First plugin with XD and i can't seem to create a instance of class Color.
Their documentation doesn't show any examples and any that i find in other examples just shows new Color() and that i don't have to perform any require.
https://adobexdplatform.com/plugin-docs/reference/Color.html
Plugin ReferenceError: Color is not defined
at exportToBmpFunction (C:\Users\<useR>\AppData\Local\Packages\Adobe.CC.XD_adky2gkssdxte\LocalState\develop\BMP_Export\main.js:21:21)
What am i doing wrong?
async function exportToBmpFunction(selection) {
if (selection.items.length == 0) {
return;
}
// Generate PNG rendition of the selected node
let application = require("application");
let scenegraph = require("scenegraph");
let fs = require("uxp").storage.localFileSystem;
let shape = selection.items[0];
let file = await fs.getFileForSaving('what.png', { types: ["png"] });
let renditions = [{
node: shape,
outputFile: file,
type: application.RenditionType.PNG,
scale: 1,
background: new Color('#FF00CD', 1)
}];
application.createRenditions(renditions).then(function(results) {
// ...do something with outputFiles on disk...
});
}
module.exports = {
commands: {
exportToBmp: exportToBmpFunction
}
};
Turns out after digging through other classes in the same 'namespace' that their documentation is just flat out wrong in some places. This is what it should be.
const Color = require("scenegraph").Color;
let color = new Color('#FF00CD');
This happens to be in direct contradiction to examples of use of Color in the docs.
Yay for freehanding code!
Related
There is a way to change a background or text color to a row in PrimeReact Datatable that is using rowClassName={rowClass} where rowClass is a function that allows returning a class configured in the CSS file.
but... what if I want to choose an arbitrary color? for example, one fetched from a database in #RRGGBB format?
Reading de documentation I can't see a way to call a function to return the style string. Another way could be, creating dynamically the class name, for example...
class RRGGBB for a selected color, define this class with background: #RRGGBB and let rowClassName={rowClass} call rowClass function returning this dynamically created class...
I have this approach, but don't work:
const mycolor = "#00ff00";
function createStyle() {
const style = document.createElement("style");
// add CSS styles
style.innerHTML = `
.lulu {
color: white;
background-color: ${mycolor};
}
`;
// append the style to the DOM in <head> section
document.head.appendChild(style);
}
createStyle();
const rowClass = (data) => {
return {
"lulu": data.category === "Accessories"
};
};
.....
<DataTable value={products} rowClassName={rowClass}>
this code is a modified version of the sample code by prime react, here, in sandbox:
https://codesandbox.io/s/o6k1n
thanks!
I have solved it...
What I did is to create a dynamic css, and then use it:
function createStyle(color) {
var style = document.getElementsByTagName("style");
var colortag = color.replace("#", "mycolor");
//Assuming there is a style section in the head
var pos = style[0].innerHTML.indexOf(colortag);
if(pos<0)
style[1].innerHTML += "."+colortag+`
{
color: ${color}!important;
}
`;
return colortag;
const rowClass = (data) => {
var colortag;
if (data.COLOR!=undefined)
colortag=createStyle(data.COLOR);
return { [colortag]: ata.COLOR!=undefined };
}
<DataTable ref={dt} value={Data} rowClassName={rowClass}>
<column>......</column>
</DataTable>
With this code, if in the data there is a field called COLOR:"#RRGGBB" then it will create a style with this color and use it as text color. The same can be applied to background or whatever
I would like to use the "zoomToMapObject" method based on a selection on a dropdown menu.
For some reason the start zoom location is the middle of the map and not the set the geoPoint.
(The zooming works but the start location make it look a bit weird.)
My current approach looks like this:
const duration = this.chart.zoomToMapObject(selectedPoloygon, this.countryZoom, true).duration;
setTimeout(() => {
this.chart.homeGeoPoint = geoPoint;
this.chart.homeZoomLevel = this.countryZoom;
}, duration);
this.handleCountrySelection(selectedPoloygon);
Somehow even setting the homeGeoPoint / homeZoomLevel doesn't affect next zoom actions.
**UPDATE: Workaround heavy cost (from 1300 nodes to over 9000) **
I examined the problem a step further. It seems the middle point gets set when I push a new mapImageSeries into the map.
My workarround currently is to draw all points on the map and hide them.
Then after I select a country I change the state to visible.
However this approach is very costly. The DOM-Nodes rises from 1300 to ~ 9100.
My other approach with creating them after a country has been selected AND the zoom animation finished was much more
effective. But due to the map starting every time for a center location it is not viable? Or did I do s.th. wrong?
Here is my current code which is not performant:
// map.ts
export class MapComponent implements AfterViewInit, OnDestroy {
imageSeriesMap = {};
// ... standard map initialization ( not in zone of course )
// creating the "MapImages" which is very costly
this.dataService.getCountries().forEach(country => {
const imageSeriesKey = country.id;
const imageSeriesVal = chart.series.push(new am4maps.MapImageSeries()); // takes arround 1-2 ms -> 300 x 2 ~ 500 ms.
const addressForCountry = this.dataService.filterAddressToCountry(country.id); // returns "DE" or "FR" for example.
const imageSeriesTemplate = imageSeriesVal.mapImages.template;
const circle = imageSeriesTemplate.createChild(am4core.Circle);
circle.radius = 4;
circle.fill = am4core.color(this.colorRed);
circle.stroke = am4core.color('#FFFFFF');
circle.strokeWidth = 2;
circle.nonScaling = true;
circle.tooltipText = '{title}';
imageSeriesTemplate.propertyFields.latitude = 'latitude';
imageSeriesTemplate.propertyFields.longitude = 'longitude';
imageSeriesVal.data = addressForCountry.map(address => {
return {
latitude: Number.parseFloat(address.lat),
longitude: Number.parseFloat(address.long),
title: address.company
};
});
imageSeriesVal.visible = false;
this.imageSeriesMap[imageSeriesKey] = imageSeriesVal;
});
// clicking on the map
onSelect(country) {
this.imageSeriesMap[country].visible = true;
setTimeout( () => {
const chartPolygons = <any>this.chart.series.values[0];
const polygon = chartPolygons.getPolygonById(country);
const anim = this.chart.zoomToMapObject(polygon, 1, true, 1000);
anim.events.on('animationended', () => {});
this.handleCountrySelection(polygon);
}, 100);
});
}
handleCountrySelection(polygon: am4maps.MapPolygon) {
if (this.selectedPolygon && this.selectedPolygon !== polygon) {
this.selectedPolygon.isActive = false;
}
polygon.isActive = true;
const geoPoint: IGeoPoint = {
latitude: polygon.latitude,
longitude: polygon.longitude
};
this.chart.homeGeoPoint = geoPoint;
this.chart.homeZoomLevel = this.countryZoom;
this.selectedPolygon = polygon;
}
}
Thanks to your thorough followup I was able to replicate the issue. The problem you were having is triggered by any one of these steps:
dynamically pushing a MapImageSeries to the chart
dynamically creating a MapImage via data (also please note in the pastebind you provided, data expects an array, I had to change that while testing)
In either step, the chart will fully zoom out as if resetting itself. I'm going to look into why this is happening and if it can be changed, so in the meantime let's see if the workaround below will work for you.
If we only use a single MapImageSeries set in advance (I don't particularly see a reason to have multiple MapImageSeries, would one not do?), that eliminates problem 1 from occurring. Asides from data, we can create() MapImages manually via mapImageSeries.mapImages.create(); then assign their latitude and longitude properties manually, too. With that, problem 2 does not occur either, and we seem to be good.
Here's a demo with a modified version of the pastebin:
https://codepen.io/team/amcharts/pen/c460241b0efe9c8f6ab1746f44d666af
The changes are that the MapImageSeries code is taken out of the createMarkers function so it only happens once:
const mapImageSeries = chart.series.push(new am4maps.MapImageSeries());
const imageSeriesTemplate = mapImageSeries.mapImages.template;
const circle = imageSeriesTemplate.createChild(am4core.Circle);
circle.radius = 10;
circle.fill = am4core.color('#ff0000');
circle.stroke = am4core.color('#FFFFFF');
circle.strokeWidth = 2;
circle.nonScaling = true;
circle.tooltipText = 'hi';
In this case, there's no need to pass chart to createMarkers and return it, so I've passed polygon instead just to demo dynamic latitude/longitudes, I also assign our new MapImage to the polygon's data (dataItem.dataContext) so we can refer to it later. Here's the new body of createMarkers:
function createMarkers(polygon) {
console.log('calling createMarkers');
if ( !polygon.dataItem.dataContext.redDot) {
const dataItem = polygon.dataItem;
// Object notation for making a MapImage
const redDot = mapImageSeries.mapImages.create();
// Note the lat/long are direct properties
redDot.id = `reddot-${dataItem.dataContext.id}`;
// attempt to make a marker in the middle of the country (note how this is inaccurate for US since we're getting the center for a rectangle, but it's not a rectangle)
redDot.latitude = dataItem.north - (dataItem.north - dataItem.south)/2;
redDot.longitude = dataItem.west - (dataItem.west - dataItem.east)/2;;
dataItem.dataContext.redDot = redDot;
}
}
There's no need for the animationended event or anything, it just works since there is no longer anything interfering with your code. You should also have your performance back.
Will this work for you?
Original answer prior to question's edits below:
I am unable to replicate the behavior you mentioned. Also, I don't know what this.countryZoom is.
Just using the following in a button handler...
chart.zoomToMapObject(polygon);
...seems to zoom just fine to the country, regardless of the current map position/zoomLevel.
If you need to time something after the zoom animation has ended, the zoomToMapObject returns an Animation, you can use its 'animationended' event, e.g.
const animation = this.chart.zoomToMapObject(selectedPoloygon, this.countryZoom, true);
animation.events.on("animationended", () => {
// ...
});
Here's an example with all that with 2 external <button>s, one for zooming to USA and the other Brazil:
https://codepen.io/team/amcharts/pen/c1d1151803799c3d8f51afed0c6eb61d
Does this help? If not, could you possibly provide a minimal example so we can replicate the issue you're having?
I am working on a project for my programming class. I'd like to essentially have a canvas with a background element (say a room.jpg) and then maybe three interactive objects in the room (lamp.jpg, couch.jpg, desk.jpg). I'd like for it to be that if you hover over the lamp a small box or text pops out, giving you some information. Or maybe have it so if you click an image, the same concept happens. You know, something interactive with the objects in the canvas. Again, I'm new to canvas but we have to use it in our assignment. My current code is:
function loadImages(sources, callback) {
var images = {};
var loadedImages = 0;
var numImages = 0;
// get num of sources
for(var src in sources) {
numImages++;
}
for(var src in sources) {
images[src] = new Image();
images[src].onload = function() {
if(++loadedImages >= numImages) {
callback(images);
}
};
images[src].src = sources[src];
}
}
var sources = {
room: 'room.jpg',
title: 'title.jpg'
};
loadImages(sources, function(images) {
context.drawImage(images.room, 0,0);
context.drawImage(images.title, 0,0);
});
}
But from what I understand, it makes the two jpegs a "permanent" canvas element (unable to be messed with). I had been trying to get it so that when I clicked I'd go from the title.jpg to the room.jpg but I've since given up. Essentially, all I want now is just to have the room.jpg appear when the page is first loaded, and have three other png objects on top (as objects in the room). Are these able to be interacted with, or do I have to put the images into the canvas in another way? Thanks for all your help and your patience!
// --- Image Loader ----
var images = {};
var loadedImages = 0;
var pictures = {
room: 'room.jpg',
title: 'title.jpg'
lamp1: 'lampoff.jpg'
lamp2: 'lampon.jpg'
};
function loadImages(sources, callback) {
var numImages = 0;
for(var src in sources)numImages++;
for(var src in sources) {
images[src] = new Image();
images[src].onload = function() {
if(++loadedImages >= numImages) {
callback(images);
}
};
images[src].src = sources[src];
}
}
// --- Mouse Down Functionality ----
$('#canvas').addEventListener('mouseDown', function(e){
if(e.clientX){
var rect = this.getBoundingClientRect();
if(rect) clickCanvas(e.clientX - rect.left, e.clientY - rect.top)
else clickCanvas(e.clientX - this.offsetLeft, e.clientY - this.offsetTop);
}else if(e.offsetX) clickCanvas(e.offsetX, e.offsetY);
else if(e.layerX) clickCanvas(e.layerX, e.layerY);
else console.warn("Couldn't Determine Mouse Coordinates");
})
var lampOn;
function drawCanvas(showLamp){
lampOn = showLamp;
canvas.width = canvas.width //clears canvas
context.drawImage(images.room, 0,0);
context.drawImage(images.title, 0,0);
if(lampOn){
context.drawImage(images.lamp2, 100,100);
}else{
context.drawImage(images.lamp1, 100,100);
}
}
function clickCanvas(x,y){
console.log('clicked canvas at:',x,y)
if(clickedLamp){
drawCanvas(!lampOn)
}
}
loadImages(pictures, function(images) {
drawCanvas(false)
});
Make sure to replace "clickedLamp" and "#canvas"! The idea here is that you redraw the same canvas, using the same function. Everytime you modify any of it, you rerender ALL of it. See if you can get this example working, it will help clarify alot. If you don't understand something comment
when I click on a marker the map always re-pans and zooms to the initial state. Not such a big deal for a single marker but if I start with a cluster, zoom in and then click on a marker there is the problem. It zooms out, reclusters and then pops up the window. Anybody come across this issue?
This is what it looks like:
Here is the relevant code:
var loc = { latitude: item.Latitude, longitude: item.Longitude };
var marker = { location: loc, label: item.Label, id: item.Id, value: item.Value,showWindow:false };
markers.push(marker);
marker.onClick = function () {
if ($scope.$$phase || $scope.$root.$$phase) {
this.model.showWindow = true;
} else {
var self = this;
$scope.$apply(function() {
self.model.showWindow = true;
});
}
};
And the markup. This is in another directive that allows me to just keep a list of different layer types:
'<markers models="mylayer.locations" coords="\'location\'" doRebuildAll="true" idKey="\'id\'" doCluster="true" fit="true" options="mylayer.options" click="\'onClick\'">' +
'<windows show="\'showWindow\'" doRebuildAll="false" disableAutoPan="true" data-ng-if="mylayer.options.clickable" ng-cloak>' +
'<div>hello</div>' +
'</windows>' +
'</markers>'
Turns out the problem happened when updating from version 1.1.0 of angular-google-maps.js to version 1.1.4. Reverted and it works fine now.
I'm generating street view static images like so:
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/streetview?size=1080x400&location=%s&fov=90&heading=235&pitch=0&key=%s
If you visit that link you see an image that says, "Sorry, we have no imagery for this..."
Is there any way to detect this "sorry" state so that I can fall back to another image?
One quick solution would be to load the image file using xmlrpc and check that its md5sum is 30234b543d5438e0a0614bf07f1ebd25, or that its size is 1717 bytes (it's unlikely that another image can have exactly the same size), but that's not very robust since I have seen Google change the position of the text in the image. Though it's a very good start for a prototype.
You could go for image processing instead. Note that it's still not perfectly robust since Google could decide to change the looks of the image anytime. You'll have to decide whether it's worth it.
Anyway, here is how I would do it using jQuery:
load the image and open a 2D context for direct pxiel access (see this question for how to do it)
analyse the image:
sample groups of 2×2 pixels at random locations; I recommend at least 30 groups
a group of 2×2 pixels is good if all the pixels have the same value and their R/G/B values do not differ by more than 10% (ie. they're grey)
count the ratio of good pixel groups in the image
if there are more than 70% good pixel groups, then we are pretty sure this is the “no imagery” version: replace it with another image of your choice.
The reason I do not recommend testing directly for an RGB value is because JPEG decompression may have slightly different behaviours on different browsers.
this situation is already build in in the 3.0 version due
the boolean test status === streetviewStatus.Ok, here is a snippet from my situation solving
if (status === google.maps.StreetViewStatus.OK) {
var img = document.createElement("IMG");
img.src = 'http://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/streetview?size=160x205&location='+ lat +','+ lng +'&sensor=false&key=AIzaSyC_OXsfB8-03ZXcslwOiN9EXSLZgwRy94s';
var oldImg = document.getElementById('streetViewImage');
document.getElementById('streetViewContainerShow').replaceChild(img, streetViewImage);
} else {
var img = document.createElement("IMG");
img.src = '../../images/ProfilnoProfilPicture.jpg';
img.height = 205;
img.width = 160;
var oldImg = document.getElementById('streetViewImage');
document.getElementById('streetViewContainerShow').replaceChild(img, streetViewImage);
}
As of 2016, you can use the new Street View Image Metadata API.
Now you just need the status field to know if a panorama is found.
Example requests:
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/streetview/metadata?size=600x300&location=78.648401,14.194336&fov=90&heading=235&pitch=10&key=YOUR_API_KEY
{
"status" : "ZERO_RESULTS"
}
https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/streetview/metadata?size=600x300&location=eiffel%20tower,%20paris,%20france&heading=-45&pitch=42&fov=110&key=YOUR_API_KEY
{
...
"status" : "OK"
}
You can use the getPanoramaByLocation function (see http://code.google.com/apis/maps/documentation/javascript/services.html#StreetViewService).
try something like this:
function handleMapClick()
{
var ll= new google.maps.LatLng(latitude,longitude);
sv.getPanoramaByLocation(ll, 50, processSVData);
}
function processSVData(data, status) {
if (status==google.maps.StreetViewStatus.ZERO_RESULTS)
{
<DO SOMETHING>
}
}
Request a google street view image and if it has a specific file size it is a 'Not street view avaible'. I did the follwing:
var url = 'google street view url';
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest();
xhr.open('GET', url, true);
xhr.responseType = 'blob';
xhr.onload = function (e) {
if (this.status == 200) {
try {
var image = new Blob([this.response], {type: 'image/jpeg'});
if (image.size) {
if (url.indexOf('640x640') > -1 && image.size === 8410) {
// Not street view
}
if (url.indexOf('400x300') > -1 && image.size === 3946) {
// Not street view
}
}
} catch (err) {
// IE 9 doesn't support blob
}
}
};
xhr.send();
Another way is to load the image and then compare some pixels colors. The "no streetview" image from google is always the same. Here is how you would compare 2 pixels:
var url = STREETVIEWURL
var img = new Image();
// Add some info to prevent cross origin tainting
img.src = url + '?' + new Date().getTime();
img.setAttribute('crossOrigin', '');
img.crossOrigin = "Anonymous";
img.onload = function() {
var context = document.createElement('CANVAS').getContext('2d');
context.drawImage(img, 0, 0);
//load 2 pixels. I chose the first one and the 5th row
var data1 = context.getImageData(0, 0, 1, 1).data;
var data2 = context.getImageData(0, 5, 1, 1).data;
console.log(data1);
// google unknown image is this pixel color [228,227,223,255]
if(data1[0]==228 && data1[1]==227 && data1[2]==223 && data1[3]==255 &&
data2[0]==228 && data2[1]==227 && data2[2]==223 && data2[3]==255){
console.log("NO StreetView Available");
}else{
console.log("StreetView is Available");
}
};
Some potential issues:
I've seen some errors with CrossOrigin tainting. Also, if google changes the image returned this code will break.