Laravel Hyn Tenancy routes not defined on scheduler tasks - laravel

I am using Hyn Tenancy to handle multiple tenants on our Laravel application. Every tenant routes are defined at routes/tenants.php as specified by the package documentation and the system is working smoothly as expected.
But when I try to access tenant route via scheduler task, route not defined error pops up. I have setup tenant appropriately on the job execution and everything except route are working fine.
Find detailed issue here

Try to give name to the routes like below:
Route::get('/register', function () {
return view('register');
})->name('register');
Then call the route with the name.

Related

defining route with 'auth:web' middleware in laravel service provider boot() method

im using a package called https://github.com/garygreen/pretty-routes
there is line in its service provider boot() method (here the code)
it is defining a get route with middlewares from its config file(link to the code) I just added 'auth:web' to its config file but it seems the 'auth:web' middleware is called as soon as code reaches the line before Laravel bootstraps its session and etc. when the auth('web')->user() is yet null
What I can not understand is that I do the same exact thing (here the code)with laravel/telescope but it works. why ???
also changing :
Route::get(config('pretty-routes.url'), 'PrettyRoutes\PrettyRoutesController#show')
->name('pretty-routes.show')
->middleware(config('pretty-routes.middlewares'));
to :
$this->app['router']->get(config('pretty-routes.url'), 'PrettyRoutes\PrettyRoutesController#show')
->name('pretty-routes.show')
->middleware(config('pretty-routes.middlewares'));
in service provider seems to solve the problem and make this code behave like the way telescope package use 'auth:web' as middleware.
what's happening ?
You need to have the web middleware applied to any routes you need sessions for, which is what the default authentication system is using. When you apply the auth middleware without this it can't possibly resolve a user since there is no session to be authenticated against.
You need to apply the web middleware and then what ever other middleware you want:
'middlewares' => [
'web', 'auth:web',
],
If you look at the telescope example you provided you will see they also add the web middleware. So you didn't quite "do the same exact thing" as the telescope config.

Route [x] not defined when using auth middleware

I am making a website with laravel but i am getting an error while using middleware auth. it says Route[x] not defined.
i am using laravel 5.8 please some one help me
The route you have written that has no named route so you need to specify name for that route like this
Route::get('x', function() {
//
})->name('x')->middleware('auth');
for more information you can check here https://laravel.com/docs/7.x/urls#urls-for-named-routes

Route::getRoutes() returns only package routes

I am trying to fetch all routes in Laravel package using \Illuminate\Support\Facades\Route::getRoutes();. But it gives only package routes, not the entire Laravel application routes.
Is there any way to fetch entire Laravel application routes inside the package.
You will need to load the application routes first in order to be able to list them. So in your package Service Provider, within the boot method, you can load the routes from the application like this:
public function boot()
{
$this->loadRoutesFrom(base_path('/routes/web.php')); // or /routes/api.php
}
Then you can use
Route::getRoutes();

Laravel Multi-Tenant Multi-Database Multi-Domain - Problem with default route

I'm studying about multi-tenant with Laravel and I'm having a problem with the routes. The main application works fine, however the main client domain (route / ) returns the 401 error configured in the middleware I created, but the other routes (login, register, etc) work perfectly.
If I put a prefix on the main application routes, then the / client route works normally, but I need the main application not to have a prefix since I want to use it to create the service submission and hiring system.
Anyone who has knowledge on this subject and can take a look at my code and help me find out why only the route is returning this error I will be very grateful.
If i access app.mydefaultapp works
If i access app.myclientapp doesn't works
If i access app.myclientapp/login(or any other route) works
https://pastebin.com/bHHux9sY
I solved the problem by creating a Provider with the same Middleware identification logic, and when accessing the main domain it dynamically loads the routes of the main domain.
$manager = app(ManagerTenant::class);
if ($manager->domainIsMain())
{
$this->registerTenantRoutes();
$this->registerTenantAdminRoutes();
}
https://pastebin.com/20SCsgfL

Laravel 4 - changing resource root routing path

In a Laravel 4 installation, Using Jeffrey Way's Laravel 4 Generators, I set up a 'tweet' resource, using the scaffolding command from his example:
php artisan generate:scaffold tweet --fields="author:string, body:text"
This generated the model, view, controller, migration and routing information for the tweet type. After migrating the database, visiting http://localhost:8000/tweets works fine, and shows the expected content.
The contents of the routes.php file at this point is:
Route::resource('tweets', 'TweetsController');
Now I would like to move the url for tweets up one level into admin/tweets, so the above url should become: http://localhost:8000/admin/tweets. Please note that I am not treating 'Admin' as a resource, but instead just want to add it for hypothetical organizational purposes.
Changing the routes.php file to:
Route::resource('admin/tweets', 'TweetsController');
Does not work, and displays the following error:
Unable to generate a URL for the named route "tweets.create" as such route does not exist.
Similarly when using the following:
Route::group(array('prefix' => 'admin'), function() {
Route::resource('tweets', 'TweetsController');
});
As was suggested in this stackoverflow question.
Using php artisan routes reveals that the named routes also now have admin prefixed to them, turning tweets.create into admin.tweets.create.
Why is the error saying that it cannot find tweets.create? shouldn't that automatically be resolved (judging by the routes table), to use admin.tweets.create?
How can I change my routing so that this error no longer occurs?
I just tested with new resource controller and it works fine for me.
The problem is not with the Route, its with the named routes used in your application.
check your view files there are link to route like link_to_route('tweets.create', 'Add new tweet'), this is creating the error because when you add admin as prefix tweets.create doesn't exists so change it to admin.tweets.create every where, in your controller also where ever named route is used.

Resources