This is my table;
#Table
public class Opinion {
private String text;
#PrimaryKeyColumn(type = PrimaryKeyType.PARTITIONED)
private String topic;
#PrimaryKeyColumn(type = PrimaryKeyType.PARTITIONED)
private String owner;
#PrimaryKeyColumn(type = PrimaryKeyType.CLUSTERED)
private LocalDateTime createdDate;
...
}
How can I declare a Repository for this table with a composite primary key? This is what I have now but it does not work, probably because of the ID part, since my id is not just a string but a composite one.
#Repository
public interface OpinionRepository extends CassandraRepository<Opinion, String> {
....
}
By the way I would be glad to hear your experiences whether Cassandra plays nicely with Spring Data or not.. Actually I have been using Spring Data for a while, and I have to say that this time with Cassandra was everything different. Even for some very simple stuff which one can deal with easily on other databases, I have hard time figuring it out. And some of the stuff was not supported at all.. So I am actually very disappointed about Cassandra-Spring Boot interplay.
Related
I am exploring possible ideas when it comes to designing the one-to-one and one-to-many relationships while using Spring Data R2DBC.
As Spring Data R2DBC still do not support relationships natively there is still a need to handle those on our own (unlike Spring Data JDBC).
What I would imagine that when it comes to one-to-one mapping, the implementation could look like this:
#Table("account")
public class Account {
#Id
private Long id;
#Transient // one-to-one
private Address address;
}
#Table("address")
public class Address {
#Id
private Integer id;
}
while the database schema would be defined as follows:
--address
CREATE TABLE address
(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY
)
--account
CREATE TABLE account
(
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
address_id INTEGER REFERENCES address(id)
)
As the Account object is my aggregate root what I would imagine is that I am supposed to load the Address object with it following the advice of Jens Schaduer:
An aggregate is a cluster of objects that form a unit, which should
always be consistent. Also, it should always get persisted (and
loaded) together.
source: Spring Data JDBC, References, and Aggregates
This leads me to thinking that in case of one-to-one relationships like this one I in fact should have my Account entity defined like this:
#Table("account")
public class Account {
#Id
private Long id;
#Transient // one-to-one
private Address address;
#Column("address_id")
private Integer addressId;
}
and later on to recreate the full Account aggregate entity with an Address I would write something like:
#Service
public class AccountServiceImpl implements AccountService {
private final AccountRepository accountRepository;
private final AddressRepository addressRepository;
public AccountServiceImpl(AccountRepository accountRepository,
AddressRepository addressRepository) {
this.accountRepository = accountRepository;
this.addressRepository = addressRepository;
}
#Override
public Mono<Account> loadAccount(Integer id) {
return accountRepository.getAccountById(id)
.flatMap(account ->
Mono.just(account)
.zipWith(addressRepository.getAddressByAccountId(account.getAddressId()))
.map(result -> {
result.getT1().setAddress(result.getT2());
return result.getT1();
})
);
}
}
If that is not the case, how else should I handle one-to-one relationships while using Spring Data R2DBC?
I think your approach is reasonable. There are just a couple of nitpicks:
Do you need the flatMap -> Mono.just ? Can't you just use map directly?
I wouldn't consider this a service, but a repository (it's just not implemented by Spring Data directly.
You might be able to that code in a after load callback.
We have model class saved in Redis as mentioned below:-
#Data
#NoArgsConstructor
#AllArgsConstructor
#RedisHash("book")
public class Book implements Serializable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 2208852329346517265L;
#Id
private Integer bookID;
#Indexed
private String title;
#Indexed
private String authors;
private String averageRating;
private String isbn;
private String languageCode;
private String ratingsCount;
private BigDecimal price;
}
We have title and authors as our indexed property.
Now we wanted to search all the records from Redis by passing title and a list of authors using the spring crud repository as mentioned below.
public interface BookSpringRepository extends CrudRepository<Book, String> {
List<Book> findAllByTitleAndAuthors(String title, List<String> authors);
}
Service layer:-
#Override
public Optional<List<Book>> searchBooksByTitleAndAuthorNames(String title, List<String>
autherNames) {
return Optional.ofNullable(bookSpringRepository.findAllByTitleAndAuthors(title,
autherNames));
}
Here we are getting below exception
Unable to fetch data from Spring data Redis cache using List of Integer or
String.
Getting error while fetching - "Resolved
[org.springframework.core.convert.ConversionFailedException: Failed to convert from type
[java.lang.String] to type [byte] for value 'Ronak';
nested exception is java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: "Ronak"]."
We would not want to convert the list of string/integer to byte as it is a time-consuming process and as we tried took so much amount of time. Also when the results are retrieved we will again have to convert back to normal integer or string values.
The other option is to loop through the list and pass a single value at a time to the Redis crud repository and this time Redis crud repository is happy but that will be a loop call to Redis and network latency.
We cannot add ID attributes on authors' property as these can be duplicate records.
Does the spring crud repository support the LIKE query in search that way we can create a unique id having these authors' names and make put ID annotation on that new derived property to search the records using spring crud repository using LIKE or contains kind of query.
Any suggestions here are highly appreciated!!
Try to add serialization to your redis key and value. This might help :
https://medium.com/#betul5634/redis-serialization-with-spring-redis-data-lettuce-codec-1a1d2bc73d26
As Spring jpa Provides some usefull features to find Items from a repository by defining it in the method name. e .x findByTitle(String title) then Spring is automatically searching the Title Colum for the given String. If i have an int column named numberOfCopies and i want only to find the datasets with >0 greater then null how would define such a method ?
to filter out those books with the numberOfCopies equals 0 = zero
#Entity
public class Book {
#Id
private int id;
private String title;
private int numberOfCopies;
}
can i use the Repomethod
public List findBooksByNumberOfCopies.greater then 0 ?To Use this Spring Feature without some if or for loops
First, you should use Integer, since it is better, in my opinion, to use wrapper classes than to primitives, and enforce not null requirement through annotations, e.g. #Column(nullable = false)
#Entity
public class Book {
#Id
private Integer id;
private String title;
private Integer numberOfCopies;
}
Then you can add the following two methods in your BookRepository;
List<Book> findByNumberOfCopiesGreaterThan(Integer numberOfCopies);
default List<Book> findAllAvailableBooks() {
return findByNumberOfCopiesGreaterThan(0);
}
and use the default findAllAvailableBooks method, with hardcoded 0 value which is your requirement.
you can easily use
List<Book> findByNumberOfCopiesGreaterThanEqual(int numberOfCopies);
Pretty sure this would work:
public interface BookRepo extends JpaRepository<Book, Integer> {
#Query("SELECT b FROM Book b WHERE b.numberOfCopies >= 0")
public Optional<List<Book>> getTheBooksWithMultCopies();
}
// back in your component class:
{
...
Optional<List<Book>> optionalBookList = myBookRepo.getTheBooksWithMultCopies();
if (optionalBookList.isPresent()){
List<Book> bookList = optionalBookList.get();
}
}
Note that the language within the query is called HQL, which is what is used by Hibernate internally (which is used by JPA internally). It's really not very intimidating - just, know that you the objects in your POJO, which map to your database table, rather than your database table directly.
Also, I'd recommend using Integer over int in entity classes, at least if your value is nullable. Otherwise, numberOfCopies will always default to 0, which may not be desirable and may cause exceptions that are difficult to decipher.
GreaterThanEqual takes an Integer not int
List<Book> findByNumberOfCopiesGreaterThanEqual(Integer numberOfCopies);
I have a database table which holds Metadata for documents. My task now is to get a list with documenttypes. The documenttypes are not unique in the database table but of course I want them to be in my list. The sql is very simple:
SELECT DISTINCT groupname, group_displayorder
FROM t_doc_metadata
ORDER BY group_displayorder;
I have learned that I can use projections to get a subset of fields from my entity DocMetadata. I solved this as follows. My Entity:
#Entity
#Table(name="T_DOC_METADATA")
#Data
public class DocMetadata {
..............
#Column(nullable=false)
private String displayname;
#Column(nullable=false)
private Integer displayorder;
#Column(nullable=false)
private String groupname;
#Column(name="GROUP_DISPLAYORDER",
nullable=false)
private Integer groupDisplayorder;
#Column(name="METADATA_CHANGED_TS",
nullable=false,
columnDefinition="char")
private String metadataChangedTimestamp;
..........
}
My inteface for projection:
public interface GroupnameAndOrder {
String getGroupname();
Integer getGroupDisplayorder();
void setGroupname(String name);
void setGroupDisplayorder(int order);
}
Now I thought I'd be extraordinary clever by adding these lines to my repository:
#Query("select distinct d.groupname, d.groupDisplayorder from DocMetadata d order by d.groupDisplayorder")
public List<GroupnameAndOrder> findSortedGroupnames();
Sadly, when iterating over the result list and calling getGroupname() the result is null.
So I changed the lines in my repository according to the documentation:
public List<GroupnameAndOrder> findBy();
Now I get the groupnames but of course they are not unique now. So it doesn't solve my problem.
Is there any way to receive a ordered list with unique groupnames?
You are trying to be too clever. Instead just write the proper find method and return the GroupnameAndOrder. Spring Data JPA will then only retrieve what is needed for the projection.
Something like this should do the trick.
List<GroupnameAndOrder> findDistinctByOrderByGroupDisplayorder();
First let me say I'm a complete novice with Spring AOP, and I apologize if this is a duplicate question.
Here's my scenario:
Let's say I have the following domain class:
#Entity(name="MyTable")
#Table(name="MY_TABLE")
public class MyTable {
private static final long serialVersionUID = 1234567890123456L;
#Id
#Column(name = "USER_ID")
private Long userID;
#Transient
private String key;
#Column(name = "KEY")
private String secureKey;
/* Other columns */
/* Getters and Setters */
}
and I have the following JPARepository class to manage it:
#Repository
public interface MyTableRepository extends JpaRepository<MyTable, Long> {
/* findBy methods */
}
As you can see, I have a secureKey field and a transient key field. In this case secureKey is an encrypted version of key.
What I need is for the secureKey value to be populated before a domain object is saved, and for the key value to be populated after a domain object is fetched. (This is a trivial example but in the real case I have multiple transient and encrypted values.) The idea is for the secure values to be persisted to the DB, but users of the domain class will only need to work with the "insecure" values.
Currently I'm handling this in my service layer. After I call a fetch method I'm populating the transient values, and before calling a save method I'm populating the "secure" values. This is working as expected but ideally I'd like this to be managed transparently, because now the burden is on each developer to remember to update those values after fetching or before saving.
I'm assuming the best way to handle this would be through some AOP class, but I confess I have little to no idea where to begin there. Is this a common scenario, and if so, would someone be willing to point me in the right direction? Also, if you have a suggestion for a better way to implement this decrypted/encrypted field pair scenario, please let me know.
Ideally I'd like to be able to add an annotation to both the secure and insecure fields, maybe pointing to each other, maybe something like:
#Insecure(secureValue = "secureKey")
#Transient
private String key;
#Secure(insecureValue = "key")
#Column(name = "KEY")
private String secureKey;
Any assistance you could provide is most appreciated.
Thanks,
B.J.
I think Spring AOP isn't the correct technology in your use case, i would recommend to use EntityListeners.
Hibernate: https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/entitymanager/3.5/reference/en/html/listeners.html
Eclipselink: https://wiki.eclipse.org/EclipseLink/Release/2.5/JPA21#CDI_Entity_Listeners