLink({
uri: wsUri,
options: {
reconnect: true, //auto-reconnect
// // carry login state (should use secure websockets (wss) when using this)
// connectionParams: {
// authToken: localStorage.getItem("Meteor.loginToken")
// }
}
}),
new HttpLink({ uri: httpUri })
);
const cache = new Cache(window.__APOLLO_STATE);
const client = new ApolloClient({
link,
cache
});
On the server:
import { WebApp } from 'meteor/webapp'; // Meteor-specific
import { execute, subscribe } from 'graphql';
import { SubscriptionServer } from 'subscriptions-transport-ws';
import { createApolloServer, addCurrentUserToContext } from 'meteor/apollo'; // specific to Meteor, but you can always check out the Express implementation
import { makeExecutableSchema } from 'graphql-tools';
import resolvers from './resolvers'; // your custom resolvers
import typeDefs from './schema.graphql'; // your custom schema
// make schema executable
const schema = makeExecutableSchema({
typeDefs,
resolvers
});
// any additional context you use for your resolvers, if any
const context = {};
// start a graphql server with Express handling a possible Meteor current user
// if you're not using Meteor, check out https://github.com/apollographql/apollo-server for instructions on how to create a server in pure Node
createApolloServer({
schema,
context
}, {
// // enable access to GraphQL API cross-domain (requires NPM "cors" package)
// configServer: expressServer => expressServer.use(cors())
});
// create subscription server
// non-Meteor implementation here: https://github.com/apollographql/subscriptions-transport-ws
new SubscriptionServer({
schema,
execute,
subscribe,
// // on connect subscription lifecycle event
// onConnect: async (connectionParams, webSocket) => {
// // if a meteor login token is passed to the connection params from the client,
// // add the current user to the subscription context
// const subscriptionContext = connectionParams.authToken
// ? await addCurrentUserToContext(context, connectionParams.authToken)
// : context;
// return subscriptionContext;
// }
}, {
server: WebApp.httpServer,
path: '/subscriptions'
});
resolvers.js
import { withFilter } from 'graphql-subscriptions'; // will narrow down the changes subscriptions listen to
import { PubSub } from 'graphql-subscriptions';
import { People } from '../imports/api/collections'; // Meteor-specific for doing database queries
const pubsub = new PubSub();
const resolvers = {
Query: {
person(obj, args, context) {
const person = People.findOne(args.id);
if (person) {
// Mongo stores id as _id, but our GraphQL API calls for id, so make it conform to the API
person.id = person._id;
delete person._id;
}
return person;
}
},
Mutation: {
updatePerson(obj, args, context) {
// You'll probably want to validate the args first in production, and possibly check user credentials using context
People.update({ _id: args.id }, { $set: { name: args.name, eyeColor: args.eyeColor, occupation: args.occupation } });
pubsub.publish("personUpdated", { personUpdated: args }); // trigger a change to all subscriptions to this person
// Note: You must publish the object with the subscription name nested in the object!
// See: https://github.com/apollographql/graphql-subscriptions/issues/51
return args;
}
},
Subscription: {
personUpdated: {
// See: https://github.com/apollographql/graphql-subscriptions#channels-mapping
// Take a look at "Channels Mapping" for handling multiple create, update, delete events
// Also, check out "PubSub Implementations" for using Redis instead of PubSub
// PubSub is not recommended for production because it won't work if you have multiple servers
// withFilter makes it so you can only listen to changes to this person instead of all people
subscribe: withFilter(() => pubsub.asyncIterator('personUpdated'), (payload, args) => {
return (payload.personUpdated.id===args.id);
})
}
}
};
export default resolvers;
schema.graphql
enum EyeColor {
brown
blue
green
hazel
}
type Person {
id: ID
name: String
eyeColor: EyeColor
occupation: String
}
type Query {
person(id: ID!): Person
}
type Mutation {
updatePerson(id: ID!, name: String!, eyeColor: EyeColor!, occupation: String!): Person
}
type Subscription {
personUpdated(id: ID!): Person
}
schema {
query: Query
mutation: Mutation
subscription: Subscription
}
A full write-up about this can be found in this Medium post: How to get Apollo 2.0 working with GraphQL + subscriptions.
An example app demonstrating how to use Apollo 2.0 with a GraphQL server + subscriptions can be found here: meteor-apollo2

Apollo GraphQL server; setting context to handle requests triggered by a fired subscription

I understand how to set the context object when creating a GraphQL server e.g.
const app = express();
app.use(GRAPHQL_URL, graphqlExpress({
schema,
context: {
foo: 'bar'
},
}));
so that the context object is passed to my resolvers when handling an incoming request.
However I'm not seeing this context object when the resolvers are triggered by a subscription (i.e. a client subscribes to a GraphQL subscription, and defines the shape of the data to be sent to them when the subscription fires); in that case the context appears to be an empty Object.
Is there way to ensure that my context object is set correctly when resolvers are called following a PubSub.publish() call?
I guess you are using the package subscription-transport-ws. In that case it is possible to add a context value in different execution steps.
See API. Two possible scenarios
If you have some kind of authentication. You could add a viewer in the context at the onConnect execution step. This is done at the first connection to the websocket and wont change until the connection is closed and opened again. See example.
If you want to add a context more dynamically you can add a kind of middleware before the execute step.It could look like this:
const middleware = (args) => new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
const [schema, document, root, context, variables, operation] = args;
context.foo = "bar"; // add something to context
resolve(args);
})
subscriptionServer = SubscriptionServer.create({
schema: executable.schema,
subscribe,
execute: (...args) => middleware(args).then(args => {
return execute(...args);
})
}, {
server: websocketServer,
path: "/graphql",
}, );
Here is my solution:
You can pass the context and do the authentication for graphql subscription(WebSocket )like this:
const server = new ApolloServer({
typeDefs,
resolvers,
context: contextFunction,
introspection: true,
subscriptions: {
onConnect: (
connectionParams: IWebSocketConnectionParams,
webSocket: WebSocket,
connectionContext: ConnectionContext,
) => {
console.log('websocket connect');
console.log('connectionParams: ', connectionParams);
if (connectionParams.token) {
const token: string = validateToken(connectionParams.token);
const userConnector = new UserConnector<IMemoryDB>(memoryDB);
let user: IUser | undefined;
try {
const userType: UserType = UserType[token];
user = userConnector.findUserByUserType(userType);
} catch (error) {
throw error;
}
const context: ISubscriptionContext = {
// pubsub: postgresPubSub,
pubsub,
subscribeUser: user,
userConnector,
locationConnector: new LocationConnector<IMemoryDB>(memoryDB),
};
return context;
}
throw new Error('Missing auth token!');
},
onDisconnect: (webSocket: WebSocket, connectionContext: ConnectionContext) => {
console.log('websocket disconnect');
},
},
});
You can pass the context argument of resolver using pubsub.publish method in your resolver like this:
addTemplate: (
__,
{ templateInput },
{ templateConnector, userConnector, requestingUser }: IAppContext,
): Omit<ICommonResponse, 'payload'> | undefined => {
if (userConnector.isAuthrized(requestingUser)) {
const commonResponse: ICommonResponse = templateConnector.add(templateInput);
if (commonResponse.payload) {
const payload = {
data: commonResponse.payload,
context: {
requestingUser,
},
};
templateConnector.publish(payload);
}
return _.omit(commonResponse, 'payload');
}
},
Now, we can get the http request context and subscription(websocket) context in
your Subscription resolver subscribe method like this:
Subscription: {
templateAdded: {
resolve: (
payload: ISubscriptionPayload<ITemplate, Pick<IAppContext, 'requestingUser'>>,
args: any,
subscriptionContext: ISubscriptionContext,
info: any,
): ITemplate => {
return payload.data;
},
subscribe: withFilter(templateIterator, templateFilter),
},
},
async function templateFilter(
payload?: ISubscriptionPayload<ITemplate, Pick<IAppContext, 'requestingUser'>>,
args?: any,
subscriptionContext?: ISubscriptionContext,
info?: any,
): Promise<boolean> {
console.count('templateFilter');
const NOTIFY: boolean = true;
const DONT_NOTIFY: boolean = false;
if (!payload || !subscriptionContext) {
return DONT_NOTIFY;
}
const { userConnector, locationConnector } = subscriptionContext;
const { data: template, context } = payload;
if (!subscriptionContext.subscribeUser || !context.requestingUser) {
return DONT_NOTIFY;
}
let results: IUser[];
try {
results = await Promise.all([
userConnector.findByEmail(subscriptionContext.subscribeUser.email),
userConnector.findByEmail(context.requestingUser.email),
]);
} catch (error) {
console.error(error);
return DONT_NOTIFY;
}
//...
return true;
}
As you can see, now we get the subscribe users(who establish the WebSocket connection with graphql webserver) and HTTP request user(who send the mutation to graphql webserver) from subscriptionContext and HTTP request context.
Then you can do the rest works if the return value of templateFilter function is truthy, then WebSocket will push message to subscribe user with payload.data, otherwise, it won't.
This templateFilter function will be executed multiple times depending on the count of subscribing users which means it's iterable. Now you get each subscribe user in this function and does your business logic to decide if push WebSocket message to the subscribe users(client-side) or not.
See github example repo
Articles:
GraphQL Subscription part 1
GraphQL Subscription part 2
If you're using Apollo v3, and graphql-ws, here's a docs-inspired way to achieve context resolution:
const wsContext = async (ctx, msg, args) => {
const token = ctx.connectionParams.authorization;
const currentUser = await findUser(token);
if(!currentUser) throw Error("wrong user token");
return { currentUser, foo: 'bar' };
};
useServer(
{
schema,
context: wsContext,
}
wsServer,
);
You could use it like so in your Apollo React client:
import { GraphQLWsLink } from '#apollo/client/link/subscriptions';
import { createClient } from 'graphql-ws';
const wsLink = new GraphQLWsLink(createClient({
url: 'ws://localhost:4000/subscriptions',
connectionParams: {
authorization: user.authToken,
},
}));

Resources