I want to use Mongock migration tool to initialize my app's configuration that is stored in database.
The problem I have is that one of my configs is used in class that is annotated with #Configuration. As Mongock changesets are executed after #Configuration it cannot retrieve not existing yet value from database and that results in a crash of application. Is there a way to postpone creating #Configuration class? Or should I initialize this one config without using mongock?
I don't fully understand your issue. I think that you need Mongock to run before your class annotated with #Configuration is processed. As you mention, SpringMongock requires the configuration class to be processed, as it requires the Spring ApplicationContext. However, you can run Mongock as standalone runner and use it(run it) wherever you want, as it doesn't depend on Spring context.
Mongock documentation
I hope it helps.
Related
I was searching for the difference between the #Configuration vs #SpringBootConfiguration. I found many articles mentioned "As per the Spring documentation, #SpringBootConfiguration is just an alternative to the Spring standard #Configuration annotation. The only difference between the two is that the #SpringBootConfiguration allows the configuration to be found automatically".
So what does it mean by #SpringBootConfiguration allows the configuration to be found automatically? If we use the #Configuration for a class that contains #Bean annotated methods, Spring will create instantiation for those beans as well. Can anybody explain this to me clearly?
Because this question was driving me a little crazy and this was the first StackOverflow page I found, which didn't resolve the issue for me, I'm going to try to explain my findings:
#SpringBootApplication is a specialisation of #SpringBootConfiguration, which is a specialisation of #Configuration.
You may only have 1 #SpringBootConfiguration, which means you can't have both a #SpringBootConfiguration and a #SpringBootApplication in your application.
"#SpringBootConfiguration allows the configuration to be found automatically" means you don't have to do anything to have this (and therefore #SpringBootApplication) found. Other #Configuration classes are generally discovered by #ComponentScan
An extra advantage over #Configuration, is that it will be discovered by #StringBootTest.
Just open https://github.dev/spring-projects/spring-boot/tree/main/spring-boot-project/spring-boot-docs/src/docs/asciidoc and search for SpringBootConfiguration you will find some information about it.
such as
#SpringBootConfiguration: enable registration of extra beans in the
context or the import of additional configuration classes. An
alternative to Spring’s standard #Configuration that aids
configuration detection in your integration tests.
and
Detecting Test Configuration If you are familiar with the Spring Test
Framework, you may be used to using #ContextConfiguration(classes=…)
in order to specify which Spring #Configuration to load.
Alternatively, you might have often used nested #Configuration classes
within your test.
When testing Spring Boot applications, this is often not required.
Spring Boot’s #*Test annotations search for your primary configuration
automatically whenever you do not explicitly define one.
The search algorithm works up from the package that contains the test
until it finds a class annotated with #SpringBootApplication or
#SpringBootConfiguration. As long as you structured your code in a
sensible way, your main configuration is usually found.
I have started a spring boot project using start.spring.io.
But I am getting this error-
I have read various articles on the internet about this issue and they all say about putting my tests in the same package as my Main class.
But I already have the same.
Could you point out what is wrong with my configuration?
The exception is pretty clear: You are missing a configuration for your spring context. What you need to do is to add the configuration classes for your context like so:
#SpringBootTest(classes = { TestConfiguration.class })
whereas your TestConfiguration class must be annotated with
#Configuration
and/or
#EnableAutoConfiguration
There you can add configurations to your liking. You can of course also use your DatabaseApplication class as Configuration although Im wouldn't recommend that.
The search algorithm works up from the package that contains the test until it finds a #SpringBootApplication or #SpringBootConfiguration annotated class. As long as you’ve structure your code in a sensible way your main configuration is usually found.
Make Sure your DatabaseApplication class is annotated with #SpringBootApplication .
I have created a configuration project which essentially creates couple of beans with configuration stereotype. Then, I want this project to be reused across by my clients.
I have added this config project as a maven dependency, but my client project is not having those beans i have created as part of configuration project.
Could someone help
Ok, the answer is the following: you should place
#ComponentScan("you.configurations.base.package")
on one of your configuration (in the current application, one that #SpringBootApplication sees) or on the class with #SpringBootApplication annotation.
The explanation is as follows: #SpringBootApplication under the hood contains #ComponentScan without specifying a base package. That means that it says to Spring to scan the package where the class annotated with #SpringBootApplication resides and all the packages recursively. And that's it. If you place you #Configuration somewhere there - it will create it during startup, otherwise not.
We can resolve this by enabling spring-boot autoconfiguration
Create classpath->resources->META-INF->spring.factories file
org.springframework.boot.autoconfigure.EnableAutoConfiguration=[add your class with you need to be loaded during application load time]
I have written some code in order test integration with mongoDB. Please find the link to the main method for running this spring boot application below,
https://github.com/siva54/simpleusercontrol/blob/master/src/main/java/com/siva/UserManagementApplication.java
From what I have read, An application should contain any of the configurations from the following URL to declare how the applications manages the context,
http://docs.spring.io/autorepo/docs/spring-boot/current/reference/html/using-boot-using-springbootapplication-annotation.html
I haven't used any of those contexts, However my application works fine and I'm able to run it without any issues. Am I missing something here? Can you please help with the info of how my application is able to start and manage the context/dependencies automatically?
Thanks in advance
#SpringBootApplication is equivalent of #Configuration, #EnableAutoConfiguration and #ComponentScan. Let's consider why your application works without of any of this three annotations.
Why it works without #Configuration:
When Spring will scan packages, it will find all classes marked by #Configuration and will use them as part of configuration. But in next line you manually passed UserManagementApplication as configuration source:
SpringApplication.run(UserManagementApplication.class, args);
So spring doesn't need to find this class by scan. Therefor it is not necessary to mark it by #Configuration.
Why it works without #ComponentScan:
Class UserManagementApplication has #ImportResource("classpath:spring/application-context.xml") annotation. That means file spring/application-context.xml will be included into configuration. And this file contains next line:
<context:component-scan base-package="com.siva.*" />
So, you don't need use annotation for scan packages, because you already declared it in the xml file.
Why it works without #EnableAutoConfiguration:
This annotation allows to Spring to try guess and configure the components automatically. For example, if you include the following dependency in your build.gradle:
dependencies {
compile 'org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-data-mongodb'
}
Spring configures all the components required to work with MongoDB automatically. And all you need just specify host and user/pass in the aplication.proprties file.
But you preferred to declare all needed beans manually in the spring/application-context.xml file. So, you simply don't need #EnableAutoConfiguration annotation at all.
I am attempting to migrate a spring, non-boot, app to a boot app. The current one builds a war file. Following these instructions, I am walking through the steps to migrate.
I am finding that the #SpringBootApplication annotation forces a lot of things to fail. For instance, it tries to auto config security when I really need the existing xml security config to remain as is. I found that I can override #EnableAutoConfiguration and exclude configuration classes (.i.e. SecurityAutoConfiguration.class). But I am finding it is doing this a great deal for the items I already have on my classpath. I decided it would be better to remove #SpringBootApplication and replace it with just #Configuration, #ComponentScan and #ImportResource to load my original context xml. The class extends SpringBootServletInitializer so that I can register my custom servlets and filters.
What I have found, it now no longer knows to load the application.yml or bootstrap.yml. What triggers auto configuration of these files? Do I fall back to loading with the traditional properties placeholder configurers? I want to avoid this as the next step is to hook it up to spring cloud config to centralize the management of the application configuration.
#SpringBootApplication is a alternative for #Configuration, #EnableAutoConfiguration and #ComponentScan.
Probably you want use #Configuration + #ComponentScan. If you want load xml configuration you can use: #ImportResource annotation.
If you want use autoconfiguration, but you can disable a few auto configurations, eg:
#EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude={DataSourceAutoConfiguration.class})
Details:
http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/using-boot-auto-configuration.html
http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/using-boot-configuration-classes.html
http://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/reference/html/using-boot-using-springbootapplication-annotation.html