How to use gradle feature variant dependecies in tests? - gradle

I am migrating a Maven library project to Gradle. The original project also has optional dependencies. I use the java-library plugin but moving the formerly optional dependencies to implementation results in runtime dependencies instead of compile. So I tried the gradle feature variants which results in the right dependencies in the pom.xml. But doing so results is failing test compile as the dependencies of the feature variant are missing on the test compile classpath!
Here is my current setup in build.gradle:
apply plugin: 'java'
apply plugin: 'java-library'
apply plugin: 'maven-publish'
sourceCompatibility = 1.8
java {
registerFeature('oSupport') {
usingSourceSet(sourceSets.main)
}
}
dependencies {
api 'my.compile:dep-a:1.0.0'
implementation 'my.runtime:dep-i:1.0.0'
oSupportApi 'my.optional:dep-o:1.0.0'
}
Let's assume there is a class O available from my.optional:dep-o. If I import O in any class in src/main/java it works perfectly. Also the dependencies are exported right to Maven (using gradle generatePomFileForMavenJavaPublication, see the dependencies from the generated pom.xml below). But any test in src/test/java using class O will not compile (import my.optional.O; creates error: package my.optional does not exist)
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>my.compile</groupId>
<artifactId>dep-a</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>my.rintime</groupId>
<artifactId>dep-r</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>my.optional</groupId>
<artifactId>dep-0</artifactId>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
<optional>true</optional>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
How to solve this? I know I could have used the nebula.optional-base plugin instead of the buildin Gradle feature variant but I would prefer the new gradle builtin support for optional dependencies instead.
PS: I use Java 8 and Gradle 5.6.2

This looks like a bug when the feature source set uses the main source set. Can you report on https://github.com/gradle/gradle/issues?
In the meantime, this should fix it:
configurations {
testCompileClasspath.extendsFrom(oSupportApi)
testRuntimeClasspath.extendsFrom(oSupportApi)
testRuntimeClasspath.extendsFrom(oSupportImplementation)
}

Really weird, I agree with #melix this seems to be a Gradle bug.
The following will fix it but should not be needed, imho:
dependencies {
api 'my.compile:dep-a:1.0.0'
implementation 'my.runtime:dep-i:1.0.0'
oSupportApi 'my.optional:dep-o:1.0.0'
testImplementation(project(":${project.name}")) {
capabilities {
requireCapability("${project.group}:${project.name}-o-support")
}
}
}
For this simplified setup with only one feature dependency could be replaced by testImplementation 'my.optional:dep-o:1.0.0' but for a general larger dependency list this approch avoids repetition of the dependencies as the extendsFrom solution of #melix.

Related

Gradle maven-publish dependency scope

I have a pretty simple Gradle Kotlin project.
plugins {
id 'application'
id 'maven-publish'
}
repositories { mavenCentral() }
dependencies {
compile 'com.google.guava:guava:31.1-jre' // 'compile' is deprecated
}
publishing {
publications {
maven(MavenPublication) {
groupId = 'de.mabe'; artifactId = 'project1'; version = '1.0'
from components.java
}
}
}
When I start gradle publishToMavenLocal it generates a correct pom file with a correct dependency:
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
<artifactId>guava</artifactId>
<version>31.1-jre</version>
<scope>compile</scope> <!-- this scope is important -->
</dependency>
Now I replaced the compile with implementation in the gradle script.
implementation 'com.google.guava:guava:31.1-jre'
Unexpectedly this changes the scope in the pom file from compile to runtime.
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.guava</groupId>
<artifactId>guava</artifactId>
<version>31.1-jre</version>
<scope>runtime</scope> <!-- compile EXPECTED ?!?! -->
</dependency>
What do I have to do to get the previous pom back?
That is by design. The semantics of the implementation configuration is to declare dependencies that are internal to a module. By mapping it to the runtime scope of a Maven pom, it ensures that it doesn't leak onto the compilation classpath of consumers. This has a few advantages like being more free to swap out transitive depencies with less risk of affecting consuming modules, to make compilation faster and more.
If you need to make a transitive dependency part of the compile scope, i.e. expose it on the compilation classpath of consuming projects, you need to use the api configuration instead. This is available by applying the java-library plugin.
For example (Groovy DSL):
plugins {
id 'java-library'
id 'maven-publish'
}
dependencies {
implementation 'org.apache.commons:commons-math3:3.6.1' // <- Maps to the Maven runtime scope
api 'com.google.guava:guava:30.1.1-jre' // <- Maps to the Maven compile scope
}
publishing {
publications {
maven(MavenPublication) {
groupId = 'de.mabe'; artifactId = 'project1'; version = '1.0'
from components.java
}
}
}
You can read more about the separation between API and implementation in the Gradle user guide here.

Gradle 5: BOM dependencies are not written to pom file

I'm trying to use a BOM to build project A with Gradle 5. The pom file that's created does not correctly contain the BOM or the dependencies coming from it (see below). Moreover, Trying to build project B that depends on A fails on project A's pom.
When working with DependencyManagementPlugin (i.e. Not using Gradle 5 native support), everything works:
apply plugin:
io.spring.gradle.dependencymanagement.DependencyManagementPlugin
dependencyManagement {
imports {
mavenBom 'myGroup:infra-bom:1.0.+'
}
}
Creates this in project A's pom in a dependencyManagement block:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>myGroup</groupId>
<artifactId>infra-bom</artifactId>
<version>1.0.25</version>
<scope>import</scope>
<type>pom</type>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
Trying to make it work with Gradle 5 isn't so lucky:
dependencies {
compile platform ('myGroup:infra-bom:1.0.+')
...
...
}
gradle dependencies shows correct versions from the BOM, but it creates this in project A's pom in the existing dependencies block:
<dependency>
<groupId>myGroup</groupId>
<artifactId>infra-bom</artifactId>
<version>null</version> // note the null here
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
Which fails builds trying to use it.
Am I correctly using Gradle 5 native support for BOM? What does it include?

Publish BOM (as pom.xml) using gradle plugin java-platform

I am setting up a project specific BOM that will "inherit" definitions from other BOMs (available as pom.xml) and also define own managed dependendies.
I tried the following (as stated in the java-platform docs) in my build.gradle.kts:
plugins {
`java-platform`
`maven-publish`
}
dependencies {
constraints {
api(platform("org.camunda.bpm:camunda-bom:${Versions.camunda}"))
}
}
publishing {
publications {
create<MavenPublication>("camunda-bom") {
from(components["javaPlatform"])
}
}
}
But when I do gradle publishToMavenLocal and check the resulting pom.xml in .m2/repositories it looks like:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.camunda.bpm</groupId>
<artifactId>camunda-bom</artifactId>
<version>7.10.0</version>
<scope>compile</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Which will not work because the syntax for importing poms should be
...
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
...
How can I publish a valid BOM as pom.xml with gradle (using version 5.3.1)?
You are defining the BOM as a constraint, but that is most likely not what you want to do.
A constraint on a platform will just say that if that dependency enters the graph elsewhere it should use the platform part of it and the version recommendation from the constraint.
If you expect that constraints of that BOM to be visible to the consumers of your platform, then you need to add the BOM as a platform dependency by doing something like:
javaPlatform {
allowDependencies()
}
dependencies {
api(platform("org.camunda.bpm:camunda-bom:${Versions.camunda}"))
}
Then this will be properly published as an inlined BOM in Maven.

How to use a maven BOM for Spring in Gradle?

I am converting POM to Gradle and one of the things I am stuck at is having dependency management in Gradle like the following that I have in POM:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>Edgware.SR4</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
Is there a way to have Edgware.SR4 in Gradle as well?
I checked https://docs.gradle.org/4.6/release-notes.html#bom-import but that doesn't really tell me a way on how to utilize Edgware.SR4 BOM.
UPDATE
I finally have my build.gradle as follows that seems to work:
plugins{
id 'org.springframework.boot' version '1.5.8.RELEASE'
}
apply plugin: 'io.spring.dependency-management'
dependencyManagement {
imports {
mavenBom 'org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-dependencies:Edgware.SR4'
}
}
This seems to be working fine but wondering if there is any flaw in this approach. Documentation available at https://docs.spring.io/spring-boot/docs/current/gradle-plugin/reference/html/ suggests to use apply false to begin with in
id 'org.springframework.boot' version '1.5.8.RELEASE'
I didn't do that and it worked fine. Wondering why it was suggested like that.
Assuming that you are using Spring Boot and, therefore, already have the Dependency Management Plugin applied, you can import Spring Cloud's bom by adding the following to your build.gradle file:
dependencyManagement {
imports {
mavenBom 'org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-dependencies:Edgware.SR4'
}
}
As of today, the latest versions of gradle have a built-in solution.
dependencies {
implementation(platform("org.springframework.cloud:spring-cloud-dependencies:Edgware.SR4"))
}

Jersey + Gradle with maven dependencies not working

Hi I am following the jersey sun documentation. I have deployed before this simple pom.xml before
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.jersey</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-server</artifactId>
<version>1.14</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.sun.jersey</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-grizzly2</artifactId>
<version>1.14</version>
</dependency>
and Add the repository
<url>https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/snapshots/</url>
Nevertheless when I try to do this with gradle, it does not seem to be working, is not downloading the rest of dependencies that requires and aparently I have to explicitly put javax.ws.rs:jsr311-api:1.1.1 and even jersey-core. This is my build.gradle.
apply plugin: 'java'
apply plugin: 'eclipse'
apply plugin: 'jetty'
sourceCompatibility = 1.6
repositories {
mavenCentral()
maven {
url 'https://maven.java.net/content/repositories/snapshots/'
}
}
List compileLibraries =['com.sun.jersey:jersey-server:1.14',
'com.sun.jersey:jersey-grizzly2:1.14',
'com.sun.jersey:jersey-core:1.14',
'javax.ws.rs:jsr311-api:1.1.1']
dependencies {
compile (compileLibraries )
testCompile group: 'junit', name: 'junit', version: '4.+'
}
httpPort = 8888
stopPort = 9451
stopKey = 'foo'
Is this proper gradle behaviour? How can I do as same as with maven?
Edit
Just for the sake of this and if somebody is interesting in seeing a gradle build file that work with gradle you can go to
https://github.com/necronet/XTradeJerseyimpl/
Thanks!!
Seems that the dependency from jersey-server to jersey-core isn't being properly interpreted by Gradle. Looking at the pom shows that the jersey-core dependency is in a profile, which is likely why it's not being picked up. And jersey-core has the dependency on jsr311. Sounds like Gradle should probably account for the profile marked 'activeByDefault' in cases like these.
That said, you've already hit upon the solution, which is to specify the two jars directly - and it's still less lines to configure than the maven xml :)
Also, it looks like all the jars you need can be found in mavenCentral, so the snapshot repository isn't contributing anything.
This doesn't solve the need to explicitly mention those two extra jars, but I hope this explains why, and you might want to raise an issue on Gradle Jira if you think this should be addressed.

Resources