When creating a file with zero size, I would like to set the logical size of the file to be bigger than zero size.
One drive shows for dehydrated files Size on disk with zero bytes and the Size
it will be shown to a value that is the bigger than zero.
Can this behavior be done through windows api functions?
Thanks.
Sample onedrive properties window for a file:
Related
I have a file on Windows machine with this size and i need to caclulate file size on disk from file size:
Size
3,06 MB (3.216.171 bytes)
Size on disk
3,07 MB (3.219.456 bytes)
I have 512 bytes/sector file system
How to calculate how many sectors I need to use, to store the file from file size?
I understand 3219456 / 512 = 6288, but how to calculate size on disk from file size?
Thare is a way to get size on disc from file size?
I miss something?
Your file length is 0x31132B.
The required storage (rounded up to the nearest cluster) is 0x312000. Your clusters are either 4kB (0x1000) or 8kB (0x2000).
This can be computed as:
clusterSize * ceil(fileSize * 1.0 / clusterSize)
(The 1.0 prevents integer division.) In integer math, it is:
clusterSize * (1 + (fileSize - 1) / clusterSize)
You get the cluster size from GetDiskFreeSpace, which you'll need to call anyway to figure out if your file will fit. See this existing answer:
Getting the cluster size of a hard drive (through code)
Of course, other things can affect the true storage used by storing a file... if a directory doesn't have enough space in its cluster for the new entry, if you are storing metadata with it that doesn't fit in the directory, if you have compression enabled. But for an "ordinary" file system, the above calculations will be correct.
I use NtQueryInformationFile with FILE_STANDARD_INFORMATION struct to retrieve the allocation size of file. But for small files it returns incorrect1 result. For example text file with size 1 byte returns 8 bytes allocation size, instead 4096 bytes. Where is problem?
1 I'm assuming that this value is incorrect, because Explorer (on Windows XP Checked Build in my case) the size on disk reports higher figures (4096 bytes for a file with size 1).
file size in EndOfFile member. AllocationSize - this is how many disk space allocated for file -
Usually, this value is a multiple of the sector or cluster size of the
underlying physical device.
When viewing details of a file using Finder, different values are shown for how much space the file occupies. For example, a file takes up 28.8KB of RAM but, 33KB of the disk. Anyone know the explanation?
Disk space is allocated in blocks. Meaning, in multiples of a "block size".
For example, on my system a 1 byte file is 4096 bytes on disk.
That's 1 byte of content & 4095 bytes of unused space.
Hello fellow programmers.
I'm trying to dump the contents of the USN Journal of a NTFS partition using WinIoCtl functions. I have the *USN_JOURNAL_DATA* structure that tells me that it has a maximum size of 512 MB. I have compared that to what fsutil has to say about it and it's the same value.
Now I have to read each entry into a *USN_RECORD* structure. I do this in a for loop that starts at 0 and goes to the journal's maximum size in increments of 4096 (the cluster size).
I read each 4096 bytes in a buffer of the same size and read all the USN_RECORD structures from it.
Everything is going great, file names are correct, timestamps as well, reasons, everything, except I seem to be missing some recent records. I create a new file on the partition, I write something in it and then I delete the file. I run the app again and the record doesn't appear. I find that the record appears only if I keep reading beyond the journal's maximum size. How can that be?
At the moment I'm reading from the start of the Journal's data to the maximum size + the allocation delta (both are values stored in the *USN_JOURNAL_DATA* structure) which I don't believe it's correct and I'm having trouble finding thorough information related to this.
Can someone please explain this? Is there a buffer around the USN Journal that's similar to how the MFT works (meaning it's size halves when disk space is needed for other files)?
What am I doing wrong?
That's the expected behaviour, as documented:
MaximumSize
The target maximum size for the change journal, in bytes. The change journal can grow larger than this value, but it is then truncated at the next NTFS file system checkpoint to less than this value.
Instead of trying to predetermine the size, loop until you reach the end of the data.
If you are using the FSCTL_ENUM_USN_DATA control code, you have reached the end of the data when the error code from DeviceIoControl is ERROR_HANDLE_EOF.
If you are using the FSCTL_READ_USN_JOURNAL control code, you have reached the end of the data when the next USN returned by the driver (the DWORDLONG at the beginning of the output buffer) is the USN you requested (the value of StartUsn in the input buffer). You will need to set the input parameter BytesToWaitFor to zero, otherwise the driver will wait for the specified amount of new data to be added to the journal.
i have a webhosting that gives maximum memory_limit of 80M (i.e. ini_set("memory_limit","80M");).
I'm using photo upload that uses the function imagecreatefromjpeg();
When i upload large images it gives the error
"Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 83886080 bytes exhausted"
What maximum size (in bytes) for the image i can restrict to the users?
or the memory_limit depends on some other factor?
The memory size of 8388608 is 8 Megabytes, not 80. You may want to check whether you can still increase the value somewhere.
Other than that, the general rule for image manipulation is that it will take at least
image width x image height x 3
bytes of memory to load or create an image. (One byte for red, one byte for green, one byte for blue, possibly one more for alpha transparency)
By that rule, a 640 x 480 pixel image will need at least 9.2 Megabytes of space - not including overhead and space occupied by the script itself.
It's impossible to determine a limit on the JPG file size in bytes because JPG is a compressed format with variable compression rates. You will need to go by image resolution and set a limit on that.
If you don't have that much memory available, you may want to look into more efficient methods of doing what you want, e.g. tiling (processing one part of an image at a time) or, if your provider allows it, using an external tool like ImageMagick (which consumes memory as well, but outside the PHP script's memory limit).
Probably your script uses more memory than the just the image itself. Trying debugging your memory consumption.
One quick-and-dirty way is to utilize memory_get_usage and memory_get_usage memory_get_peak_usage on certain points in your code and especially in a custom error_handler and shutdown_function. This can let you know what exact operations causes the memory exhaustion.