I want to create a custom variable or command that can be called on like $RANDOM, but for strings. I have a script that creates a random string, using /dev/urandom . The script produces a randomly generated string each time the script is run.
#!/bin/bash
rando=$(head -100 /dev/urandom | tr -dc a-zA-Z0-9 | fold -w 15 | head -1)
echo $rando
If I create an alias or environmental variable that calls on the script, it will produce only one variation of a random string until a new bash sessions is created. How can I make it so it will create a new variation of the random string in the same bash session?
As replied by JNevill, you can place it as a function in your bash profile :
function RANDOM(){
rando=$( head -100 /dev/urandom | tr -dc a-zA-Z0-9 | fold -w ${1:-15} | head -1 )
echo $rando
}
RANDOM
RANDOM 4
RANDOM 40
Output
17oxDRkl2O1c9iz
vfgZ
4xlVNyINrBj8XT04nkQWIVOTHAV51eVxtVNEyRW0
I added an optional first argument so you can control the length of the string as well.
Related
I am trying to left align with printf in bash with unknown width.
How do I do so?
So sort of like this, but this does not work
max=<enter random number>
printf "%-${max}s|", "Instance"
The point of this is the instance below will be an unknown length that can is dynamic in length.
Example Input
max=10
Example Output
Instance |
Example Input2
max=12
Example Output2
Instance |
You can use an * for the length:
for ((max=8;max<15;max++)); do
printf "%-*s|\n" ${max} "Instance"
done
Result:
Instance|
Instance |
Instance |
Instance |
Instance |
Instance |
Instance |
I suppose you're trying to print a table. I think you won't be able to do this with printf alone. This would basically require your line outputting command to predict the future output.
If you can tolerate post-processing though, you can simply do it using the column command. Just pick a character you'd like to replace with padding, and do as in the following example (I've picked the backslash \):
printf "%s\\|\n" "Instance" "Linstance" "Mintinginstance" | column -ts'\'
Output:
Instance |
Linstance |
Mintinginstance |
I want to stick all the variables into one variable
A=('blah')
AA=('blah2')
AAA=('blah3')
AAB=('blah4')
AAC=('blah5')
#^^lets pretend theres 100 more of these ^^
#Variable composition
#after AAA, is AAB then AAC then AAD etc etc, does that 100 times
I want them all placed into this MASTER variable
#MASTER=${A}${AA}${AAA} (<-- insert AAB, AAC and 100 more variables here)
I obviously don't want to type 100 variables in this expression because there's probably an easier way to do this. Plus I'm gonna be doing more of these therefore I need it automated.
I'm relatively new to sed, awk, is there a way to append those 100 variables into the master variable?
For this specific purpose I DO NOT want an array.
You can use a simple one-liner, quite straightforward, though more expensive:
master=$(set | grep -E '^(A|AA|A[A-D][A-D])=' | sort | cut -f2- -d= | tr -d '\n')
set lists all the variables in var=name format
grep filters out the variables we need
sort puts them in the right order (probably optional since set gives a sorted output)
cut extracts the values, removing the variable names
tr removes the newlines
Let's test it.
A=1
AA=2
AAA=3
AAB=4
AAC=5
AAD=6
AAAA=99 # just to make sure we don't pick this one up
master=$(set | grep -E '^(A|AA|A[A-D][A-D])=' | sort | cut -f2- -d= | tr -d '\n')
echo "$master"
Output:
123456
With my best guess, how about:
#!/bin/bash
A=('blah')
AA=('blah2')
AAA=('blah3')
AAB=('blah4')
AAC=('blah5')
# to be continued ..
for varname in A AA A{A..D}{A..Z}; do
value=${!varname}
if [ -n "$value" ]; then
MASTER+=$value
fi
done
echo $MASTER
which yields:
blahblah2blah3blah4blah5...
Although I'm not sure whether this is what the OP wants.
echo {a..z}{a..z}{a..z} | tr ' ' '\n' | head -n 100 | tail -n 3
adt
adu
adv
tells us, that it would go from AAA to ADV to reach 100, or for ADY for 103.
echo A{A..D}{A..Z} | sed 's/ /}${/g'
AAA}${AAB}${AAC}${AAD}${AAE}${AAF}${AAG}${AAH}${AAI}${AAJ}${AAK}${AAL}${AAM}${AAN}${AAO}${AAP}${AAQ}${AAR}${AAS}${AAT}${AAU}${AAV}${AAW}${AAX}${AAY}${AAZ}${ABA}${ABB}${ABC}${ABD}${ABE}${ABF}${ABG}${ABH}${ABI}${ABJ}${ABK}${ABL}${ABM}${ABN}${ABO}${ABP}${ABQ}${ABR}${ABS}${ABT}${ABU}${ABV}${ABW}${ABX}${ABY}${ABZ}${ACA}${ACB}${ACC}${ACD}${ACE}${ACF}${ACG}${ACH}${ACI}${ACJ}${ACK}${ACL}${ACM}${ACN}${ACO}${ACP}${ACQ}${ACR}${ACS}${ACT}${ACU}${ACV}${ACW}${ACX}${ACY}${ACZ}${ADA}${ADB}${ADC}${ADD}${ADE}${ADF}${ADG}${ADH}${ADI}${ADJ}${ADK}${ADL}${ADM}${ADN}${ADO}${ADP}${ADQ}${ADR}${ADS}${ADT}${ADU}${ADV}${ADW}${ADX}${ADY}${ADZ
The final cosmetics is easily made by hand.
One-liner using a for loop:
for n in A AA A{A..D}{A..Z}; do str+="${!n}"; done; echo ${str}
Output:
blahblah2blah3blah4blah5
Say you have the input file inputfile.txt with arbitrary variable names and values:
name="Joe"
last="Doe"
A="blah"
AA="blah2
then do:
master=$(eval echo $(grep -o "^[^=]\+" inputfile.txt | sed 's/^/\$/;:a;N;$!ba;s/\n/$/g'))
This will concatenate the values of all variables in inputfile.txt into master variable. So you will have:
>echo $master
JoeDoeblahblah2
I have a log file ala.txt looking like that:
dummy FromEndPoint = PW | dummy | ToEndPoint = LALA | dummy
dummy FromEndPoint = PW | dummy | ToEndPoint = PAPA | dummy
dummy FromEndPoint = WF | dummy | ToEndPoint = LALA | dummy
dummy FromEndPoint = WF | dummy | ToEndPoint = KAKA | dummy
I used sed to generate an array containing every combination of FromEndPoint and ToEndPoint. Then I want to iterate through it.
function main {
file="./ala.txt"
local a=`sed 's/^.*FromEndPoint = \([a-zA-Z\-]*\).*ToEndPoint = \([a-zA-Z\-]*\).*$/\1;\2/' $file | sort -u`
echo ${#a[#]} # prints 1
for connectivity in ${a[#]}; do
echo "conn: $connectivity" # iterates 4 times
#conn: PW;LALA
#conn: PW;PAPA
#conn: WF;KAKA
#conn: WF;LALA
done
}
Why echo ${#a[#]} prints 1 if there are 4 elements in the array? How can I get a real size of it?
Bash used: 4.4.12(1)-release
Don't use variables to store multi-line content, use arrays!
In a bash shell you could process substitution feature to make the command output appear as a file content for you to parse over with an array. in bash versions of 4 and above, commands readarray and mapfile can parse the multi-line output given a delimiter without needing to use a for-loop with read
#!/usr/bin/env bash
array=()
while read -r unique; do
array+=( "$unique" )
done< <(sed 's/^.*FromEndPoint = \([a-zA-Z\-]*\).*ToEndPoint = \([a-zA-Z\-]*\).*$/\1;\2/' file | sort -u)
Now printing the length of the array as echo "${#array[#]}" should print the length as expected.
And always separate the initialization of local variables and assigning of the values to it. See Why does local sweep the return code of a command?
I am trying to write a shell which will take an SQL file as input. Example SQL file:
SELECT *
FROM %%DB.TBL_%%TBLEXT
WHERE CITY = '%%CITY'
Now the script should extract all variables, which in this case everything starting with %%. So the output file will be something as below:
%%DB
%%TBLEXT
%%CITY
Now I should be able to extract the matching values from the user's .profile file for these variables and create the SQL file with the proper values.
SELECT *
FROM tempdb.TBL_abc
WHERE CITY = 'Chicago'
As of now I am trying to generate the file1 which will contain all the variables. Below code sample -
sed "s/[(),']//g" "T:/work/shell/sqlfile1.sql" | awk '/%%/{print $NF}' | awk '/%%/{print $NF}' > sqltemp2.sql
takes me till
%%DB.TBL_%%TBLEXT
%%CITY
Can someone help me in getting to file1 listing the variables?
You can use grep and sort to get a list of unique variables, as per the following transcript:
$ echo "SELECT *
FROM %%DB.TBL_%%TBLEXT
WHERE CITY = '%%CITY'" | grep -o '%%[A-Za-z0-9_]*' | sort -u
%%CITY
%%DB
%%TBLEXT
The -o flag to grep instructs it to only print the matching parts of lines rather than the entire line, and also outputs each matching part on a distinct line. Then sort -u just makes sure there are no duplicates.
In terms of the full process, here's a slight modification to a bash script I've used for similar purposes:
# Define all translations.
declare -A xlat
xlat['%%DB']='tempdb'
xlat['%%TBLEXT']='abc'
xlat['%%CITY']='Chicago'
# Check all variables in input file.
okay=1
for key in $(grep -o '%%[A-Za-z0-9_]*' input.sql | sort -u) ; do
if [[ "${xlat[$key]}" == "" ]] ; then
echo "Bad key ($key) in file:"
grep -n "${key}" input.sql | sed 's/^/ /'
okay=0
fi
done
if [[ ${okay} -eq 0 ]] ; then
exit 1
fi
# Process input file doing substitutions. Fairly
# primitive use of sed, must change to use sed -i
# at some point.
# Note we sort keys based on descending length so we
# correctly handle extensions like "NAME" and "NAMESPACE",
# doing the longer ones first makes it work properly.
cp input.sql output.sql
for key in $( (
for key in ${!xlat[#]} ; do
echo ${key}
done
) | awk '{print length($0)":"$0}' | sort -rnu | cut -d':' -f2) ; do
sed "s/${key}/${xlat[$key]}/g" output.sql >output2.sql
mv output2.sql output.sql
done
cat output.sql
It first checks that the input file doesn't contain any keys not found in the translation array. Then it applies sed substitutions to the input file, one per translation, to ensure all keys are substituted with their respective values.
This should be a good start, though there may be some edge cases such as if your keys or values contain characters sed would consider important (like / for example). If that is the case, you'll probably need to escape them such as changing:
xlat['%%UNDEFINED']='0/0'
into:
xlat['%%UNDEFINED']='0\/0'
I think of xargs as the map function of the UNIX shell. What is the filter function?
EDIT: it looks like I'll have to be a bit more explicit.
Let's say I have to hand a program which accepts a single string as a parameter and returns with an exit code of 0 or 1. This program will act as a predicate over the strings that it accepts.
For example, I might decide to interpret the string parameter as a filepath, and define the predicate to be "does this file exist". In this case, the program could be test -f, which, given a string, exits with 0 if the file exists, and 1 otherwise.
I also have to hand a stream of strings. For example, I might have a file ~/paths containing
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf
/foo/bar/baz
/etc/hosts
Now, I want to create a new file, ~/existing_paths, containing only those paths that exist on my filesystem. In my case, that would be
/etc/apache2/apache2.conf
/etc/hosts
I want to do this by reading in the ~/paths file, filtering those lines by the predicate test -f, and writing the output to ~/existing_paths. By analogy with xargs, this would look like:
cat ~/paths | xfilter test -f > ~/existing_paths
It is the hypothesized program xfilter that I am looking for:
xfilter COMMAND [ARG]...
Which, for each line L of its standard input, will call COMMAND [ARG]... L, and if the exit code is 0, it prints L, else it prints nothing.
To be clear, I am not looking for:
a way to filter a list of filepaths by existence. That was a specific example.
how to write such a program. I can do that.
I am looking for either:
a pre-existing implementation, like xargs, or
a clear explanation of why this doesn't exist
If map is xargs, filter is... still xargs.
Example: list files in the current directory and filter out non-executable files:
ls | xargs -I{} sh -c "test -x '{}' && echo '{}'"
This could be made handy trough a (non production-ready) function:
xfilter() {
xargs -I{} sh -c "$* '{}' && echo '{}'"
}
ls | xfilter test -x
Alternatively, you could use a parallel filter implementation via GNU Parallel:
ls | parallel "test -x '{}' && echo '{}'"
So, youre looking for the:
reduce( compare( filter( map(.. list()) ) ) )
what can be rewiritten as
list | map | filter | compare | reduce
The main power of bash is a pipelining, therefore isn't need to have one special filter and/or reduce command. In fact nearly all unix commands could act in one (or more) functions as:
list
map
filter
reduce
Imagine:
find mydir -type f -print | xargs grep -H '^[0-9]*$' | cut -d: -f 2 | sort -nr | head -1
^------list+filter------^ ^--------map-----------^ ^--filter--^ ^compare^ ^reduce^
Creating a test case:
mkdir ./testcase
cd ./testcase || exit 1
for i in {1..10}
do
strings -1 < /dev/random | head -1000 > file.$i.txt
done
mkdir emptydir
You will get a directory named testcase and in this directory 10 files and one directory
emptydir file.1.txt file.10.txt file.2.txt file.3.txt file.4.txt file.5.txt file.6.txt file.7.txt file.8.txt file.9.txt
each file contains 1000 lines of random strings some lines are contains only numbers
now run the command
find testcase -type f -print | xargs grep -H '^[0-9]*$' | cut -d: -f 2 | sort -nr | head -1
and you will get the largest number-only line from each files like: 42. (of course, this can be done more effectively, this is only for demo)
decomposed:
The find testcase -type f -print will print every plain files so, LIST (and reduced only to files). ouput:
testcase/file.1.txt
testcase/file.10.txt
testcase/file.2.txt
testcase/file.3.txt
testcase/file.4.txt
testcase/file.5.txt
testcase/file.6.txt
testcase/file.7.txt
testcase/file.8.txt
testcase/file.9.txt
the xargs grep -H '^[0-9]*$' as MAP will run a grep command for each file from a list. The grep is usually using as filter, e.g: command | grep, but now (with xargs) changes the input (filenames) to (lines containing only digits). Output, many lines like:
testcase/file.1.txt:1
testcase/file.1.txt:8
....
testcase/file.9.txt:4
testcase/file.9.txt:5
structure of lines: filename colon number, want only numbers so calling a pure filter, what strips out the filenames from each line cut -d: -f2. It outputs many lines like:
1
8
...
4
5
Now the reduce (getting the largest number), the sort -nr sorts all number numerically and reverse order (desc), so its output is like:
42
18
9
9
...
0
0
and the head -1 print the first line (the largest number).
Of course, you can write your own list/filter/map/reduce functions directly with bash programming constructions (loops, conditions and such), or you can employ any fullblown scripting language like perl, special languages like awk, sed "language", or dc (rpn) and such.
Having an special filter command such:
list | filter_command cut -d: -f 2
is simple doesn't needed, because you can use directly the
list | cut
You can have awk do the filter and reduce function.
Filter:
awk 'NR % 2 { $0 = $0 " [EVEN]" } 1'
Reduce:
awk '{ p = p + $0 } END { print p }'
I totally understand your question here as a long time functional programmer and here is the answer: Bash/unix command pipelining isn't as clean as you'd hoped.
In the example above:
find mydir -type f -print | xargs grep -H '^[0-9]*$' | cut -d: -f 2 | sort -nr | head -1
^------list+filter------^ ^--------map-----------^ ^--filter--^ ^compare^ ^reduce^
a more pure form would look like:
find mydir | xargs -L 1 bash -c 'test -f $1 && echo $1' _ | grep -H '^[0-9]*$' | cut -d: -f 2 | sort -nr | head -1
^---list--^^-------filter---------------------------------^^------map----------^^--map-------^ ^reduce^
But, for example, grep also has a filtering capability: grep -q mypattern which simply return 0 if it matches the pattern.
To get a something more like what you want, you simply would have to define a filter bash function and make sure to export it so it was compatible with xargs
But then you get into some problems. Like, test has binary and unary operators. How will your filter function handle this? Hand, what would you decide to output on true for these cases? Not insurmountable, but weird. Assuming only unary operations:
filter(){
while read -r LINE || [[ -n "${LINE}" ]]; do
eval "[[ ${LINE} $1 ]]" 2> /dev/null && echo "$LINE"
done
}
so you could do something like
seq 1 10 | filter "> 4"
5
6
7
8
9
As I wrote this I kinda liked it