Running Selenium(TestNG) tests from Azure Devops - maven

I'm working on running my automation test scripts (which is a Maven project
based on java and using test ng ) in AzureDevops CI/CD pipeline. I have pushed all my code to Github and created a Maven task to run the tests.
But when I try to run the Maven task , it is not considering testng.xml, where I have all the tests configurations like which tests to be run(order of the tests) and other configuration stuff like listener to create some custom reports. It is just running all the test classes present in my complete Maven project.
Please help me which config / task I should in add in my build inorder for the test to run based on my testng.xml
Below is the Pom.xml
http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
4.0.0
TestAutomation
Test
0.0.1-SNAPSHOT
jar
Test
http://maven.apache.org
org.seleniumhq.selenium
selenium-java
3.14.0
org.testng
testng
6.11
compile
org.apache.poi
poi
3.16-beta2
com.relevantcodes
extentreports
2.41.2
commons-io
commons-io
2.6
log4j
log4j
1.2.17
com.googlecode.json-simple
json-simple
1.1.1
<!-- for gson https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.code.gson/gson -->
<dependency>
<groupId>com.google.code.gson</groupId>
<artifactId>gson</artifactId>
<version>2.8.6</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.7.0</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.0.0-M3</version>
<configuration>
<suiteXmlFiles>
<suiteXmlFile>testng.xml</suiteXmlFile>
</suiteXmlFiles>
<properties>
<property>
<name>listener</name>
<value>com.qa.ExtentReportListner.ExtentRerportListener</value>
</property>
</properties>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>

Related

Lombok with Netbeans/Maven Annotations are not Recognized/Working

I tried to update my existing Lombok version 1.16.16 to 1.18.2 in Netbeans 8.2 (maven multi-module project).
Unfortunately, all versions higher than 1.16.18 are not working. No annotation is recognized and I get compile errors in the IDE. The pure maven build is working.
You have to configure the maven compiler plugin. Add the following snippet to the build section of your pom (at best to your parent pom or to each project which is using Lombok).
If you already have a configuration of the build plugin in your pom make sure to add the <annotationProcessorPaths> section.
This will ensure that Lombok is available during the compiling process to manipulate the AST.
pom.xml - snippet
...
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>3.8.0</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
<annotationProcessorPaths>
<path>
<groupId>org.projectlombok</groupId>
<artifactId>lombok</artifactId>
<version>1.18.2</version>
</path>
</annotationProcessorPaths>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
...

Jenkins SonarQube plugin Multi Module Code Coverage Not Displaying

so we have a Spring Boot maven based project, which we split into multi modules which all works perfectly fine in unit tests and Jenkins, but coverage is not showing up in Sonar at all.
This is the structure of our application:
ApplicationRoot
-SharedCommonModule
--main
---java
-----com...(SomeModule.java)
--test
----com....(SomeModuleTest.java)
-ApplicationModule
--main
---java
-----com...(Application.java)
--test
----com....(ApplicationTest.java)
Parent pom file config:
<properties>
<!-- Sonar -->
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.dynamicAnalysis>reuseReports</sonar.dynamicAnalysis>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<sonar.language>java</sonar.language>
<jacoco.destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</jacoco.destFile>
</properties>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>0.7.5.201505241946</version>
<configuration>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
<append>true</append>
</configuration>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>agent</id>
<goals>
<goal>prepare-agent</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
SharedCommonModule pom:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Main ApplicationModule pom file:
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<configuration>
<mainClass>com.org.Application</mainClass>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
Jenkins SonarQube plugin configuration:
sonar.projectKey=com.Application
sonar.projectName=ApplicationModule
sonar.projectVersion=1.0.0.${BUILD_NUMBER}
sonar.sources=src/main
sonar.tests=src/test
sonar.java.binaries=target/classes
sonar.jacoco.reportPaths=target/jacoco.exec
sonar.modules=ApplicationModule,SharedCommonModule
ApplicationModule.sonar.projectName=ApplicationModule
SharedCommonModule.sonar.projectName=SharedCommonModule
We have researched and tried to hack it together from multiple examples, but nothing seems to work - closest we've got, is for Sonar to show some coverage, while some classes would show 0% coverage even though we know for sure we have UTs that used those classes (tested via IntelliJ).
So, without without the added properties and build xml sections above, we get partial coverage, only for ApplicaitonModule, I think all reported uncovered classes, belong to SharedCommonModule
EDIT: I want to clarify, the combined jacoco.exec file does show coverage for classes when loaded in IntelliJ Coverage tool, but Sonar does not show coverage for the very same classes in its report (which is generated only when I remove the build and properties xml elements in the parent pom).
Please help :)
You have Maven projects, so you should start using Sonar Scanner for Maven.
It is smart enough to generate all parameters for you.
If you remove:
<sonar.jacoco.reportPath>${project.basedir}/../target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPath>
<jacoco.destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</jacoco.destFile>
<destFile>${sonar.jacoco.reportPath}</destFile>
Jenkins SonarQube plugin configuration
add to parent pom file:
<name>ApplicationModule</name>
<properties>
<sonar.sources>src/main</sonar.sources>
<sonar.tests>src/test</sonar.tests>
<sonar.projectKey>com.Application</sonar.projectKey>
</properties>
add to SharedCommonModule pom file:
<name>SharedCommonModule</name>
add to ApplicationModule.pom file:
<name>ApplicationModule</name>
and finally execute:
mvn sonar:sonar -Dsonar.projectVersion="1.0.0.${BUILD_NUMBER}"
After that you should see missing coverage data.
Btw. it is not recomended to set sonar.projectKey for Maven projects. I set it to the same value, so your project will be accessible under the same link.

OSGi Code coverage - Jacoco + Easymock

I'm currently working on a Java OSGi project(based on Apache felix runtime) with a project setup like the one below:
pkg | parent maven project
persistence | real plugin
persistence.tests | test plugin (indeed a Fragment project with fragment host the persistence plugin above )
... others like the ones above
Basically I use maven + tycho to manage the lifecycle of the project. the whole stuff flows through a continuos integration pipeline which involves jenkins for building, testing, deploying and forwarding code analysis to a Sonarqube server. Just like mentioned above, tests are implemented through Fragment projects pointing OSGi bundles to be tested. In these tests I make use of EasyMock library to generate mocked OSGi bundles.
In order to make Sonarqube aware of tests coverage I had to add Jacoco (maven plugin) into my sets of tools. After a few adjustments to the configuration of my parent pom.xml file I ended up with something that is working partially: jacoco code coverage is only working for classes included in test plugins (the fragment projects). As you may guess - though better than nothing - this result is far from being useful. I need to evalute test coverage on real OSGi bundles. After some googling I understood that the problem could be linked to the usage of EasyMock library, since this alterate original classes during execution causing a mismatch between test classes and real classes. According to my understanding, to solve I need to disable jacoco on-the-fly instrumentation and use offline instrumentation instead.
Nevertheless I'm not able to understand :
what does this really means
how to do it
Can someone kindly revert on this ?
This is the maven command i'm running to generate jacoco report
mvn -f com.mycompany.osgi.myproject.pkg/pom.xml clean test
Below my current parent pom.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><project
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"
xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.mycompany.osgi</groupId>
<artifactId>com.mycompany.osgi.myproject.pkg</artifactId>
<packaging>pom</packaging>
<version>1.0.0</version>
<properties>
<tycho.version>1.0.0</tycho.version>
<surefire.version>2.16</surefire.version>
<main.basedir>${project.basedir}</main.basedir>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<jacoco.version>0.7.9</jacoco.version>
<!-- Sonar-JaCoCo properties -->
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.junit.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/target/surefire-reports</sonar.junit.reportPaths>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>${project.basedir}/target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
</properties>
<modules>
<module>../com.mycompany.osgi.myproject.core.persistence</module>
<module>../com.mycompany.osgi.myproject.core.persistence.tests</module>
</modules>
<build>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
</plugin>
</plugins>
<pluginManagement>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.eclipse.tycho</groupId>
<artifactId>tycho-compiler-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${tycho.version}</version>
<configuration>
<source>1.8</source>
<target>1.8</target>
<encoding>UTF-8</encoding>
</configuration>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.eclipse.tycho</groupId>
<artifactId>tycho-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${tycho.version}</version>
<extensions>true</extensions>
</plugin>
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${surefire.version}</version>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.surefire</groupId>
<artifactId>surefire-junit47</artifactId>
<version>${surefire.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
<executions>
<execution>
<id>test</id>
<phase>test</phase>
<configuration>
<testClassesDirectory>${project.build.outputDirectory}</testClassesDirectory>
</configuration>
<goals>
<goal>test</goal>
</goals>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</pluginManagement>
</build>
<repositories>
...
</repositories>
<distributionManagement>
...
</distributionManagement>
As suggested by #Godin, my problems were solved using the following jacoco plugin configurations
<plugin>
<groupId>org.jacoco</groupId>
<artifactId>jacoco-maven-plugin</artifactId>
<version>${jacoco.version}</version>
<configuration>
<dataFile>../com.mycompany.myproject.pkg/target/jacoco.exec</dataFile>
<destFile>../com.mycompany.myproject.pkg/target/jacoco.exec</destFile>
<outputDirectory>../com.mycompany.myproject.pkg/target/site/jacoco</outputDirectory>
</configuration>
</plugin>
and this project configuration to instruct sonarqube to read expected resources
<properties>
...
<!-- Sonar-JaCoCo properties -->
<sonar.java.coveragePlugin>jacoco</sonar.java.coveragePlugin>
<sonar.junit.reportPaths>com.mycompany.myproject.pkg/target/surefire-reports</sonar.junit.reportPaths>
<sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>com.mycompany.myproject.pkg/target/jacoco.exec</sonar.jacoco.reportPaths>
</properties>

Openshift 3 WAR

In the Openshift 2 I had such a profile in a pom.xml file:
<profile>
<!-- openshift red hat cloud build profile -->
<id>openshift</id>
<build>
<finalName>${project.artifactId}</finalName>
<plugins>
<plugin>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.1.1</version>
<configuration>
<outputDirectory>webapps</outputDirectory>
<warName>${project.artifactId}</warName>
</configuration>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
</profile>
and this was responsible for putting a WAR file to directory from where it was automatically deployed to Tomcat-like-jboss.
Now - in Openshift 3 - by using browser-embeded ssh console I checked that WAR files were build and put into /tmp/src/webapps directory. Where should I move it (how should I modify the Maven profile) to make new Openshift 3 Tomcat-like-jboss deploy it and host it?
I've found the answear - the correct outputDirectory is target, so the WAR plugin looks now:
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-war-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3</version>
<configuration>
<failOnMissingWebXml>false</failOnMissingWebXml>
<outputDirectory>target</outputDirectory>
<warName>ROOT</warName>
</configuration>
</plugin>
I've found it there: https://github.com/gshipley/book-helloworld/blob/master/pom.xml - in a sample OpenShift app. Now my WAR are being deployed to the WildFly!
Moreover - this free e-book is really heplful: https://www.openshift.com/promotions/for-developers.html.

Linkage failure when running Apache Flink jobs

I have a job developed in Flink 0.9 that is using the graph module (Gelly). The job is running successfully within the IDE (Eclipse) but after exporting it to a JAR using maven (mvn clean install) it fails to execute on the local flink instance with the following error
"The program's entry point class 'myclass' could not be loaded due to a linkage failure"
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/apache/flink/graph/GraphAlgorithm
Any idea why is this happening and how to solve it?
It looks like the code of flink-gelly did not end up in your jar file.
The most obvious reason for this issue is the missing maven dependency in your project's pom file. But I assume the dependency is present, otherwise developing the job in the IDE would be impossible.
Most likely, the jar file has been created by the maven-jar-plugin, which is not including dependencies.
Try adding the following fragment to your pom.xml:
<build>
<plugins>
<!-- We use the maven-shade plugin to create a fat jar that contains all dependencies
except flink and it's transitive dependencies. The resulting fat-jar can be executed
on a cluster. Change the value of Program-Class if your program entry point changes. -->
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<version>2.3</version>
<executions>
<!-- Run shade goal on package phase -->
<execution>
<phase>package</phase>
<goals>
<goal>shade</goal>
</goals>
<configuration>
<filters>
<filter>
<artifact>org.apache.flink:*</artifact>
<excludes>
<exclude>org/apache/flink/shaded/**</exclude>
<exclude>web-docs/**</exclude>
</excludes>
</filter>
</filters>
<transformers>
<!-- add Main-Class to manifest file -->
<transformer implementation="org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.ManifestResourceTransformer">
<mainClass>YOURMAINCLASS</mainClass>
</transformer>
</transformers>
<createDependencyReducedPom>false</createDependencyReducedPom>
</configuration>
</execution>
</executions>
</plugin>
</plugins>
</build>
<profiles>
<profile>
<!-- A profile that does everyting correctly:
We set the Flink dependencies to provided -->
<id>build-jar</id>
<activation>
<activeByDefault>false</activeByDefault>
</activation>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
<artifactId>flink-java</artifactId>
<version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
<artifactId>flink-streaming-core</artifactId>
<version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.flink</groupId>
<artifactId>flink-clients</artifactId>
<version>0.9-SNAPSHOT</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</profile>
</profiles>
Now, you can build the jar using mvn clean package -Pbuild-jar.
The jar file will now be located in the target/ directory.
You can manually check whether the jar (zip) file contains class files in /org/apache/flink/graph/

Resources