RxJS Add an observable after subscribe - rxjs

Is there a way to add one more element after an observable has been subscribed?
observable = timer(1000,2000).take(5)
observable.subscribe()
//Now I want to add one more element to observable....

Maybe a subject is what you are looking for, a subject is both an observable and an observer.
const { Subject, timer, fromEvent } = rxjs;
const { take } = rxjs.operators;
let subject$ = new Subject();
subject$.subscribe(val => { console.log(val); });
timer(1000,2000).pipe(take(5)).subscribe(val => { subject$.next(val); });
fromEvent(document.getElementsByTagName('button')[0], 'click').subscribe(() => {
subject$.next('clicked');
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.3/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
<button>Click</button>

You can use a combination of merge and Subjects
const { Subject, timer, merge } = rxjs;
const { take } = rxjs.operators;
let source_1 = timer(1000,2000).pipe(take(5));
let source_2 = new Subject();
let final_source = merge(
source_1,
source_2
);
final_source.subscribe(e => console.log(e));
source_2.next('jabadabadoo!');
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.3/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>

Related

How long was an observable delayed for when using debounceTime?

In this example: https://rxviz.com/v/0oqKpbWJ the delay in time from the first interval to when a value is emitted from the debounceTime operator is 4 seconds.
Is there a way to know that/be able to log the window that a debounce has debounced for?
Yes, you need timeInterval operator https://rxjs.dev/api/operators/timeInterval
Put it after the debounceTime
Update:
okay, I got it. You need a custom operator for sure. Try this
import { fromEvent, OperatorFunction } from 'rxjs';
import { debounceTime, tap, map } from 'rxjs/operators';
const clicks = fromEvent(document, 'click');
const result = clicks.pipe(debounceTimeWithIntervalTracking(1000));
result.subscribe(x => console.log(x));
function debounceTimeWithIntervalTracking<T>(time: number): OperatorFunction<T, { value: T, delayedFor: number }> {
let startedTime = new Date().getTime();
let restart = true;
return src$ => src$.pipe(
tap(() => {
if (restart) {
startedTime = new Date().getTime();
}
restart = false;
}),
debounceTime(time),
map(value => {
const delayedFor = new Date().getTime() - startedTime;
restart = true;
return { value, delayedFor };
})
)
}

Any reason to use shareReplay(1) in a BehaviorSubject pipe?

I'm using a library that exposes data from a service class using a pretty common BehaviorSubject pattern. The only notable difference with the implementation and what I have seen/used myself is the addition of a pipe with a shareReplay(1) operator. I'm not sure if the shareReplay is required. What effect, if any, does the shareReplay have in this case?
// "rxjs": "^6.3.0"
this.data = new BehaviorSubject({});
this.data$ = this.data.asObservable().pipe(
shareReplay(1)
)
Note: I've read a number of articles on shareReplay, and I've seen questions about different combinations of shareReplay and Subject, but not this particular one
Not in your example but imagine if there was some complex logic in a map function that transformed the data then the share replay would save that complex logic being run for each subscription.
const { BehaviorSubject } = rxjs;
const { map, shareReplay } = rxjs.operators;
const bs$ = new BehaviorSubject('initial value');
const obs$ = bs$.pipe(
map(val => {
console.log('mapping');
return 'mapped value';
}),
shareReplay({bufferSize:1, refCount: true})
);
obs$.subscribe(val => { console.log(val); });
obs$.subscribe(val => { console.log(val); });
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.1/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
Compare without the share, the map happens twice.
const { BehaviorSubject } = rxjs;
const { map } = rxjs.operators;
const bs$ = new BehaviorSubject('initial value');
const obs$ = bs$.pipe(
map(val => {
console.log('mapping');
return 'mapped value';
})
);
obs$.subscribe(val => { console.log(val); });
obs$.subscribe(val => { console.log(val); });
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.1/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
With this pattern (use of shareReplay(1)), the service protects itself from the user using the next() function of the BehaviorSubject while sending the last value of the BehaviorSubject (which would not have been the case without shareReplay(1)).

How to restart rxjs interval?

I created a class which sets up a pausable RxJS Observable using the interval operator:
export class RepeatingServiceCall<T> {
private paused = false;
private observable: Observable<T>;
constructor(serviceCall: () => Observable<T>, delay: number) {
this.observable = interval(delay).pipe(flatMap(() => (!this.paused ? serviceCall() : NEVER)));
}
setPaused(paused: boolean) {
this.paused = paused;
}
getObservable() {
return observable;
}
}
This seems to work fine, but the problem I am trying to solve is that I want the timer to reset when unpaused. So, let's say that the interval time is 10 seconds and 5 seconds after the last time the interval emitted, setPaused(false) is called. In that scenario, I want it to emit immediately and then restart the timer.
Would something like that be an easy thing to add?
If you use timer instead of interval, and set the initial delay to 0, then your interval will fire immediately.
You can use takeUntil operator to prevent the interval to run always, and repeat operator with delay option (or repeatWhen for rxjs <7.0) to restart it whenever you want:
import { Observable, Subject, timer } from 'rxjs';
import { repeat, switchMap, takeUntil } from 'rxjs/operators';
export class RepeatingServiceCall<T> {
readonly observable$: Observable<T>;
private readonly _stop = new Subject<void>();
private readonly _start = new Subject<void>();
constructor(serviceCall: () => Observable<T>, delay: number) {
this.observable$ = timer(0, delay)
.pipe(
switchMap(() => serviceCall()),
takeUntil(this._stop),
// repeatWhen(() => this._start) // for rxjs <7.0
repeat({delay: () => this._start}) // for rxjs >7.0
);
}
start(): void {
this._start.next();
}
stop(): void {
this._stop.next();
}
}
Here is a working StackBlitz example.
P.S.: Getters and setters are working different in typescript. So you do not need classic getter concept, you can just make the attribute public and readonly.
You can achieve the behavior you are describing with the following snippet:
const delay = 1000;
const playing = new BehaviorSubject(false);
const observable = playing.pipe(
switchMap(e => !!e ? interval(delay).pipe(startWith('start')) : never())
);
observable.subscribe(e => console.log(e));
// play:
playing.next(true);
// pause:
playing.next(false);
When the playing Observable emits true, the switchMap operator will return a new interval Observable.
Use the startWith operator to emit an event immediately when unpausing.
If you wish to have the interval start automatically when subscribing to the observable, then simply initialize the BehaviorSubject with true.
StackBlitz Example
Yet another approach with a switchMap:
const { fromEvent, timer } = rxjs;
const { takeUntil, switchMap, startWith } = rxjs.operators;
const start$ = fromEvent(document.getElementById('start'), 'click');
const stop$ = fromEvent(document.getElementById('stop'), 'click');
start$.pipe(
startWith(void 0), // trigger emission at launch
switchMap(() => timer(0, 1000).pipe(
takeUntil(stop$)
))
).subscribe(console.log);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/rxjs#6.4.0/bundles/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
<button id="start">start</button>
<button id="stop">stop</button>
And a simpler one, that merges start and stop Observables to switch off them:
const { fromEvent, merge, timer, NEVER } = rxjs;
const { distinctUntilChanged, switchMap, mapTo, startWith } = rxjs.operators;
const start$ = fromEvent(document.getElementById('start'), 'click');
const stop$ = fromEvent(document.getElementById('stop'), 'click');
merge(
start$.pipe(mapTo(true), startWith(true)),
stop$.pipe(mapTo(false))
).pipe(
distinctUntilChanged(),
switchMap(paused => paused ? timer(0, 1000) : NEVER)
)
.subscribe(console.log);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/rxjs#6.4.0/bundles/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
<button id="start">start</button>
<button id="stop">stop</button>
And another, even wierder approach, using repeat() :
const { fromEvent, timer } = rxjs;
const { take, concatMap, takeUntil, repeat } = rxjs.operators;
const start$ = fromEvent(document.getElementById('start'), 'click');
const stop$ = fromEvent(document.getElementById('stop'), 'click');
start$.pipe(
take(1),
concatMap(()=>timer(0, 1000)),
takeUntil(stop$),
repeat()
).subscribe(console.log);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/rxjs#6.4.0/bundles/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
<button id="start">start</button>
<button id="stop">stop</button>
Just wanted to join this party :)
Thanks for #s.alem 's answer, it really helped me.
From official documentation, repeatWhen() is deprecated in RxJs of v7 and will be removed in future version, and repeat() is a replacement of it.
So here's an updated version of #s.alem 's code:
StackBlitz
Basically the change is from
repeatWhen(() => this._start),
to
repeat({ delay: (count) => this._start })
You can abandon the old timer on start and start a new one on start.
const { interval, Subject, fromEvent } = rxjs;
const { takeUntil } = rxjs.operators;
let timer$;
const pause = new Subject();
const obs$ = new Subject();
obs$.subscribe(_ => { console.log('Timer fired') });
function start() {
timer$ = interval(1000);
timer$.pipe(takeUntil(pause)).subscribe(_ => { obs$.next(); });
}
function stop() {
pause.next();
timer$ = undefined;
}
fromEvent(document.getElementById('toggle'), 'click').subscribe(() => {
if (timer$) {
stop();
} else {
start();
}
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.4.0/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
<button id="toggle">Start/Stop</button>
check this code
/**
* it is a simple timer created by via rxjs
* #author KentWood
* email minzojian#hotmail.com
*/
function rxjs_timer(interval, times, tickerCallback, doneCallback, startDelay) {
this.pause = function () {
this.paused = true;
}
this.resume = function () {
this.paused = false;
}
this.stop = function () {
if (this.obs) {
this.obs.complete();
this.obs.unsubscribe();
}
this.obs = null;
}
this.start = function (interval, times, tickerCallback, doneCallback, startDelay) {
this.startDelay = startDelay || 0;
this.interval = interval || 1000;
this.times = times || Number.MAX_VALUE;
this.currentTime = 0;
this.stop();
rxjs.Observable.create((obs) => {
this.obs = obs;
let p = rxjs.timer(this.startDelay, this.interval).pipe(
rxjs.operators.filter(() => (!this.paused)),
rxjs.operators.tap(() => {
if (this.currentTime++ >= this.times) {
this.stop();
}
}),
rxjs.operators.map(()=>(this.currentTime-1))
);
let sub = p.subscribe(val => obs.next(val), err => obs.error(err), () => obs
.complete());
return sub;
}).subscribe(tickerCallback, null, doneCallback);
}
this.start(interval, times, tickerCallback, doneCallback, startDelay);
}
/////////////test/////////////
var mytimer = new rxjs_timer(
1000/*interval*/,
10 /*times*/,
(v) => {logout(`time:${v}`)}/*tick callback*/,
() => {logout('done')}/*complete callback*/,
2000/*start delay*/);
//call mytimer.pause()
//call mytimer.resume()
//call mytimer.stop()
function logout(str){
document.getElementById('log').insertAdjacentHTML( 'afterbegin',`<p>${str}</p>`)
}
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.5.1/rxjs.umd.js"></script>
<button onclick="mytimer.pause()"> pause</button>
<button onclick="mytimer.resume()"> resume</button>
<button onclick="mytimer.stop()"> stop</button>
<div id='log'></div>

Do something if RxJs subject's refCount drops to zero

I'm working on a service layer that manages subscriptions.
I provide subject-backed observables to consumers like this:
const subject = new Subject();
_trackedSubjects.push(subject);
return subject.asObservable();
Different consumers may monitor the channel, so there may be several observables attached to each subject.
I'd like to monitor the count of subject.observers and if it ever drops back to 0, do some cleanup in my library.
I have looked at refCount, but this only is available on Observable.
I'd love to find something like:
subject.onObserverCountChange((cur, prev) =>
if(cur === 0 && prev !== 0) { cleanUp(subject) }
)
Is there a way to automatic cleanup like this on a subject?
Instead of using Subject - you should probably describe setup/cleanup logic when creating observable. See the example:
const { Observable } = rxjs; // = require("rxjs")
const { share } = rxjs.operators; // = require("rxjs/operators")
const eventSource$ = Observable.create(o => {
console.log('setup');
let i = 0
const interval = setInterval(
() => o.next(i++),
1000
);
return () => {
console.log('cleanup');
clearInterval(interval);
}
});
const events$ = eventSource$.pipe(share());
const first = events$.subscribe(e => console.log('first: ', e));
const second = events$.subscribe(e => console.log('second: ', e));
setTimeout(() => first.unsubscribe(), 3000);
setTimeout(() => second.unsubscribe(), 5000);
<script src="https://unpkg.com/rxjs#6.2.2/bundles/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>

Do some action after takeUntil

I'm listening to mousemove event until mouseup. I'm doing it with takeUntil.
My code:
const onMouseMove = fromEvent(window, "mousemove");
const onMouseUp = fromEvent(window, "mouseup");
const resizePanel = onMouseMove
.pipe(
takeUntil(onMouseUp),
map(
(event: MouseEvent) => {
this.isDragging = true;
this.resizePanel(event.clientX);
}
)
);
I have one variable isDragging: boolean, which I want to set to false, when mouseup occurs, e.g. after takeUntil in my code. It must be simple, but I can't figure it out.
You may want to try something like this
const onMouseMove = fromEvent(window, "mousemove");
const onMouseUp = fromEvent(window, "mouseup");
const resizePanel = onMouseMove
.pipe(
takeUntil(onMouseUp.pipe(tap(() => this.isDragging = false))),
map(
(event: MouseEvent) => {
this.isDragging = true;
this.resizePanel(event.clientX);
}
)
);
The idea is to add a pipe with tap operator to onMouseUp used as parameter for takeUntil
You could use combineLatest on onMouseMove$ and onMouseUp$ and use a finalise subject in takeUntil.
const { fromEvent, combineLatest, Subject } = rxjs;
const { takeUntil } = rxjs.operators;
const onMouseMove$ = fromEvent(window, "mousemove");
const onMouseUp$ = fromEvent(document, "mouseup");
const finalise = new Subject();
combineLatest(onMouseMove$, onMouseUp$).pipe(takeUntil(finalise)).subscribe(([onMouseMove, onMouseUp]) => {
if (onMouseUp) {
console.log('mouse up');
finalise.next(true);
finalise.complete();
}
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.3.3/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
You need to subscribe
const { fromEvent } = rxjs;
const onMouseUp$ = fromEvent(document, "mouseup");
onMouseUp$.subscribe(onMouseUp => {
console.log('mouse up');
});
<script src="https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/rxjs/6.3.3/rxjs.umd.min.js"></script>
takeUntil ends an observable, nothing happens after takeUntil.

Resources