How can we replicate irb behaviour using binding method as below? - ruby

Trying to write a program interactively which can take inputs from command line as an expression or attributes like -
irb : 3+2
Should evaluate to => 5
Attribute
irb : abc = 1
=> 1
irb : jkl(or def) = 1
=> 1
irb : abc + def
=> 2
Also the evaluation should take place once user inputs blank line.
My efforts : I created a method attr_accessor which iterates through the array of *secret passed to it, and calls define_method on each attr, creating an instance variable getter and setter for each attribute.
Part of code working :
I made a success in evaluating the expressions and returning string values.
irb : 3+2
Should evaluate to => 5
irb : True
=> True
But still stuck with evaluation of assignment to attributes and unable to dynamically store those values in my interactive irb. Below expected results are not working :
Attribute
irb : abc = 1
=> 1
irb : def = 1
=> 1
irb : abc + def
=> 2
Note - I don't want to use "require 'irb' " or " "require 'pry'". Can this be achieved with simple ruby code ?
My Solution:
class Demo
def self.attr_accessor(*secret)
secret.each do |attr|
define_method(attr) { instance_variable_get("##{attr}") }
define_method("#{attr}=") { |val| instance_variable_set("##{attr}", val) }
end
get_binding
end
def self.method_new(input)
#object = attr_accessor(input)
end
def self.method(secret)
#object = Regexp.new(/\A[\d+\-*\/=. ]+\z/).match(secret.to_s) ? eval(secret) : "Invalid expression"
get_binding
end
def self.simple_method(secret)
#object = secret
get_binding
end
def self.get_binding
binding
end
end
user_input = ''
until user_input == 'q' do
user_input = gets.chomp
if user_input =~ /^.*=.*$/
b2 = Demo.method_new(*user_input)
puts eval('#object', b2)
elsif user_input =~ /\A[\d+\-*\/=. ]+\z/
b3 = Demo.method(user_input)
puts eval('#object', b3)
else
b4 = Demo.simple_method(user_input)
puts eval('#object', b4)
end
end
Expected Result:
irb : 3+2
#note - each result evaluated after user enters blank line
Should evaluate to => 5
Attributes ---
irb : abc = 1
#note - each result evaluated after user enters blank line
=> 1
irb : def = 1
#note - each result evaluated after user enters blank line
=> 1
irb : abc + def( or jkl)
#note - each result evaluated after user enters blank line
=> 2
Actual Result : Output is "Invalid expression" for all other inputs except expressions and simple strings.

I believe, I have partly reached to the solution of above problem. Now I can store the values of attributes in a hash map. I tried accessing these values through keys and thus can easily store and display values for assignments like:
rb : x = 1
=> 1
or
rb : y = 1
But the part of code I have written for evaluating 'x + y' is trying to partition it on operator and then accessing value of each attribute.
I am doing something wrong in line of code marked with comment #faulty. Due to which I got output like
=> x y
I am unable to access key values after partitioning.
Can someone please advise on this piece of code alone ?
Solution:
class Module
def initialize(args)
args.each do |key, value|
# the instance_variable_set method dynamically creates instance variables
# with the key as the name and value as the assigned value
instance_variable_set("##{key}",value)
# define_singleton_method creates a getter method with the same name as the
# key and inside the block you define what it returns
define_singleton_method(key){ value }
#defining the setter method
define_singleton_method("#{key}=") do |val|
instance_variable_set("##{key}", val)
end
end
end
end
class Demo
#var :bar
def self.eval_binary_expr(expr)
if expr =~ /^.*=.*$/
obj = Module.new(:name => expr)
#object1 = eval(obj.name)
get_binding
else
obj = Module.new(:name => expr)
l_operand, op, r_operand = (obj.name).partition(%r{[/*+-]}) #Faulty
if op.empty?
raise ArgumentError, "Invalid operation or no operation in expression: #{expr}"
end
case op
when '/'; then #object1 = (l_operand / r_operand); get_binding
when '*'; then #object1 = (l_operand * r_operand); get_binding
when '+'; then #object1 = (l_operand + r_operand); get_binding
when '-'; then #object1 = (l_operand - r_operand); get_binding
end
end
end
def self.method(secret)
#object2 = Regexp.new(/\A[\d+\-*\/=. ]+\z/).match(secret.to_s) ? eval(secret) : "Invalid expression"
get_binding
end
def self.new_method(secret)
#object3 = secret
get_binding
end
def self.get_binding
binding
end
end
user_input = ''
until user_input == 'q' do
user_input = gets.chomp
if user_input =~ /\A[\w+\-*\/=. ]+\z/
b2 = Demo.eval_binary_expr(user_input)
puts eval('#object1', b2)
elsif user_input =~ /\A[\d+\-*\/=. ]+\z/
b3 = Demo.method(user_input)
puts eval('#object2', b3)
else
b4 = Demo.new_method(user_input)
puts eval('#object3', b4)
end
end

Related

Get local variables of previous scope

I am making a Ruby REPL to be used inside an application. I made code:
a = 1
b = 2
currentScope = []
Kernel.local_variables.each do |var|
currentScope << [var,Kernel.eval(var.to_s)]
end
launchREPL(currentScope)
Inside the REPL, I can execute the following code:
#a #=>1
#a+#b #=>3
Ideally I wouldn't have to write the four lines of code before I launch the REPL, and instead I would like to run them inside the launchREPL function. However this would require access to the previous scope from inside the launchREPL function.
Test1
Most notably I tried:
launchREPL(Kernel)
When I do the following:
def launchREPL(scope)
F = 0
puts scope.local_variables # => [:F]
end
it is apparent that this method is not valid.
Test2
launchREPL(Kernel.binding)
def launchREPL(scope)
Kernel.binding.local_variables #= Error: private method 'local_variables' called for #<Binding>
end
Is there any way to do what I'm trying to do?
Edit: P.S. This is currently the code inside launchREPL:
def launchREPL(scope=nil,winName="Ruby REPL")
# ICM RB file Begin:
puts "\"Starting REPL...\""
__b = binding #Evaluating in a binding, keeps track of local variables
__s = ""
###############################################################################
# SEND INSTANCE VARIABLES TO REPL
###############################################################################
#
#How to prepare scope
# currentScope = []
# Kernel.local_variables.each do |var|
# currentScope << [var,Kernel.eval(var.to_s)]
# end
# launchREPL(currentScope)
if scope != nil
scope.each do |varDef|
__b.instance_variable_set "##{varDef[0].to_s}" , varDef[1]
__b.eval("##{varDef[0].to_s} = __b.instance_variable_get(:##{varDef[0].to_s})")
end
end
# to get instance variables: __b.instance_variable_get(__b.instance_variables[0])
# or better: __b.instance_variable_get(:#pipe1)
#
###############################################################################
bStartup = true
while bStartup || __s != ""
# If startup required skip evaluation step
if !bStartup
#Evaluate command
begin
__ret = __s + "\n>" + __b.eval(__s).to_s
rescue
__ret = __s + "\n> Error: " + $!.to_s
end
puts __ret
else
#REPL is already running
bStartup = false
end
#Read user input & print previous output
__s = WSApplication.input_box(__ret,winName,"")
__s == nil ? __s = "" : nil
end
end
Although what you are trying to achieve is unclear and there are definitely many ways to do it properly, every ruby method might be called with Object#send approach:
def launchREPL(scope)
scope.send :local_variables #⇒ here you go
end
a = 42
launchREPL(binding).include?(:a)
#⇒ true
Sidenote: this is how your “4 lines” are usually written in ruby:
local_variables.map { |var| [var, eval(var.to_s)] }
And this is how they should be written (note Binding#local_variable_get):
local_variables.map { |var| [var, binding.local_variable_get(var)] }
The summing up:
def launchREPL(scope)
vars = scope.send(:local_variables).map do |var|
[var, scope.local_variable_get(var)]
end
# some other code
end
a = 42
launchREPL(binding).to_h[:a]
#⇒ 42
This won’t fit the comment, so I would post it as an answer.
def launchREPL(scope = nil, winName = "Ruby REPL")
puts '"Starting REPL..."'
scope.eval('local_variables').each do |var|
instance_variable_set "##{var}", scope.eval(var.to_s)
end if scope
s = ""
loop do
ret = begin
"#{s}\n> #{eval(s)}"
rescue => e
"#{s}\n> Error: #{e.message}"
end
puts ret
# s = WSApplication.input_box(ret, winName, "")
# break if s.empty?
s = "100 * #a" # remove this line and uncomment 2 above
end
end
a = 42
launchREPL(binding)
This is how your function should be written (I have just make it looking as ruby code.) The above works (currently it has no break at all, but you can see as it’s calculating 4200 infinitely.)

Implementing operator precedence in my calculator interpreter

As part of learning Ruby am trying to implement a basic interpreter which reads input and do basic arithmetic calculations. So far basic arithmetic operations are working but having problem in operator precedence. Which is not handled yet. This is the code. Am at a beginner level. Any mistakes in this code are due to my lack of knowledge. How this code can be modified to handle operator precedence.
Sample output
2+2+2 = 6 #correct
10+10/2 = 10 # incorrect as in irb answer must be 15
Github Repo of this interpreter
=begin
Basic calculator Interpreter
can add, substract, multiply , divide with any number of operands at a time
Drawback : Lacks operator precedence
=end
class Interpreter
attr_accessor :input
def initialize
#input = gets.chomp
end
def intepret
first_operand = []
f = []
operator = '+'
array = Array.new
lc = 0
#input.split.join.split("").each_with_index.map do |i, index|
if i.is_number?
first_operand.push(i)
if index == #input.length-1
array.push(first_operand.join("").to_i)
end
elsif i.is_plus?
f = first_operand
first_operand = nil
first_operand = []
array.push(f.join("").to_i)
array.push("+")
elsif i.is_minus?
f = first_operand
first_operand = nil
first_operand = []
operator = '-'
array.push(f.join("").to_i)
array.push("-")
elsif i.is_multi?
f = first_operand
first_operand = nil
first_operand = []
operator = '*'
array.push(f.join("").to_i)
array.push("*")
elsif i.is_divide?
f = first_operand
first_operand = nil
first_operand = []
operator = '/'
array.push(f.join("").to_i)
array.push("/")
else
puts "Illegal input exiting.."
exit
end
lc = lc+1
end
#apply the appropriate operation on the inputs based on the operand
#puts "=======TOKENS======"
#puts array.inspect
result = 0
array.each_with_index.map do |x, key|
result = x if key == 0
if x == '+'
if key == 0
result = add(result, array[key+1])
else
result = add(result, array [key+1])
end
elsif x == '-'
if key == 0
result = minus(result, array[key+1])
else
result = minus(result, array [key+1])
end
elsif x == '*'
if key == 0
result = multi(result, array[key+1])
else
result = multi(result, array [key+1])
end
elsif x == '/'
begin
if key == 0
result = divide(result, array[key+1])
else
result = divide(result, array [key+1])
end
rescue
puts "Zero Divsion error"
exit
end
end
end
puts "Result is: "+result.to_s
end
def print_token(type, value)
puts type + ' '+ value
end
def add(f,s)
return f.to_i + s.to_i
end
def minus(f,s)
return f.to_i - s.to_i
end
def multi(f,s)
return f.to_i * s.to_i
end
def divide(f,s)
return f.to_i / s.to_i
end
end
# Override the string class, to directly use methods like obj.is_number? rather than is_number?(obj)
class String
def is_number?
true if Float(self) rescue false
end
def is_plus?
true if self == '+' rescue false
end
def is_minus?
true if self == '-' rescue false
end
def is_multi?
true if self == '*' rescue false
end
def is_divide?
true if self == '/' rescue false
end
end
#continue accepting inputs until exit CTRL + D
while true
print 'pck>:'
i_obj = Interpreter.new
i_obj.intepret
end
First, process the input using the Shunting-yard algorithm. This should give a list of tokens in Reverse Polish notation (RPN). Then you can evaluate the RPN expression.

Ruby Sinatra storing variables

In the code below, the initial get '/' contains a form, whose action is post '/'. when the user inputs a number, it should be converted to a variable that will be used to call the Game class, for which I have generated another action to reveal a new form at get '/game'. the variable generated in the post method is not being stored. how can I both store the variable created in post and then link into the get '/game' action?
require 'sinatra'
require 'sinatra/reloader'
##count = 5
Dict = File.open("enable.txt")
class Game
attr_accessor :letters, :number, :guess, :disp
##count = 5
def initialize (number)
letters = find(number)
end
def find (n)
words =[]
dictionary = File.read(Dict)
dictionary.scan(/\w+/).each {|word| words << word if word.length == n}
letters = words.sample.split("").to_a
letters
end
def counter
if letters.include?guess
correct = check_guess(guess, letters)
else
##count -= 1
end
end
end
get '/' do
erb :index
end
post '/' do
n = params['number'].to_i
#letters = Game.new(n)
redirect '/game'
end
get "/game" do
guess = params['guess']
letters = #letters
if guess != nil
correct = check_guess(guess, letters)
end
disp = display(letters, correct)
erb :game, :locals => {:letters => letters, :disp => disp}
end
def display(letters, correct)
line = "__"
d=[]
letters.each do |x|
if correct == nil
d << line
elsif correct.include?x
d << x
else
d << line
end
end
d.join(" ")
end
def check_guess(guess, letters)
correct = []
if guess != nil
if letters.include?guess
correct << guess
end
end
correct
end
You cannot do this:
#letters = Game.new(n)
each time you create a request, and new Request instance created and so the #letters attribute no longer exists.
It's the equivalent of
r = Request.new()
r.letters = Game.new()
r = Request.new()
r.letters # not defined anymore!!
You could achieve what you want using a class variable instead
##letters = Game.new(n)
Although this will become a nightmare when you have multiple users and will only work when you have a single ruby server process.
A more advanced approach would be to store params['number'] in a session cookie or in a database.

puts statement is printing on two lines

I have a class called PolynomialElements and inside that class I have a method called printElement that has a puts statement that print two variables. The puts statement is printing the variables on different lines. How do I get puts to print the two variables on one line. My code is below, it is line #5 where the puts statement is.
class PolynomialElements
attr_accessor :element, :size
def printElement
puts "#{element}x^#{size}"
end
end
askAgain = true
polyArray = Array.new
while askAgain
puts "How many numbers do you want to enter? "
numString = gets
num = numString.to_i
while num > 0
puts "Enter a value for the Polynomial "
value = gets
polyArray.push(value)
num -= 1
end
sizeOfArray = polyArray.length
polyArray.each do |x|
var = PolynomialElements.new
var.element = x
sizeOfArray -= 1
var.size = sizeOfArray
var.printElement
end
puts "Enter y to enter new number or anything else to quit"
cont = gets
if cont.chomp != "y"
askAgain = false
else
polyArray.clear
end
end
In the while loop change:
value = gets
to:
value = gets.chomp
You will then get:
Enter a value for the Polynomial
3
1x^2
2x^1
3x^0

Need help indenting tags in the output in Ruby

UPDATE: OK, so I implemented your code, but now the indentation is not showing up! Any ideas what might be wrong? I modified the code so that it would attempt to pass my original test (this is only an exercise so in real life I would not be overriding the XmlDocument class) and here is the modified code:
class XmlDocument
attr_reader :indent_depth, :bool
def initialize(bool = false, indent_depth = 0)
#indent_depth = indent_depth
#bool = bool
end
def method_missing(name, *args)
indentation = ' '*indent_depth
attrs = (args[0] || {}).map { |k, v| " #{k}='#{v}'" }.join(' ')
if block_given?
puts indent_depth
opening = "#{indentation}<#{name}#{attrs}>"
contents = yield(XmlDocument.new(true,indent_depth+1))
closing = "#{indentation}</#{name}>"
bool ? opening + "\n" + contents + "\n" + closing : opening + contents + closing
else
"#{indentation}<#{name}#{attrs}/>"
end
end
end
I'm trying to get the method to pass this test:
it "indents" do
#xml = XmlDocument.new(true)
#xml.hello do
#xml.goodbye do
#xml.come_back do
#xml.ok_fine(:be => "that_way")
end
end
end.should ==
"<hello>\n" +
" <goodbye>\n" +
" <come_back>\n" +
" <ok_fine be='that_way'/>\n" +
" </come_back>\n" +
" </goodbye>\n" +
"</hello>\n"
...but I'm unsure as to where to go with my code, below. I was thinking of using a counter to keep track of how far indented we have to go. I tried some code, but then deleted it because it was getting too messy and I have a feeling that the indentation should not be too complicated to implement.
class XmlDocument
def initialize(bool = false)
#bool = bool
end
def send(tag_name)
"<#{tag_name}/>"
end
def method_missing(meth, arg={}, &block)
arbitrary_method = meth.to_s
tag_string = ''
# 1) test for block
# 2) test for arguments
# 3) test for hash
if block_given? # check for #xml.hello do; #xml.goodbye; end
if yield.class == String # base case: #xml.hello do; "yellow"; end
"<#{arbitrary_method}>#{yield}</#{arbitrary_method}>"
else # in the block we do not have a string, we may have another method
method_missing(yield)
end
elsif arg.empty? # no arguments e.g. #xml.hello
send(arbitrary_method)
else # hash as argument e.g. #xml.hello(:name => 'dolly')
send("#{arbitrary_method} #{arg.keys[0]}='#{arg.values[0]}'")
end
end
end
Your code needs a lot of work - some pointers:
Do not override the send method!
Don't call yield over and over - you don't know what side effects you might cause, not to mention a performance hit - call it once, and remember the return value.
You might want to read up on how to write a DSL (here is a blogpost on the subject), to see how it was done correctly in other places.
Ignoring the above, I will try to answer your question regarding indentation.
In a DSL use case, you might want to use a context object which holds the indentation depth as state:
class Indented
attr_reader :indent_depth
def initialize(indent_depth = 0)
#indent_depth = indent_depth
end
def method_missing(name, *args)
indentation = ' ' * indent_depth
attrs = (args[0] || {}).map { |k, v| "#{k}='#{v}'" }.join(' ')
if block_given?
"#{indentation}<#{name} #{attrs}>\n" +
yield(Indented.new(indent_depth + 1)) +
"\n#{indentation}</#{name}>"
else
"#{indentation}<#{name} #{attrs}/>"
end
end
end
xml = Indented.new
puts xml.hello do |x|
x.goodbye do |x|
x.come_back do |x|
x.ok_fine(:be => "that_way")
end
end
end
# => <hello >
# => <goodbye >
# => <come_back >
# => <ok_fine be='that_way'/>
# => </come_back>
# => </goodbye>
# => </hello>

Resources