We are building a product integration using ms teams and ms bots. We are having an existing integration with Slack already. In the slack World we identify a unique user by TEAM_ID and USER_ID . In case of Teams I can see even id in the from node is a very long string suggesting its unique. Below payload is one example coming to our server. Can someone confirm if using id from the from node is wont change a particular user ever?
the user id being assumed unqiue to a user below is "29:1374Bmi6ngJLBlF9oGVcDuTaBbMfJmcOF9eUvQVdx_rgYh5spPNQ5Mi6fLdVvCiT7mQPMNytT0zGk_iAUtvqKAwXXXX"
{
"_activity": {
"id": "1576102076169",
"from": {
"id": "29:1374Bmi6ngJLBlF9oGVcDuTaBbMfJmcOF9eUvQVdx_rgYh5spPNQ5Mi6fLdVvCiT7mQPMNytT0zGk_iAUtvqKAwXXXX",
"name": "My Name",
"aadObjectId": "37a2516a-baf2-41d8-a406-a067888d676c"
},
"conversation": {
"conversationType": "personal",
"tenantId": "9bfb3569-994e-4908-855c-c7f6c1a94100",
"id": "a:1DcGjCAgiuinvuzR0Mx6dR9uJOB3YUwjMdLOiGTAwQ7KWSGsiEijNfvir66ep7k0fABwoSXxCAACx2_3GflfTNIZL7XMkfjrMm0v8OzJJ7vvIFKasqrClrZ_T-8dDfdT0"
},
"channelData": {
"tenant": {
"id": "9bfb3569-994e-4908-855c-c7f6c1a94100"
}
},
"text": "contact mat",
"textFormat": "plain",
"type": "message",
"channelId": "msteams",
"serviceUrl": "https://smba.trafficmanager.net/amer/",
"recipient": {
"id": "28:a835cf1d-83a8-4ae9-845a-23a68a1df442",
"name": "FlashCX.ai"
}
}
}
#Moblize IT Yes the id obtained from activity.from.id is the unique id for user and it wont change.
Related
I have a teams bot that can answer 1-to-1 voice calls. During the call I want the bot to be able to send chat messages to the user and be able to reference user data (like their name).
Although an incoming call does have a encrypted source identity, from my experiments it appears this is not a valid user id for proactive messaging.
Interestingly enough this is easily possible in group calls as it starts passing you participant lists (which i've done before), but 1-to-1 calls appear to rely on the source field which effectively leaves the user as anonymous.
{
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.commsNotifications",
"value": [
{
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.commsNotification",
"changeType": "created",
"resource": "/app/calls/4a1f2c00-831f-4e4e-9d7c-1648b6dddb73",
"resourceUrl": "/communications/calls/4a1f2c00-831f-4e4e-9d7c-1648b6dddb73",
"resourceData": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.call",
"state": "incoming",
"direction": "incoming",
"callbackUri": "https://...",
"source": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.participantInfo",
"id": "7684a0ea-7db6-4f3e-a339-eb46e16d57f0",
"identity": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.identitySet",
"encrypted": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.identity",
"id": "1g7qrdwga2udafuebrjcyobchnq7r4xigupowjluuccfdceufmew6ush6wlx-kellf96ky2nnhsl084rn6vegqmwawiqpux0kk5aw5lqq9oydrewxe9awkrk_uh_0nxat", // <-- not a valid chat user
"tenantId": "{tenancyId}",
"identityProvider": "None"
}
},
"endpointType": "default",
"region": "apac",
"languageId": "en-us"
},
"targets": [
{
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.invitationParticipantInfo",
"identity": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.identitySet",
"application": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.identity",
"id": "a2716ab5-9b38-4364-8869-b9b8deeff897",
"identityProvider": "AAD"
}
},
"endpointType": "default",
"id": "023126f0-904f-4c01-a78d-03f28e77e7a7",
"region": null,
"languageId": null
}
],
"tenantId": "{Azure Tenancy}",
"myParticipantId": "023126f0-904f-4c01-a78d-03f28e77e7a7",
"callChainId": "37de77c7-54b3-4d04-9e9c-181e5f5b5773",
"incomingContext": {
"#odata.type": "#microsoft.graph.incomingContext",
"sourceParticipantId": "7684a0ea-7db6-4f3e-a339-eb46e16d57f0"
},
"id": "4a1f2c00-831f-4e4e-9d7c-1648b6dddb73"
}
}
]
}
Yes, we can able to send the chat messages by creating Responder Call handler from bot.
Could you please try to implement the sample code.
In the sample code, will have a class named "ResponderCallHandler.cs", please have a look.
When someone add my bot to their group chat in the activity object of conversationUpdate event I am not receiving the name of the group chat.
{
"membersAdded": [
{
"id": "28:306a0c33-333-47ce-a9f8-03799e676dc2"
}
],
"type": "conversationUpdate",
"timestamp": "2020-05-14T19:55:28.0039315Z",
"id": "f:9476c223-fd49-7a31-06b9-d97ff3fd4d76",
"channelId": "msteams",
"serviceUrl": "https://smba.trafficmanager.net/in/",
"from": {
"id": "29:1q1sbfe3sRPvYJgi-PwHztKmrnLj7ozY233ciqF2CRitV0cOgY5ldNxWtJMDVMmXYuItSHM5xETWmlyuZvoEGXg",
"aadObjectId": "d1ac8255-7079-4bff-bda6-1593f42e7d52"
},
"conversation": {
"isGroup": true,
"conversationType": "groupChat",
"tenantId": "86b9a961-9303-4cc1-b78d-62d07f6ab178",
"id": "19:29da1fbb91314556a8bba82eaf17ea61#thread.v2"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "28:306a0c33-333-47ce-a9f8-03799e676dc2",
"name": "testbot"
},
"channelData": {
"tenant": {
"id": "86b9a961-9303-4cc1-b78d-62d07f6ab178"
}
}
}
is there any way I can get the name of the groupChat ?
#Nikhil, You do not get the Team name in member added event.Team name will be passed only in case of team rename event. Please check the documentation for more details.
We need help in understanding how Microsoft teams like and dislike works with BotFramework. When user clicks on like option provided in background we are getting reactionID but how do we get to know for which specific message user has given his feedback. Do we have this feasibility on Teams?
You can find it in the replyToId. Example from the docs:
The messageReaction event is sent when a user adds or removes his or her reaction to a message which was originally sent by your bot. replyToId contains the ID of the specific message.
{
"reactionsAdded": [
{
"type": "like"
}
],
"type": "messageReaction",
"timestamp": "2017-10-16T18:45:41.943Z",
"id": "f:9f78d1f3",
"channelId": "msteams",
"serviceUrl": "https://smba.trafficmanager.net/amer-client-ss.msg/",
"from": {
"id": "29:1I9Is_Sx0O-Iy2rQ7Xz1lcaPKlO9eqmBRTBuW6XzkFtcjqxTjPaCMij8BVMdBcL9L_RwWNJyAHFQb0TRzXgyQvA",
"aadObjectId": "c33aafc4-646d-4543-9d4c-abd28e4d2110"
},
"conversation": {
"isGroup": true,
"id": "19:3629591d4b774aa08cb0887902eee7c1#thread.skype"
},
"recipient": {
"id": "28:f5d48856-5b42-41a0-8c3a-c5f944b679b0",
"name": "SongsuggesterLocal"
},
"channelData": {
"channel": {
"id": "19:3629591d4b774aa08cb0887902eee7c1#thread.skype"
},
"team": {
"id": "19:efa9296d959346209fea44151c742e73#thread.skype"
},
"tenant": {
"id": "72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47"
}
},
"replyToId": "1:19uJ8TZA1cZcms7-2HLOW3pWRF4nSWEoVnRqc0DPa_kY"
}
Note, however, that this replyToId is specific to Teams and I don't believe it will persist if you set it yourself. Once you have that, you can update the activity.
If you're trying to analyze which messages are reacted to, you might want to log the outgoing activity's Id and Text in TurnContext.OnSendActivities. Then, when a reaction comes in, you can use the new Activity Handler to handle the message and add the reaction to your log. I believe this would come in OnUnrecognizedActivityTypeAsync. This is similar to the previous link, update the activity.
I have a spring-boot based micro-service generated using JHipster.
I am using keycloak as my Auth Server. I could enable Role-based & scope based authorization on my resources(apis).
Now the requirement is: based on the role of the client, I need to restrict the information to send in the response (either mask the attributes or nullify them).
eg:
consider the following api to get the person's profile
/api/person/{id}
{
"name": {
"firstName": "Jack",
"lastName": "Sparrow"
},
"gender": "MALE",
"emails": {
"details": [
{
"emailId": "jack.sparrow#gmail.com"
}
]
},
"phones": {
"details": [
{
"phoneNumber": "1234567890",
"countryCode": "+1"
}
]
},
"addresses": {
"details": [
{
"addressLine1": "aaaaaaaa",
"addressLine2": "bbbbbbb",
"city": "cccccc",
"state": "ddddd",
"country": "South Africa",
"postalCode": "987654"
}
]
},
"photo": "string",
"nationality": "South Africa",
"countryOfResidence": "string",
"active": true,
"createdAt": 1537431339569,
"modifiedAt": 1537436600693,
"createdBy": "admin",
"modifiedBy": "admin"
}
Now, when a person with BASIC role calls this API, the requirement is to show only basic information like:
- name, gender
If he has INTERMEDIATE role then we can send something more than basic but not full information. eg: name, gender, photo, nationality
If he has ADMIN role then we can send the complete information.
Can anyone please let me know What is the best approach to achieve this.
-- Thanks in advance :)
I am developing a platform with JSON API using Python Flask. In some cases I need to join three tables. How to join tables with a array of IDs gave me some guidance but I need a solution beyond it.
Let's assume we have three tables for a messaging app.
Accounts
Conversations
Messages
Message Readers
Accounts table snippet
{
"id": "account111",
"name": "John Doe",
},
Conversations table snippet
{
"id": "conversation111",
"to": ["account111", "account222", "account333"], // accounts who are participating the conversation
"subject": "RethinkDB",
}
Messages table snippet
{
"id": "message111",
"text": "I love how RethinkDB does joins.",
"from": "account111", // accounts who is the author of the message
"conversation": "conversation111"
}
Message Readers table snippet
{
"id": "messagereader111",
"message": "message111",
"reader": "account111",
}
My question is "What's the magic query to get the document below when I receive a get request on an account document with id="account111"?"
{
"id": "account111",
"name": John Doe,
"conversations": [ // 2) Join account table with conversations
{
"id": "conversation111",
"name": "RethinkDB",
"to": [ // 3) Join conversations table with accounts
{
"id": "account111",
"name": "John Doe",
},
{
"id": "account222",
"name": "Bobby Zoya",
},
{
"id": "account333",
"name": "Maya Bee",
},
]
"messages": [ // 4) Join conversations with messages
{
"id": "message111",
"text": "I love how RethinkDB does joins.",
"from": { // 5) Join messages with accounts
"id": "account111",
"name": "John Doe",
},
"message_readers": [
{
"name": "John Doe",
"id": "account111",
}
],
},
],
},
],
}
Any guidance or advice would be fantastic. JavaScript or Python code would be awesome.
I had a hard time understanding what you want (you have multiple documents with the id 111), but I think this is the query you are looking for
Python query:
r.table("accounts").map(lambda account:
account.merge({
"conversations": r.table("conversations").filter(lambda conversation:
conversation["to"].contains(account["id"])).coerce_to("array").map(lambda conversation:
conversation.merge({
"to": conversation["to"].map(lambda account:
r.table("accounts").get(account)).pluck(["id", "name",]).coerce_to("array"),
"messages": r.table("messages").filter(lambda message:
message["conversation"] == conversation["id"]).coerce_to("array").map(lambda message:
message.merge({
"from": r.table("accounts").get(message["from"]).pluck(["id", "name",]),
"readers": r.table("message_readers").filter(lambda message_reader:
message["id"] == message_reader["message"]).coerce_to("array").order_by(r.desc("created_on")),
})).order_by(r.desc("created_on"))
})).order_by(r.desc("modified_on"))
})).order_by("id").run(db_connection)